Vitamin D Newsletter-Autism and Vitamin D

Although Dr. John Cannell's most recent Vitamin D Newsletter concerns the connection between autism and vitamin D, and has nothing to do with coronary plaque reversal, this fascinating discussion between a mother of an autistic boy and Dr. Cannell is so enlightening that I thought that it was still worth passing on.

I also feel very deeply for parents with autistic children, who I see struggle with the developmental difficulties their children encounter. (I even have several patients who are parents of 2 or 3 autistic children.)

As always, Dr. Cannell is at the cutting-edge of converting hard scientific information into practical use. You will note several points or questions raised:

1) Dr. Cannell advocates a powdered capsule form of vitamin D. In my experience, most powdered or tablet forms do not work. But some do. He apparently has success with the brand he specifies.

2) Are there vitamin D-receptor (VDR) genotypes that respond differently? Should there be different 25 (OH) vitamin D blood level targets for different VDR genotypes? Nobody knows yet, but it will be an important question to explore in the future.

3) Is heavy metal toxicity, at least in its milder forms, a surrogate for vitamin D deficiency? (Are chelationists unwittingly treating vitamin D deficiency?)

4) If this is a genuine association, and vitamin D replenishment exerts profound neurologic effects in autistic children, does a similar, though less marked effect, hold in non-autistic children? Will children perform better, learn more effectively, etc. with vitamin D supplementation to normal levels?

5) Vitamin A--Is vitamin A with vitamin D good or bad? This one I do not have an answer to. Reading the literature Dr. Cannell cites didn't help much. (Dr. BG--Any comments? Dr. BG is a vitamin A advocate.)


Perhaps, should the association between autism and vitamin D hold, it raises more questions than it settles. But, true to my experience with vitamin D, every day I stumble on some unique, fascinating effect, all beneficial. We continue to learn new lessons about vitamin D and Dr. Cannell's insights as a practicing psychiatrist deeply concerned with vitamin D issues have helped enormously.

(Sorry, but I did not copy the links to the literature Dr. Cannell cites. To obtain the links, go to the original Vitamin D Newsletter.)

The Vitamin D Newsletter
June 2008




This month we feature a remarkable series of letters from a mother of an autistic son who treated her child with vitamin D. It is the first case report in the medical literature suggesting vitamin D has a treatment effect in autism.

First, a brief case report and then a more detailed exchange of emails between the mother and me.

Case Report:

John is a seven-year old boy living in the northeastern U.S. with a long-standing diagnosis of autism. Symptoms include temper tantrums, repetitive self-stimulatory behavior, impaired language, mood swings, fear of being alone, toileting problems, dysbacteriosis, and impaired muscle strength. John spends a lot of time outdoors starting in the spring and his mother noticed a distinct seasonal variation in his symptoms in that he improved in the summer and regressed in the winter. A 25-hydroxy-vitamin D in April of 2008 was 25 ng/ml and obtained after John had begun to play outside. Due to the seasonality of John's symptoms the mother consulted me. I advised the mother to stop all products containing vitamin A including cod liver oil and begin John on 5,000 IU of vitamin D3 per day for two weeks followed by 2,000 IU per day in the form of powdered vitamin D dissolved in juice. Within a week of starting the vitamin D, John's language began to return and he was no longer as fearful of being alone. At the end of two weeks his language showed further improvement, he began to toilet himself, counted to 10 and knew the spelling of his name. After three weeks language continued to improve and some improvements were noted in his dysbacteriosis. After four weeks of vitamin D treatment, the mother noted improvements in muscle strength as well as continued improvements in language. A repeat 25-hydroxy-vitamin D is pending while John continues taking 2,000 IU of vitamin D per day.

Before you read the series of emails between the mother and me, I'd like to caution that this is only a case report of sorts and does not prove a treatment effect. Spontaneous remissions, while rare in autism, have been reported, thus the supplemental vitamin D may have had nothing to do with his improvement. If the response is due to vitamin D, there is no assurance it will prove lasting. I think it unlikely that older autistic children or individuals with severe autism will show these sorts of apparent improvements. Furthermore, autism is a multifactorial disease with strong genetic roots and it is highly unlikely that treatment of vitamin D deficiency in all autistic children will result in similar improvements. Finally, I did not examine this child, and I am relying on the child's mother to report both his condition and his apparent response to vitamin D treatment. However, the mother agreed to speak with the press about her son and allow for independent confirmation of the apparent treatment response.

Below are the emails, edited for brevity, clarity, and confidentiality.



Dear Dr. Cannell:

I am writing because I believe my son John is strongly affected by vitamin D and I need some advice. John is seven and autistic and weighs 50 pounds. We live in the northeastern part of the United States . He starts spending lots of time outside in May and continues until September. Every year, like clockwork, he has the same patterns of behavior and ability. After about six weeks of sun exposure, every July, he begins feeling much better, seems to be comfortable in his skin, does not have as much self-stimulatory behavior, can eat a variety of foods and has language. This past summer, he was using 14-word sentences. By the end of November, he can't even ask you for a cup of juice. He becomes more exclusive, has emotional highs and lows, has tantrums and is easily frustrated.

His 25(OH)D level on April 15th was 25 ng/ml but he had already been going out in the sun so his level must have been lower in the winter. I have had his genetics tested (Nutrigenomic) and he has mutations in his vitamin D receptors:

VDR Bsm/Taq ++
VDR Fok --
VDR Taq ++

My first question, does it sound like the changes in his behaviors and abilities could be caused by lack of vitamin D? Could you elaborate on the time it would take to get adequate amounts of vitamin D to start seeing positive results? For example, even if he starts going out in the sun in May, it's usually not until July that I see positive changes. Then would it take a month or two to go back to being deficient, thus explaining his 'regression' by the time November comes around. Secondly, I am looking at different forms of vitamin D therapy: a vitamin D lamp, vitamin D3 cream, or oral vitamin D. Can you tell me what might be the best form during the winter months?

Thank you very much for your time and attention.

