No more Lovaza

That's it: I will NEVER ever write another prescription for Lovaza.

I actually very rarely write a prescription for Lovaza, i.e., prescription fish oil. But this was the last straw.

I advised a patient that we've had good success using high-doses of fish oil to reduce lipoprotein(a), Lp(a). 6000 mg per day of the omega-3 component (EPA + DHA) from fish oil reduces Lp(a) in 60% of people after one year. (Recall that Lp(a) is the most aggressive known lipid-related cause of heart disease.)

The two preparations I generally suggest are either the very affordable Sam's Club Members Mark Triple-Strength Fish Oil with 900 mg EPA + DHA per capsule: 7 capsules per day. Another great product (my personal favorite because of its extreme purity--it doesn't even smell like fish oil): Pharmax Finest Pure Fish Oil with 1800 mg EPA + DHA per teaspoon: 3 to 3 1/2 teaspoons per day.

Both preparations work great and are quite affordable, given the high dose. For the Sam's Club preparation, it will cost around $30 per month, while the Pharmax liquid will run around $49 per month.

Well, the woman's husband insisted on a prescription for Lovaza. One Lovaza capsule contains 784 mg EPA + DHA per capsule: 7 to 8 capsules per day.

Here are some prices for Lovaza from online pharmacy discounters:
Prescription Giant: $78.99 for 30 capsules ($2.63 per capsule)
Planet Drugs Direct: $135 for 100 capsules ($1.35 per capsule)

These are lower than the prices I obtained in past by calling local pharmacies in my area, quite a bit lower, in fact.

Filling the Lovaza prescription at Prescription Giant will therefore cost $552.93 to $631.92 per month; at Planet Drugs Direct it will cost $283.50 to $324.00 per month. At local pharmacies, a similar 7 to 9 capsules Lovaza per day will cost upwards of $800 to $900 per month.

The patient's husband insisted on the Lovaza prescription because he knew that his insurance would cover it. When I pointed out that this was a large cost that would have to be borne by others in their healthcare premiums, he said that didn't matter to him.

I hesitated, but ended up writing the prescription for 7 Lovaza capsules per day. As soon as I handed to him, I regretted it. In fact, I am embarassed and angry at myself for having given in.

So I vowed: I will NEVER EVER write another prescription for Lovaza.

I do not believe that we should spread the excessive profiteering of the pharmaceutical industry around on the backs of people who pay their healthcare insurance premiums, just so that a few people, like this selfish couple, can save a few dollars a month.

This is your brain on wheat II

In the original Heart Scan Blog post, This is your brain on wheat, I discussed how opioid peptides (i.e., small proteins that act like opiates such as heroine or morphine) that result from digestion of wheat cause unique effects on the human brain, particularly addictive behaviors. I also briefly reviewed how elimination of wheat has been shown to reduce auditory hallucinations and other psychotic behaviors in a subset of people with paranoid schizophrenia.

These two phenomena, addictions and schizophrenia, are most likely the result of exorphins that cross the blood-brain barrier. Exorphins--exogenous morphine-like compounds--can be blocked by opiate-blocking drugs like naloxone and naltrexone. Naloxone is used in hospitals to reverse morphine or heroine overdoses; naltrexone is being repackaged into a weight loss drug, since blocking wheat-derived exorphins reduces appetite. (Yes: The USDA tells us to eat more wheat, the drug industry sells us the antidote.)

There's another way that wheat can affect the brain and nervous system: immune-activated damage.

This is similar to the effect seen in celiac. There's even overlap with some of the antibody markers used to diagnose celiac, like the anti-gliadin antibodies and the anti-endomysium antibodies.

The most common immune neurological syndrome consequent to wheat consumption is cerebellar ataxia, a condition in which an immune response causes damage to the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum, the portion of the brain responsible for balance and coordination. This results in stumbling, incoordination, incontinence, and eventually leads to reliance on a cane or walker and wearing a diaper. Average age of onset: 53 years. A shrunken, atrophied cerebellum can be seen on an MRI of the brain.

Problem: Most people with central nervous system damage caused by wheat do not have any intestinal symptoms, like diarrhea and abdominal pain, the sort of symptoms usually associated with celiac disease. It means the first sign of wheat-induced brain damage may be bumping into walls and wetting your pants.

There's no such thing as a "no-carb" diet

When I tell patients how I advise a wheat-free, cornstarch-free, sugar-free diet on the background of a low-carbohydrate diet, some people ask: "But can I live on a no-carb diet?"

