Condition Afflicts Millions: Do you have “YBS”?

After one of the harshest winters, spring has finally arrived.  The welcomed warmer temperatures and longer daylight hours infuse us with a sense of renewal and new beginnings.   Low and behold we begin to come out of hibernation and start the mad dash to engage in positive lifestyle changes such as eating better, exercising, proper sleep and taking appropriate nutritional supplements.  But invariably, life happens.  

Yep, just when you were about to get started, it happens.  YBS sets in.   I see this “condition” all too often with clients attempting to enter or re-enter into any number of behavior changes.  I will go so far as to say we all have been afflicted at one point or another in our lives.  I call this condition Yeah But Syndrome, or “YBS”.    It is often paralyzing and prevents those afflicted from moving into action, instead remaining in a state of inertia.  

There are many symptoms of YBS but the following are some of the most common.  

Yeah I planned to go to the gym today BUT, the kids needed a ride to practice.  
Yeah I really want to eat better BUT I don’t have the time.   
Yeah I didn’t plan to eat the cake BUT my husband wanted too, so I did also.   
Yeah I really meant to go to the grocery shopping BUT I was too tired, so I hit the drive- thru.  
Or this is a good one. Yeah I meant to start today BUT, I’ll start tomorrow.  

But tomorrow never comes.  You get the drift.  We can all come up with a million yeah buts, in other words, excuses.    The good news is the treatment for YBS is simple--just do it!  Take action.  The reality of today’s 24-7 planet is there will always be something.  The kids, work commitments, family obligations and various projects that need your attention will perpetually be present in some shape or form.  The difference to make the difference is to learn to dance in the rain, not wait for the rain to pass.  When will all the stars align so that your world will be “just right” to start?  If not NOW, WHEN will you begin?  

The key word here is begin.   Far too frequently, I coach clients that shoot themselves in the foot before they start.   Instead of consuming yourself with all the barriers to entry, select reasonable, low-hanging fruit that is “doable.”    The art of lifestyle change is to avoid all-or-nothing thinking and begin to appreciate what you CAN do, versus focusing energy on what you can’t do.  What is one action you can do TODAY to move toward your wellness goal(s)?  Start to focus on what you can do in the mist of your existing life demands. This mantra is a friendly reminder: BE-DO-HAVE.  Be committed.  Do what it takes.  And you will have results.  

Lastly, if you think removing cereal from your morning routine it is too difficult and you can’t do it. Guess what-- you’re likely right.   What you think is what you get!   But what if you think instead, “I can do this.  There are many truly healthy options for breakfast to replace cereal such as eggs and veggies that will help me look and feel my best.”  Then guess what--you will!  This simple change in mind-set can start a tidal wave of change and prevent you from abandoning ship when life tosses you into rough waters.  Ongoing support is hugely important to sustain lifestyle changes.  Join the conversations in the Cureality Forum to engage the support of health coaches and Cureality Members to stay on track. 

We Need More.....Kettlebell

You either love them or you hate them.

When you are in love with kettlebells, like I am, you enjoy the multi-muscle group movements.  Kettlebell workouts are fluid, like a dance, putting together a chain of movements that leave your heart pounding and sweat pouring.  Yes, there’s some sneaky cardio component to a kettlebell workout.   A great blend of aerobic and anaerobic conditioning.

If you hate kettlebells it’s because kettlebell exercises keep you honest with proper exercise execution.  Form is imperative to moves like the kettlebell swing or the kettlebell snatch.  Do it incorrectly and you’ll be either sore or have bruised wrists the next day.  But this is no reason to shy away from the kettlebell.  You have way too much to gain from this odd looking piece of exercise equipment.  

You will get a mega -caloric burn.  The American council on Exercise states that the average kettlebell workout burns 20 calories per minute.  That’s 1200 calories in just one hour.   Kettlebell workouts utilize many muscle groups to give you an efficient, total body conditioning workout.  

If you’re looking for a toned back side get a kettlebell.  The classic kettlebell swing works all the posterior muscles like your glutes, hamstrings, and lower back.  But only if you use correct form.  Otherwise you'll find yourself with nagging back pain, instead of a better butt.  

Kettlebell exercises are functional movements that will allow you to play hard without getting injured.  If you are an athlete, a nature enthusiast, or just want to keep up with the kids then you need to give kettlebells a try.  During a workout, the exercises will target movements that will make getting up and down off the floor easier, as well as bending over to pick something up.

If you are interested in doing kettlebell workouts start with a coach or take class.  You can’t fake form with kettlebell exercises or you could end up hurt.  I’m not trying to scare anyone away because good form is easy to learn.   Your body will memorize the correct movement pattern and you’ll be on your way to a successful kettlebell workout.  

Thyroid and the gut: Hidden health partners

Though I have personally dealt with both auto-immune thyroiditis (Hashomoto’s) and several gut issues (wheat sensitivity, gastritis, etc.), it was not until recently that I discovered how close the thyroid and gut work together to keep you healthy – and how problems with one can affect the other along with your overall health.
 
Most of us understand that the primary function of the gut, that 25 to 30 feet of “tubing” that includes everything from your stomach to your large intestines, is to process the food we eat and allow the “good stuff” (essential nutrients) to pass into our blood stream while keeping the “bad stuff” (harmful proteins) out. However, it may surprise some that the gut also holds as much as 70% of all the immune tissue in the body.
 