Jane, Boston MA



Dear Jane:

Yes, it is possible your son's autism is related to vitamin D. Such seasonality has been reported before in autism, both in an individual and in autistic children at a summer camp. Although suggestive, such seasonality does not prove a vitamin D connection. Sun exposure, unless it is full body, takes several months to get vitamin D levels up. If sunblock or clothes are worn sun exposure will not get 25(OH)D levels much above 30 ng/ml. As far as the "mutations" you list, they are actually vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphisms and not referred to as mutations although all such changes occurred through mutations at some time in the past. VDR polymorphisms are simply the different structures of the vitamin D receptor that different people have and they are widely distributed. A pilot study of actual VDR receptor mutations did not detect VDR mutations in 24 autistic individuals but they did not assess for VDR polymorphisms. However, a highly significant association exists between one VDR polymorphism and larger head size. Mean head circumference is larger in autism.

Yan J, et al. Vitamin D receptor variants in 192 patients with schizophrenia and other psychiatric diseases. Neurosci Lett 2005;380(1-2):37-41.

Handoko HY, et al. Polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor and their associations with risk of schizophrenia and selected anthropometric measures. Am J Hum Biol 2006;18(3):415-7.

Lainhart JE, et al. Head circumference and height in autism: a study by the Collaborative Program of Excellence in Autism. Am J Med Genet A 2006;140(21):2257-74.

Lainhart JE, et al. Macrocephaly in children and adults with autism. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997;36(2):282-90.

I emailed the world's foremost expert on VDR polymorphisms asking him about your son's polymorphisms and his reply, quite technical, is below.



Dear John:

I apologize for the delay in getting back to you regarding VDR polymorphisms. Initial studies by Eisman and coworkers many years ago suggested that several of the polymorphs identified above in the VDR gene (Bsm/Tag) correlated strongly with osteoporosis. Despite the hoopla, subsequent analyses by many different investigators did not really confirm these results, i.e. only a very modest (3%) correlation. This spawned multiple studies searching for correlations between VDR polymorph's and cancer, autoimmune disease and so forth. It is fair to say from all of these studies that the correlation is at best weak, and in most cases non-existent. Part of this may be due to the fact that the Bsm and Taq polymorphs are located in VDR gene introns and as a first approximation cannot affect the VDR protein's function. This is not an absolute statement, however, as our work is now showing that regulatory regions that control the VDR's expression are located within introns as well as upstream. Therefore the possibility exists that these polymorphs could affect expression, although we have not found these regions to contain enhancers yet. This is clearly where gene and disease studies are going. The only polymorph that could affect function is the Fok1 site, which we identified many years ago following our initial cloning and structural analysis of the human VDR gene. The presence of this site leads to the expression of a shorter VDR protein (424 aa) that is purported to have a slight increase in transcriptional activity (10%?) vs the large protein (427 aa). The above analysis suggests that this polymorph is absent, leading to production of the larger perhaps less active protein. On a single patient basis, it is really difficult to conclude anything regarding this finding. Indeed, despite large numbers of patients, the VDR polymorph have not really revealed any significant insight. Given the summer correlations, it is probably more likely that the individual is low in vitamin D3 in winter.

Sincerely,

Professor John Doe




Thus, one of your son's polymorphisms may have less functionality but that should be easily overcome by higher vitamin D levels. The first thing to do is stop all vitamin A, multivitamins containing vitamin A, or cod liver oil and start vitamin D. As you will see below, vitamin A antagonizes the action of vitamin D and he should have plenty of vitamin A if he eats colorful vegetables, colorful fruit, eggs and fortified oatmeal. As far as vitamin D, I think the easiest way to give vitamin D is powdered capsules, not a cream. You can open the capsule and put the powder in about anything, such as juice. To buy the capsules, go toBio Tech Pharmacal and buy both a bottle of the 5,000 and the 1,000 IU capsules. He should take one 5,000 IU capsule a day for two weeks then take 2,000 IU per day. After a month, go to the doctor and have another 25-hydroxy-vitamin D blood test. Do not let your doctor order a 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D as it will give you and your doctor false information about your son's vitamin D status. The other option is buying a Sperti vitamin D light. Daily use of the light on both sides of his trunk will raise levels fairly quickly but he should still have a 25(OH)D blood test every month to assure his levels rise to the mid level of normal ranges, about 70 ng/ml. Vitamin D is very safe. Your son would have to take more than 10,000 IU a day for more than a year to have any risk of toxicity. If he improves and his level is 50 ng/ml, the next question is would he improve even more if his level was 70 ng/ml? Some lifeguards have levels of 80-100 ng/ml; normal ranges in the labs in the USA are 30 -100 ng/ml (ideal ranges are 50 -100 ng/ml.) If you have any more questions, let me know. I certainly want to know how he is doing.

Sincerely,

John Cannell



Dear Dr. Cannell:

It has been one week on 5,000 IUs of vitamin D3 daily and already we're getting some language back! We haven't had original language since probably around the end of November. The only language we have had in the past five months has been verbal scripting. Today John has already told me "turn off the TV" and "clean up the water". This is all very exciting. Will it last? I will continue to keep you updated on progress and change in behavior. One more thing, all winter long he was afraid to be by himself anywhere. Now he is starting to be able to be in another room or outside by himself.

Thanks so much,

Jane



Dear Jane:

I can't tell you how happy I am for you. I suspect John will continue to improve. Do you have any parent rating scales or does his treating pediatrician have any objective rating scales? If you have before and after rating scales or his treating doctor does then it becomes important to track his progress on an objective measure. Jane, if you are a member of any autism discussion groups, you should post about this, including doses used. If your son's case is typical, then hundreds of thousands of autistic children may be helped with vitamin D.

John Cannell



Dear Dr. Cannell:

It has been two weeks on 5,000 IU per day and I want to inform you that we are having continued success with language. Continued in the sense that it is consistent, it wasn't just a one day fluke. In addition, he is taking himself to the bathroom; this is another thing that goes away in winter months. I usually have to catch him holding it in and then suggest he go, but now he is going completely by himself. In therapy last week, he started drawing again. He drew a bee and then ran around the room buzzing. His toileting is consistent with his therapists, not just mommy. Last night, I asked him to count to 10 for me and he did - quite enthusiastically. Then I said what does J-O-H-N spell? It took him a bit but then he said "John."

