Green coffee bean extract in AGF Factor I

Track Your Plaque's new and proprietary formulation, AGF Factor I, is designed to to support a program to achieve low levels of endogenous glycation.

Endogenous glycation, discussed at length in a recent Track Your Plaque Special Report, makes LDL particles (especially small LDL particles) more prone to oxidation and thereby more atherogenic, i.e., more likely to contribute to atherosclerotic plaque. Endogenous glycation also exerts unhealthy effects on long-lived proteins in the body, such as the proteins in the lenses of your eyes (cataracts), the lining of arteries (hypertension), and the cartilage cells of joints (brittle cartilage and arthritis).

Endogenous glycation is reduced by slashing carbohydrates in the diet, especially the most offensive carbohydrates of all, the amylopectin A of wheat, sucrose, high-fructose corn syrup and other fructose sources. Endogenous glycation can also be blocked by using blockers of the glycation reaction, such as benfotiamine (lipid-soluble thiamine), pyridoxal-5'-phosphate (a form of vitamin B6 with greater glycation blocking effect), and chlorogenic acid from green coffee beans, all components of AGF Factor I, which also contains Portulaca oleracea (Portusana), or purslane, for reduction of glucose.

Green coffee bean extract, and thereby chlorogenic acid, is receiving increased attention, most recently due to a study demonstrating substantial weight loss with 750-1050 mg green coffee bean extract, providing approximately 325-500 mg chlorogenic acid per day. Participants lost 15.4 pounds over 8 weeks at the higher dose (500 mg chlorogenic acid per day), while participants lost 8.8 pounds over 8 weeks at the lower dose (325 mg chlorogenic acid per day).

AGF Factor I was not formulated for weight loss but, taken twice or three times per day, does indeed mimic the dose of chlorogenic acid from green coffee bean extract used in the weight loss study. If you wish to take advantage of this application of chlorogenic acid/green coffee bean extract, while also maximizing protection from endogenous glycation, our AGF Factor I is one excellent choice to do so.

Lessons learned from the 2012 Low-carb Cruise

I just returned from Jimmy Moore's Low-carb Cruise, a 7-day excursion to Jamaica, Grand Cayman Island, and Cozumel aboard the Carnival Magic. During our 7 wonderful days, a number of authors and experts spoke, each offering their unique perspective on the low-carb world. The focus was the science, experience, and practical application of low-carbohydrate diets.

The event kicked off with a roast by Tom Naughton of Fat Head fame, who entertained with his insightful low-carb humor and predictions of my demise at the hands of Monsanto!

Among the most important lessons provided:

Dr. Andreas Eenfeldt of the Diet Doctor blog discussed how Sweden is leading the world as the nation with the most vigorous low-carbohydrate following, witnessing incredible weight loss and reversal of carbohydrate-related diseases way ahead of the U.S. experience. I spent several hours with Dr. Eenfeldt who, besides being an engaging speaker, is a new father and an all-around gentleman. At 6 ft, 7 inches, he also towered high above all of us.

Dr. Eric Westman of Duke University and author of The New Atkins for a New You, debunked low-carbohydrate myths, such as "low-carb diets are high-protein diets that make your kidneys explode."

Dr. John Briffa, creator of the popular blog, Dr. John Briffa: A Good Look at Good Health, and author of the wonderfully straightforward primer to low-carbohydrate eating, Escape the Diet Trap, stressed the importance of never allowing hunger to rule behavior. Dr. Briffa's serious writing tone conceals an incredible charm and wit that took me by surprise, having spent several thoroughly engaging hours over breakfast, lunch, and dinner with him over the week.

Fred Hahn, exercise expert, founder of Serious Strength and author of Slow Burn Fitness Revolution and Strong Kids, Healthy Kids, debunked a number of trendy exercise methods, boiling many of the purported benefits of exercise down to that of increased strength.

Dr. Chris Masterjohn of The Daily Lipid and supporter of the Weston A. Price Foundation program, provided a comprehensive overview of the data that fails to link saturated fat with heart disease. He also helped me understand the analytical techniques used in studies of advanced glycation end-products.

Denise Minger, brilliant young usurper of China Study dogma and blogger at Raw Foods SOS, proved an engaging speaker and a truly real person (since some critics of her analyses have actually questioned whether there was even such a person!). She also proved every bit as likable as she seems in her captivating blog discussions.

Dr. Jeff Volek, prolific researcher from University of Connecticut, author of over 200 studies validating low-carbohydrate diet effects, and author of the recently released book with Dr. Stephen Phinney, The Art and Science of Low Carbohydrate Living, debunked myths behind carbohydrate dependence and "loading" by athletes. He also talked about how assessing blood ketones may be the gold standard method to ensure low-grade ketosis on a long-term low-carb effort.

Over a bottle of wine, Jimmy Moore and I reminisced over how his modest start with no experience in blogging or media has now ballooned to an audience of over 100,000 readers/viewers.

All in all, Jimmy's Low-carb Cruise experience was worth every minute, with many wonderful lessons and memories!

Chili Sesame Crackers

Looking for something hot and crunchy?