Well, there's no such thing as a "no-carb" diet. Low-carb, yes. No-carb, no.

Here are the carbohydrate contents of various "low-carb" foods:

Gouda cheese--3 oz contains 1.65 grams carbohydrates
Mozzarella cheese--1 cup contains 2.89 grams carbohydrates
Walnuts--4 oz (56 nuts) contains 2.96 grams carbohydrates
Almonds--4 oz contains 1.38 grams carbohydrates
Sour cream--one-half cup contains 3.31 grams carbohydrates
Red wine--3.5 oz glass contains 2.69 grams carbohydrates
Eggplant--1 cup cooked contains 8.33 grams carbohydrates
Green pepper--1 medium-sized raw contains 5.52 grams carbohydrates
Cucumber--1 medium contains 4.34 grams carbohydrates
Tomato--1 medium contains 4.82 grams carbohydrates

(Nutrition data from USDA Nutrient Database)

In other words, foods thought to be "low-carb" actually contain a modest quantity of carbohydrates.

Such modest quantities of carbohydrates may not be enough to trip your blood sugar. But add up all the "low-carb" foods you consume over the course of a day and you can easily achieve 30 grams or more carbohydrates per day even without consuming any higher carbohydrate foods.

Why doesn't your doctor try to CURE diabetes?

Imagine you have breast cancer. You go to your doctor and she says, "As your pain worsens, we'll help you with pain medication. We'll fit you with a special bra to accommodate the tumor as it grows. That's all we're going to do."

"What?" you ask. "You mean just deal with the disease and its complications, but you're not going to help me get rid of it . . . cure it?"

It would be incredibly shocking to receive such advice. Then why is that the sort of advice given when you are diagnosed with diabetes?

Say you go to the doctor. Lab values show a fasting blood sugar of 156 mg/dl, HbA1c (a reflection of your previous 60 days average glucose) of 7.1%. Both values show clear-cut diabetes.

Your doctor advises you to 1) start the drug metformin, then 2) talk to the diabetic teaching nurse or dietitian about an American Diabetes Association (ADA) diet.

The ADA diet prescribed encourages you to increase carbohydrates and cut fats at each meal and maintain a consistent intake so that you don't experience hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) episodes. You follow the diet, which causes you to gain 10-15 lbs per year, increasing your "need" for diabetes medication. You doctor adds Actos, then Januvia, then injections of Byetta.

Three years and 34 lbs later, you are not responding well to the drug combination with blood sugars rarely staying below 200 mg/dl. You've developed protein in your urine ("proteinuria"), lost 30% of your kidney function, and you are starting to lose sensation in your feet. So the doctor replaces some of your medication with several insulin injections per day.

This formula is followed millions of times per year in the U.S. So where along the way did your doctor mention anything about a "cure"?

Adult diabetes is the one chronic disease that nobody cares to cure. Treat it, maintain control over blood sugars, but cure it? Most physicians say it's impossible.

The tragedy is that diabetes is a curable condition. I've seen it happen many times. Physicians dedicated to curing diabetes like low-carb expert, Dr. Mary Vernon, have cured it countless times. Dr. Eric Westman and colleagues have been building the case for the carbohydrate-restricted cure for diabetes with studies such as this. In this last study, of the 8 participants on insulin + medications at the start of the study, 5 no longer required medications at the close of the study--they were essentially non-diabetic.

I tell patients that diabetes, in fact, is a disease you choose to have or not to have--provided you are provided the right diet and tools. Sadly, rarely are diabetics told about the right diet and tools.

That's why Cadbury Schweppes has been a major contributor to the American Diabetes Association, as are other processed food manufacturers and the drug industry, all who stand to profit from maintaining the status quo.

The cure? Eliminate or at least dramatically reduce carbohydrates, the foods that increase blood sugar.

Note: If you have diabetes and you are taking any prescription agents, such as glyburide, glipizide, insulin, and some others, you will need to discuss how to manage your medications if you reduce carbohydrates. The problem is finding a doctor or other resource to help you do this.

LDL pattern B

Here's a Q&A I stumbled on in the Forum of MedHelp, where people obtain answers from presumed health "experts."