Unfortunately, the last scale taken was when he was 3 when he had his first developmental evaluation. But we do track behavior and language on a weekly basis. The forms we fill out give a good indication as to how he is doing.

I belong to a parent forum. It was created by a doctor named Amy Yasko. She's a PhD, a researcher, not a medical doctor. It was through her that I got John's genetics tested. She advocates vitamin D as being very crucial. I will post something on her forum for the parents there. However, if the parents on the forum are following her recommendations, they should be taking it already - 2000 IUs in winter and 1000 IUs in summer is her recommendation. I will post something on the forum to really emphasize how important vitamin D is.

Jane



Dear Jane:

I'm glad the improvements are continuing. I see Dr. Yasko recommends 10,000 IU of vitamin A/day as well as cod liver oil. I strongly disagree. Make sure your son is taking neither vitamin A nor cod liver oil. Rather, make sure he eats colored fruits and vegetables as well as fortified oatmeal. Vitamin A interferes with vitamin D's function, especially at the doses Dr. Yasko recommends.

Vitamin A antagonizes the action of vitamin D. In humans, even the vitamin A in a single serving of liver impairs vitamin D’s rapid intestinal calcium response. Furthermore, the consumption of preformed retinols, even in amounts consumed by many Americans in both multivitamins and cod liver oil appears to be causing low-grade, but widespread, bone toxicity, perhaps through its antagonism of vitamin D. In a recent dietary intake study, Kyungwon et al found high retinol intake completely thwarted vitamin D’s otherwise protective effect on distal colorectal adenoma and they found a clear relationship between vitamin D and vitamin A intakes as the women in the highest quintile of vitamin D intake also ingested almost 10,000 IU of retinols/day. As early as 1933, Hess et al warned about vitamin A consumption, concluding, “as to a requirement of thousands of units of vitamin A daily, the unquestionable answer is that this constitutes therapeutic absurdity, which, happily, will prove to be only a passing fad.”

Rohde CM, Deluca HF. All-trans retinoic acid antagonizes the action of calciferol and its active metabolite, 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol, in rats. J Nutr. 2005;135(7):1647-1652.

Johansson S, Melhus H. Vitamin A antagonizes calcium response to vitamin D in man. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16(10):1899-1905.

Penniston KL, Tanumihardjo SA. The acute and chronic toxic effects of vitamin A. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(2):191-201.

Oh K, Willett WC, Wu K, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci EL. Calcium and vitamin D intakes in relation to risk of distal colorectal adenoma in women. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(10):1178-1186.

Hess AF, Lewis JM, Barenberg LH. Does our dietary require vitamin A supplement? JAMA. 1933;101:657-663.

Unfortunately, Hess’s prophecy of a passing fad proved premature and many Americans continue to consume “absurd” and dangerous quantities of vitamin A. For example, multivitamins, until recently, had small amounts of vitamin D (200 to 400 IU) but high amounts of preformed retinols (5,000 to 10,000 IU). This pales in comparison to a tablespoon of modern cod liver oil, which contains sub-physiological amounts of vitamin D (400 to 1200 IU) but supra-physiological amounts of completely preformed retinols (5,000 to 15,000 IU or in some cases 30,000 IU).

John Cannell



Dear Dr. Cannell:

It has been three weeks and he went from 5,000 IU of vitamin D per day to 2,000 IU per day a week ago. His language is increasing. He's now back to saying the things he wants with some prompting. He also has gut dysbiosis and I'm sure the D is helping with microbes in his gut. He has a lot of problems with his immune system and bacteria and viruses. Also, doesn't vitamin D aid in the production of glutathione? I feel that could be a big part of his increased language.

Jane



Dear Jane:

Yes, abnormal immune responses are associated with both autism and vitamin D deficiency. For example, autistic individuals have immune abnormalities that show a striking similarity to the immune functions affected by vitamin D. Animal evidence indicates some vitamin D deficiency induced brain damage may be malleable, that is, vitamin D may partially reverse the brain damage, if given early enough. These studies offer hope that sunlight or oral vitamin D, especially in young autistic children, may have a treatment effect.

Ashwood P, et al. The immune response in autism: a new frontier for autism research. J Leukoc Biol 2006;80(1):1-15.

Cantorna MT, et al. Vitamin D status, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, and the immune system. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80(6 Suppl):1717S-20S.

Burne TH, et al. Combined prenatal and chronic postnatal vitamin D deficiency in rats impairs prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle. Physiol Behav 2004;81(4):651-5.

Both the brain and the blood of autistic individuals show evidence of ongoing chronic inflammation and oxidative stress. That is, the disease process is probably increasingly destructive. Further hope for a treatment effect rests in activated vitamin D's powerful anti-inflammatory properties. Its administration reduces production of inflammatory cytokines in the brain, which have consistently been associated with cognitive impairment. Furthermore, activated vitamin D is remarkably neuroprotective by stimulating neurotropin release, reducing toxic cellular calcium levels in the brain, inhibiting the production of nitrous oxide, and by its immunomodulating properties, especially in reducing inflammatory cytokines and by increasing brain glutathione.

Moore ME, Piazza A, McCartney Y, Lynch MA. Evidence that vitamin D3 reverses age-related inflammatory changes in the rat hippocampus. Biochem Soc Trans 2005;33(Pt 4):573-7.

Cohen-Lahav M, Shany S, Tobvin D, Chaimovitz C, Douvdevani A. Vitamin D decreases NFkappaB activity by increasing IkappaBalpha levels. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21(4):889-97

Kalueff AV, Eremin KO, Tuohimaa P. Mechanisms of neuroprotective action of vitamin d(3). Biochemistry (Mosc) 2004;69(7):738-41.

