Is health the absence of disease?

It sounds like a word game, but is health the absence of disease?

In other words, if you're not sick, you must be well. If you don't have cancer, heart disease (overtly, that is, like angina and heart attack), the flu, diarrhea, fevers, pain someplace . . . well then, you must be well.

Of course, most of us would disagree. You can be quite unhealthy yet have no overt, explicit disease. Yet this is the philosophy followed in conventional medicine when it comes to many aspects of health.

With regards to heart disease, if you have no chest pain or breathlessness, you don't have heart disease. "Oh, all right, we'll perform a stress test to be sure." Track Your Plaque followers, as well as former President Bill Clinton, recognize the enormous pitfalls of this approach: It fails to identify the vast majority of hidden heart disease. In heart disease, the apparent lack of overt, sympatomatic "disease" does NOT equal the true absence of disease, even life-threatening.

How about nutritional supplements? Vitamin D is a perfect example. Blood levels of vitamin D of 10 ng/ml--profound deficiency--are common, yet people feel fine. Beneath the surface, blood sugar rises because of poor insulin response, hidden inflammatory responses are magnified, HDL is lower and triglycerides are higher, coronary plaque grows at an accelerated rate, colon cancer activity is heightened . . . Though you feel fine.

Can an abnormal "endothelial response" be present while you feel fine? You bet it can. This refers to the abnormal constrictive behavior of arteries that is present in many people who have hidden coronary plaque or risk for coronary plaque, but is entirely beneath consciousness.

How about a triglyceride level of 200 mg/dl, fatally high from the Track Your Plaque experience? (We aim for <60 mg/dl.) This is typical in people who follow the diets endorsed by agencies like the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association, organizations too eager to keep the money flowing from corporate sponsors and thereby offer us their advice based more on politics and less on health. Triglyceride levels of 200 mg/dl cause no symptoms.


At so many levels, the absence of disease is NOT the same as health. Health is something that is expressed by, yes, feeling good, but it's also measured by so many other factors hidden beneath the surface. An annual physical is one lame effort to address this aspect of "health." But it needs to go farther, much farther.

Heart scan, lipoprotein testing, vitamin D blood level--those are the basic requirements to go beyond the shortsighted practice of the conventional approach in the world of heart disease.

Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs





Take a look at the list of ingredients in Cocoa Puffs: corn, sugar, corn syrup--all high glycemic index foods.

In other words, Cocoa Puffs is the physiologic equivalent of pure table sugar. Sure, it comes packaged with this wacky bird and the back of the box usually has fun games and offers. There's also the clever, fast-paced TV commercials to remind you of how fun Cocoa Puffs can be.


What is the actual consequence of a breakfast of a food like Cocoa Puffs in a cup of skim milk? That's easy: A big surge in insulin and blood sugar (from the corn and sugar), a drop in HDL cholesterol, surge in triglycerides (from the sugar and sugar-equivalents), increase in small LDL. Beyond this, you raise blood pressure and experience an insatiable increase in appetite. Then you get fat.

Obviously, none of this is desirable. Then why does the American Heart Association allow its Heart CheckMark endorsement on the package?

The Heart Association is trapped in 1982. Low-fat was in, saturated fat was the sole enemy of heart disease.

In 1982, the evils of small LDL, for instance, were unappreciated. LDL cholesterol was LDL cholesterol--all of it was bad and saturated fats seem to raise LDL. But the story has evolved enormously since then: LDL is not all the same. Small LDL is among the principal culprits in heart disease, the same small LDL hugely magnified by Cocoa Puffs and other similar products that fill 70% of supermarket shelves.

The American Heart Association needs to get with the times. The conversation on healthy diets has progressed considerably. Yet garbage foods that wreak havoc on health like Cocoa Puffs continue to be endorsed by an organization that still carries substantial clout with the American consumer.

My advice: Until they change their tune, anything that carries the endorsement of the American Heart Association should be eliminated from your diet.

Further validation of the Track Your Plaque 60:60:60 targets

The latest analysis of the data from Treat to New Targets (TNT) Trial shows that higher HDL cholesterol values are associated with reduced risk of heart attack, even in those with low LDL cholesterol values.

This counters the argument that some have made that, if a person takes a statin drug, raising HDL adds no additional benefit.

In the 9770-participant trial (randomized, double-blind), participants were given atorvastatin (Lipitor®) 10 mg or 80 mg per day. The study was sponsored by Pfizer, the manufacturer of Lipitor®. All participants were survivors of heart attacks, significant coronary disease by heart catheterization, or had previously undergone coronary angioplasty, stent placement, or bypass surgery—a high-risk group.

At the third month of enrollment, lipid (cholesterol panel) values were obtained and used as the basis for analysis. Participants on 80 mg atorvastatin achieved an average LDL cholesterol (Friedewald) of 77 mg/dl; participants taking 10 mg achieved a level of 101 mg/dl. Using these values, 8.7% of participants taking the higher dose of drug experienced an event, compared to 10.9% on the lower dose (which the investigators called a 22% relative reduction).