Now, imagine all the health havoc that could ensue if, suddenly, the gut stopped doing its job – particularly if it failed to stop toxic proteins from entering the blood stream and then mounted an overzealous immune response against them.  Sometimes, those overzealous immune responses reach beyond their intended targets to attack otherwise healthy tissues and organs – like the thyroid gland.
 
Recent studies indicate that thyroid hormones play a significant role in maintaining gut integrity, preventing leaky gut that can, in some cases, lead to auto-immune attacks against the thyroid.  A properly functioning gut also aids the production of thyroid hormones by converting some of the inactive “T4” thyroid hormone into the functional “T3” hormone.  Failure to simultaneously maintain both a healthy gut and a healthy thyroid can create a vicious cycle leading to chronic health problems and declining vitality.
 
What it all means is that to enjoy optimal health, you must promote good thyroid health to promote good gut health and vice versa.  Unfortunately, traditional medicine tends to focus on one issue to the exclusion of others.  A typical endocrinologist may treat your under active thyroid without spending a moment to address underlying gut issues.  A gastroenterologist will work alleviate a gut problem but will rarely address a potential thyroid problem.
 
This illustrates, once again, how our bodies work as a system and why it is necessary to bridge the “healthcare gaps” in traditional medicine by becoming personally responsible for your health.  I encourage everyone to consult the Cureality Program Guide and online Cureality Diet and Thyroid Health Tracks to learn more about how to optimize both your gut and thyroid health on your journey to realizing complete, whole-body health.

Omega-3 fatty acids likely NOT associated with prostate cancer

A weakly constructed study was reported recently that purportedly associated higher levels of omega-3 fatty acid blood levels and prostate cancer. See this CBS News report, for instance.

Lipid and omega-3 fat expert, Dr. William Harris, posted this concise critique of the study, exposing some fundamental problems:

First, the reported EPA+DHA level in the plasma phospholipids in this study was 3.62% in the no-cancer control group, 3.66% in the total cancer group, 3.67% in the low grade cancer group, and 3.74% in the high-grade group. These differences between cases and controls are very small and would have no meaning clinically as they are within the normal variation. Based on experiments in our lab, the lowest quartile would correspond to an HS-Omega-3 Index of <3.16% and the highest to an Index of >4.77%). These values are obviously low, and virtually none of the subjects was in “danger” of having an HS-Omega-3 Index of >8%. So to conclude that regular consumption of 2 oily fish meals a week or taking fish oil supplements (both of which would result in an Index above the observed range) would increase risk for prostate cancer is extrapolating beyond the data.

This study did not test the question of whether giving fish oil supplements (or eating more oily fish) increased PC risk; it looked only a blood levels of omega-3 which are determined by intake, other dietary factors, metabolism and genetics.


The authors also failed to present the fuller story taught by the literature. The same team reported in 2010 that the use of fish oil supplements was not associated with any increased risk for prostate cancer. A 2010 meta-analysis of fish consumption and prostate cancer reported a reduction in late stage or fatal cancer among cohort studies, but no overall relationship between prostate cancer and fish intake. Terry et al. in 2001 reported higher fish intake was associated with lower risk for prostate cancer incidence and death, and Leitzmann et al. in 2004 reported similar findings. Higher intakes of canned, preserved fish were reported to be associated with reduced risk for prostate cancer. Epstein et al found that a higher omega-3 fatty acid intake predicted better survival for men who already had prostate cancer, and increased fish intake was associated with a 63% reduction in risk for aggressive prostate cancer in a case-control study by Fradet et al). So there is considerable evidence actually FAVORING an increase in fish intake for prostate cancer risk reduction.

Another piece of the picture is to compare prostate cancer rates in Japan vs the US. Here is a quote from the World Foundation of Urology:


"[Prostate cancer] incidence is really high in North America and Northern Europe (e.g., 63 X 100,000 white men and 102 X 100,000 Afro-Americans in the United States), but very low in Asia (e.g., 10 X 100,000 men in Japan).”

Since the Japanese typically eat about 8x more omega-3 fatty acids than Americans do and their
blood levels are twice as high, you’d think their prostate cancer risk would be much higher...
but the opposite is the case.


Omega-3 fatty acids are physiologically necessary, normalizing multiple metabolic phenomena including augmentation of parasympathetic tone, reductions of postprandial (after-meal) lipoprotein excursions, and endothelial function. It would indeed make no sense that nutrients that are necessary for life and health exert an adverse effect such as prostate cancer at such low blood levels. (Recall that an omega-3 RBC index of 6.0% or greater is associated with reduced potential for sudden cardiac death.)

I personally take 3600 mg per day of EPA + DHA in highly-purified, non-oxidized triglyceride form (Ascenta Nutrasea liquid) that yields an RBC omega-3 index of just over 10%, the level that I believe the overwhelming bulk of data suggest is the ideal level for humans.

Are statins and omega-3s incompatible?

French researcher, Dr. Michel de Lorgeril, has been in the forefront of thinking and research into nutritional issues, including the Mediterranean Diet, the French Paradox, and the role of fat intake in cardiovascular health. In a recent review entitled Recent findings on the health effects of omega-3 fatty acids and statins, and their interactions: do statins inhibit omega-3?, he explores the question of whether statin drugs are, in effect, incompatible with omega-3 fatty acids.