This last function of vitamin D, increasing cellular levels of glutathione, may explain the purported link between heavy metals, oxidative stress, and autism. For example, activated vitamin D reduces iron-induced and zinc-induced oxidative injuries in rat brain. The primary route for the neurotoxicity of most heavy metals is through depletion of glutathione and subsequent generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Besides its function as a master antioxidant, glutathione acts as a chelating (binding) agent to remove heavy metals. Several studies indicate autistic individuals have difficulty excreting heavy metals, especially mercury. If vitamin D deficient brains are unable to utilize glutathione properly, and thus unable to remove heavy metals, they may be oxidatively damaged by heavy metal loads normal children easily excrete. The amount of activated vitamin D in the brain directly depends on how much vitamin D is made in the skin or put in the mouth.

Garcion E, Wion-Barbot N, Montero-Menei CN, Berger F, Wion D. New clues about vitamin D functions in the nervous system. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2002;13(3):100-5.

Chen KB, Lin AM, Chiu TH. Systemic vitamin D3 attenuated oxidative injuries in the locus coeruleus of rat brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003;993:313-24.

Lin AM, Chen KB, Chao PL. Antioxidative effect of vitamin D3 on zinc-induced oxidative stress in CNS. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;1053:319-29.

Valko M, Morris H, Cronin MT. Metals, toxicity and oxidative stress. Curr Med Chem 2005;12(10):1161-208

Kern JK, Jones AM. Evidence of toxicity, oxidative stress, and neuronal insult in autism. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 2006;9(6):485-99.

Sincerely,

John Cannell



Dear Dr. Cannell:

It has been a month now and John's Improvements are continuing. In the last week, he has been using his muscles more, he goes on the swing outside and lifts his legs and bends in ways that take core muscle strength. This is yet another skill or interest that left and is returning. I will report more next week.
Jane




Conclusion:

It is too early to say vitamin D has a treatment effect in autism. However, a simple risk/benefit analysis suggests that autistic children should be diagnosed and aggressively treated for vitamin D deficiency. If readers want to learn more about vitamin D and autism, they can obtain the entire paper on the link below. Unfortunately, Elsevier charges $31.50 to download it. You can read a similar document for free on the website, where we first published the theory a year ago.

Cannell JJ. Autism and vitamin D. Med Hypotheses. 2008;70(4):750-9.

http://vitamindcouncil.org/newsletter/2007-may.shtml

In summation, autistic children should be given enough vitamin D to get their 25(OH)D levels up to the mid to high range of normals, that is, 70 ng/ml (175 nmol/L in countries that use the metric system). In the absence of sun exposure, this usually requires long-term administration of about 1,000 IU/day per 20 pounds of body weight with a loading dose of 2,000 IU of vitamin D/day for every 20 pounds of body weight for the first two weeks. As individual variation in response is very high, they should have 25(OH)D blood tests every month until their level has stabilized around 70 ng/ml. They should stop all products containing preformed retinols (vitamin A), especially cod liver oil.

John Cannell, MD
The Vitamin D Council

This is a periodic newsletter from the Vitamin D Council, a non-profit trying to end the epidemic of vitamin D deficiency. If you don't want to get the newsletter, please hit reply and let us know. As we are a 501(3)(c) non-profit corporation, dedicated to ending vitamin D deficiency and not making money, the Vitamin D Council does not copyright this newsletter. Please reproduce it and post it on Internet sites. If this newsletter proves useful to a child you know with autism, the Vitamin D Council asks for a donation as we have not been able to secure a grant and our bank account balance is again below $5,000. Send your tax-deductible contributions to:

The Vitamin D Council
9100 San Gregorio Road
Atascadero, CA 93422

Comments (16) -

  • concerned heart

    6/1/2008 4:30:00 PM |

    Vitamin D3 is wonderful vitamin, but it won't change the brain defects in severe autism.



    One cause of non-familial autism is an older father at conception that results in mutations in sperm DNA and possible autism, schizophrenia, cancers, birth defects etc. etc. People need to be informed about the male biological clock. Of course in familial autism, schizophrenia, Alheimer's, cancers, the mutations happened in earlier generations.


    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2059130/Scientists-reveal-dangers-of--older-fathers.html


    http://how-old-is-too-old.blogspot.com/

  • Dr. B G

    6/1/2008 5:12:00 PM |

    Like you, I believe we need to 'eat food'.  Whole, balanced, high quality food provides all that our bodies require. (And supplements fill in when these requirements cannot be met.)

    Perhaps Cannell is aware of an interaction betw these VDR polymorphisms and excessive doses of pre-formed retinol? I agree with Cannell that high doses of Vitamin A (which can be accumulated due its fat-soluble nature) can antagonize and create the same problems Vit A is supposed to prevent/tx: osteoporosis, proliferation, inflammation, etc (much like vitamin D toxicity). BTW New formulations of cod liver oil have 75% less vit A now. Chris Masterjohn has tried to address the vit A and vit D conflict.
    http://www.greenpasture.org/content/VitaminA.pdf

    What is autism? Is it sign of many deficiencies and environmental interactions (both maternal and neonatal/pedi)??
    1) in utero effects from maternal conditions (maternal low steroid/chol diet, low EPA/DHA diet, vitamin D hypovitaminosis low vit A diet)?
    2) neonatal/pediatric vit D hypovitaminosis? (which can lead to Pb++/lead nonselective uptake?)
    3) wheat exposure and silent celiac dz (and subsequently deficient immunity which can lead to fungal/eukaryotic/yeast infxns)?

    Stocker CJ, et al. Fetal origins of insulin resistance and obesity.
    Proc Nutr Soc. 2005 May;64(2):143-51. PMID: 15960859

    Antipatis C, et al. Moderate maternal vitamin A deficiency affects perinatal organ growth and development in rats. Br J Nutr. 2000 Jul;84(1):125-32. PMID: 10961169

    Morris GS, et al.Maternal consumption of a low vitamin D diet retards metabolic and contractile development in the neonatal rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995 Jun;27(6):1245-50. PMID: 8531206

    Gallagher EA, et al. The effect of low protein diet in pregnancy on the development of brain metabolism in rat offspring.
    J Physiol. 2005 Oct 15;568(Pt 2):553-8. PMID: 16081486

    -G

  • Dr. B G

    6/1/2008 5:12:00 PM |

    Like you, I believe we need to 'eat food'.  Whole, balanced, high quality food provides all that our bodies require. (And supplements fill in when these requirements cannot be met.)