However, when the groups were re-analyzed by HDL cholesterol levels, higher HDLs remained predictive of less heart attack and other events, with the group having the highest HDL of =55 mg/dl experiencing 25% less events. Most interestingly, this effect was upheld even in participants with very low LDL cholesterols of <70 mg/dl.

I'm always a bit leery of drug company-sponsored studies, especially ones in which virtually all the participants tolerated a drug like Lipitor 80 mg, a dose in my experience that is very poorly tolerated for more than a few months. (Muscle aches are, in my experience, inevitable. I do not even recommend this dose.) In other words, the data are, in that respect, too good to believe.

Anyway, despite my reservations about these big money studies, there was nothing to gain from the HDL observation. (Of course, at one time, there would have been, given Pfizer's efforts to commercialize the now-kaput torcetrapib, scrapped because of excess mortality in phase II trials.)

Thankfully, there's other data that likewise suggest that the higher the HDL, the better. Yet more validation for the Track Your Plaque lipid targets of LDL 60 mg/dl, triglycerides 60 mg/dl or less, HDL 60 mg/dl or greater.



Copyright 2007 William Davis,MD

My sister called today . . .

My younger sister, aged 48 years (sorry, sis), called this morning.

"I'm going to my doctor today. What labs should I tell him to draw?" she asked.

"Why do you have to tell him? Can't you just ask him what he thinks should be drawn?"

"No," she said. "He just draws what I tell him to."


Maybe my sister is bossier than most. But I've heard this from many patients, as well. They go to their primary care physician and end up requesting this or that test. Sometimes their doctor complies. Often, they resist and refuse to do so.

I've heard many complaints from patients about doctors refusing to order even fairly benign tests like a vitamin D blood level or lipoproteins, even a C-reactive protein.

The number of these sorts of complaints seems to be growing. Ten years ago, it rarely happened. Today, I hear this nearly every day.

I think it is symptomatic of the growing discontent we all have with the status quo in healthcare. We are all expected to submit to the paternalistic, what-can-you-possibly-know mentality that still rules the day in medical offices. Only 40-50 years ago, if you wanted to look at a medical book, you'd have to ask the librarian for special permission so that they could make sure you weren't just a pervert trying to look at naked bodies. Today, every manner of medical and health information can be found online. Quite a contrast.

We are entering a new age, one in which people are far better informed, have surfed the internet and read media reports on health topics, have been exposed to drug company advertising, and know a fair amount about nutritional supplements. I think the system needs to change to accommodate this rapidly growing hyper-knowledgeable society.

In past, when a health problem turned up, you'd turn to your doctor first. I predict that,in the next few years, we will use the doctor as a place of last resort, the person we turn to when all else has failed, after you've exhausted your information sources.

I hope that the Track Your Plaque process will become one of the engines of change, an information resource that provides empowering tools that don't replace your doctor, but provide many information tools that are superior and may minimize your reliance on a health care provider.


Copyright 2007 William Davis, MD

Failure to diagnose

I picked up a hospital publication today. Featured prominently on the cover was a glossy photo of an attorney and his wife, both smiling.

The headline: "Atorney grateful for the lifesaving work of the ______ Hospital."

The story detailed the near-tragic story of how this 59-year old man was exercising at his local gym, only to lose consciousness after stepping off one of the exercise machines. Bystanders--hospital employees, as luck would have it--checked the man's pulse: none. They performed CPR. Ambulance called, blah blah blah.

Severe coronary disease discovered, extensive atherosclerotic plaque in all three coronary arteries, a 12-inch chest incision later and he and his wife are eternally grateful for the fine work done at X hospital. And so they should be for a job well done.

But wait a minute. After the urgent hospital dust settled, did anyone ask the one crucial question: Why wasn't this man's far-advanced heart disease identified? Why did he have to die and be resuscitated before his disease was recognized?

If this man was an indigent, homeless alcoholic . . . well, perhaps it would be no surprise. Health is neglected in this population. But a successful attorney?

Detecting hidden coronary atherosclerotic plaque simply isn't that tough. In Milwaukee, $199 would have diagnosed his disease unequivocally.

Unfortunately, we still have to set off drumrolls and crash cymbals to even begin to get the attention of the practicing physicians around us who continue to fail to diagnose hidden coronary disease. I wouldn't be at all surprised to hear if this man had a $4000 nuclear stress recently that was normal. Why would a nuclear stress test be normal? Easy: Wrong test.

The hidden message: The failure to diagnose paid somebody and some hospital over $100,000. So, why bother detecting disease before the payoff?

The profit motive in all this is all too obvious. The only other explanation is the enormous, repetitive, and systematic stupidity of the conventional approach to heart disease detection. You have the solution, at least for you and the people around you, in a CT heart scan and in the Track Your Plaque program.


