Green coffee bean extract in AGF Factor I

Track Your Plaque's new and proprietary formulation, AGF Factor I, is designed to to support a program to achieve low levels of endogenous glycation.

Endogenous glycation, discussed at length in a recent Track Your Plaque Special Report, makes LDL particles (especially small LDL particles) more prone to oxidation and thereby more atherogenic, i.e., more likely to contribute to atherosclerotic plaque. Endogenous glycation also exerts unhealthy effects on long-lived proteins in the body, such as the proteins in the lenses of your eyes (cataracts), the lining of arteries (hypertension), and the cartilage cells of joints (brittle cartilage and arthritis).

Endogenous glycation is reduced by slashing carbohydrates in the diet, especially the most offensive carbohydrates of all, the amylopectin A of wheat, sucrose, high-fructose corn syrup and other fructose sources. Endogenous glycation can also be blocked by using blockers of the glycation reaction, such as benfotiamine (lipid-soluble thiamine), pyridoxal-5'-phosphate (a form of vitamin B6 with greater glycation blocking effect), and chlorogenic acid from green coffee beans, all components of AGF Factor I, which also contains Portulaca oleracea (Portusana), or purslane, for reduction of glucose.

Green coffee bean extract, and thereby chlorogenic acid, is receiving increased attention, most recently due to a study demonstrating substantial weight loss with 750-1050 mg green coffee bean extract, providing approximately 325-500 mg chlorogenic acid per day. Participants lost 15.4 pounds over 8 weeks at the higher dose (500 mg chlorogenic acid per day), while participants lost 8.8 pounds over 8 weeks at the lower dose (325 mg chlorogenic acid per day).

AGF Factor I was not formulated for weight loss but, taken twice or three times per day, does indeed mimic the dose of chlorogenic acid from green coffee bean extract used in the weight loss study. If you wish to take advantage of this application of chlorogenic acid/green coffee bean extract, while also maximizing protection from endogenous glycation, our AGF Factor I is one excellent choice to do so.

Lessons learned from the 2012 Low-carb Cruise

I just returned from Jimmy Moore's Low-carb Cruise, a 7-day excursion to Jamaica, Grand Cayman Island, and Cozumel aboard the Carnival Magic. During our 7 wonderful days, a number of authors and experts spoke, each offering their unique perspective on the low-carb world. The focus was the science, experience, and practical application of low-carbohydrate diets.

The event kicked off with a roast by Tom Naughton of Fat Head fame, who entertained with his insightful low-carb humor and predictions of my demise at the hands of Monsanto!

Among the most important lessons provided:

Dr. Andreas Eenfeldt of the Diet Doctor blog discussed how Sweden is leading the world as the nation with the most vigorous low-carbohydrate following, witnessing incredible weight loss and reversal of carbohydrate-related diseases way ahead of the U.S. experience. I spent several hours with Dr. Eenfeldt who, besides being an engaging speaker, is a new father and an all-around gentleman. At 6 ft, 7 inches, he also towered high above all of us.

Dr. Eric Westman of Duke University and author of The New Atkins for a New You, debunked low-carbohydrate myths, such as "low-carb diets are high-protein diets that make your kidneys explode."

Dr. John Briffa, creator of the popular blog, Dr. John Briffa: A Good Look at Good Health, and author of the wonderfully straightforward primer to low-carbohydrate eating, Escape the Diet Trap, stressed the importance of never allowing hunger to rule behavior. Dr. Briffa's serious writing tone conceals an incredible charm and wit that took me by surprise, having spent several thoroughly engaging hours over breakfast, lunch, and dinner with him over the week.

Fred Hahn, exercise expert, founder of Serious Strength and author of Slow Burn Fitness Revolution and Strong Kids, Healthy Kids, debunked a number of trendy exercise methods, boiling many of the purported benefits of exercise down to that of increased strength.

Dr. Chris Masterjohn of The Daily Lipid and supporter of the Weston A. Price Foundation program, provided a comprehensive overview of the data that fails to link saturated fat with heart disease. He also helped me understand the analytical techniques used in studies of advanced glycation end-products.

Denise Minger, brilliant young usurper of China Study dogma and blogger at Raw Foods SOS, proved an engaging speaker and a truly real person (since some critics of her analyses have actually questioned whether there was even such a person!). She also proved every bit as likable as she seems in her captivating blog discussions.

Dr. Jeff Volek, prolific researcher from University of Connecticut, author of over 200 studies validating low-carbohydrate diet effects, and author of the recently released book with Dr. Stephen Phinney, The Art and Science of Low Carbohydrate Living, debunked myths behind carbohydrate dependence and "loading" by athletes. He also talked about how assessing blood ketones may be the gold standard method to ensure low-grade ketosis on a long-term low-carb effort.