    Perhaps Cannell is aware of an interaction betw these VDR polymorphisms and excessive doses of pre-formed retinol? I agree with Cannell that high doses of Vitamin A (which can be accumulated due its fat-soluble nature) can antagonize and create the same problems Vit A is supposed to prevent/tx: osteoporosis, proliferation, inflammation, etc (much like vitamin D toxicity). BTW New formulations of cod liver oil have 75% less vit A now. Chris Masterjohn has tried to address the vit A and vit D conflict.
    http://www.greenpasture.org/content/VitaminA.pdf

    What is autism? Is it sign of many deficiencies and environmental interactions (both maternal and neonatal/pedi)??
    1) in utero effects from maternal conditions (maternal low steroid/chol diet, low EPA/DHA diet, vitamin D hypovitaminosis low vit A diet)?
    2) neonatal/pediatric vit D hypovitaminosis? (which can lead to Pb++/lead nonselective uptake?)
    3) wheat exposure and silent celiac dz (and subsequently deficient immunity which can lead to fungal/eukaryotic/yeast infxns)?

    Stocker CJ, et al. Fetal origins of insulin resistance and obesity.
    Proc Nutr Soc. 2005 May;64(2):143-51. PMID: 15960859

    Antipatis C, et al. Moderate maternal vitamin A deficiency affects perinatal organ growth and development in rats. Br J Nutr. 2000 Jul;84(1):125-32. PMID: 10961169

    Morris GS, et al.Maternal consumption of a low vitamin D diet retards metabolic and contractile development in the neonatal rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995 Jun;27(6):1245-50. PMID: 8531206

    Gallagher EA, et al. The effect of low protein diet in pregnancy on the development of brain metabolism in rat offspring.
    J Physiol. 2005 Oct 15;568(Pt 2):553-8. PMID: 16081486

    -G

  • Richard A.

    6/1/2008 8:11:00 PM |

    DHA from fish oil might be beneficial for Autism also. Carlson's Super-DHA contains 500mg of DHA per normal sized softgel. Jarrow's Max DHA contains 250mg of DHA per smaller sized softgel.

  • Anonymous

    6/1/2008 10:47:00 PM |

    "5) Vitamin A--Is vitamin D with vitamin D good or bad?"

    I'm sure you meant so say: Is vitamin A with vitamin D good or bad?

    Lynn

  • Dr. William Davis

    6/1/2008 11:44:00 PM |

    Thanks, Lynn.

  • Stephan

    6/2/2008 8:08:00 PM |

    I have a VERY hard time believing that preformed vitamin A in the amounts found in liver/cod liver oil are unhealthy.  

    Our hunter-gatherer ancestors almost certainly prized liver, as do modern HG groups.  Weston Price identified a high intake of vitamin A as one of the characteristics of traditional cultures that have excellent bone and dental health.  That indicates good mineral metabolism.  With empirical evidence like that, it's hard to take seriously predictions based on molecular arguments and weak epidemiological associations.  

    What I might be willing to believe is that vitamin A is harmful in the presence of vitamin D deficiency.  All the cultures Price studied presumably got plenty of vitamin D from sunlight.  

    It makes no sense that vitamin A would seriously interfere with vitamin D function, considering our ancestors have been getting plenty of both for the last million years or more.

  • Jessica

    6/2/2008 9:07:00 PM |

    "Dr. Cannell advocates a powdered capsule form of vitamin D. In my experience, most powdered or tablet forms do not work. But some do. He apparently has success with the brand he specifies."

    Myself, my dad, my physician, and our patients (thousands of them) have had much success using the 5,000 IU tablets from Bio-Pharm as Dr. Cannell mentioned. We've seen significant increases in 25-OH levels from the tablet form.

  • Dr. B G

    6/3/2008 3:50:00 AM |

    Dr. Davis,
    I believe Cannell uses the powdered capsules as a convenient dosage form for children to be sprinkled on to food. (I think?)

    Stephan -- I totally agree!  Could Cannell have come up with incorrect conclusions from confounding data?

    The only time I found antagonism between vitamin A and vitamin D is in the situation of vitamin D deficiency (as you said) -- and each of the examples Cannell lists are such cases (all the animals, all the men and the women  -- for the humans, I assumed because frequently reported EVERYONE in the world has 25(OH)D < 55-60 ng/ml below the  TYP goal/normal).

    This is the only explanation I could come up with (because otherwise it doesn't make sense, right? to me or my nutritionist who consumes Blue Ice highly distilled cod liver oil daily).

    In the trials Cannell lists, I would assume that vitamin D deficiency is the baseline case (in the colorectal trial, vit D intake > or < 400 IU/d was studied -- and we all are aware that is woefully inadequate, by a magnitude of TEN).  Also, for the in vitro studies, all the animals were first UVB deprived then fed only vitamin D-depleted and retinol-depleted diets, and therefore all the VDRs (vitamin D receptors) and vitamin A receptors were nonexistent/downregulated.  For humans, 6-8wks are required for vit D benefits to be exerted via supplementation, and the experiments did not provide enough time for that.  The experimental conditions were extreme... Yet probably mirrors the general population -- sun-deprived and excessively vitamin D depleted (again not individuals who follow TYP!).

    Evolutionary-wise, humans had abundant sun (vitamin D), abundant movement and abundant vitamin A-rich foods.  When abundant vitamins A and D are together, toxicity of either one does not appear to occur... neither in the literature nor reality (that I have found). I have looked hard for it.  What I found was that high dose vitamin A and D are used to treat cancers to reduce proliferation and inflammation -- prostate, breast and colon at several oncology centers in the U.S.  