Copyright 2007 William Davis, MD

Interview with world heart scan authority, Dr. John Rumberger












Dr. John Rumberger has, from its start, been a good friend of the Track Your Plaque program.

We are very proud to have his friendship. Dr. Rumberger is not only a world-renowned scientist in the world of cardiac imaging and heart scanning, but also a humanitarian and gentleman. From the very first day I met Dr. Rumberger many years ago, when he answered my many silly and naive questions about heart scans, I came to appreciate his deep and genuine interest in improving the world of heart disease detection.

I tracked Dr. Rumberger down from his busy schedule, now on a new project at the Princeton Longevity Center in Princeton, New Jersey.




TYP: Dr. Rumberger, we understand that your career has taken a new direction. Can you tell us about your current project?

Dr. Rumberger: I have not really taken a new direction, but further expanded on my opportunities.

I remain Medical Director of PrevaHealth Wellness Diagnostic Center (formerly Healthwise) in Columbus, Ohio. At that center, we see patients referred by their doctors for further refinement in cardiac risk stratification using heart and body scanning. However, by only doing scans alone there are limited opportunities for me to react in a meaningful way with the individual patients and thus I miss opportunities to do direct one-on-one teaching.

Currently, I spend most of my time in Princeton, NJ as Director of Cardiac Imaging for the Princeton Longevity Center. At the PLC, we perform comprehensive medical examinations along with screening CT scans, blood work, fitness and diet consultation to affect a more thorough one-on-one experience. Each patient then receives a comprehensive de-briefing.

In addition, since I have been involved with cardiac CT for now nearly 24 years, the PLC also affords me an opportunity to develop a CT coronary angiography training program for cardiologists and radiologists (www.cardiaccta.us). Together, these new efforts are merely an extension of my interests in prevention, patient care, and teaching.



TYP: Based on your book, The Way Diet, we understand that you advocate gravitating away from processed foods and incorporating more nuts, monounsaturated oils, lean proteins like fish, and a reduction in processed carbohydrates. You’ve also been a proponent of the Mediterranean diet that demonstrated a dramatic reduction in cardiovascular events in the Lyon Heart Study.

Has your philosophy or practice regarding nutritional strategies evolved or changed in any way since your book was published?

Dr. Rumberger: No, the strategies put forward in The Way Diet have, if anything, been reinforced by further and further research in selecting foods that are naturally high in anti-oxidants with lean sources of protein and reduced intake of processed sugar-containing preparations. The book, however, is what I call a ‘philosophy’ book which looks at three major aspects: proper diet, adequate exercise, and stress management. I also include some recipes which follow the dietary plans, but are done using ingredients that are commonly found in the average home.



TYP: We regard you as the source of much of the wisdom in heart scanning as the basis for early heart disease detection. Much of the original and subsequent scientific data, in fact, bears your name. Can you touch on some of the new directions your research has taken over the past couple of years?

Dr. Rumberger: We have come a long way from the beginning and there is a long way to go to get this incorporated into routine preventive care in the United States.

The most recent research has provided not so much more information as continuing to reinforce the old research. As I always say: if your research continues to show the same thing, then maybe there is a clear pattern here! The biggest challenge is getting this message into the mainstream and also trying to get cardiologists (and internists and, in fact, the general public) away from ‘stenosis’ detection to define the real cause of heart attacks (plaque) and into ‘plaque detection.’ This is where basic heart scanning has the greatest potential to reduce the expanding burden of heart disease.

You may be aware of our SHAPE initiave in which an international group of cardiologists and scientists have advocated getting a heart scan FIRST and then, if abnormal, checking your cholesterol values; rather than using cholesterol (which is valuable, but highly variable in predictive power) to determine who needs medications or further testing. The heart scan can define the current level of plaque and THEN you can determine what to do about it. [See the Track Your Plaque report on the release of the Shape Guidelines at SHAPE Guidelines]



TYP: We understand that you are performing CT coronary angiography in your center. What are your thoughts on the role of CTA in 1) screening for coronary disease, and 2) its role in the diagnostic process?

Dr. Rumberger: CT coronary angiography (CTA) is an incredible method to really define the extent of disease, beyond just coronary calcium. Its role is most appropriate in ruling OUT a significant ‘stenosis’ while really defining the absence or presence (and thus ‘how much’) of plaque. It is the ultimate ‘plaque detector’. CTA is best used in patients who have some symptoms, but in whom the clinician feels may NOT have clear cardiac chest pain. By risk-stratifying using CTA, we also gain information about heart size, heart function, whether there is prior heart damage, as well as other important information. This then becomes a very universal means to risk-stratifying individuals.



TYP: Thanks for your wonderful insights, Dr. Rumberger! We look forward to hearing about your future projects and research directions.