These chili sesame crackers are perfect for dipping into hummus or salsa. As written, the recipe yields a moderately spicy cracker that you can modify readily by increasing or decreasing quantities of cayenne pepper and Tabasco sauce.

This recipe uses sesame seeds as the "flour." Either brown sesame seeds or the lighter version work, though the lighter seeds yield a slightly less bitter flavor with the spices.

For ease of baking, a shallow baking pan measuring 11 x 17 inches works best, as it allows the batter to fill the pan and spread to a cracker thickness. With a smaller pan, you may have to bake in two batches.

Makes approximately 30 chips

2 cups raw sesame seeds
1 cup shredded Parmesan cheese
2 tablespoons extra-virgin olive oil
1 tablespoon chili powder
½ teaspoon cayenne pepper
2 teaspoons onion powder
1 teaspoon garlic powder
1 teaspoon dry mustard
1 teaspoon sea salt
1 teaspoon Tabasco sauce
1¼ cups water

Preheat oven to 350º F.

In food chopper or food processor, grind 1¼ cups sesame seeds to fine meal. Remove and place in large bowl.

Place shredded Parmesan cheese in food chopper or food processor and pulse briefly until reduced to granular consistency. Add to sesame seed meal and mix. Stir in olive oil.

Add remaining (unground) sesame seeds, chili powder, cayenne pepper, onion and garlic powder, mustard, sea salt and mix thoroughly. Add Tabasco sauce and water and mix. Add additional water, if necessary, one tablespoon at a time, to obtain a consistency similar to pancake batter.

Pour mixture into baking pan and smooth to fill pan and obtain a thickness of a cracker. If too thick, remove some batter and re-smooth. Optionally, roll a clean cylindrical glass or bottle over top to smooth and yield a consistent thickness.

Bake for 30 minutes or until edges browned and center firm. If a dry, extra crunchy cracker is designed, bake an additional 10-15 minutes at 250 degrees F.

Remove and allow to cool. Cut with pizza cutter to desired size.

Opiate of the masses

Although it is a central premise of the whole Wheat Belly argument and the starting strategy in the New Track Your Plaque Diet, I fear that some people haven't fully gotten the message:

Modern wheat is an opiate.

And, of course, I don't mean that wheat is an opiate in the sense that you like it so much that you feel you are addicted. Wheat is truly addictive.

Wheat is addictive in the sense that it comes to dominate thoughts and behaviors. Wheat is addictive in the sense that, if you don't have any for several hours, you start to get nervous, foggy, tremulous, and start desperately seeking out another "hit" of crackers, bagels, or bread, even if it's the few stale 3-month old crackers at the bottom of the box. Wheat is addictive in the sense that there is a distinct withdrawal syndrome characterized by overwhelming fatigue, mental "fog," inability to exercise, even depression that lasts several days, occasionally several weeks. Wheat is addictive in the sense that the withdrawal process can be provoked by administering an opiate-blocking drug such as naloxone or naltrexone.

But the "high" of wheat is not like the high of heroine, morphine, or Oxycontin. This opiate, while it binds to the opiate receptors of the brain, doesn't make us high. It makes us hungry.

This is the effect exerted by gliadin, the protein in wheat that was inadvertently altered by geneticists in the 1970s during efforts to increase yield. Just a few shifts in amino acids and gliadin in modern high-yield, semi-dwarf wheat became a potent appetite stimulant.

Wheat stimulates appetite. Wheat stimulates calorie consumption: 440 more calories per day, 365 days per year, for every man, woman, and child. (440 calories per person per day is the average.) We experience this, sense the weight gain that is coming and we push our plate away, settle for smaller portions, increase exercise more and more . . . yet continue to gain, and gain, and gain. Ask your friends and neighbors who try to include more "healthy whole grains" in their diet. They exercise, eat a "well-balanced diet" . . . yet gained 10, 20, 30, 70 pounds over the past several years. Accuse your friends of drinking too much Coca Cola by the liter bottle, or being gluttonous at the all-you-can-eat buffet and you will likely receive a black eye. Many of these people are actually trying quite hard to control impulse, appetite, portion control, and weight, but are losing the battle with this appetite-stimulating opiate in wheat.

Ignorance of the gliadin effect of wheat is responsible for the idiocy that emits from the mouths of gastroenterologists like Dr. Peter Green of Columbia University who declares:

"We tell people we don't think a gluten-free diet is a very healthy diet . . . Gluten-free substitutes for food with gluten have added fat and sugar. Celiac patients often gain weight and their cholesterol levels go up. The bulk of the world is eating wheat. The bulk of people who are eating this are doing perfectly well unless they have celiac disease."

In the simple minded thinking of the gastroenterology and celiac world, if you don't have celiac disease, you should eat all the wheat you want . . . and never mind about the appetite-stimulating effects of gliadin, not to mention the intestinal disruption and leakiness generated by wheat lectins, or the high blood sugars and insulin of the amylopectin A of wheat, or the new allergies being generated by the new alpha amylases of modern wheat.

Jelly beans and ice cream

What if I said: "Eliminate all wheat from your diet and replace it with all the jelly beans and ice cream you want."