Dr. Lorgeril makes several arguments:

1) Earlier studies, such as GISSI-Prevenzione, demonstrated reduction in cardiovascular events with omega-3 fatty acid supplementation, consistent with the biological and physiological benefits observed in animals, experimental preparations, and epidemiologic observations in free-living populations.

2) More recent studies (and meta-analyses) examining the effects of omega-3 fatty acids have failed to demonstrate cardiovascular benefit showing, at most, non-significant trends towards benefit.

He points out that the more recent studies were conducted post-GISSI and after agencies like the American Heart Association's advised people to consume more fish, which prompted broad increases in omega-3 intake. The populations studied therefore had increased intake of omega-3 fatty acids at the start of the studies, verified by higher levels of omega-3 RBC levels in participants.

In addition, he raises the provocative idea that the benefits of omega-3 fatty acids appear to be confined to those not taking statin agents, as suggested, for instance, in the Alpha Omega Trial. He speculates that the potential for statins to ablate the benefits of omega-3s (and vice versa) might be based on several phenomena:

--Statins increase arachidonic acid content of cell membranes, a potentially inflammatory omega-6 fatty acid that competes with omega-3 fatty acids. (Insulin provocation and greater linoleic acid/omega-6 oils do likewise.)
--Statins induce impaired mitochondrial function, while omega-3s improve mitochondrial function. (Impaired mitochondrial function is evidenced, for instance, by reduced coenzyme Q10 levels, with partial relief from muscle weakness and discomfort by supplementing coenzyme Q10.)
--Statins commonly provoke muscle weakness and discomfort which can, in turn, lead to reduced levels of physical activity and increased resistance to insulin. (Thus the recently reported increases in diabetes with statin drug use.)

Are the physiologic effects of omega-3 fatty acids, present and necessary for health, at odds with the non-physiologic effects of statin drugs?

I fear we don't have sufficient data to come to firm conclusions yet, but my perception is that the case against statins is building. Yes, they have benefits in specific subsets of people (none in others), but the notion that everybody needs a statin drug is, I believe, not only dead wrong, but may have effects that are distinctly negative. And I believe that the arguments in favor of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation, EPA and DHA (and perhaps DPA), make better sense.



DHA: the crucial omega-3

Of the two omega-3 fatty acids that are best explored, EPA and DHA, it is likely DHA that exerts the most blood pressure- and heart rate-reducing effects. Here are the data of Mori et al in which 4000 mg of olive oil, purified EPA only, or purified DHA only were administered over 6 weeks:



□ indicates baseline SBP; ▪, postintervention SBP; ○, baseline DBP; •, postintervention DBP; ⋄, baseline HR; and ♦, postintervention HR.

In this group of 56 overweight men with normal starting blood pressures, only DHA reduced systolic BP by 5.8 mmHg, diastolic by 3.3 mmHg.

While each omega-3 fatty acid has important effects, it may be DHA that has an outsized benefit. So how can you get more DHA? Well, this observation from Schuchardt et al is important:

DHA in the triglyceride and phospholipid forms are 3-fold better absorbed, as compared to the ethyl ester form (compared by area-under-the-curve). In other words, fish oil that has been reconstituted to the naturally-occurring triglyceride form (i.e., the form found in fresh fish) provides 3-fold greater blood levels of DHA than the more common ethyl ester form found in most capsules. (The phospholipid form of DHA found in krill is also well-absorbed, but occurs in such small quantities that it is not a practical means of obtaining omega-3 fatty acids, putting aside the astaxanthin issue.)

So if the superior health effects of DHA are desired in a form that is absorbed, the ideal way to do this is either to eat fish or to supplement fish oil in the triglyceride, not ethyl ester, form. The most common and popular forms of fish oil sold are ethyl esters, including Sam's Club Triple-Strength, Costco, Nature Made, Nature's Bounty, as well as prescription Lovaza. (That's right: prescription fish oil, from this and several other perspectives, is an inferior product.)

What sources of triglyceride fish oil with greater DHA content/absorption are available to us? My favorites are, in this order:

Ascenta NutraSea
CEO and founder, Marc St. Onge, is a friend. Having visited his production facility in Nova Scotia, I was impressed with the meticulous methods of preparation. At every step of the way, every effort was made to limit any potential oxidation, including packaging in a vacuum environment. The Ascenta line of triglyceride fish oils are also richer in DHA content. Their NutraSea High DHA liquid, for instance, contains 500 mg EPA and 1000 mg DHA per teaspoon, a 1:2 EPA:DHA ratio, rather than the more typical 3:2 EPA:DHA ratio of ethyl ester forms.

Pharmax (now Seroyal) also has a fine product with a 1.4:1 EPA:DHA ratio.

Nordic Naturals has a fine liquid triglyceride product, though it is 2:1 EPA:DHA.





Krill oil: Do the math

The manufacturers of krill oil claim that the phospholipid form of omega-3 fatty acids, EPA and DHA, enhance their absorption. There are indeed some data to that effect:


Here are some representative krill oil preparations available on the market:


MegaRed Krill Oil:
EPA 50 mg
DHA 24 mg
Total omega-3s (EPA + DHA + other forms) 90 mg
Price: $28.99 for 60 softgels

Source Naturals (a fine company otherwise, by the way):

EPA 150 mg
DHA 90 mg
Total omega-3 fatty acids 300 mg
Price: $24.99 for 60 softgels

Alright, let's do some simple math:

Average volume of blood in the human body (all components): 5000 cc
Percentage of red blood cells (RBCs) by volume: 45%
Total volume RBCs: 2250 cc
Percentage of total volume RBCs occupied by fatty acids:

What tests are MORE important than cholesterol?