About John Rumberger, PhD, MD:

Dr. Rumberger is among the world's leading authorities on cardiac and vascular imaging using EBT and CT Scanning. Dr. Rumberger was among the first to pioneer the use of new CT technologies for heart scanning. He currently serves as Director of Cardiac Imaging at the Princeton Longevity Center, Princeton, NJ.

Dr. Rumberger is formerly Professor of Medicine and Consultant in the Department of Cardiovascular Diseases at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Dr. Rumberger received his doctorate in engineering from The Ohio State University in 1976 and graduated from the University of Miami School of Medicine in 1978.

During his over 20 year career as a clinician, educator, and researcher, Dr. Rumberger has published nearly 500 scientific papers and book chapters. He has lectured worldwide on EBT, early heart disease diagnosis, and wellness. He is an Established Investigator of the American Heart Association and a Founding Member of the International Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging. Dr Rumberger is an active Reviewer for the Journal of the American Medical Association, Archives of Internal Medicine, and the New England Journal of Medicine.

Summer in Wisconsin

It's been a glorious summer in Wisconsin.

For weeks straight, we've enjoyed bright, sunny days with temperatures in the 70s and 80s. Even now, in late September, our windows are wide open and the days are warm and sunny. Yesterday, it was 84 degrees. Yes, it did rain for a stretch of about 10 days in August, but for the most part it has been a wonderfully sunny summer.

So it struck Andy as a big surprise when we checked his 25-OH-vitamin D3 blood level: 15 ng/ml--severe deficiency.

"I don't get it. I'm outside almost every day. Look at me! How do you think I got this tan?"

Indeed, Andy sported a nice dark tan over exposed areas.

In fact, Andy was among the dozen or so people this month with deficiencies of this magnitude.

Deficiency is not the exception; it is the rule. Of course, if Andy's blood level is at the level of severe deficiency in September, he will only trend lower over the next few weeks and months. He would likely have shown vitamin D blood levels of <10 ng/ml by January--profound deficiency.

With deficiency of this severity, Andy has been exposing himself to risk for prostate and colon cancer, diabetes and metabolic syndrome, low HDL, higher triglycerides, higher blood sugars, higher C-reactive protein, osteoporosis, arthritis . . .

Correcting the deficiency is easy. But, as you can see, getting sun is not always the answer. Even with an active, outdoor lifestyle and a tan, Andy still remained significantly deficient. Oral replacement with vitamin D3, or cholecalciferol, is an absolute necessity.

Wacky statin effects

In general, I try to exhaust possibilities before resorting to the statin drugs. But we still do use them, both in general practice and the Track Your Plaque program.

There are indeed a number of ways to reduce, minimize, or eliminate the need for these drugs. For instance, if your LDL is 150 mg/dl but comprised of 90% small particles, then a reduction in wheat and other high-glycemic index foods, weight loss, fish oil, and niacin can yield big drops in LDL.

But sometimes we need them. Say LDL is 225 mg/dl and is a mix of large and small. Exercise, weight loss, niacin, oat bran, ground flaxseed, Benecol, etc. and LDL: 198 mg/dl. Alright, that's when statins may be unavoidable. There's also many people who are not as motivated as all of us trying to reverse heart disease. Some just want the easy way out. Statins do indeed provide that option in some people.

So in truth, we end up using these drugs fairly regularly. How common are muscle aches and fatigue? In my experience, they are universal . If taken long enough, or if high doses are used, muscle complaints are inevitable. Most of the time, thankfully, they're modest and often relieved with a change in drug or with coenzyme Q10 supplementation.












But there's more to statin side effects than muscle aches. Among the wacky effects that I have witnessed with statin drugs:

--Insomnia-especially with simvastatin (Zocor and Vytorin). Insomnia can be quite severe, in fact, with difficulty sleeping more than 3-4 hours a night.

--Bone aches--I don't know why this happens, unless it's somehow related to muscle aches. I've seen this with all the statins, but more commonly with Crestor.

--Memory impairment--a la Dr. Duane Graveline's wacky book, Lipitor: Thief of Memory. I've seen this with Lipitor, though it's uncommon, and less commonly with simvastatin (Zocor, Vytorin).

--Diarrhea--More common with Zetia and Vytorin (which contains Zetia), because of the inhibition of bile acid reabsorption.

--Migraine headaches--This I certainly do not understand, but the cause-effect relationship is undoubtedly true in an occasional person.

--Low libido--In men more than women, though it may be more due to men being more willing to admit to it.

--Increased appetite--Rare, though I've seen dramatic instances.

--Tinnitus--Ringing in the ears. I've only seen it with Lipitor and Zocor.


In their defense (and in general I am no defender of the drug manufacturers), most people do fine with statin drugs, though the majority do eventually require coenzyme Q10 in my experience. By the way, coenzyme Q10 can be an indispensable aid to help tolerate statin agents.

I'd love to hear about your wacky experiences.