That would be stupid, wouldn't it? Eliminate one rotten thing in diet--modern high-yield, semi-dwarf wheat products that stimulate appetite (via gliadin), send blood sugar through the roof (via amylopectin A), and disrupt the normal intestinal barriers to foreign substances (via the lectin, wheat germ agglutinin)--and replace it with something else that has its own set of problems, in this case sugary foods. How about a few other stupid replacements: Replace your drunken, foul-mouthed binges with wife beating? Replace cigarette smoking with excessive bourbon?

Sugary carbohydrate-rich foods like jelly beans and ice cream are not good for us because:

1) High blood sugar causes endogenous glycation, i.e, glucose modification of long-lived proteins in the body. Glycate the proteins in the lenses of your eyes, you get cataracts. Glycate cartilage proteins in the cartilage of your hips and knees, you get brittle cartilage that erodes and causes arthritis. Glycate structural proteins in your arteries and you get hypertension (stiff arteries) and atherosclerosis. Small LDL particles--the #1 cause of heart disease in the U.S. today--are both triggered by blood sugar rises and are 8-fold more prone to glycation (and thereby oxidation).

2) High blood sugar is inevitably accompanied by high blood insulin. Repetitive surges in insulin lead to <em>insulin resistance</em>, i.e., muscles, liver, and fat cells unresponsive to insulin. This forces your poor tired pancreas to produce even more insulin, which causes even more insulin resistance, and round and round in a vicious cycle. This leads to visceral fat accumulation (Jelly Bean Belly!), which is highly inflammatory, further worsening insulin resistance via various inflammatory mediators like tumor necrosis factor.

3) Sugary foods, i.e., sucrose- or high-fructose corn syrup-sweetened, are sources of fructose, a truly very, very bad sugar that is metabolized via a completely separate pathway from glucose. Fructose is 10-fold more likely to induce glycation of proteins than glucose. It also provokes a (delayed) rise in insulin resistance, accumulation of triglycerides, marked increase in formation of small LDL particles, and delayed postprandial (after-eating) clearance of the lipoprotein byproducts of meals, all of which leads to diabetes, hypertension, and atherosclerosis.

I think we can all agree that replacing wheat with jelly beans and ice cream is not a good solution. And, no, we shouldn't have drunken binges, wife beating, smoking or bourbon to excess. So why does the "gluten-free" community advocate replacing wheat with products made with:

rice starch, tapioca starch, potato starch, and cornstarch?

These powdered starches are among the few foods that increase blood sugar (and thereby provoke glycation and insulin) higher than even the amylopectin A of wheat! For instance, two slices of whole wheat bread typically increase blood sugar in a slender, non-diabetic person to around 170 mg/dl. Two slices of gluten-free, multigrain bread will increase blood sugar typically to 180-190 mg/dl.

The fatal flaw in thinking surrounding gluten-free junk carbohydrates is this: If a food lacks some undesirable ingredient, then it must be good. This is the same fatally flawed thinking that led people to believe, for instance, that Snack Well low-fat cookies were healthy: because they lacked fat. Or processed foods made with hydrogenated oils were healthy because they lacked saturated fat.

So gluten-free foods made with junk carbohydrates are good because they lack gluten? No. Gluten-free foods made with rice starch, tapioca starch, potato starch, and cornstarch are destructive foods that NOBODY should be eating.

This is why the recipes for muffins, cupcakes, cookies, etc. in this blog, the Track Your Plaque website, and the Track Your Plaque Cookbook are wheat- and gluten-free and free of gluten-free junk carbohydrates. And put that bottle of Jim Beam down!

Diet by LDL

Conventional notions of heart healthy diets, such as that advocated by the American Heart Association, are largely based on observations of total and LDL cholesterol.

So, cut the saturated fat in the diet, cut the overall fat content, and replace them with polyunsaturated oils like safflower, corn, and vegetable oils and increase consumption of whole grains and total and LDL cholesterol show a modest downturn. Thus, diets like the American Heart Association Total Lifestyle Change approach advocate limiting total fat to no more 25 to 35% of calories and saturated fat to no more than 7% of calories.

Orange Cream Cookies

If you loved Creamsicles as a kid, you'll love these Orange Cream Cookies. (Sorry, no photo: We ate them up before I realized we hadn't taken the photo. And, worse, we did it twice!)

Ingredients:
2 cups almond meal
2 tablespoons coconut flour
1 teaspoon baking soda
½ teaspoon sea salt
¼ cup golden raisins
½ cup chopped pecans
Sweetener equivalent to 1 cup sugar
2 tablespoons finely-grated orange rind
1 large egg
2 tablespoons coconut oil, melted
½ cup whipping cream (or coconut milk)
1 tablespoon vanilla extract

Preheat oven to 350º F.

Combine almond meal, coconut flour, baking soda, salt, raisins, pecans, sweetener and orange zest in bowl and mix.

In separate bowl, whisk egg, then add coconut oil, whipping cream, vanilla extract and mix together. Pour wet mix into dry and blend by hand thoroughly.