In the conventional practice of early heart disease prevention, cholesterol testing takes center stage. Rarely does it go any further, aside from questions about family history and obvious sources of modifiable risk such as smoking and sedentary lifestyle.

So standard practice is to usually look at your LDL cholesterol, the value that is calculated, not measured, then--almost without fail--prescribe a statin drug. While there are indeed useful values in the standard cholesterol panel--HDL cholesterol and triglycerides--they are typically ignored or prompt no specific action.

But a genuine effort at heart disease prevention should go farther than an assessment of calculated LDL cholesterol, as there are many ways that humans develop coronary atherosclerosis. Among the tests to consider in order to craft a truly effect heart disease prevention program are:

--Lipoprotein testing--Rather than using the amount of cholesterol in the various fractions of blood as a crude surrogate for lipoproteins in the bloodstream, why not measure lipoproteins themselves? These techniques have been around for over 20 years, but are simply not part of standard practice.

Lipoprotein testing especially allows you to understand what proportion of LDL particles are the truly unhealthy small LDL particles (that are oxidation- and glycation-prone). It also identifies whether or not you have lipoprotein(a), the heritable factor that confers superior survival capacity in a wild environment ("The Perfect Carnivore"), but makes the holder of this genetic pattern the least tolerant to the modern diet dominated by grains and sugars, devoid of fat and organ meats.

--25-hydroxy vitamin D--The data documenting the health power of vitamin D restoration continue to grow, with benefits on blood sugar and insulin, blood pressure, bone density, protection from winter "blues" (seasonal affective disorder), decrease in falls and fractures, decrease in cancer, decrease in cardiovascular events. I aim to keep 25-hydroxy vitamin D at a level of 60 to 70 ng/ml. This generally requires 4000-8000 units per day in gelcap form, at least for the first 3 or so years, after which there is a decrease in need. Daily supplementation is better than weekly, monthly, or other less-frequent regimens. The D3 (cholecalciferol) form is superior to the non-human D2 (ergocalciferol) form.

--Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)--HbA1c represents glycated hemoglobin, i.e., hemoglobin molecules within red blood cells that are irreversibly modified by glucose, or blood sugar. It therefore provides an index of endogenous glycation of all proteins of the body: proteins in the lenses of the eyes that lead to cataracts; proteins in the cartilage of the knees and hips that lead to brittle cartilage and arthritis; proteins in kidney tissue leading to kidney dysfunction.

HbA1c provides an incredibly clear snapshot of health: It reflects the amount of glycation you have been exposed to over the past 90 or so days. We therefore aim for an ideal level: 5.0% or less, the amount of "ambient" glycation that occurs just with living life. We reject the notion that a HbA1c level of 6.0% is acceptable just because you don't "need" diabetes medication, the thinking that drives conventional medical practice.

--RBC Omega-3 Index--The average American consumes very little omega-3 fatty acids, EPA and DHA, such that a typical omega-3 RBC Index, i.e., the proportion of fatty acids in the red blood cell occupied by omega-3 fatty acids, is around 2-3%, a level associated with increased potential for sudden cardiac death (death!). Levels of 6% or greater are associated with reduced potential for sudden cardiac death; 10% or greater are associated with reduced other cardiovascular events.

Evidence therefore suggests that an RBC Omega-3 Index of 10% or greater is desirable, a level generally achieved by obtaining 3000-3600 mg EPA + DHA per day (more or less, depending on the form consumed, an issue for future discussion).

--Thyroid testing (TSH, free T3, free T4)--Even subtle degrees of thyroid dysfunction can double, triple, even quadruple cardiovascular risk. TSH values, for instance, within the previously presumed "normal" range, pose increased risk for cardiovascular death; a TSH level of 4.0 mIU, for instance, is associated with more than double the relative risk of a level of 1.0.

Sad fact: the endocrinology community, not keeping abreast of the concerning issues coming from the toxicological community regarding perchlorates, polyfluorooctanoic acid and other fluorinated hydrocarbons, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PDBEs), and other thyroid-toxic compounds, tend to ignore these issues, while the public is increasingly exposed to the increased cardiovascular risk of even modest degrees of thyroid dysfunction. Don't commit the same crime of ignorance: Thyroid dysfunction in this age of endocrine disruption can be crucial to cardiovascular and overall health.


All in all, there are a number of common blood tests that are relevant--no, crucial--for achieving heart health. Last on the list: standard cholesterol testing.

Cranberry Sauce

Happy Thanksgiving 2012, everyone, from all the staff at Track Your Plaque!

Here’s a zesty version of traditional cranberry sauce, minus the sugar. The orange, cinnamon, and other spices, along with the crunch of walnuts, make this one of my favorite holiday side dishes.

There are 31.5 grams total “net” carbohydrates in this entire recipe, or 5.25 grams per serving (serves 6). To further reduce carbs, you can leave out the orange juice and, optionally, use more zest.