Track Your Plaque goes global

I don't use this space to toot my horn (at least I don't too often), but we were looking at the listings of our viewers and members. I was surprised to learn that we now have Track Your Plaque followers in 15 different countries around the world!

We have members from Europe including England, Ireland, Switzerland, Belgium, and the Czech Republic. We have members from as far away as South Africa, Australia, India, Singapore, Thailand, and China.

I see the entire Track Your Plaque process as a grand experiment. Never before in history has a system of health been delivered via a communication medium like the web. The internet provides more interactivity than television, it's more fluid than a book, it's more dynamic and evolves more rapidly than a face-to-face interaction. While we cannot be hands-on over the internet, we can still deliver all the crucial information and, hopefully, the knowledge on how to get it done.



Track Your Plaque is part of an even grander experiment: The movement to shift control over health away from the medical system, doctors, and hospitals and back to individuals. When you think about it, the idea that "health" (more acurately sickness) should be managed by people and institutions (e.g., hospitals and insurance companies) outside of the individual is a 20th century concept. I predict that this notion will also become a relic of the 20th century.

Someday, we will look back and laugh at the folly of the 20th century style of paternalistic health care. Perhaps it was a necessary step in the sequence to transform health to a better system that returns control to the individual. But it's clearly time for a change.

Track Your Plaque is an example of the extraordinary power that can be taken by a lone individual with only minimal assistance of a health care provider. I see Track Your Plaque members who understand heart disease (at least the coronary disease aspect) far better than 95% of my cardiology colleagues, 100% of my internal medicine and family practice colleagues. Physicians maintain a role, but their role has shrunk and receded. They should be facilitators of success in health, educators, a resource to turn to when we need help. It's not that way today. It will be in 50 years.

But, right now, we can get started on this wonderfully self-empowering--liberating-- movement by participating in this global experiment known as Track Your Plaque, the program with the goofy name that has the potential to usurp and unravel this enormous institutionalized system of health care the world has created.

Go to your corners

There's a heated debate being waged on the Heart Hawk Blog

Dr. Melissa Walton-Shirley authored an editorial entitled It Should Be the Right of All Americans to Have Primary Percutaneous-Based Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome .

Heart Hawk's response:

Dr. Walton-Shirley feels the best use of time, talent, and money is to build more cath labs and train more people in how to use them so that IF you have a heart attack, you stand a better chance of being pulled back from the brink of death. Unfortunately, you have to first let people get so sick that they are about to die. My position is to use those same resources to prevent such disasters from happening in the first place. Take your pick. You cannot spend the money twice.

I am no stranger to "direct angioplasty," meaning performing immediate coronary angioplasty (with stenting) for heart attack. Since 1990, I have personally performed hundreds, perhaps over a thousand of these procedures, particularly when I was younger and my practice was procedurally-focused. But, after a few years, I quickly recognized the futility of this approach. Yes, you might have aborted a heart attack ,perhaps even saved a life at the brink of death. But wouldn't it have been better to have prevented the entire episode in the first place?

In my mind, putting a cath lab on every corner, as Dr. Walton-Shirley suggests, is like having a fire truck on every street to prevent a house from burning down. It's an enormously expensive proposition that provides no incentive to prevent fires. Why not spend the money on preventing the fires?

Expanding access to cath lab procedures is putting the fox in the henhouse. Procedures yield money--big money--for hospitals and cardiologists. Guess what happens when you build facilities that exceed the need? Yes--the number of procedures grows, whether or not they were needed.

In my view, Dr. Shirley-Walton's opinions are symptomatic of the profit-driven, procedurally-focused quick-fixes that divert money that would be far better spent on effective dissemination of preventive practices.
Statin drug revolt

Statin drug revolt

I sense a growing revolt against the intrusion of statin drugs into our lives.

No doubt, the statin drug industry is, at least from an economic perspective, a huge success: $27 billion annual revenues at last accounting. The latest big plug for more and more statins was the JUPITER trial that showed reduced cardiovascular events on Crestor in people with "normal" LDL cholesterol levels and increased c-reactive protein.

It seems that not one day passes that doesn't include some news story about the "benefits" of statin drugs: reduction in heart attack, stroke, colon cancer, osteoporosis, heart failure, etc.

Ironically, the overwhelming economic success of the statin drug industry also seems to be encouraging a grassroots revolt.





More and more people are coming to the office, more people commenting on the web over how they want to avoid statin drugs, stop a drug they are already taking, or at least reduce the dose of an ongoing drug.

My day-to-day experience with coronary plaque control and reversal is that, while statin drugs are helpful tools, they are not necessary tools for full benefit of a prevention program. "Need" for statin drugs can differ by the patterns measured, though not the usual patterns suggested by the drug industry. For instance, using C-reactive protein, a la JUPITER, as justification for statin prescription is, in my view, totally absurd and makes no sense whatsoever, since inflammatory responses can be effective reduced with plenty of other strategies besides statin drugs. Conventional LDL, likewise, is a fictitious number that often bear little or no resemblance to the true and genuine measured value (apoprotein B or LDL particle number).