    Just as there are antagonism petri dish trials, there are in vitro SYNERGISM trials for vitamin A and D where 'normal' cells were used which were not depleted of vitamins A and D prior to experimentation (see the 'Astaxanthin' post).  The UL (upper limit) of Vitamin A is 10,000 IU/d -- from diet and supplements. I think this is great 'dose' for any age adult provided they have adequate vitamin D repletion... with 25(OH)D3 ~60 ng/ml. I think the context of Vitamin D status and degree of repletion needs to be always addressed when looking at a vitamin A trial.  It is like many things in the human body -- all interconnected and inter-related. (or like life?)  

    Here, in the DeLuca article that Cannell cites... the researchers in fact found with HIGH DOSE ergocalciferol and HIGH DOSE cholecalciferol, NO ANTAGONISM with either Retinyl Palmitate OR all-trans-retinoic-acid occurred. Funny...?

    I wonder why this did not make the abstract?? (perhaps this is what happens when DeLuca --the 'Godfather' of Vitamin D -- works for a drug company?  *wink wink*).  
    http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/135/7/1647

    TABLE 2 Retinyl acetate does not antagonize higher amounts of ergocalciferol in rats (Expt. 1)1

    TABLE 6 ATRA does not antagonize higher amounts of 1,25(OH)2D3 in rats (Expt. 3)1

    We have seen in the past other antagonistic things can happen with 'good' nutritional factors in the context of vitamin D deficiency:
    --calcium supplementation -- leads to more coronary plaque growth

    I find Cannell's thoughts on this similar to the people who 'damned' estrogen for women. In the WHI trial, when Estrogen was given to women 15-20 years AFTER menopause -- after all the ERs (estrogen receptors) had disappeared -- estrogen caused more strokes, heart attacks and breast CA. However, when estrogen was provided during perimenopause (when the ERs were still in place and intact and functional), benefits were seen like vascular integrity maintained, heart protection, MI/stroke prevention, and even breast cancer prevention. (And as you can imagine, estrogen has a role in TYP!)

    -G

  • Dr. B G

    6/3/2008 3:50:00 AM |

    Dr. Davis,
    I believe Cannell uses the powdered capsules as a convenient dosage form for children to be sprinkled on to food. (I think?)

    Stephan -- I totally agree!  Could Cannell have come up with incorrect conclusions from confounding data?

    The only time I found antagonism between vitamin A and vitamin D is in the situation of vitamin D deficiency (as you said) -- and each of the examples Cannell lists are such cases (all the animals, all the men and the women  -- for the humans, I assumed because frequently reported EVERYONE in the world has 25(OH)D < 55-60 ng/ml below the  TYP goal/normal).

    This is the only explanation I could come up with (because otherwise it doesn't make sense, right? to me or my nutritionist who consumes Blue Ice highly distilled cod liver oil daily).

    In the trials Cannell lists, I would assume that vitamin D deficiency is the baseline case (in the colorectal trial, vit D intake > or < 400 IU/d was studied -- and we all are aware that is woefully inadequate, by a magnitude of TEN).  Also, for the in vitro studies, all the animals were first UVB deprived then fed only vitamin D-depleted and retinol-depleted diets, and therefore all the VDRs (vitamin D receptors) and vitamin A receptors were nonexistent/downregulated.  For humans, 6-8wks are required for vit D benefits to be exerted via supplementation, and the experiments did not provide enough time for that.  The experimental conditions were extreme... Yet probably mirrors the general population -- sun-deprived and excessively vitamin D depleted (again not individuals who follow TYP!).

    Evolutionary-wise, humans had abundant sun (vitamin D), abundant movement and abundant vitamin A-rich foods.  When abundant vitamins A and D are together, toxicity of either one does not appear to occur... neither in the literature nor reality (that I have found). I have looked hard for it.  What I found was that high dose vitamin A and D are used to treat cancers to reduce proliferation and inflammation -- prostate, breast and colon at several oncology centers in the U.S.  

    Just as there are antagonism petri dish trials, there are in vitro SYNERGISM trials for vitamin A and D where 'normal' cells were used which were not depleted of vitamins A and D prior to experimentation (see the 'Astaxanthin' post).  The UL (upper limit) of Vitamin A is 10,000 IU/d -- from diet and supplements. I think this is great 'dose' for any age adult provided they have adequate vitamin D repletion... with 25(OH)D3 ~60 ng/ml. I think the context of Vitamin D status and degree of repletion needs to be always addressed when looking at a vitamin A trial.  It is like many things in the human body -- all interconnected and inter-related. (or like life?)  

    Here, in the DeLuca article that Cannell cites... the researchers in fact found with HIGH DOSE ergocalciferol and HIGH DOSE cholecalciferol, NO ANTAGONISM with either Retinyl Palmitate OR all-trans-retinoic-acid occurred. Funny...?

    I wonder why this did not make the abstract?? (perhaps this is what happens when DeLuca --the 'Godfather' of Vitamin D -- works for a drug company?  *wink wink*).  
    http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/135/7/1647

    TABLE 2 Retinyl acetate does not antagonize higher amounts of ergocalciferol in rats (Expt. 1)1

    TABLE 6 ATRA does not antagonize higher amounts of 1,25(OH)2D3 in rats (Expt. 3)1

    We have seen in the past other antagonistic things can happen with 'good' nutritional factors in the context of vitamin D deficiency:
    --calcium supplementation -- leads to more coronary plaque growth

    I find Cannell's thoughts on this similar to the people who 'damned' estrogen for women. In the WHI trial, when Estrogen was given to women 15-20 years AFTER menopause -- after all the ERs (estrogen receptors) had disappeared -- estrogen caused more strokes, heart attacks and breast CA. However, when estrogen was provided during perimenopause (when the ERs were still in place and intact and functional), benefits were seen like vascular integrity maintained, heart protection, MI/stroke prevention, and even breast cancer prevention. (And as you can imagine, estrogen has a role in TYP!)

    -G

  • Rita.

    6/3/2008 12:31:00 PM |

    Dr. Mary Megson treats autism with cod liver oil and believes it is the natural (non-synthetic) vitamin A that is primarily responsible. She also does a ton of other stuff with the kids, as do most doctors treating this terrible epidemic.