Over a bottle of wine, Jimmy Moore and I reminisced over how his modest start with no experience in blogging or media has now ballooned to an audience of over 100,000 readers/viewers.

All in all, Jimmy's Low-carb Cruise experience was worth every minute, with many wonderful lessons and memories!

Chili Sesame Crackers

Looking for something hot and crunchy?

These chili sesame crackers are perfect for dipping into hummus or salsa. As written, the recipe yields a moderately spicy cracker that you can modify readily by increasing or decreasing quantities of cayenne pepper and Tabasco sauce.

This recipe uses sesame seeds as the "flour." Either brown sesame seeds or the lighter version work, though the lighter seeds yield a slightly less bitter flavor with the spices.

For ease of baking, a shallow baking pan measuring 11 x 17 inches works best, as it allows the batter to fill the pan and spread to a cracker thickness. With a smaller pan, you may have to bake in two batches.

Makes approximately 30 chips

2 cups raw sesame seeds
1 cup shredded Parmesan cheese
2 tablespoons extra-virgin olive oil
1 tablespoon chili powder
½ teaspoon cayenne pepper
2 teaspoons onion powder
1 teaspoon garlic powder
1 teaspoon dry mustard
1 teaspoon sea salt
1 teaspoon Tabasco sauce
1¼ cups water

Preheat oven to 350º F.

In food chopper or food processor, grind 1¼ cups sesame seeds to fine meal. Remove and place in large bowl.

Place shredded Parmesan cheese in food chopper or food processor and pulse briefly until reduced to granular consistency. Add to sesame seed meal and mix. Stir in olive oil.

Add remaining (unground) sesame seeds, chili powder, cayenne pepper, onion and garlic powder, mustard, sea salt and mix thoroughly. Add Tabasco sauce and water and mix. Add additional water, if necessary, one tablespoon at a time, to obtain a consistency similar to pancake batter.

Pour mixture into baking pan and smooth to fill pan and obtain a thickness of a cracker. If too thick, remove some batter and re-smooth. Optionally, roll a clean cylindrical glass or bottle over top to smooth and yield a consistent thickness.

Bake for 30 minutes or until edges browned and center firm. If a dry, extra crunchy cracker is designed, bake an additional 10-15 minutes at 250 degrees F.

Remove and allow to cool. Cut with pizza cutter to desired size.

Opiate of the masses

Although it is a central premise of the whole Wheat Belly argument and the starting strategy in the New Track Your Plaque Diet, I fear that some people haven't fully gotten the message:

Modern wheat is an opiate.

And, of course, I don't mean that wheat is an opiate in the sense that you like it so much that you feel you are addicted. Wheat is truly addictive.

Wheat is addictive in the sense that it comes to dominate thoughts and behaviors. Wheat is addictive in the sense that, if you don't have any for several hours, you start to get nervous, foggy, tremulous, and start desperately seeking out another "hit" of crackers, bagels, or bread, even if it's the few stale 3-month old crackers at the bottom of the box. Wheat is addictive in the sense that there is a distinct withdrawal syndrome characterized by overwhelming fatigue, mental "fog," inability to exercise, even depression that lasts several days, occasionally several weeks. Wheat is addictive in the sense that the withdrawal process can be provoked by administering an opiate-blocking drug such as naloxone or naltrexone.

But the "high" of wheat is not like the high of heroine, morphine, or Oxycontin. This opiate, while it binds to the opiate receptors of the brain, doesn't make us high. It makes us hungry.

This is the effect exerted by gliadin, the protein in wheat that was inadvertently altered by geneticists in the 1970s during efforts to increase yield. Just a few shifts in amino acids and gliadin in modern high-yield, semi-dwarf wheat became a potent appetite stimulant.

Wheat stimulates appetite. Wheat stimulates calorie consumption: 440 more calories per day, 365 days per year, for every man, woman, and child. (440 calories per person per day is the average.) We experience this, sense the weight gain that is coming and we push our plate away, settle for smaller portions, increase exercise more and more . . . yet continue to gain, and gain, and gain. Ask your friends and neighbors who try to include more "healthy whole grains" in their diet. They exercise, eat a "well-balanced diet" . . . yet gained 10, 20, 30, 70 pounds over the past several years. Accuse your friends of drinking too much Coca Cola by the liter bottle, or being gluttonous at the all-you-can-eat buffet and you will likely receive a black eye. Many of these people are actually trying quite hard to control impulse, appetite, portion control, and weight, but are losing the battle with this appetite-stimulating opiate in wheat.