So here are a number of strategies that can help reduce or eliminate the "need" for a statin drug:

--Elimination of wheat and cornstarch--This is no namby-pamby dietary strategy, as low-fat diets were. This is a powerful, enormously effective strategy, particularly if LDL is in the small category. Small LDL drops like a stone when these foods are eliminated. This means no breads, pasta, breakfast cereals, pretzels, crackers, chips, tacos, wraps, etc.
--Non-wheat fibers--Especially raw nuts, ground flaxseed, and oat bran.
--Vitamin D restoration
--Fish oil
--Weight loss
--Niacin

There are additional strategies that focus on specific subsets of LDL cholesterol (e.g., Lp(a) masquerading as LDL). But the above list can reduce LDL cholesterol substantially, reducing the apparent "need" for a statin drug.

You will notice that there are few money makers in the above list, compared to the billions of dollars reaped by the statin drug industry. There is therefore little incentive to allow a pretty sales rep to go to your doctor and pitch the use of over-the-counter vitamin D or make changes in diet.

Statin drugs in my view need to be shoved back into their more limited role as drugs to be used on occasion when necessary (e.g., heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia with LDL cholesterol values of 250 mg/dl in a person with measurable coronary plaque). These should never have achieved the "celebrity" status they enjoy, complete with gushing endorsements by TV personalities, daily news stories, and back-to-back TV commercials.

Join the revolt!

Comments (28) -

  • Anne

    12/17/2008 12:46:00 PM |

    Please make mention of the continued prescribing of Zetia and Vytorin. Is there ever a reason to use these?

  • Sean

    12/17/2008 2:40:00 PM |

    It seems like you're ignoring or discrediting some of the more paramount statin trials -- such as 4S, PROVE-IT, HPS, and AFCAPS/TexCAPS, just to name a few.  

    I've only followed your website for about a month, so I'm still getting a feel for your philosophy of practice, but are your fish oil/vitamin D/niacin first-line recommendations (and a statin as a second-line agent) founded on clinical data, or only personal experience?

    The benefit of statins isn't limited to LDL alone -- the pleiotropic effects are actually quite impressive, particularly in type II diabetes.

    Could you possibly elaborate on your reasoning for only using a statin when necessary, despite clinical data that strongly supports their use?

  • Anonymous

    12/17/2008 4:36:00 PM |

    Dr., I am so grateful for your blog. I stumbled across it a few days ago. Although I am really young, I have family history of heart disease at really young age- 20s. So I am reading your blog voraciously and taking notes.
    Your no-wheat recommendation doe seem very hard to follow. what do you suggest we use instead of wheat? How about other grains like millet or Bajra? How about brown rice?

    Thanks.
    P

  • Scott Miller

    12/17/2008 4:47:00 PM |

    Dr. Davis, I still think you're missing vit. K2 from your program, which is a key regulator of calcium, and showing to reverse coronary calcium.  The current issue of Life Extension magazine has a cover story on K2, claiming it reduces all-cause mortality by 26% based on a large study (Rottingham, I think).

    I've been taking and recommend K2 for years. I recently had several arteries imaged, including the carotid artery, and there was no detectable plaque. Note that the first 40 years of my life I lived on wheat-filled processed/junk foods, so I'm sure I had detectable, worrisome plaque -- but 7 years later my blood pressure is at an athletic level, and the plaque is gone.  K2, I'm sure, played a big role in this, along with the other tactics you've listed.

    More on K2 and arterial calcification reversal:
    http://tinyurl.com/5rzoh4

  • Anonymous

    12/17/2008 6:05:00 PM |

    Dr. D.,

    I know you don't often reply to posts to your blog anymore, but if you find the time I was wondering what your opinion was for statin use for someone WITH heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia but WITHOUT any measurable coronary plaque?? I have FHC but a heart scan on my 37th birthday revealed a heart scan score of 0,0,0. I did have a small pixel of calcium show up around the aorta. Not one to rest on my good fortunes, I have since found an Internist that specializes in lipid disorders and we have since done NMR testing, added fish oil (2.4g EPA/DHA), vitamin D3 (3,0000IU) and niacin (1g) and went from Vytorin 80/10 from my previous physician to Crestor 10mg & Zetia 10mg. I plan on adding 100mcg of K2 (MK-7) in the hopes of arresting/reversing the calcium dot around the aorta.

    For the record, I have been on statins for the most part since they were first introduced in 1987/88.

    Thanking you in advance.

    Keep up the good work.

  • Jenny

    12/17/2008 6:56:00 PM |

    Dr. Davis,

    Since you cite weight loss as an effective strategy, I'm curious if you have any unique ideas for promoting weight loss among those of us who stall out on low carb diets.