    Dr Natasha Campbell McBride works on the gut dysbiosis in autistim which causes malabsorbtion of nutrients leading to deficiencies of vitamins and minerals and also accumulation of toxins. Her book, "Gut and Psychology Syndrome" advocates the use of the Specific Carbohydrate Diet. She cured her own son's autism.

  • Dr. William Davis

    6/3/2008 10:31:00 PM |

    Dr BG--

    Fascinating arguments.

    I'm beginning to see the logic of your enthusiasm for vitamin A--provided vitamin D is first normalized.

  • Dr. B G

    6/4/2008 4:29:00 AM |

    Dr. Davis,

    It was your 'enthusiasm' for Vitamin D that lead me to TYP...

    And now my asthma (and future health and that of my family) are assuredly as protected as can be.  Thank you for all that you do!

    Kindly, Dr. 'G'

  • Dr. B G

    6/4/2008 4:29:00 AM |

    Dr. Davis,

    It was your 'enthusiasm' for Vitamin D that lead me to TYP...

    And now my asthma (and future health and that of my family) are assuredly as protected as can be.  Thank you for all that you do!

    Kindly, Dr. 'G'

  • Gyan

    6/4/2008 7:07:00 AM |

    Chris Masterjohn's articles on Weston Price site also mention vitamin K2 and its role in preventing vitamin D toxicity.
    He claims that vitamin D toxicty is nothing more than a vitamin K2 deficiency,
    Is it plausible?. Do we need yet another vitamin?

  • Stephan

    6/4/2008 4:55:00 PM |

    Dr BG,

      Thanks, that was very informative.

Loading
Equal calories, different effects

Equal calories, different effects

A great study was just published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology:

Metabolic effects of weight loss on a very-low-carbohydrate diet compared with an isocaloric high-carbohydrate diet in abdominally obese subjects.

88 obese adults with metabolic syndrome were placed on either of two diets:

1) A very low-carbohydrate, high-fat diet (VLCHF): 4% calories from carbohydrates (truly low-carb); 35% protein; 61% fat, of which 20% were saturated. In the first 8 weeks, carbohydrate intake was severely limited to <20 grams per day, then <40 grams per day thereafter.

2) A high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet (HCLF): 46% calories from carbohydrates; 24% protein; 30% total fat, of which <8% were saturated.

Both diets were equal in calories (around 1400 calories per day--rather restrictive) and participants were maintained on the program for six months.

At the end of the six month period, participants on the VLCHF diet lost 26.4 lb, those on the HCLF diet 22.2 lbs (though the difference did not reach statistical significance). Thus, both approaches were spectacularly successful at weight loss.

Surprisingly, blood pressure, blood sugar, insulin and insulin sensitivity (a measure called HOMA) were all improved with both diets equally. Thus, these measures seemed to respond more to weight loss and less to the food composition.

Lipids differed between the two diets, however:


VLCHF:
Total cholesterol: initial 208.4 mg/dl final 207.7 mg/dl

LDL: initial 125 mg/dl final 123 mg/dl

HDL: initial 55 mg/dl final 64.5 mg/dl

Triglycerides: initial 144 mg/dl final 74 mg/dl

Apoprotein B: initial 98 mg/dl final 96 mg/dl


HCLF
Total cholesterol: initial 208.4 mg/dl final 187.5 mg/dl

LDL: initial 126 mg/dl final 108 mg/dl

HDL: initial 51 mg/dl final 54.5 mg/dl

Triglycerides: initial 157.6 mg/dl final 111 mg/dl

Apoprotein B: initial 100 mg/dl final 95 mg/dl


Some interesting differences became apparent:
--The VLCHF diet more effectively reduced triglycerides and raised HDL.
--The HCLF diet more effectively reduced total and LDL.
--There was no difference in Apo B (no statistical difference).

The investigators also made the observation that individual responsiveness to the diets differed substantially. They concluded that both diets appeared to exert no adverse effect on any of the parameters measured, both were approximately equally effective in weight loss with slight advantage with the carbohydrate restricted diet, and that lipid effects were indeed somewhat different.


What lessons can we learn from this study? I would propose/extrapolate several:

When calories are severely restricted, the composition of diet may be less important. However, when calories are not so severely restricted, then composition may assume a larger role. When calories are unrestricted, I would propose that the carbohydrate restriction approach may yield larger effects on weight loss and on lipids when compared to a low-fat diet.

The changes in total cholesterol are virtually meaningless. Part of the reason that it didn't drop with the VLCHF diet is that HDL cholesterol increased. In other words, total cholesterol = LDL + HDL + trig/5. A rise in HDL raises total cholesterol.

Despite no change in Apo B, if NMR lipoprotein analysis had been performed (or other assessment of LDL particle size made), then there would almost certainly have seen a dramatic shift from undesirable small LDL to less harmful large LDL particles on the VLCHF diet, less change on the HCLF diet.

The lack of restriction of saturated fat in the VLCHF that failed to yield adverse effects is interesting. It would be conssistent with the re-analysis of saturated fat as not-the-villain-we thought-it-was put forward by people like Gary Taubes (Good Calories, Bad Calories).

In the Track Your Plaque experience, small LDL is among the most important measures of all for coronary plaque reversal and control. Unfortunately, although this study was well designed and does add to the developing scientific exploration of diet, it doesn't add to our insight into small LDL effects. But if I had to make a choice, I'd choose the low-carbohydrate, high-fat approach for overall benefit.

Comments (15) -

  • MAC

    1/9/2008 1:55:00 AM |

    Dr. Davis,
        You have to check out Dr. Eades blog on the same study. You both had different takes but came to the same conclusion. http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/

  • Dr. Davis

    1/9/2008 3:22:00 AM |

    Hi, MAC--

    Thanks for pointing out Dr. Eades post.

    I've lately come to read his posts regularly, as I have been thoroughly impressed with his insights.

    It's good to know there's some real thinkers out there!