Ignorance of the gliadin effect of wheat is responsible for the idiocy that emits from the mouths of gastroenterologists like Dr. Peter Green of Columbia University who declares:

"We tell people we don't think a gluten-free diet is a very healthy diet . . . Gluten-free substitutes for food with gluten have added fat and sugar. Celiac patients often gain weight and their cholesterol levels go up. The bulk of the world is eating wheat. The bulk of people who are eating this are doing perfectly well unless they have celiac disease."

In the simple minded thinking of the gastroenterology and celiac world, if you don't have celiac disease, you should eat all the wheat you want . . . and never mind about the appetite-stimulating effects of gliadin, not to mention the intestinal disruption and leakiness generated by wheat lectins, or the high blood sugars and insulin of the amylopectin A of wheat, or the new allergies being generated by the new alpha amylases of modern wheat.

Jelly beans and ice cream

What if I said: "Eliminate all wheat from your diet and replace it with all the jelly beans and ice cream you want."

That would be stupid, wouldn't it? Eliminate one rotten thing in diet--modern high-yield, semi-dwarf wheat products that stimulate appetite (via gliadin), send blood sugar through the roof (via amylopectin A), and disrupt the normal intestinal barriers to foreign substances (via the lectin, wheat germ agglutinin)--and replace it with something else that has its own set of problems, in this case sugary foods. How about a few other stupid replacements: Replace your drunken, foul-mouthed binges with wife beating? Replace cigarette smoking with excessive bourbon?

Sugary carbohydrate-rich foods like jelly beans and ice cream are not good for us because:

1) High blood sugar causes endogenous glycation, i.e, glucose modification of long-lived proteins in the body. Glycate the proteins in the lenses of your eyes, you get cataracts. Glycate cartilage proteins in the cartilage of your hips and knees, you get brittle cartilage that erodes and causes arthritis. Glycate structural proteins in your arteries and you get hypertension (stiff arteries) and atherosclerosis. Small LDL particles--the #1 cause of heart disease in the U.S. today--are both triggered by blood sugar rises and are 8-fold more prone to glycation (and thereby oxidation).

2) High blood sugar is inevitably accompanied by high blood insulin. Repetitive surges in insulin lead to <em>insulin resistance</em>, i.e., muscles, liver, and fat cells unresponsive to insulin. This forces your poor tired pancreas to produce even more insulin, which causes even more insulin resistance, and round and round in a vicious cycle. This leads to visceral fat accumulation (Jelly Bean Belly!), which is highly inflammatory, further worsening insulin resistance via various inflammatory mediators like tumor necrosis factor.

3) Sugary foods, i.e., sucrose- or high-fructose corn syrup-sweetened, are sources of fructose, a truly very, very bad sugar that is metabolized via a completely separate pathway from glucose. Fructose is 10-fold more likely to induce glycation of proteins than glucose. It also provokes a (delayed) rise in insulin resistance, accumulation of triglycerides, marked increase in formation of small LDL particles, and delayed postprandial (after-eating) clearance of the lipoprotein byproducts of meals, all of which leads to diabetes, hypertension, and atherosclerosis.

I think we can all agree that replacing wheat with jelly beans and ice cream is not a good solution. And, no, we shouldn't have drunken binges, wife beating, smoking or bourbon to excess. So why does the "gluten-free" community advocate replacing wheat with products made with:

rice starch, tapioca starch, potato starch, and cornstarch?

These powdered starches are among the few foods that increase blood sugar (and thereby provoke glycation and insulin) higher than even the amylopectin A of wheat! For instance, two slices of whole wheat bread typically increase blood sugar in a slender, non-diabetic person to around 170 mg/dl. Two slices of gluten-free, multigrain bread will increase blood sugar typically to 180-190 mg/dl.

The fatal flaw in thinking surrounding gluten-free junk carbohydrates is this: If a food lacks some undesirable ingredient, then it must be good. This is the same fatally flawed thinking that led people to believe, for instance, that Snack Well low-fat cookies were healthy: because they lacked fat. Or processed foods made with hydrogenated oils were healthy because they lacked saturated fat.

So gluten-free foods made with junk carbohydrates are good because they lack gluten? No. Gluten-free foods made with rice starch, tapioca starch, potato starch, and cornstarch are destructive foods that NOBODY should be eating.

This is why the recipes for muffins, cupcakes, cookies, etc. in this blog, the Track Your Plaque website, and the Track Your Plaque Cookbook are wheat- and gluten-free and free of gluten-free junk carbohydrates. And put that bottle of Jim Beam down!