    It is an unfortunate, but very common finding that many of us can eat very clean low carb diets without losing any weight, even with calorie restriction.  I have run into this myself and know others who have too.

    Do you have any tricks and tips you've found helpful for your compliant patients who stall?

    If so, could you discuss them in a future blog post. The online low carb forums are filled with people who stall out.  This may be partly due to changes in thyroid hormone levels that many of us cannot get our doctors to treat as they are considered within the normal ranges.

    Whatever it is, it is one of the big frustrations real people, as opposed to those who star in diet books, run into with the low carb diet after an initial burst of encouraging weight loss.

  • steve

    12/17/2008 7:49:00 PM |

    excellent points.  are peanuts in the nut category you recommend?
    is zero sat fat recommended as in your book( i know new revision out in 2009)

  • e4e

    12/17/2008 8:02:00 PM |

    Thanks for this advice. JUPITER (and the reporting on it) was really flawed.

    I wrote about it and there are links to some other good analyses too.

    http://www.emotionsforengineers.com/2008/11/more-statin-misreporting.html

    Regards,
    Tony

  • renegadediabetic

    12/17/2008 9:32:00 PM |

    I revolted when my doctor prescribed Lipitor after I was first diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.  After researching side effects, I knew I didn't want to take it.  Then I discovered what a scam this whole cholesterol business is.  By cutting carbs and increasng fat, I lowered my cholesterol to the point that it was no longer an issue.  Now I'm armed for battle if the issue ever comes up again.  Thanks for all you do in keeping us informed of the facts.

  • JPB

    12/18/2008 4:13:00 PM |

    I hope that you are right!  Unfortunately a lot more people are going to be dismissed from their doctors' practices for refusing these drugs unless the truth about lipids and statins becomes more widely known.  The dogma is almost impenetrable!

  • Anonymous

    12/18/2008 7:33:00 PM |

    hmm, I posted a comment yesterday and it seems to have disappeared. Dr. Davis, what is your take on consuming grains other than wheat like millet or quinoa?

  • Ed

    12/18/2008 11:07:00 PM |

    Dr. Davis: I've been on 5 to 10mg of Crestor for several years and your article has encouraged me to discuss a reduction with my doctor. (I purchased almost a 1 year supply of Made in the U.S. Crestor for about $1/pill in Argentinian pharmacies. It paid for my airfare. Here I pay $3/pill. I consulted you via mail after I had a scary 346 (97 percentile) on a heart scan in July of '07. I'm fit and had always followed a "good" diet so the scan results were surprising. After looking at my numbers you accurately predicted that I probably had high Lp(a). I've been following your recommendations (nuts,oat bran, flaxseed, fish oil, niacin, very low wheat, etc.) to get it lower.

  • Dr. William Davis

    12/18/2008 11:15:00 PM |

    Scott Miller--

    My March 2008 Life Extension Magazine article on vitamin K2 can be found at:
    http://search.lef.org/cgi-src-bin/MsmGo.exe?grab_id=0&page_id=776&query=k2%20davis&hiword=DAVI%20DAVID%20DAVIE%20DAVIES%20DAVIN%20DAVIO%20DAVISON%20DAVISS%20DAVIT%20davis%20k2%20.

    There are also extensive discussions on K2 on the www.trackyourplaque.com website.

  • Scott Miller

    12/19/2008 4:20:00 AM |

    Very nice LEF article, Dr. D.

    So why not list it among your other essentials in your program?  You're clearly very knowledgeable on K2's benefits, and used properly, there appears to be no downside/toxicity to using it.

    BTW, I know you frequent TheHeart.org forum.  Perhaps you've seen some of the posts I've made recently in the most busy threads, in defence of natural supplements.  Dr. Hackam, in particular, is truly a lacky of Big Pharma propoganda, and gives zero credit to vitamins, writing: "I will stick with what works and try to get my patients off their addictions to these drugs (yes vitamins are drugs; because they are taken in pharmacological rather than physiologic doses by most people)."

  • Anonymous

    12/19/2008 7:21:00 AM |

    As a nutritionist myself it is difficult to understand this demonization of even whole grain wheat. What is wrong with that?

  • Anonymous

    12/19/2008 4:49:00 PM |

    Responding to the nutritionist who wrote on December 19, 2008 questioning the "demonization" of whole grain wheat take a look at today's article in the NY Times about diabetics and diet.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/19/health/19diet.html

    This study found that a diet high in whole grains (and thus high in glycemic load) caused a decrease in HDL-C.  In contrast, a purportedly lower glycemic load diet, which excluded whole grains but included beans, peas and lentils, was found to reduce blood glucose levels in diabetics and increase HDL-C.  Perhaps this is reason to reconsider the traditional advice regarding eating whole grains???

    -Russ

  • Anonymous

    12/19/2008 7:52:00 PM |

    Nutritionist, his entire blog is about what's wrong with wheat.