1 cup water
12 ounces fresh whole cranberries
Sweetener equivalent to 1 cup sugar (I used 6 tablespoons Truvía)
1 tablespoon orange zest + juice of half an orange
½ cup chopped walnuts
1 teaspoon ground cinnamon
½ teaspoon ground nutmeg
¼ teaspoon ground cloves

In small to medium saucepan, bring water to boil. Turn heat down and add cranberries. Cover and cook at low-heat for 10 minutes or until all cranberries have popped. Stir in sweetener. Remove from heat.

Stir in orange zest and juice, walnuts, cinnamon, nutmeg, and cloves.

Transfer mixture to bowl, cool, and serve.


Apple Cranberry Crumble

Apple, cranberry, and cinnamon: the perfect combination of tastes and scents for winter holidays!

I took a bit of carbohydrate liberties with this recipe. The entire recipe yields a delicious cheesecake-like crumble with 59 “net” grams carbohydrates (total carbs – fiber); divided among 10 slices, that’s 5.9 grams net carbs per serving, a quantity most tolerate just fine. (To reduce carbohydrates, the molasses in the crumble is optional, reducing total carbohydrate by 11 grams.)

Other good choices for sweeteners include liquid stevia, stevia glycerite, powdered stevia (pure or inulin-based, not maltodextrin-based), Truvía, Swerve, and erythritol. And always taste your batter to test sweetness, since sweeteners vary in sweetness from brand to brand and your individual sensitivity to sweetness depends on how long you’ve been wheat-free. (The longer you’ve been wheat-free, the less sweetness you desire.)


Crust and crumble topping
3 cups almond meal
1 stick (8 tablespoons) butter, softened
1 cup xylitol (or other sweetener equivalent to 1 cup sugar)
1½ teaspoons ground cinnamon
1 tablespoon molasses
1½ teaspoons vanilla extract
Dash sea salt

Filling
16 ounces cream cheese, softened
2 large eggs
½ cup xylitol (or other sweetener equivalent to ½ cup sugar)
1 Granny Smith apple (or other variety)
1 teaspoon ground cinnamon
1 cup fresh cranberries

Preheat oven to 350° F.

In large bowl, combine almond meal, butter, sweetener, cinnamon, molasses, vanilla, and salt and mix.

Grease a 9½-inch tart or pie pan. Using approximately 1 cup of the almond meal mixture, form a thin bottom crust with your hands or spoon.

In another bowl, combine cream cheese, eggs, and sweetener and mix with spoon or mixer at low-speed. Pour into tart or pie pan.

Core apple and slice into very thin sections. Arrange in circles around the edge of the cream cheese mixture, working inwards. Distribute cranberries over top, then sprinkle cinnamon over entire mixture.

Gently layer remaining almond meal crumble evenly over top. Bake for 30 minutes or until topping lightly browned.
Buy local, get a goiter

Buy local, get a goiter

The notion of buying food locally--"buy local"--i.e., food produced in your area, state, or region, is catching on.

And for good reason: Not only do you support your local economy, buying locally saves energy, since food doesn't have to be transported from South America or other faraway locations.

But what about those of us in the Midwest, particularly around the Great Lakes basin, i.e., the region previously known as the "goiter belt"? In the early 20th century, up to a third of the residents of this region had enlarged thyroid glands, or goiters, due to iodine deficiency. Lack of iodine causes the thyroid to enlarge, or "hypertrophy," in an effort to more efficiently extract any available iodine in the blood.

Well, there's been a resurgence of iodine deficiency nationwide with 11.3% of the population severely deficient, representing a four-fold increase since the 1970s.

Why an iodine deficiency? Because more people are avoiding iodized salt, the principal source of iodine for Americans since the FDA introduced its voluntary program for iodization of table salt back in 1924. Approximately 90% of the patients I ask now declare that they use very little iodized table salt. While a few take multimineral or multivitamin supplements that contain iodine, the majority do not. The globalization of the food supply--eat global--however, has softened the blow, since we eat tomatoes from Mexico, blueberries from Argentina, lettuce from the Salinas Valley of California.

Now, we have the growing trend to eat local. In the Midwest, it means that the vegetables, fruits, and meats grown locally will also be iodine depleted, since the soil is also iodine-poor, being so far from the sea.

Ironically, two healthy trends--avoiding salt and eating local--will be accounting for a surge in unsightly neck bulges in the Midwest, as well as an increase in thyroid disease.

The lesson: Avoid salt, eat local, but mind your iodine.

Comments (19) -

  • mike V

    4/3/2009 6:56:00 PM |

    Dr Davis:

    PREVENTION v PREVENTION!
    A curious thing but I wonder if you mid-westerners really need to be giving up iodized salt at all if you are taking care of your potassium and magnesium?
    When you get time, please let us know your patient findings on mineral status.
    "Lite" salt contains a % of potassium which may be  iodized. Of course one's ability to take potassium maybe compromised by some medications.

    Mike V

    *************************
    UK ARTICLE
    Is salt REALLY so bad for your blood pressure?
    By Jerome Burne
    30th March 2009

    It's been demonised for years. But suddenly experts are asking whether we're missing the bigger picture about salt...