Spoon onto parchment paper-lined baking pan (or oiled pan) and flatten with spoon to ½-¾ inch thickness. Bake for 20-25 minutes or until toothpick withdraws dry.

Why are heart attacks still happening?

I'm a cardiologist. I see patients with heart disease in the form of coronary artery disease every day.

These are people who have undergone bypass surgery, received one or more stents or undergone other forms of angioplasty, have survived heart attacks or sudden cardiac death, or have high heart scan scores. In short, I see patients every day who are at high-risk for heart attack and death from heart disease.

But I see virtually no heart attacks. And nobody is dying from heart disease. (I'm referring to the people who follow the strategies I advocate, not the guy who thinks that smoking a pack of cigarettes a day is still okay, or the woman who thinks the diet is unnecessary because she's slender.)

Two high-profile deaths from heart attacks occurred this week:

Davy Jones--The iconic singer from the 1960s pop group, the Monkees, suffered sudden cardiac death after a large heart attack, just hours after experiencing chest pain.

Andrew Breitbart--The conservative blogger and controversy-generating media personality suffered what was believed to be sudden cardiac death while walking.

It's a darn shame and it shouldn't happen. The tools to identify the potential for heart attack are available, inexpensive, and simple. The strategies to reduce, even eliminate, risk are likewise available, inexpensive, and cultivate overall health.

The followers of the Track Your Plaque program who

1) get a heart scan that yields a coronary calcium score (for long-term tracking purposes)
2) identify the causes such as small LDL particles, lipoprotein(a), vitamin D deficiency, and thyroid dysfunction
3) correct the causes

enjoy virtual elimination of risk.

My letter to the Wall Street Journal: It's NOT just about gluten

The Wall Street Journal carried this report of a new proposed classification of the various forms of gluten sensitivity: New Guide to Who Really Shouldn't Eat Gluten

This represents progress. Progress in understanding of wheat-related illnesses, as well as progress in spreading the word that there is a lot more to wheat-intolerance than celiac disease. But, as I mention in the letter, it falls desperately short on several crucial issues.

Ms. Beck--

Thank you for writing the wonderful article on gluten sensitivity.

I'd like to bring several issues to your attention, as they are often neglected
in discussions of "gluten sensitivity":

1) The gliadin protein of wheat has been modified by geneticists through their
work to increase yield. This work, performed mostly in the 1970s, yielded a form
of gliadin that is several amino acids different, but increased the
appetite-stimulating properties of wheat. Modern wheat, a high-yield, semi-dwarf
strain (not the 4 1/2-foot tall "amber waves of grain" everyone thinks of) is
now, in effect, an appetite-stimulant that increases calorie intake 400 calories
per day. This form of gliadin is also the likely explanation for the surge in
behavioral struggles in children with autism and ADHD.
2) The amylopectin A of wheat is the underlying explanation for why two slices
of whole wheat bread raise blood sugar higher than 6 teaspoons of table sugar or
many candy bars. It is unique and highly digestible by the enzyme amylase.
Incredibly, the high glycemic index of whole wheat is simply ignored, despite
being listed at the top of all tables of glycemic index.
3) The lectins of wheat may underlie the increase in multiple autoimmune and
inflammatory diseases in Americans, especially rheumatoid arthritis and
inflammatory bowel diseases (ulcerative colitis, Crohn's).

In other words, if someone is not gluten-sensitive, they may still remain
sensitive to the many non-gluten aspects of modern high-yield semi-dwarf wheat,
such as appetite-stimulation and mental "fog," joint pains in the hands, leg
edema, or the many rashes and skin disorders. This represents one of the most
important examples of the widespread unintended effects of modern agricultural
genetics and agribusiness.

William Davis, MD
Author: Wheat Belly: Lose the wheat, lose the weight and find your path back to health
Battery acid and oatmeal

Battery acid and oatmeal

Ever notice the warnings on your car's battery? "Danger: Sulfuric acid. Protective eyewear advised. Serious injury possible."

Sulfuric acid is among the most powerful and potentially harmful acids known. Get even a dilute quantity in your eyes and you will suffer serious burns and possibly loss of eyesight. Ingest it and you can sustain fatal injury to the mouth and esophagus. Sulfuric acid's potent tendency to react with other compounds is one of the reasons that it is used in industrial processes like petroleum refining. Sulfuric acid is also a component of the harsh atmosphere of Venus.

Know what food is the most potent source of sulfuric acid in the body? Oats.

Yes: Oatmeal, oat bran, and foods made from oats (you know what breakfast cereal I'm talking about) are the most potent sources of sulfuric acid in the human diet.

Why is this important? In the transition made by humans from net-alkaline hunter-gatherer diet to net-acid modern overloaded-with-grains diet, oats tip the scales heavily towards a drop in pH, i.e., more acidic.

The more acidic your diet, the more likely it is you develop osteoporosis and other bone diseases, oxalate kidney stones, and possibly other diseases.

Here's one reference for this effect.

Comments (38) -

  • Sly

    3/23/2011 8:21:12 AM |

    I wonder what is the best/healthiest way to alkalize your body?
    Removieng grains, of course, but what else?