Diet by LDL

Conventional notions of heart healthy diets, such as that advocated by the American Heart Association, are largely based on observations of total and LDL cholesterol.

So, cut the saturated fat in the diet, cut the overall fat content, and replace them with polyunsaturated oils like safflower, corn, and vegetable oils and increase consumption of whole grains and total and LDL cholesterol show a modest downturn. Thus, diets like the American Heart Association Total Lifestyle Change approach advocate limiting total fat to no more 25 to 35% of calories and saturated fat to no more than 7% of calories.

Orange Cream Cookies

If you loved Creamsicles as a kid, you'll love these Orange Cream Cookies. (Sorry, no photo: We ate them up before I realized we hadn't taken the photo. And, worse, we did it twice!)

Ingredients:
2 cups almond meal
2 tablespoons coconut flour
1 teaspoon baking soda
½ teaspoon sea salt
¼ cup golden raisins
½ cup chopped pecans
Sweetener equivalent to 1 cup sugar
2 tablespoons finely-grated orange rind
1 large egg
2 tablespoons coconut oil, melted
½ cup whipping cream (or coconut milk)
1 tablespoon vanilla extract

Preheat oven to 350º F.

Combine almond meal, coconut flour, baking soda, salt, raisins, pecans, sweetener and orange zest in bowl and mix.

In separate bowl, whisk egg, then add coconut oil, whipping cream, vanilla extract and mix together. Pour wet mix into dry and blend by hand thoroughly.

Spoon onto parchment paper-lined baking pan (or oiled pan) and flatten with spoon to ½-¾ inch thickness. Bake for 20-25 minutes or until toothpick withdraws dry.

Why are heart attacks still happening?

I'm a cardiologist. I see patients with heart disease in the form of coronary artery disease every day.

These are people who have undergone bypass surgery, received one or more stents or undergone other forms of angioplasty, have survived heart attacks or sudden cardiac death, or have high heart scan scores. In short, I see patients every day who are at high-risk for heart attack and death from heart disease.

But I see virtually no heart attacks. And nobody is dying from heart disease. (I'm referring to the people who follow the strategies I advocate, not the guy who thinks that smoking a pack of cigarettes a day is still okay, or the woman who thinks the diet is unnecessary because she's slender.)

Two high-profile deaths from heart attacks occurred this week:

Davy Jones--The iconic singer from the 1960s pop group, the Monkees, suffered sudden cardiac death after a large heart attack, just hours after experiencing chest pain.

Andrew Breitbart--The conservative blogger and controversy-generating media personality suffered what was believed to be sudden cardiac death while walking.

It's a darn shame and it shouldn't happen. The tools to identify the potential for heart attack are available, inexpensive, and simple. The strategies to reduce, even eliminate, risk are likewise available, inexpensive, and cultivate overall health.

The followers of the Track Your Plaque program who

1) get a heart scan that yields a coronary calcium score (for long-term tracking purposes)
2) identify the causes such as small LDL particles, lipoprotein(a), vitamin D deficiency, and thyroid dysfunction
3) correct the causes

enjoy virtual elimination of risk.

My letter to the Wall Street Journal: It's NOT just about gluten

The Wall Street Journal carried this report of a new proposed classification of the various forms of gluten sensitivity: New Guide to Who Really Shouldn't Eat Gluten

This represents progress. Progress in understanding of wheat-related illnesses, as well as progress in spreading the word that there is a lot more to wheat-intolerance than celiac disease. But, as I mention in the letter, it falls desperately short on several crucial issues.

Ms. Beck--

Thank you for writing the wonderful article on gluten sensitivity.

I'd like to bring several issues to your attention, as they are often neglected
in discussions of "gluten sensitivity":

1) The gliadin protein of wheat has been modified by geneticists through their
work to increase yield. This work, performed mostly in the 1970s, yielded a form
of gliadin that is several amino acids different, but increased the
appetite-stimulating properties of wheat. Modern wheat, a high-yield, semi-dwarf
strain (not the 4 1/2-foot tall "amber waves of grain" everyone thinks of) is
now, in effect, an appetite-stimulant that increases calorie intake 400 calories
per day. This form of gliadin is also the likely explanation for the surge in
behavioral struggles in children with autism and ADHD.
2) The amylopectin A of wheat is the underlying explanation for why two slices
of whole wheat bread raise blood sugar higher than 6 teaspoons of table sugar or
many candy bars. It is unique and highly digestible by the enzyme amylase.
Incredibly, the high glycemic index of whole wheat is simply ignored, despite
being listed at the top of all tables of glycemic index.
3) The lectins of wheat may underlie the increase in multiple autoimmune and
inflammatory diseases in Americans, especially rheumatoid arthritis and
inflammatory bowel diseases (ulcerative colitis, Crohn's).