    We're all eating too much salt and it's going to give us high blood pressure - that's the message we've heard for years, but now new research suggests salt is being wrongly demonised.
    A recent study suggests that by concentrating on the effects of salt we could be missing the bigger picture. That's because salt doesn't affect blood pressure on its own; it does so with another mineral we get in our diet - potassium.
    Blood pressure is constantly being raised and lowered - salt is involved in raising pressure by tightening arteries, while potassium is part of the relaxation system. So making sure you have enough potassium is vital.
    Salty snack: Research has found that eating more salt does not necessarily raise the risk of heart disease
    This was highlighted in the study from Loyola University in Chicago. Researchers measured the amount of salt in the urine, an accurate way of measuring how much had been consumed, and found no significant difference in the risk of heart disease whether patients had been eating a lot or a little. What did reduce the risk, however, was the ratio of salt to its balancing mineral potassium.
    The new study 'is a quantum leap in the quality of the data', says lead author Dr Paul Whelton, an epidemiologist and president of the university's health division. That's because it followed nearly 3,000 patients for between ten and 15 years.
    Whelton now believes many of us need to significantly increase our potassium intake to help our arteries.
    'To lower blood pressure and dampen the effects of salt, adults should consume 4.7grams of potassium per day,' he says.
    The British recommended daily dose of potassium is only 3.5g. Foods high in potassium include potatoes, sweet potatoes, yoghurt, tuna, lima beans and bananas.
    'To lower blood pressure and dampen the effects of salt, adults should consume 4.7grams of potassium per day'
    _______________________________________

    As for salt, Dr Whelton and colleagues from America's Institute of Medicine say we should stick to less than 6g (a teaspoon) a day, which is the same as the existing UK guidelines.
    But his study is not the only one to raise questions about conventional approaches to this problem.
    A review of the evidence published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) seven years ago found that while cutting back on salt might help those taking medication for high blood pressure, the research showed no clear benefits for everyone doing it.

    Even more extraordinarily, in 2005, researchers at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York published the results of a 13-year study that had followed 7,000 men and women - this showed that people who consumed less than 6g of salt a day actually had a ********'raised' risk of heart disease.*********

    The author of that study, Dr Hillel Cohen, says this was only an observation, and more work is needed to establish why this trend was found. 'But it does suggest a set limit of salt for everyone doesn't work,' he adds.

    Effective or not, cutting back on salt makes up only a small part of the regime recommended for anyone with raised blood pressure, which is also known as hypertension.
    The first step is usually a version of the Dash (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) diet that recommends fruits, vegetables, and low-fat dairy foods, and which has been shown to be effective in bringing blood pressure down. But this can be hard to follow if you've been eating less healthily for years.
      Eating a healthy amount of potassium in your diet can offset the impact salt has on raising blood pressure
    Dr Peter Berkin is a GP in Milton Keynes who favours treating chronic disorders with diet where possible.
    'Doctors always recommend weight loss and improving your diet but they rarely have the time or facilities to help patients to make and stick with the changes,' he says.
    The result is that after six weeks or so, most patients are prescribed drugs to lower their blood pressure.
    An estimated ten million people in the UK have high blood pressure, and in England alone millions of prescriptions are written for drugs to treat them every year. But are drugs the best way to treat the problem?

    What patients are often not told is the numbers of people who have to be treated with a drug in order for just one person to benefit.
    In the case of elderly patients with mild hypertension, of every 76 patients who take the drug, one will avoid a stroke, according to Michael Oliver, professor emeritus of cardiology at the University of Edinburgh, writing in the BMJ.
    Professor Oliver was also concerned about the side-effects of these drugs that benefit so few. 'Reduction of mild hypertension can lead to vertigo, particularly in elderly people,' he wrote.

    The drugs have a range of other effects. Diuretics, which make you go to the loo more often, reducing the volume of water in the blood and in turn lowering blood pressure, can cause gout.

    Calcium channel blockers, which relax the arteries, can bring on headaches, while ACE inhibitors, which work by stopping the blood vessels from narrowing, often cause a nasty cough.

    More seriously, several of these drugs are now linked, ironically, with a raised risk of heart disease.
    One study of 1,860 men followed over 17 years found that ^^^^^^those treated with diuretics were 23 per cent more likely to have a heart attack********* than those who weren't.
    Another widely used class of drug is the beta-blocker. These work by blocking a natural substance that causes the arteries to narrow and the heart to beat faster, enabling the arteries to widen again.
    However, using these actually raises heart problems, according to a review by doctors at St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital in New York. They found that patients given beta-blockers had more heart attacks and more strokes.
    'A study found that people who consumed less than 6g of salt a day had a *****raised risk of heart disease'******
    _______________________________________

    The reason could be that most of the studies involved a widely used beta-blocker, atenolol. Worryingly, even though the problems with atenolol have been known for years, 14 million prescriptions for it were written in England and Wales in 2007.

    'Atenolol should not be given to anybody,' says Dr John Cockcroft of the Wales Heart Institute in Cardiff. 'Nobody disagrees atenolol is guilty, yet we are still using it.'
    Drugs certainly bring dangerously high blood pressure down, and for those with high blood pressure they are a lifesaver. But do people with only slightly elevated blood pressure really need them? Research shows that 167 patients need to take the drugs for a single person to benefit.
    A number of GPs believe that more could be done to help people simply with diet and lifestyle.

    'Around 33 per cent of people aged 25 to 55 have borderline hypertension,' says Dr Adam Carey, a nutrition expert who runs a corporate health programme helping employees to get fit, as well as advising the Welsh rugby union team on nutrition.