  • Anne

    3/23/2011 8:42:01 AM |

    Dear Dr Davis,

    I understand that oats give an acid load to the body, but please can you explain how they are a source of sulphuric acid.

  • Kris @ Health Blog

    3/23/2011 12:18:13 PM |

    I've been reading Nutrition and Physical Degeneration by Weston Price, a dentist who travels around the world sometime around 1930-1940.

    He notices how awful the teeth of modernized people eating sugar and white flour are compared to the more "primitive" populations who don't eat those things.

    He does notice that the people who still eat a lot of rye or oats are in excellent health, while those eating sugar and wheat are awful and have very damaged teeth.

    After reading this I've put a bit of a question mark on banishing all grains, since wheat seems to be the primary culprit here. Apparently populations can live very healthy with oats and rye as a large part of their calorie intake.

    I wonder about this Oat and sulfuric acid thing, do you think this has any real consequences for us?

  • JC

    3/23/2011 12:29:06 PM |

    Alkalizing you body can lead to all kinds of problems such as yeast overgrowth.You need stomach acid to inhibit dangerous pathogens.Its a mistake to jump on the old Cayce idea of alkalilizng the body.

  • Jenny

    3/23/2011 12:44:22 PM |

    The article you cite is not a study, just a rehash of current belief. In fact, the argument that eating protein leaches calcium away from bone is one of the old wives tales used to discredit the low carb diet that hasn't stood up to actual research.

  • Peter

    3/23/2011 12:49:05 PM |

    I used to eat loads of oat bran (your suggestion), became anemic, then read someone's opinion that oat bran blocks iron absorbtion.  So I stopped eating oat bran, and the anemia went away.  Maybe coincidence, maybe not.

  • Anonymous

    3/23/2011 2:15:17 PM |

    Dr Davis:  Now that oat and oat products are off the table,and you remain in the anti sat fat camp, it would be interesting to hear what daily diet recommendations might be since you also think Omega 6 should be minimized and fruit intake watched to make sure blood sugar is not to high. What then do you recommend the diet be?  Hard to exist on just veggies, and a few nuts( to many bad for Omega 6 levels)

  • Geoffrey Levens

    3/23/2011 3:20:05 PM |

    "I wonder what is the best/healthiest way to alkalize your body?
    Removieng grains, of course, but what else?"

    The best and really only way to alkalize your body long term is to load w/ alkalizing minerals via non-starchy veg esp leafy greens.  And yes, avoid acidifying foods esp junk food, processed foods, refined carbs.

  • Dr. William Davis

    3/23/2011 3:52:24 PM |

    Commenter Geoffrey Levens, I believe, provided the right response to what foods to eat to maintain a net alkaline bias in the body.

    Most of the effects of an overly acidic lifestyle do not reach conscious perception. The calciuric effect of wheat and oats, for instance, generate no symptoms.

    Anon--

    I am not in "the anti sat fat camp." Saturated fat is part of the Track Your Plaque diet, unless you are apoprotein E4.

    By the way, the entire diet, saturated fat, wheat-free and all, is articulated in a total of nearly 100 pages of discussion on www.trackyourplaque.com, as well as the new Track Your Plaque book, version 2.0 (online now; hard copy coming in the next 2 weeks).

  • Amy

    3/23/2011 5:49:21 PM |

    I am pro-paleo and fairly anti-grain (especially wheat) -- but I have to say I take issue with your reasoning here.

    I assume you are specifically referring to Table 2 of this review article (written by a nutritionist). It lists milliequivalents of potential acid generated per 100 g of protein from the food. Oats are highest at 82.2, closely followed by eggs at 79.6; wheat is 69.4. According to your logic it would be better by far to eat wheat instead of eggs -- and I'm sure you wouldn't advise that.

    Also it is useful to think of the quantities required to obtain 100 g of protein from each food. I might easily eat 3 eggs at a meal, but I would be unlikely, if I ate oatmeal, to eat the nearly 4 cups required for the same amount of protein.

    I'm not defending oats. But as a scientist I find this particular argument against them to be weak.

  • Might-o'chondri-AL

    3/23/2011 7:37:42 PM |

    pH ranges in "normal" health is tightly controlled. Phrasing like acid/alkaline "load"/"balance" should be referenced to spot measures of the kidney dynamic. We don't have sulfuric acid sloshing against our cells.

    Cells use a lot of oxygen and kick back CO2, which we breath out. Yet, before it gets out of the cell and into blood circulation that CO2 is doing things.

    CO2, being a gas with no valent electrical charge, moves freely inside and outside our cells. We use an enzyme (carbonic anhydrase) to make it soluble (ie: so body can shift it in way body needs to). In solution it is in the form of H2CO3, carbonic acid.

    Carbonic acid is what the cells use, both inside and outside, to get ion charges (+ and -) to quickly adapt to pH fluctuations. As metabolic processes occur they naturally engender pH reactions. These pH reactions use H2CO3 (carbonic acid) to get H+, HCO3- and/or CO3-- ions, which have + and/or - interactive potential.