In other words, if someone is not gluten-sensitive, they may still remain
sensitive to the many non-gluten aspects of modern high-yield semi-dwarf wheat,
such as appetite-stimulation and mental "fog," joint pains in the hands, leg
edema, or the many rashes and skin disorders. This represents one of the most
important examples of the widespread unintended effects of modern agricultural
genetics and agribusiness.

William Davis, MD
Author: Wheat Belly: Lose the wheat, lose the weight and find your path back to health
Men's lingerie is on the second floor

Men's lingerie is on the second floor

Consume wheat products, like poppyseed muffins, raisin bagels, and whole grain bread, and you trigger the 90- to 120-minute glucose-insulin cycle.

Blood glucose goes way up (more than almost any other known food), triggering insulin release from the pancreas. Glucose enters cells as a result, blood glucose plummets. You get hungry, shaky, and crabby, reach for another wheat or other sugar-generating food to start the roller coaster ride all over again.

Repetitive insulin triggering grows this thing I call a "wheat belly," the protuberant, hang-over-the-belt fat you see everywhere nowadays. Wheat belly fat is really visceral fat. Visceral fat means you have fat kidneys, fat intestines, fat pancreas, and fat liver, all causing the belly to protrude in the familiar way we've all come to recognize.

Visceral fat is special fat. Unlike the fat in the backside, thighs, or arms, visceral fat triggers inflammatory responses that are evident in such measures as tumor necrosis factor, interleukins, and leptin, as well as drops in the protective hormone, adiponectin.

Visceral fat also, oddly, triggers estrogen release. Estrogen triggers growth of breast tissue. That's why females with wheat bellies have up to four-fold (400%) greater likelihood of breast cancer.

Men also experience excess estrogen from the visceral fat wheat belly, causing "man boobs." This B-cup phenomenon means that inflammation is raging beneath the surface, all due to this thing you're wearing around your waist.

I wasn't aware until recently that male breast reduction surgery is a booming business growing at double-digit rates. So are special clothes to help men conceal their expansive breasts.

Perhaps the USDA is in cahoots with Playtex.

Comments (33) -

  • nonegiven

    8/7/2010 6:13:41 PM |

    And yet if you read a typical article on "gynecomastia" you'll rarely see anything suggesting a problem with feeding plant estrogens (like processed soy foods) and insulin-spiking foods (like wheat and grain products) to growing male babies, children, and adolescents.  Usually the focus on on the remedy.

    "Moobs" seem to  a growing phenomenon that rapidly increased with the rise in soy and processed grain consumption during the past 3 decades, though it may also be due to everyone's increased awareness of appearances or the Seinfeld episode with Kramer's invention of a "mansierre" and similar media references.  I was never really aware specifically of the existence of "man-boobs" until the late 1980s and even then, I noticed it mostly on overweight middle-aged and older men  and thought the condition on slim men to be extremely rare (turns out it isn't).  I never heard any slang terms  until just a few years ago and now I regularly hear quite a few names for it.  It seems like the condition is everywhere at every age and weight level now - I don't think I was less observant 25 or 30 years ago.   Even grade school kids are aware of the condition and slang names, though if they eat the school lunches, they'll likely end up with their own set.

  • Franklin Mason

    8/7/2010 6:23:23 PM |

    Nicely said.

    The world we live in is a strange one. Man boobs - moobs - are now so common that they seem to elicit little or no attention. I was at a pool recently with the wife and kids, and moobs were present in abundance. Perhaps we've come to think of them as inevitable, as we seem to think that tooth decay, myopia, diabetes, heart disease, dementia all the other diseases of civilization are inevitable concomitants of being human.

    As John Durant recently said over at Hunter-Gatherer, we need a new concept of normal. Disease isn't normal. Health is normal. And we must come to recognize that only when we aren't lean, fit and ready for whatever the world thows us  - when, for instance, moobs begin to sprout on our boys- something has gone very wrong.

  • Anonymous

    8/7/2010 9:13:30 PM |

    So funny but true.  I like to run quite regularly and have some friends into running also.  They love to 'carb up' before a race!!  Yet, they can't figure out how to loose that bit of belly hanging over their belt w/o extreme excercise or calorie restriction.  I've been doing VLC (very low carb) for about 2 years now.  I've got no 'wheat belly' to be found Smile.  Maybe I'll let'em in on my little secret!  Age of these guys are a couple in 40's and one is 60.  So funny, I see them eat their bannana and grape nuts/shredded wheat every morning.  It seems an impossible task to lift the veil that 'FAT is bad for you' montra that's been lied to us the last 30 years.  Keep doing what your doing Dr. Davis.