    'We can get that down to 9 per cent without using drugs, but by giving them a structured programme of diet and exercise.
    'The key is to cut out refined carbohydrates such as white flour and sugar. These foods push up your blood sugar level, and the body stores the extra sugar as fat.
      
    Foods high in potassium include potatoes, sweet potatoes, yoghurt, tuna, lima beans and bananas
    'Eating carbohydrates that haven't been refined, such as brown rice and wholegrains, smoothes out the sudden spikes and troughs of blood sugar that come with sweets and pastries.'

    The American study showed, raising your potassium is important. But there is another pair of minerals involved in controlling blood pressure in the same way as the sodium in salt and potassium do - calcium and magnesium.

    While calcium tightens the blood vessels, magnesium relaxes them. The recommended daily allowance for magnesium is 300 to 400mg and it is found, together with potassium, in green leafy vegetables, nuts and seeds. One of the effects of diuretics can be to flush magnesium and potassium out of the body.

    Relaxation techniques such as meditation can help, too. Anxiety pushes up your blood pressure by raising levels of hormones such as adrenaline and cortisol.

  • P

    4/3/2009 7:28:00 PM |

    Dr. Davis, can you suggest a good omega-3 capsule? I know you have previously mentioned that one can use any omega-3 we get at Costco. I used Naturemade (or Nature's own, I do not remember the name right now) omega-3 capsules. HOWEVER, they have started smelling fishy these last few days! Obviously the oil in them has gone rancid! The capsules are not supposed to expire till 2011, so its really bothering me that they turned bad so soon. I store them in my pantry which is cool and dark, so the capsules were not exposed to harsh sunlight.

  • Anonymous

    4/3/2009 7:56:00 PM |

    Dr.Davis

    This is very informative.
    What is the best base level of Iodine daily to promote thyroid health?

    Thanks for you great blog!

    Aaron

  • David

    4/3/2009 8:10:00 PM |

    So iodine aside, I'm curious as to your take about the whole salt issue. Taubes touches on it in Good Calories, Bad Calories, and essentially looks to insulin --not salt-- as the villain in blood pressure problems. NHANES III seems to help things along in that direction as well: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18465175

    I would grant that high salt intake might be a problem for a certain percentage of sensitive individuals, but I kind of doubt that percentage is all that high. I also wonder if sodium sensitivity in some people has more to do with other factors, such as magnesium deficiency (since magnesium regulates sodium) than with sodium actually being malicious in and of itself. *shrugs*

    Some say that the chemically processed, straight sodium chloride is what causes the problems, and that a good full-spectrum sea salt is the way to go, as it contains all the original trace minerals to balance things out. I use Redmond RealSalt (I love the taste). I've known three people now who have gotten on the RealSalt (in large quantities) only to have their blood pressure go down. With no other changes. I don't really understand it, but it's interesting, and helps to further my skepticism about the supposedly universal salt/BP connection.

  • Sabio

    4/4/2009 2:55:00 AM |

    Loved this entry (a fellow paleo) -- thank you for your blog. I added my own libertarian take on it.

  • xenolith_pm

    4/4/2009 3:38:00 AM |

    Eat two Egglands Best eggs a day and you'll get your daily allowance of iodine.

    Or, just a pinch of dry sea kelp in your tea will do the same.

    Or, just a single daily serving of seafood (any of the wild finfishes, roe [fish eggs], crustaceans, or mollusks) should do the trick too.

    Unfortunately, sea salt (unless it's been purposely iodized) has only a small, insignificant trace amount of iodine.

  • Braesikalla

    4/4/2009 8:52:00 AM |

    Iodine seems to upregulate the sensitivity of steroid receptors. There is anecdotal evidence that in the case of diabetes the amount of injected insulin (which is a steroid hormone) has to be drastically reduced to avoid severe side effects like hypoglycaemia ( http://www.healthy-eating-politics.com/diabetes-iodine.html ).
    Since vitamin d is actually a steroid hormone, too, could it be that the recommended range of sufficiency (60-80 ng/dl) has to be adjusted for someone who is on iodine supplementation and therefore likely has increased steroid receptor sensitivity?
    Any thoughts?

  • Dr. William Davis

    4/4/2009 12:42:00 PM |

    Mike V--

    Admittedly, "avoid salt" is a generalization.

    There are genetic types who gain little by minimizing salt. Then there are people at the other end of the spectrum who gain visibly and dramatically with salt restriction, e.g., drops in systolic BP 30+ mmHg, weight (water) reductions of many lbs, even changes in blood electrolytes.

    Salt is one of those things that is handled in dramatically different ways among different humans.

  • Kismet

    4/5/2009 11:18:00 AM |

    David, I believe there's also increased stomach cancer risk with salt...

  • Anna

    4/5/2009 8:25:00 PM |

    It's easy to avoid salt imbalances if one avoids processed foods, as processed foods contain lots of sodium, very little potassium and magnesium.

    Eating real foods one prepares at home may be salted with sea salt with little worry of taking in too much salt.  I tend to think that the association of disease with salt is a marker for malnutrition and poor nutrition from a crappy SAD diet, too high in carbs, too low in protein and natural fats, and deficient in multiple micronutrients.  

    Taubes wrote a great article in Science a few years back on the soft (political) science behind the salt restriction advice.  That's eventually what moved him to investigate the fat/cholesterol hypothesis, because the most influential salt restriction theorist was such a "bad" scientist and bragged so much about his influence that Taubes' skepticism went on high alert.