    It's an absolute necessity for our bodies ability to use pH to make things happen. Example: to maintain an ion neutral state for molecules needing to use a cell membrane ion channel. Membranes are designed not to let + or - charged molecules pass for good reasons; polarization and de-polarization must be regulated.

  • Helen

    3/23/2011 10:59:10 PM |

    You're killing me, Dr. Davis.  Despite your anti-oat stance and my status as a diabetic, I've found oats to be gentle to my blood sugar and, because of a number of other food intolerances, and a lack of tolerance for fat (vis a vis my blood sugars), oats make up a big part of my diet.  Now I find that I'm consuming battery acid.  

    Is there really any study correlating oat consumption per se with the diseases you mention?  I find again and again in nutrition advice (not just here) the idea that "because this contains this, it should be good/bad for you," while food and the body have such complex interrelationships it's really hard to make conclusions soley based on a food's containing a certain substance.

  • Helen

    3/23/2011 10:59:32 PM |

    (continued)

    The review you cite finds that there is insufficient evidence to suggest an upper limit for protein based on its presumed tendency to cause greater calcium excretion and that many dietary factors must be considered vis a vis urinary calcium and bone metabolism.  I think the term "not sufficiently unamibiguous" applies to your post's case against oats.

    BTW, improperly prepared oats can indeed lead to anemia.  They have to be soaked in a warm medium overnight with a phytase-containing substance (I use buckwheat flour), water, and yogurt to allow the mineral-binding phytate to get broken down.  It also allows the *phosphorous* to become bioavailable, as it is in animal sources of protein, which may mitigate the calcium-leaching effect of the oat proteins. although phosphorous is one of those things I hear contradictory things about.  One of the many.

  • steve

    3/24/2011 12:05:41 AM |

    hi Dr Davis:  I note your response that sat fat is ok except if you are Apo E 4.  Other than a blood testhow can you know?  In my case following the recommendations of this blog and others in my last NMR my LDL particle count was 64o and my small LDL was <90! Two years ago it was 1795 all small following diet of grains(plenty of oats and whole wheat and fruit). Particle size has increased from Now, eggs, meat fish,some cheese,  veggies, some potato or rice. Dark chocolate 85% and above only sweet) HDL directly measured was 64 and direct LDL was 54.  I do take Crestor and Zetia, but understand that if am Apo E 4 not likely for me to achieve these numbers even on a Statin.  Is this so?

    For me oats are for horses!
    look forward to buying your book.  Alert us when it is available.  Maybe have an Amazon link

  • Vladimir

    3/24/2011 1:12:54 AM |

    From Samuel Johnson's A Dictionary of the English Language:

    Oats: A grain, which in England is generally given to horses, but in Scotland appears to support the people.

  • Dr. William Davis

    3/24/2011 2:07:01 AM |

    Hi, Helen--

    This was not meant to indict meat. This was only about oats.

    Perhaps the confusion comes from the fact that meats yield a net acidic effect. However, the effects of animal products extend beyond acid-base effects and may impact on such things as IGF-1alpha that may blunt any pH effect.

    Some of the worst postprandial glucoses I have ever seen have been after consuming oats--no sugar, non-diabetics. This is not true in everybody, but in enough people that I've removed it from our list of foods to eat.

  • Dr. William Davis

    3/24/2011 2:07:58 AM |

    Hi, Steve--

    Great results!

    I suggest testing apo E only when you fail to obtain the results you desire. I do not consider apo E genotype testing as a "first line" test.


    Vladimir--

    That's great!

  • Anonymous

    3/24/2011 2:21:21 AM |

    Don't we want some foods in our diet which are acidic. Is the goal to strive for 100% alkaline food consumption? I have cut down wheat dramatically but because of my active lifestyle I consume organic steel cut oats to give me a good dose of carbohydrates.

  • Jeremy

    3/24/2011 5:17:47 AM |

    Does this apply to things like apple cider vinegar as well? I understand that adding vinegar to food decreases the overall GI of the meal, so sometimes I take some apple cider vinegar with meals. Is this actually over-acidifying my diet?

  • Might-o'chondri-AL

    3/24/2011 5:28:42 AM |

    Sulphur in proteins comes from the amino acids cysteine and methonine. These sulphur aminos, along with the ammonium ions foster faster kidney filtration.
    When urination carries away positive ion rich calcium the pH can drop toward acidic.

    Sulphur (S) in the body does other things that are important. When the cells are doing "housekeeping" by internal recycling, auto-phagy (not apotosis or programmed cell death) S binds  copper, iron, mangenese & "Fenton" active metals so they can't cause problem reactions (ex: hydroxyl radicals)during auto-phagy. Oat's sustaining power from S can be applicable in this context; the battery keeps going and going....

    The amino acid cysteine's nitrogen atoms become relevant to the type of metabolic process called nitro-sylation. Sulphur(S) is the way the body moves these molecules around as a complex molecule. Cysteine protein has to shed 1 electron per each sulphur atom it has to undergo nitro-sylation.