Question:

My VAP test results in July 07 identified an LDL Pattern B.
Overall results:
Total 150
HDL 75
LDL 61
Trig 60
HDL-2 17
LP(a) 6.0
LDL Pattern B

Medications:
Lipitor 10mg
Zetia 10mg
Altace 10mg
Atenolol 50mg
Plavix 75mg
Aspirin 81mg

I had several heart attacks which resulted in CABG performed May 2000. I am a 53 year old white male , 6'1", 190 pounds, exercise every day, watch my diet and feel great. Everything looks OK except my LDL Pattern B. Is there any therapy to improve the Patten B?


Answer from CCF, MD:
Your results indicate an LDL pattern B, which generally indicates small atherogenic LDL particles which may cause increased risk for CAD. However, there are several problems with LDL patterning: 1) its unreliability (of LDL pattern testing ), 2) unclear clinical evidence regarding regarding the usefulness of LDL patterns and particle size. The majority of evidence regarding the progression of atherosclerosis is with LDL lowering and to an smaller extent HDL raising.

All available clinical evidence shows that any particles in the VLDL, IDL, or LDL range are atherogenic, and there is no evidence that whether belonging to pattern A or B one is more atherogenic than others.

Subclass studies have proliferated over the last few years, but many of these studies were funded or subsidized either by suppliers of the assays as a method to expand their use and move them into mainstream practice, or by pharmaceutical companies in an attempt to claim some advantage over other therapeutic agents.
Thus, current data on LDL subclasses are at best incomplete and at worst misleading, suffering from publication bias, and now given the recent results of the Ensign et al. study, unreliable.

Your LDL, and HDL are at goal. The Lpa level is still not clearly linked as a modifiable risk factor for CAD, although elevated levels are now know to be linked to stroke.

Continue with your present treatments: aspirin, plavix, ateonol and altace are all essential medications.



Wow. The extent of ignorance that pervades the ranks of my colleagues is frightening.

Contrary to the response, LDL particle size assays are quite reliable and accurate. I've performed many thousands of lipoprotein assays and they yield reproducible and clinically believable results. For example, eliminate wheat, oats, cornstarch, and sugars and small LDL drops from 2400 nmol/L to 893 nmol/L (NMR)--huge drops. If repeated within a short period of time, the second measure will correspond quite closely.

The data are also quite clear: Small LDL particles (i.e., "pattern B") are a potent predictor of cardiovascular events. What we lack are the treatment trials that show that reduction of small LDL results in reduced cardiovascular events. The reason for this is that small LDL research is not well-funded, since there is no prescription drug to treat small LDL, only nutritional means. Niacin (as Niaspan) is as close as it comes for a "drug" to reduce small LDL. But diet is far more effective.

Given the questioner's fairly favorable BMI of 25.1 and his history of aggressive heart disease, it is virtually certain that he has what I call "genetic small LDL," i.e., small LDL that occur on a genetically-determined basis (likely due to variants of the cholesteryl-ester transfer protein, or CETP, or of hepatic lipase and others).

Ignoring this man's small LDL will, without a doubt, consign him to a future of more heart attacks, stents, and bypass. Maybe by that time the data supporting the treatment of small LDL will become available.

What increases blood sugar more than wheat?

Take a look at these glycemic indexes (GI):


White bread 69
Whole wheat bread 72
Sucrose 59
Mars bar 68
White rice 72
Brown rice 66


I've made issue in past of whole wheat's high GI--higher than white bread. Roughly in the same glycemic league as bread are shredded wheat cereal, brown rice, and a Mars candy bar.

With few exceptions, wheat products have among the highest GIs compared to the majority of other foods. For instance:


Kidney beans 29
Chick peas 36
Apple 39
Ice cream 36
Snickers Bar 40


Yes, by the crazy logic of glycemic index, Snickers is a low-glycemic index food.

While I do not believe that low GI makes a food good or desirable, since low GI foods still provoke high blood sugars, small LDL particles, trigger glycation, and other abnormal phenomena, they are clearly less obnoxious than the items in the first list.

Take a look at this list:

Cornflakes 80
Rice cakes 80
Rice Krispies 82
Rice pasta, 92
Instant potatoes 83
Tapioca 81



Starches that are dried and/or pulverized, such as cornstarch, potato starch, rice starch, and tapioca starch (cassava root) will increase blood sugar even more than wheat. Foods with these starches have GI's of 80-100.

Cornstarch, potato starch, rice starch, and tapioca starch: Sound familiar? These are the main starches used in "gluten-free" foods. A hint of the high GI behavior of these dried starches is seen in the GI for cornflakes of 80.