  • David

    4/5/2009 10:29:00 PM |

    Kismet,

    I won't argue that point, but I would question it, just because I think more information would be helpful. A lot of the studies on salt and stomach cancer that I've seen are observational in nature. Observational studies are useful as far as they go, but they're not good at proving causality. In other words, perhaps it's true that people who get stomach cancer eat a lot of salt. But is the salt actually causing the cancer? People who eat a lot of salt also eat a lot of nitrates-- in fact the two often go together. So which is it that causes the cancer? Salt or nitrates? We can't tell from the observational studies, because there are still too many variables to narrow down the relationship.

    Maybe lots of salt does cause stomach cancer. I honestly don't know what to think. But I do think that caution is needed when evaluating observational studies for the purpose of establishing causality, especially when they are so often contradictory (see another study on salt and stomach cancer here that shows an opposite conclusion from the mainstream: http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/cgi/reprint/1/7/607.pdf)

    David

  • freecicero

    4/7/2009 12:37:00 PM |

    Dr. Davis:

    What do you think of the ideas of those who advocate drastically increasing iodine intake to Japanese levels?

    Examples:

    http://www.optimox.com/pics/Iodine/opt_Research_I.shtml

    Radio inteviews Dr. Stan, Dr. Blaylock, Dr. Flechas:

    http://curezone.com/ig/f.asp?f=1723

  • Anonymous

    4/8/2009 4:56:00 PM |

    Lack of iodized salt may not be as big an issue as lack of iodine in store bought baked goods. We absorb only 10% of the iodine in salt but 90% of the iodine in baked goods. Bakeries used to condition doughs with iodine but now use bromine which competes with iodine. We are now under-Iodiniated and over-Brominated.

  • Anonymous

    4/8/2009 4:58:00 PM |

    Braesikalla, insulin is not a steriod hormone, it is a peptide.

  • Trinkwasser

    4/12/2009 2:13:00 PM |

    I've seen localised clusters of goiters in Europe but hadn't realised you had such a large zone of iodine depletion.

    Here (UK) we have localised areas of other mineral shortages, animal farmers have to put out salt licks or add magnesium, manganese etc. to the feed, and some arable and vegetable farmers need to mineralise their soil. There are large areas deficient in selenium (and I believe in some parts of China it is at near toxic levels) your local farmer may be someone to ask about your local conditions.

    They told me to eat less salt and my BP kept going up, plus I started getting leg cramps. I ate less carbs and it came back down, they didn't tell me that one! I believe the population of salt sensitive hypertensives is quite low, yet they tell the rest of us to avoid it as well.

    Strangely when I was chomping sodium bicarbonate (acid reflux) I started getting leg cramps again, that time adding magnesium sorted them (and my electrolytes came back spot on) the interrelationship can be complex.

  • Dane Miller

    4/16/2009 2:27:00 PM |

    Who avoids salt?  That seems ridiculous.  Especially if you exercise, you need even more salt.

  • fierce4nations

    5/24/2009 3:50:01 AM |

    High salt levels can build up in your body and chlorine (chloride from the sodium chloride aka table salt) can displace the nessesary iodine in your body especially from thyroid. This can cause health problems including goiters. Iodine can be relaced by consuming it in small amounts. One very effective way is by adding small amounts of Lugol's solution of iodine in your drinking water. A couple of drops per liter is enough. Pure iodine itself will not dissolve in water therefore you must have some type of iodine solution in order to properly intake it.
    You can easily make your own Lugol's Iodine. Here is the formula: (adjust it to your desired amount by multiplying or dividing the factors)
    10 grams of potassium iodide
    5 grams of pure iodine (crystals, prills, or flakes)
    85 mL of distilled water or drinkable (spring) water
    Mix the potassium iodide with the water first then add and stir the iodine until all is dissolves. This usually takes some time but can be speed up by heating the water a little.
    You can purchase iodine and potassium iodide at www.ushalogen.com

  • Dana Seilhan

    9/27/2010 3:02:43 AM |

    It might be better to think of the buy-local movement in terms of, "It's silly to buy foods from elsewhere that we're perfectly capable of growing here," while still importing foods that contain nutrients that are deficient locally.  That's the whole point of trade, after all:  acquiring things you wouldn't have otherwise.

    Expecting foods grown in the ground to provide us with iodine when we've got perfectly good seafood in the oceans that give us the same thing is kind of silly.  Rather on the order of using tofu or seitan as meat substitutes when there are perfectly good cows and chickens running around out there.

    An alternative, too, is to completely avoid goitrogenic foods if you live far from the sea.  It's believed that this is why cruciferous vegetables taste bitter to some people but not others:  the genes responsible seem to have evolved in people who lived far inland.  They needed to maximize thyroid function, so a mutation that allowed them to detect foods that were most likely to mess with thyroid function came in very handy.  No reason we can't make conscious choices in that direction now--it's not like we can't live without any of the foods in question.

    Dealing with environmental pollution and avoiding chemical stressors is important too, as you know.  But every little bit that we ourselves can control right now, counts for something.

  • how to stop sweating

    2/22/2011 12:17:09 AM |

    Glorious post from skilled additionally it's going to probably be an exquisite know-methods to us and thank you numerous for posting this priceless info with us all.

Loading