    One way that incipient tumors are stopped is by blocking S-nitro-sylation in the cell. Some people suspect meat nitrogen acidifies the body and thus is a risk factor for cancer; it's more likely due to an amino acid trans-nitrosation propensity than the pH. If the body can get that cysteine back it's 1 electron per sulphur atom then nitro-sylation is reversable (ex: spontaneous remission reported from following some "special" regimen).

    Insulin molecules have di-sulfide(S to S) linkages; some of which join insulin's A-chain to it's B-chain. The body clears insulin by breaking it down; first step  is by exposing the di-sulfide bonds for reaction. Insulin Degrading Enzyme (IDE) does this preparatory degradation, but IDE still leaves the insulin break down in a reversible phase.

    Insulin's function of decreasing protein degradation inside the cell is one reason for the body to hedge on it's (insulin's) clearing (ie: hold at reversible phase). A cell might be moving toward auto-phagy (ex: protein recycling) and have to hold off the process due to a life-threatening development. (Protein di-sulfide isomerase enzyme is what can finish the process and put insulin's trichloracetic acids into  irreversably soluble particles.)  

    Human genetic variants of splicing IDE are involved in hypo-glycemia  and hyper-glycemia. Those individuals can't regulate insulin and have their post-prandial blood sugar respond "normally". Doc mentions (above) variable response to oats he's dealt with.

    Type II diabetics have chronic inflammation and this leads to the molecule S-nitroso-glutathione formation. Elevated circulating free fatty acids are another activator of s-nitoso-glutathione; and as such can also inhibit insulin clearance.

    The cysteine protein loses 2electrons for every sulphur atom it has in order to glutation-ylate. In order to reverse S-nitroso-glutathione those 2 electons have to be restored to the cysteine wing of the molecule. Then the glutathione is free from the sulphurous nitrogen amino acid.

    With higher levels of free glutathione the body increases the solubility of insulin. Which is why Type II diabetics who eat lots of  vegetables (as opposed to tubers and grains)see some benefit; the veggies provide electrons to donate to and reverse the excessive glutathonylation. It's not about veggies "fixing" pH - that's done in cells via CO2 and carbonates, etc .

  • Might-o'chondri-AL

    3/24/2011 5:47:03 AM |

    typo errors alert for:
    methionine, glutathione, glutathion-ylate, glutathion-ylation, S-nitroso-glutathione

  • CarbSane

    3/24/2011 10:10:03 AM |

    Aww c'mon Doc!  

    2 large eggs contain 140 cals and 12g protein = approx 9.6 mEq SAA

    A 140 cal serving of plain oatmeal contains just under 5.5g protein = approx  4.5 mEq SSA.

  • revelo

    3/24/2011 4:21:37 PM |

    Johnson: "Oats: A grain, which in England is generally given to horses, but in Scotland appears to support the people."

    Boswell: "And that is why England is renowed for her horses and Scotland is renowned for her men."

  • Dr. William Davis

    3/24/2011 6:52:34 PM |

    It sounds to me like acid-base issues require an entire separate series of discussions all of their own.

    An issue for the future.

  • Might-o'chondri-AL

    3/24/2011 11:49:43 PM |

    (Sulfphur = S) S-nitroso-glutathione inhibits insulin degradation and impedes the insulin degrading enzyme (IDE) doing it's job. However, there is a "weak" acid that can partially annul that effect of S-nitroso-glutathione; that acid is ascorbate (commonly called vitamin C).

    Type II diabetics have notably low levels of ascorbate in their blood. There was a lot of 1990s
    European research indicating vitamin C gave diabetics better blood sugar control; and some researchers got no beneficial results.

    For each 1 mol of Ascorbate it was calculated there was +/- 0.5 mol glutathione increase. The more glutathione free from S-nitroso-glutathione molecule there is more of insulin's tri-chlor-acetic acid (from the insulin A-chain) made soluble.

    2007 data after 16 weeks for  43 adults(24 men & 19 women), aged +/- 52 year old, with Type II diabetics of +/- 7.5 years diagnosed as having diabetes who supplemented 1000 mg/day vitamin C (average for both sex):
    insulin before = 16.91 +/- 3.1 uU/ml
    insulin after  =  8.77 +/- 1.3 uU/ml
    HbA1c % before =  8.82 +/- 1.3
    HbA1c % after  =  7.66 +/- 1.3
    fasting blood sugar (mg/dl),
            before = 169.33 +/-34.03
    fasting blood sugar (mg/dl),
            after  = 144.80 +/-33.44

    A seperate comparable group of 41subjects, who supplemented with 500 mg/day vitamin C for 16 weeks, showed no benefit in the same parameters. So insulin, Hb1Ac and fasting blood sugar had no statistically significant improvement with the lower dose.

    There is however evidence, from other investigations, that some diabetic individuals who take supplements of vitamin C have their blood sugar actually go up even higher. I suspect this is related to individual genetics; and another indication diabetes is not a uniform disease awaiting one single cure.

  • Might-o'chondri-AL

    3/25/2011 4:43:20 AM |

    Acidity inside the cell is sometimes necessary. At the onset of auto-phagy  sulphur (S) keeps metals from reacting  dangerously. It temporarily "stashes" them in one of the vacuole compartments inside the cell.