  • Tommy

    8/7/2010 10:38:04 PM |

    I eat bananas every day. I eat a lot of fruit. I have 1/2 cup of rolled oats (which I soak overnight with an acid medium) every morning, with ground flax and cottage cheese...been doing it for years. I also have quinoa daily and most weeks brown rice also at dinner which I also soak. Lots of veggies. No bread, no wheat no sugar or anything containing sugar. No processed foods. I don't have a belly and as a matter of fact I have a hard time keeping any weight on. I'm 53 years old 5'10" and currently 169.5 lbs. I don't eat till I'm full and I eat pretty big portions...any more would be ridiculous.  I prefer being around 173 or at least 170 but weight just falls off of me. I'd say I eat moderate carbs.  Every one is different.  I think I eat sensibly and pretty traditional. Eggs, chicken, meat in small portions (3-5 oz) soaked grains in moderation, lots of veggies and fruit, water and raw milk, walnuts and almonds, ground flax, extra vitamin D and fish oil capsules. I exercise a lot and have for the last 30 years or more.

  • Kevin

    8/7/2010 11:24:58 PM |

    I think the problem is a bit more complicated than just too much wheat.  With age men's testosterone levels decline while estrogen levels go up.  Men in their 50's can have hormone patterns similar to a woman.  And if a man develops BPH, the medications that allow him to get a full night's sleep suppress his testosterone levels while leaving estrogen unchecked.  Being 54 with BPH I worry about gynecomastia.  I used beta-sitosterol as an alternative to alpha reductase inhibitors but recently found articles that say sterols like beta-sitosterol cause the same side effects as Proscar.  My weight now is less than when I was in high school in 1973.   I follow the Sears antiinflammation diet.  

    kevin

  • Anonymous

    8/7/2010 11:45:26 PM |

    Is it wheat or the carbs in the wheat that's the villain?  

    If it's the wheat, should both soluble and insoluble fiber be avoided?

    Also, the poppyseed reference seems kinda random... is there something particular about poppy seeds?

  • Anonymous

    8/7/2010 11:46:36 PM |

    Thanks for the laugh with the post title!

    At 260 lbs on my 5'7" frame as of May 13, I had "wheat belly," and lots of it, along with dangerously high LDL, low HDL and high triglycerides, and, ironically, borderline hyperthyroidism at .34 TSH.  That was also around the time I discovered this blog.

    Since June 11, I've  been grain-free except for flaxseed; have not had any processed foods; cut down on added salt; have had nothing to drink except water and unsweetended almond milk; have had only lean meats to eat; greatly increased my intake of vegetables (mostly leafy green, i.e., kale, Swiss chard, spinach, red/grean leaf lettuce with some occasional asparagus and broccoli); have had  minimal dairy (maybe 4-8 ounces of cheese per week, at most); and some avocado, and a little fruit.

    As of July 21, I'd lost only 18lbs even though my hyperthyroidism is all but confirmed (TSH dropped to .19 as of 7/8 and lots of symptoms have hit).  Since then, I don't feel as if I have dropped an ounce, my clothes feel the same in terms of fit, and of course, I still have plenty of "wheat belly."

    Next weigh-in is on Friday, 8/13, when I see my endocrinologist for the 1st time.  How bad is my luck that I can't lose weight quickly on a very low carb diet AND with hyperthyroidism?!

  • Dr. William Davis

    8/7/2010 11:48:13 PM |

    My wife tells me that Playtex is no longer in the bra business.

    Oh well. It was the only bra manufacturer that I popped off the tip of my tongue.

    Franklin--

    Yes, well said. I, too, worry more about our children and the strange dietary legacy we leave.

    I constantly have to remind patients, family, and friends that what we hear on TV, radio, read in magazines, etc. is largely driven by industry, easily drowning out the message that we are trying to disseminate.

  • Anonymous

    8/8/2010 3:30:38 AM |

    I have heard of "beer belly" and clearly its occurrence is ubiquitous, but "wheat belly" is something new. Are they the same thing or are we talking about a different condition?

  • puddle

    8/8/2010 5:49:33 AM |

    Moobs are *not* a new phenomenon, lol!  Take a look at very old Buddha figurines. . . .
    But, *more* for sure.  

    But anyone interested needs to look at pollution (air, water, food) and see how much of it is pseudoestrogens.  We are feminizing a whole generation of baby boys.