  • moblogs

    12/19/2008 7:57:00 PM |

    I think it was only a matter of time before people started going 'hey wait a minute - statin companies are raking in billions but heart morality is still the same or worse?'.

    If statins were the wonder drug(tm), in about 30yrs of use you'd have thought heart disease was something relegated to history books.

  • Anonymous

    12/19/2008 8:23:00 PM |

    Anonymous Nutritionist:

    As previously stated, Doctor Davis no longer replies to questions on his blog (very rarely at least..). Do a search of his blog and read up if you are wondering why he is in favor of wheat elimination. Many patients that have been referred to him by other Physicians have been practicing the consumption of whole wheat products because they were told this is "heart healthy". Many of these same patients turn out to have terrible lipid profiles when tested by advanced lipoprotein testing (like the NMR test)....specifically small particle LDL. Once wheat consumption is reduced or eliminated, these abnormalities usually vanish. Dr. Davis believes that small  particle LDL is one of the biggest causes of CAD. Let's face it, many of the products that are sold to the average consumer that claim to be whole wheat and/or whole grain are high glycemic because they still are HIGHLY refined. The Paleo Diet Dr. says that a natural wheat berry is hard enough to break a tooth. Obviously the stuff that the food manufactures sell us is HIGHLY refined to be palatable to us. I've checked glycemic food databases and whole wheat bread is usually just as highly gylcemic (index & load) as a piece of white bread. Cornstarch is another culprit that Dr. Davis feels people should avoid if they want to improve their lipid profiles. I've often thought to myself that eating a sandwich...even with (mass produced) whole wheat bread, is probably no different to the pancreas then eating a sandwich made between layers of equivalent weight sugar cubes bonded together (actually most breads have a worse GI then sucrose!!). Nobody would eat a sandwich made of sugar cubes, but likewise..few people would think there is anything unhealthy about eating a sandwich on whole wheat bread..   Frown

    Just my 2 cents worth..

  • Michael

    12/19/2008 10:04:00 PM |

    Dr Davis,
    Just a quick comment to say that in a way I'm heartened by the comments on this thread and on recent posts by people who "don't get it". It means that neophytes are now reading the blog and are a demonstration of the influence you appear to be gathering.
    More power to you and, though I know it's testing on your patience as you're a busy man, please look on such posts as "what's wrong with grains anyway?" and its like, as a sign that the message is at last getting out as it so thoroughly deserves (even those that are trying to counter your ideas -- another sign that you are having an effect).

  • Anonymous

    12/19/2008 10:57:00 PM |

    Wheat increases inflammation.

    Jeanne

  • Dr. William Davis

    12/20/2008 12:49:00 AM |

    Thanks for the assistance, everyone!

  • Shreela

    12/20/2008 4:08:00 AM |

    My hubby and I hadn't been to a GP in a long time, and he noticed a change in one of his back moles. So I took advantage of his concern about that to finally get him to go in. We both knew his BP was too high, but since it was only a little too high, he ignored it.

    The GP chemically burned off the back mole, started him on BP meds, and prescribed him some kind of statin.

    On our follow up, I asked him why he prescribed a statin when our lipid labs hadn't even come in yet. GP answered it was his age, combined with his BP problems. I replied that they were medicating him for his BP, and we'd wait until the lipid tests came back before going on statins.

    The GP didn't even argue, which made me think there wasn't a very good reason to start statins, except for the big pharma push on them.

    Both our lipids came back within normal limits.

  • Anne

    12/20/2008 9:04:00 AM |

    Nutritionist,

    Wheat, whether whole grain or not, contains substances such as lectins and phytates which are essentially poisons used by the plant to protect itself from 'predators'...ie from being destroyed by being eaten or by the digestive process if they are eaten. This is the same for all grains, not just wheat, which is why they are not good for people.

    Anne

  • Kuntsa

    12/22/2008 2:11:00 AM |

    I'm curious how the American cholesterol measurements (taken as mg/dL) are converted to more conventional mmol/l measurements?  Does the analysis assume certain lipoprofile which is used to convert the result to mg/dL?

    http://www.globalrph.com/conv_si.htm gives factor 0.0259, but 10 mmol/l sounds awful high (they are recommending statins if your cholesterol is above 4 mmol/l here in Finland).

  • Anne

    12/22/2008 9:13:00 AM |

    To convert total cholesterol, LDL or HDL from nmol/L to mg/dl multiply by 38.67 - or divide by 38.67 to convert the other way round. And to convert triglycerides, multiply by 88.57 to convert nmol/L to mg/dl or divide by 88.57 to go the other way.

    Anne

  • Sanael

    2/9/2009 9:13:00 AM |

    Dr., I liked the article, from your permission I will publish it at myself in a blog.

  • simvastatin side effects

    5/9/2011 2:29:00 AM |

    The used of statin worldwide is a very overwhelming success in drug industry. We can read this on different blogs where in more people are commenting on this drug.

Loading