    Acidic pH is instigated by the protein Vascular Regulatory Subunit 1 H (V1H; a.k.a. Nef binding protein 1) and is powered by ATP energy. This takes the form of an enzyme called V1H-ATPase; it's action is to lower (acidify) the pH inside the auto-phagy cell.

    This function of V1H makes it possible for things to shift around inside that cell and mediate the steps whereby components get "stashed" (endo-cytosis). This extends to the damaged proteins  slated for recycling; they get processed in a "safe" compartment inside the cell.

    Once the inner endo-some &/or lyso-some compartment pH acidifies to a set ( pre-programmed) low the protease enzymes (protein cleavers) upregulate for action. The di-sulfide (S-S) bonds of damaged proteins cleave and those proteins open up their uniquely convoluted configuration (unfold).

    Unfolded proteins are then "digested" and their components recylced, into new and unblemished proteins. It's an economical saving of energy not to have to assemble a new cell and improve the efficiency of an existing cell whose proteins were "wearing" out.

    When auto-phagy is done, and new protein(s) made, that protein(s) is sent out into the same cell and the cell pH rises back to normal. Being integral to survival, this (auto-phagy) is not dependant on pH from foods in the diet of a relatively healthy person.

  • body lift

    3/25/2011 10:04:35 AM |

    Your information may be very useful for me. Oats consumption is perhaps one of the best natural remedies for eczema. Oats are rich in fiber, fats, saponins, proteins and polysaccharides.

  • Anonymous

    3/25/2011 7:49:17 PM |

    Dr. Bernstein recommends limiting vit c supplements to 250mg/day.

  • paul

    3/26/2011 1:15:14 AM |

    You sir .... are a fear monger, and after this article, I am UNSUBSCRIBING to your blog!

    I don't know what happened to you, but you seem to be over time developing paranoia, and now instilling it in your faithful readers ...

    Maybe you should consult with a chemist before publishing such a reckless article trying to demonize perhaps one of the most balanced foods for people with blood sugar or cholesterol problems.

    THIS DOCTOR IS A QUACK PEOPLE!!! Talk to a chemist about what kind of damage oats are doing to your body - not this tinfoil-hat-wearing fraud!!!

    Our bodies need to be not to alkaline, and not too acidic ... sulfates and sulfuric acid help to counter the effects of alkalinity, and are necessary in moderate amounts in our diets!!!  

    UNSUBSCRIBED!!!

  • meta

    3/28/2011 6:39:21 PM |

    Your post showed up on my google reader recommended reads. this article sounds so hokey and weird.
    I don't know what you learned in physiology class in med school.. or did you pay someone to do your assignments for you back then?
    So weird I won't even attempt to refute, there is no head or tail to the amount of wrong in your article. To compare acid in oats with acid in car battery?
    Are you intellectually handicapped as you are so unable to make a decent analogous example?

  • karl

    3/29/2011 3:31:37 AM |

    A bit over the top - Oatmeal is loaded with carbs, but many foods contain similar substances that are toxic - our digestive system has evolved to deal with the chemical arms race brought to us by the plant kingdom.

    I'm all for reducing carbohydrates but this borders on disinformation..

    Almonds contain a bit of cyanide.. etc..

  • microdermabrasion

    6/24/2011 2:59:21 PM |

    Interference and you may suffer fatal injuries in the mouth and esophagus. Strong tendency of sulfuric acid to react with other compounds is one of the reasons used in industrial processes such as oil refineries.

  • Dion

    9/1/2011 7:50:43 PM |

    I have been eating oatmeal/porridge for breakfast with honey and Brazil nuts for three months. My total cholesterol has droppped from 251 to 199, my triglycerides from 305 to 72. My HDL is 58 and my LDL is 127.  I don't know if these are good figures but my doctor was surprised by the drop. The only change in my diet was the oatmeal. I'm Irish and porridge was a traditional breakfast food when people were thinner.

  • Dr. William Davis

    9/2/2011 2:17:23 AM |

    Hi, Dion--While these are great changes, it does not mean that you have fully eliminated, or at least substantially decreased, small LDL. To know, it requires specific measurement.

  • Dion

    10/3/2011 11:02:01 PM |

    I'm following a wheat-free diet since reading your book but am still a bit unsure about stopping the oatmeal porridge. If I have a bowl at 8am, I don't feel hungry until 2pm. Surely this is not representative of a high carb food effect, at least for me?

  • Dr. William Davis

    10/4/2011 2:38:20 AM |

    Sure doesn't sound like it. You might be among the metabolically "gifted."

  • Ginger_gal

    10/19/2011 3:44:07 PM |

    The best way to alkalize is by eating vegetables and some fruits.  If not eating them, then make smoothies with greens in them....spinach, lettuce, etc.

  • [...] first. At last, be certain that everything is attached and now you have a clean and safe battery.Was there ever before a time when your car needed jumpstarting, and your battery was barely visible ...chemical solution. If you have baking soda in the house, then you'll be able to remove the battery [...]

Loading