  • Trey

    8/8/2010 8:51:08 AM |

    I appreciate the low carb/preventing insulin release science, but how the heck do people maintain muscle mass on a low carb diet?  Short sets can only be fueled by muscle glycogen, so how does one support their weight training on such a low carb diet?

  • Larry

    8/8/2010 11:28:46 AM |

    Dr Davis,
    Have you looked into the Primal Blueprint at www.Marksdailyapple,com ?

    That lifestyle is pretty much what you're trying to tell us about.

  • Jason

    8/8/2010 11:43:21 AM |

    Hi dr davis

    Im drinking protein supplements and i dont know that glutamine peptides is from wheat protein.

    What can you say about artifial sweetener acesulfame potassium in the ingredients of most whey supplements??

  • Anonymous

    8/8/2010 2:06:45 PM |

    Trey,

    go to bodybyscience.net for answers about conserving muscle mass

    Jeanne

  • Dr. William Davis

    8/8/2010 5:19:44 PM |

    Hi, Puddle--

    Excellent point.

    I do believe, however, that high-carbohydrate eating and obesity are typically accompanied by the man boob phenomenon. I rarely see them in slender men who might "just" have exposure to pseudoestrogens.

  • Anonymous

    8/8/2010 8:55:08 PM |

    Dr. Davis, this must be the funniest post you have ever written. My husband thankfully didn't have moobs, but he had wheat belly and "Cheerio" face. One day I gathered up all the "heart healthy" whole wheat bread, Cheerios, Kashi bars and crackers and put them in a big garbage bag for the trashman.

    He was not especially pleased, but with the exception of ferreting out a couple of stale Girl Scout cookies late one night (I call this "carbdar") he was good about it. Then one morning about 6 weeks later, he came flying out of the bedroom with his shirt up pointing to his belly, which was significantly reduced. He is quite pleased with himself now.

    Thanks for taking the time to write this blog. We had diner last evening with a good friend who is a head of cardiology at a large suburban hospital. In short, he hasn't a clue when it comes to nutrition. Do you see any progress with cardiologists in this area? Or are they all just Statinators?

  • stop smoking help

    8/8/2010 10:16:15 PM |

    Okay, okay, I give. I don't want any man boobs! I'll try going wheat free for two weeks and see if I notice a difference in all this stuff that I read about on this blog.

    So no wheat products and watch my carbs, right? Fruits/veggie carbs good, wheat/sugar carbs bad.

    I'm also going to start cooking with coconut oil. George Dejohn in Dallas has talked it up on his radio program, so I'm going to finally give that a try as well.

    Wish me luck. I think I'll be going through withdrawal cravings, big time.

  • Anonymous

    8/8/2010 10:19:28 PM |

    Dr Davis

    with regard to the comment on Budhas moobs it is very funny. My take is him being located in a wheat eating country - India could have contributed to his moobs (nice catch puddle) and perhaps the neurotoxins in the wheat gave him the nirvana experience *snicker snicker*

  • Anonymous

    8/8/2010 10:23:03 PM |

    to add to the above

    its the Laughing buddha with moobs and wheat belly not the Nirvana Buddha!

  • Anonymous

    8/8/2010 11:40:41 PM |

    Hi,

    I tried to help out many people but it seems hopeless at this point. Most don't believe me. I even tried to provide studies, etc but they refuse to do so. I hope that we eventually break through but as long as drug companies, etc continue to control things, it's going to be tough no matter what. It appears to be all about profits and federal gov't is for that. What a shame...

  • Anonymous

    8/9/2010 7:56:14 AM |

    stopsmoking: You are not serious, are you? You intend to eat no wheat for two weeks and I suppose you expect results at the end of two weeks? That means you are looking for a QuickFix - but your body is not a machine with a reset button. You will have to invest a little more time and patience.

  • Peter

    8/9/2010 12:26:08 PM |

    I wonder what makes sense for poor countries.  I see that Sonia Ghandi wants to wipe out malnutrition by giving every poor family a 77 pund bag of grain, sugar, and kerosene each month.

  • stop smoking help

    8/9/2010 6:03:58 PM |

    Anonymous - Fortunately, I'm pretty healthy and don't have anything to get a quick fix for, except a little belly fat. I just want to see if I can stop eating this for two weeks, then I'll see how I feel. When I stopped drinking sodas, I did feel better after two weeks. Nothing I could put into words, just better. That's what I meant by see how I feel.

    What will probably happen is I will have proved to myself that I can go at least 2 weeks without, so I'll start another 2 week goal. That's what I did with sodas and it worked out pretty well - 4 years without a coke!