  • rick

    1/9/2008 4:37:00 AM |

    Had the HCLF group enjoyed the same nearly 50% drop in TG as the VLCHF group, their calculated LDL would have dropped to 117 rather than 108.  So part of their comparative advantage is not a benefit at all.

  • Anonymous

    1/9/2008 5:33:00 AM |

    Hello,

    Dr. Davis, what is your viewpoint on saturated fat intake and arterial damage? Although perhaps saturated fat doesn't affect lipid values too negatively (in fact, it seems to raise HDL), maybe it can eventually lead to heart disease by other means -- inflammation/damage to arteries, leading to plaque build-up?

    There is a reference to a study here, which you've probably seen:

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/08/060808091635.htm

    I'm curious on your viewpoints, as we know not all fats are bad, but it seems a little muddy as to if certain saturated fats are bad or not.

  • chcikadeenorth

    1/9/2008 5:37:00 AM |

    Hi, you commented once on my high hdl..68...it happened after I low carbed, high calories( plus 1800 a day) and hi fat but under 20 gr of sat fat a day.My Ldl went up but lipoprotein(a) was still within the norm not for TYP but for lab values,
    I hear nothing but good results  with LC going back to Atkins,Bernsteins, Eades, Westman and you Dr D so keep plodding along. Soon everyone will know what a wheat belly is and rather than plod you'll be galloping writing another book SmileThnx for all.

  • Dr. Davis

    1/9/2008 1:33:00 PM |

    Most of the feeding studies like the one you cited are flawed in that they claim to have isolated the effect of saturated fat on some measure, brachial forearm dilatation, in this instance. Unfortunately, they did no such thing. They did not control well for carbohydrate effects. Gary Taubes would point out that they presumed that carbohydrates are good and therefore all adverse effects must be from the saturated fat component.

    We are planning a thorough review of the issue in future.

  • g

    1/9/2008 4:50:00 PM |

    You know... I'd love to see the CAC scores (or even IMT if possible?) for people on Protein Power?  Has that ever been studied?  Mac, have you ever had an EBT/CT scan? (are you > 40 yr?)

    I think that would be very very COOL data Smile   Thanks for sharing -- I've checked DR. Eades out since you started posting...  His wife does a nice 'tablescape' like Sandra Lee!  
    I loved his post on foie gras!  That's what I tell my elevated liver test patients -- they are making their fatty livers into FOIE GRAS (and good think I'm not Hannibal... but I like chianti *ha ahaaa*).

    g

  • andyj

    1/9/2008 5:53:00 PM |

    While I would dearly love to try this myself, I am still (as always) having a mental problem with the high-fat part.  I am currently trying to fine tune a plan to do a calorie-restricted diet (about 1600 calories) but I'm not sure how low I can get the carbohydrate segment to go  -- certainly not under 10%.   Most of the fat will be from nuts and chocolate (and salmon and sardines) and I will certainly do a NMR after the fact.  The biggest problem is crafting something you can actually live with for an extended period of time, not just a couple of months.  Therein lies the real problem.  Maybe we should just stop eating altogether!  I have plans for a blog entry on just this subject --  what if we ate only when we truly had to?  Some days I'd have no problem dropping down to about 1000 calories a day, but of course then exercise would be out of the question.  Yeah, this plan still needs some tinkering before I attempt it.  
              andysheart.blogspot.com

  • MAC

    1/9/2008 8:01:00 PM |

    Dr. Davis,
       New paper on Vitamin D and heart diseases. Paper says they cannot recommend testing for Vit D nor recommend supplementaion for those with a known deficiency.
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases
    /2008/01/080107181600.htm

    To g: I am over 40 and only low carbing recently. Previous to that used vegan diet to lose weight successfully. Have not had a heart scan yet but seriously thinking of it as my father was diagnosed with Type 2 at 65 and had quadruple bypass.

    P.S. Went to doc the other day and we decided to do some blood work since it had been while and unbeknownst to me until I looked at the paper work he had ordered a Vit D 25OH test and I got him to order a lipoprotein analysis for the lipid part. No discussion, he agreed. I think he keeps up on  latest research.

  • Dr. Davis

    1/9/2008 8:25:00 PM |

    Hi, MAC--

    Progress!

  • MAC

    1/9/2008 11:18:00 PM |

    FYI.

    Posted by me on Dr. Eades site:

    "You and Dr. Davis both reviewed the same study in your respective blogs on the same day. Bit of different takes but same conclusion. http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/

    Hi MAC–

    I’m a reader of Dr. Davis’ blog from time to time. I guess today that great minds thought alike.

  • g

    1/10/2008 4:20:00 AM |

    MAC -- it sounds like you have a biochem background too?  Yes, I agree many great thinkers are coming up with vastly similar conclusions!  I think that the best balance betw being fed and 'fasting' maybe key (didn't u discuss earlier?). Where is that? maybe being mildly ketotic? at 5-10? or 0-20?  for CAD who knows yet?

    Here's an example of industry looking for a single drug ligand/target (a $325 million one)...  The answer has already been discovered.  you've found it, dude!  I'm not sure about the relationship betw protein and plaque and CAD yet...  do you have some insights?

    http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/01/08/rna-mania-genzyme-drops-325-million-on-cholesterol-shot/#comment-60086

    THANKS!! g

  • MAC

    1/10/2008 3:24:00 PM |

    To g: I think you have me confused with another poster. Sorry don't think that was me. Maybe Peter? Minor in chemistry and lots of science courses but no biochem.

    BTW, the great mind in this case was Dr. Davis, and that was Dr. Eades paying him the compliment.

  • g

    1/10/2008 8:49:00 PM |

    Sorry for the confusion -- so many quality post-ers here!  It's great that you're considering starting on vit D -- it improved insulin sensivity in a small trial 60% (that's more than any drug out there like metformin or Actos).

  • chickadeenorth

    1/11/2008 7:45:00 PM |

    g et al  do you have some reading material about Vit D improving insulin resistance I could take to my doc. I am on 4000 units a day, haven't noticed any difference but it is only about 2 weeks now.

Loading