September 2007 Copyright 2007, Track Your Plaque, LLC 

NOT A SUBSCRIBER YET?
Enter your e-mail address below and click the button for a
FREE SUBSCRIPTION
How did you hear about
Track Your Plaque?

 

 

Track Your Plaque shows how to use CT heart scans as the 1st step in a proven program to slow, stop, even REVERSE heart disease!

In this issue:

 

Hello, everybody!

Over the last couple of months, we’ve proudly told you the stories of two participants in the Track Your Plaque program who have successfully dropped their heart scan scores by considerable amounts, 51% and 63%.

However, we need to keep in mind that these are our record holders. Talking to some people, it appears that they’ve gotten the false impression that you, too, must achieve numbers like this to succeed.

Not true. Success can be had on a more modest scale and you can still lead a happy, healthy life, free of heart attack and heart procedures.

In this issue of the Scanner, we detail such a person, someone who started the program, stuck to it, and simply stopped his score but didn’t drop it, at least not by a large margin.

Is he a failure? Absolutely not. He is, in fact, a great success. Read on to hear his story.

Because this issue is so important to understanding your results in the program, we will also release a new Special Report in the near future called The Track Your Plaque Five Stages of Success.

Track in health!
 


Dr. Davis
 


What constitutes success in the Track Your Plaque program?

Tom’s heart scan score of 619 hit him like a lightning bolt.

Just retired from his plumbing business at age 57, he felt on top of the world. His heart scan score brought him back down to earth.

His doctor shrugged and handed him a prescription for a cholesterol drug to him. “Do you want to see a cardiologist?”

That was the full extent of the interaction. Tom didn’t tell his doctor that he had a real aversion to the cholesterol drugs and wished to avoid using them. He was also unconvinced that he had received truly insightful information sufficient to deal with an important issue.

In comes the Track Your Plaque program. Tom’s hidden patterns included a severe small LDL pattern, intermediate-density lipoprotein, and severe deficiency of vitamin D. We used fish oil, niacin, and vitamin D supplementation to correct his patterns. We discussed how to use food choices to dramatically correct his patterns. Tom promptly lost 37 lbs.

One year later, Tom’s repeat heart scan score: 615, somewhat less than a 1% drop from his previous score.


Dr. Davis:

Is Tom any better off than when he started? After all, he began with a score of 619 and ended up almost no different at 615.

Is he simply at the same place he started?

Well, let’s take Tom’s results in perspective. If nothing had been done, we’d expect a 30% per year increase. That is the natural rate of plaque growth. This would have put Tom’s score at 805 after one year. If Tom had simply followed his doctor’s advice and taken a statin drug and followed a conventional diet, his plaque growth would likely have slowed to about 20% per year, putting his score at 743 one year later.

Tom’s score stayed virtually the same. If we were permitted to take a really close look inside Tom’s coronary atherosclerosis, we’d witness several phenomena:

1) Tom’s arteries are more relaxed and less constricted (i.e., he has normalized “endothelial function.” See our recent Special Report on “.The Injured Endothelium: How it lays the groundwork for plaque growth—And how to put a stop to it!”)
2) Inflammatory responses have subsided, inflammatory cells have exited plaque, and other injurious factors are diminished or gone.
3) Fatty material (including “lipid pools”) have shrunk or disappeared.

Most of these observations come from studies involving intracoronary ultrasound that require an imaging catheter to be threaded into a coronary artery.

Should we persuade Tom to undergo an intracoronary ultrasound procedure to get a closer look? Absolutely not. Tom is without symptoms and has a normal stress test. There is simply no justification for invasive procedures. But it is a safe assumption that the same phenomena have occurred inside Tom’s arteries, given his lipoprotein responses on the program.

We also know from our experience and that of others that no change in heart scan score means a near-zero risk of heart attack. (Nobody is truly at zero risk statistically. Even a healthy 20 year old, for instance, carries a minimal amount of risk, but not zero risk.) You might say that Tom has achieved plaque “inactivation.”

At the start of the program, Tom’s score put him in the 95th percentile of heart scan scores for men his age. He carried a 5–10% per year risk of heart attack. His risk is now reduced to near zero.

So Tom has actually had a big success. Although he hasn’t broken any records (at least in the Track Your Plaque program), Tom has nonetheless succeeded in reducing his risk for heart attack to near zero

.
 