  • billye

    8/9/2010 7:13:30 PM |

    Hi Anon,

    260 lbs and 5' 7" sounds typical.  Don't be so hard on your self.  The version of a low carb program you describe sounds lacking.  I have lost 55 pounds over about 18 months and holding.  I get it that you are frustrated.  You do not lose weight on a straight line on a low carb program.  You are not taking homeostasis in to account.  That is the body fighting you to keep your system in balance, therefor, you will hit plateaus, and because we are all different,  the duration between a weight drop could take weeks or even months.  But, rest assured the weight loss will start again.  It didn't take a few weeks to put on most of your weight and your body will fight to keep it on, because, it thinks famine is upon you.  If you think that just giving up wheat is going to solve all of your health problems, get over it.  Our idea of a health supporting evolutionary lifestyle that works is high saturated fat and unlimited flesh with a few very low starch veggies and a few not very sweet berries (1 cup daily mostly blue berries).  Don't worry about quantity, let your hunger drive limit you.  Eating as an evolutionary lifestyle dictates will automatically stop hunger and give you satiety.  After 18 months on our program my diabetes type 2is cured along with obesity.  I can't tell you every thing in this short comment, but, talk it over with your doctor and see what he thinks before you proceed.

    Billy E
    Editor, evmedforum.com

  • Jaime

    8/9/2010 8:22:07 PM |

    I am so the poster child of this syndrome.  Therefore, I've started my own blog on how to combat it.  I stubbled on you while trying to research other blogs that are somewhat like mine.  I love this.  You are brilliant.  Please visit mine, while rudimentary, I do believe we share the same concepts of health.  www.appleandpears.com

  • Dr. William Davis

    8/9/2010 8:25:02 PM |

    Hi, Anonymous--

    Sadly, my colleagues are still trapped somewhere in "low-fat, take your Lipitor" land.

    Anyone who has tested small LDL as many times as I have eventually comes to realize that the carbohydrates are the culprit, not the fat.

  • Davide

    8/10/2010 1:34:21 AM |

    Although not directly related to this post, have you ever read this published study?

    http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/134/10/2517

    The reason why I ask, is because I have never heard you mention the relevant association between genotype and LDL size.

  • LeonRover

    8/10/2010 10:17:43 AM |

    Hello Doctor Davis

    It seems to me you are describing a "hypos", just like those my newly diagnosed T1 step-son suffered from, until he learned to over-eat for his insulin dose. This in otherwise normal people would seem to be a failure of the glucagon response, whose function is to release glucose to the blood via glycogenolysis.

    Recent food tests seem to show that many proteins induce as much insulin to the bloodstream as some carbohydrates do, which naturally enough reduces BG - as well as storing protein - and the glucagon response then steps in if BG goes too low.

    You know this middle aged visceral fat used also to be called "beer belly", and according to some might even be re-labeled "fructose belly".
    My point is, wheat may be cause in some, but there are other foods which manage to produce the same effects.

  • chet Holmes

    8/10/2010 12:06:27 PM |

    your article is very nice, i have found good information from this. Even i have found good information about Chet Holmes

  • CarbSane

    8/10/2010 1:30:32 PM |

    Umm ... Playtex still makes bras!
    http://www.google.com/search?aq=f&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=playtex+bras

    Also, the "bloop" over the belt is not visceral fat, it is subcutaneous fat.  It's the hard bellies that look like a pregnant woman that are mostly visceral fat under the abs around the organs that is pushing outward.  Two good tests to distinguish the two are whether you can squeeze a roll (sub-Q) or how much disappears when you try to hold in your tummy really hard (sub-Q fat cannot be held in).  

    I'm curious about the estrogen link.  In women, menopausal reductions in estrogen production are associated with increased VAT -- not weight gain per se but a shift of SCAT to VAT.  If VAT produces estrogen, is this nature's version of HRT? -- stimulating our secondary estrogen producing "organ" when the first one shuts down?  That seems odd given the negative metabolic consequences of VAT accumulation.

  • Aaron Houssian

    8/11/2010 2:12:40 PM |

    So Dr. Davis do you mean wheat or all grains?  I eat very little wheat (no breads or cereals here as we have kids that are gluten/casein free) but I do enjoy the rye bread that is popular here in Europe with my lunches.

  • Contemplationist

    9/10/2010 6:21:34 PM |

    LOL The USDA Playtex line was hilarious. But who knows anymore? Ours is a crazy world where the elites are completely wrong and unwilling to acknowledge it, while attacking others as idiots.

  • Mens Fitness

    9/13/2010 10:27:19 AM |

    William Davis has written a very information to and knowledge about heart disease in men

Loading