Can cholesterol trump your heart scan?

Reprinted from The Heart Scan Blog

Lela's heart scan score: 449—very high for a 49-year old woman just beginning her menopausal years. Her score placed her flat in the 99th percentile, or the worst 1% of women her age.

Lela first consulted her primary care physician. She looked at the result and seemed puzzled. "Now wait a minute. Your cholesterol numbers have been great."

After a pause, Lela’s doctor declared the heart scan wrong. "Tests aren't perfect. The heart scan is simply wrong. I'm going to believe the cholesterol numbers and there's no way you have heart disease."

Is that right? Can cholesterol numbers trump your heart scan score? Can the heart scan simply be wrong?

The answer is simple: NO.

The heart scan is NOT wrong. The heart scan is right. What is wrong with this picture is that standard cholesterol testing commonly and frequently fails to identify people at risk for heart disease and have hidden coronary plaque.

What if this woman smoked when she was younger? That wouldn't be revealed in her cholesterol panel. Or had high blood pressure, increased inflammatory responses like C-reactive protein, small LDL particles or lipoprotein(a), severe deficiency of vitamin D? NONE of that would be revealed by cholesterol numbers.

So, no, the heart scan is not wrong. Nor are the cholesterol numbers wrong. The doctor's interpretation of the data is wrong.

Please do not allow false reassurances offered by those who do not understand the technology steer you wrong.

This woman proved to have an entire panel of hidden causes of her coronary plaque uncovered. No surprise.
 

It’s the plaque, stupid!

Reprinted from The HeartHawk Blog.

I remember when I first met Dr. William Davis and we discussed the book he was writing titled "Track Your Plaque." My first thought was, "What a goofy name!" In retrospect, focusing on plaque and methods to track and reverse it was brilliant.

The latest debate about relative risk ratios and antioxidants reminds me about how traditional medicine relies on all manner of risk factors to determine how to treat heart disease. However, risk deals only with what might or could happen. Yes, if you have high LDL cholesterol, low HDL cholesterol, or any number of other risk factors you might have heart disease.

But, why live in the world of "maybe" when you could know exactly whether you have heart disease, how serious it is, and whether what you are doing is effective in treating it?! Get a heart scan and you will know for certain. As Homer Simpson would say, "D'OH!"

The efficacy of heart scans is no longer in question. Recent studies, statements by the AHA, the SHAPE guidelines all agree: heart scans are the best predictor of heart attack.

Dr. Steven Nissen, Cleveland Clinic, has stated: "We now know that 95% to 99% of the heart disease occurs at sites WITHOUT artery narrowing. Thus, the old tests we perform to detect narrowing and blockages have really misled us. We miss over 95% of the heart disease that causes heart attacks."

Dr. Harvey Hecht, of The Heart and Vascular Institute in New York, has said that "plaque imaging is ...not to be confused with risk factors, which merely estimate a probability of developing atherosclerosis. Rather, [plaque imaging] directly measures atherosclerosis, irrespective of the presence or absence of risk factors; it provides the final common denominator and is the most powerful predictor of cardiac events."

Regardless of cholesterol or the supplements you may or may not be taking, settle the question. Get a heart scan and, if you have a non-zero score, repeat it in a year to see if you are gaining or losing ground. The plaque that is the root cause of heart disease can be treated—but only if you know how much you have!

Plaque—it's not just for teeth anymore!


HeartHawk

 

Interested in becoming a Track Your Plaque Member?

If you’re interested in finding out more about becoming a Member of Track Your Plaque, go to the Track Your Plaque Member Benefits page. See why more and more people are finding out that there are alternatives to the conventional answers (or lack of answers!) for heart disease.

 

Track Your Plaque Members

Watch for our new and upcoming Special Reports on:

Endothelial Health: Why it's important and 9 ways to improve it
The endothelium is the single-celled layer lining the arteries of the body. In fact, it’s the most extensive organ system in the human body. It’s a fragile organ that injury transforms into a plaque-lined landmine. Endothelial injury precedes real trouble by years. Here’s how to recognize when you have it and nutritional supplements and health strategies to help correct it.

Heart scans and radiation: The Real story

NEW FEATURE: Book Review - NO More Heart Disease
 
 

Copyright 2007, Track Your Plaque