So remember: Wheat-free is not the same as gluten-free. Gluten-free identifies junk carbohydrates masquerading as healthy because they don't contain one unhealthy ingredient, i.e. wheat.

China fiction?

Dr. Colin Campbell caused a stir with publication of his 2005 book, The China Study. Dr. Campbell, after extensive animal and epidemiologic research conducted in China over 20 years, concluded that a diet high in animal protein, especially casein, was associated with increased cancer, osteoporosis, and heart disease risk.

Richard Nikoley of Free the Animal and Stephan Guyenet of Whole Health Source have been talking about an analysis of the China Study raw data performed by a young woman named Denise Minger.

Denise's analysis is nothing short of brilliant, absolutely "must" reading for anyone interested in nutrition.

Her comments on the relationship of wheat to heart disease:

Why does Campbell indict animal foods in cardiovascular disease (correlation of +1 for animal protein and -11 for fish protein), yet fail to mention that wheat flour has a correlation of +67 with heart attacks and coronary heart disease, and plant protein correlates at +25 with these conditions?

Speaking of wheat, why doesn’t Campbell also note the astronomical correlations wheat flour has with various diseases: +46 with cervix cancer, +54 with hypertensive heart disease, +47 with stroke, +41 with diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs, and the aforementioned +67 with myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease?

Carbohydrate-LDL double whammy

Carbohydrates in the diet trigger formation of small LDL particles. Because carbohydrates, such as products made from wheat, increase triglycerides and triglyceride-containing lipoproteins (chylomicrons, chylomicron remnants, VLDL, and IDL), LDL particles (NOT LDL cholesterol) become triglyceride-enriched. Triglyceride-enriched LDL particles are "remodeled" by the enzyme, hepatic lipase, into triglyceride-depleted, small LDL particles.

The list of reasons why small LDL particles are more atherogenic, i.e., plaque-causing, is long:

--Small LDL particles, being smaller, more readily penetrate the endothelial barrier of the arterial wall.
--Small LDL particles are more adherent to glycosaminoglycans in the artery wall.
--Small LDL particles are poorly taken up by the liver LDL receptor, but enthusiastically taken up by macrophage receptors of the sort in your artery walls.
--Because of their poor liver clearance, small LDL persists in the bloodstream far longer than large LDL.
--Small LDL particles are more oxidation-prone. Oxidized LDL are more likely to trigger inflammatory phenomena and be taken up by macrophages in the artery wall.

Let me add another reason why small LDL particles are more likely to cause plaque: They are more likely to undergo glycation. (More on glycation here.)

Glycation occurs when glucose (sugar) molecules in the blood or tissue modify proteins, usually irreversibly. Small LDL particles are uniquely glycation-prone. (This is likely due to a conformational change of the apoprotein B in the small LDL particle, exposing lysine residues along apo B that become glycated.)

Here's a great demonstration of this phenomenon by Younis et al:


"LDL3" is the small type. Note that small LDL particles are 4-5 times more glycated than large LDL. That's a big difference.

Once glycated, small LDL is especially resistant to being taken up by the liver. Like annoying in-laws, they hang around and hang around and . . . The longer they hang around, they more opportunity they have to contribute to plaque formation.

So, carbohydrates trigger formation of small LDL particles. Once formed, small LDL particles are glycated when blood sugar increases. While LDL can be glycated even when blood sugars are in the normal range (90 mg/dl or less), glycation goes berserk when blood sugars go higher, such as a blood sugar of 155 mg/dl after a bowl of steel-cut oatmeal.

To lose weight, prick your finger

We know that foods that trigger insulin lead to fat storage. Putting a stop to this process allows you to mobilize fat and lose weight. If you're starting out from scratch, rapid and dramatic weight loss can be experienced, as much as one pound per day.

So how can you stop triggering insulin?

The easiest way is to eliminate, or at least minimize, carbohydrates. My favorite method to restrict carbohydrates is to eliminate wheat and minimize exposure to other carbohydrates, such as oats, cornstarch, and sugars. All these foods, wheat products worst of all, cause blood sugar and insulin to skyrocket.

Another way is to check your blood sugar one hour after completing a meal and keep your after-eating, or "postprandial," blood sugar 100 mg/dl or less. Let's say you are going to eat stone ground oatmeal, for example. Blood sugar prior to eating is, say, 90 mg/dl. One hour after oatmeal it's 168 mg/dl--you know that this is going to trigger insulin and make you fat. Oatmeal should therefore be eliminated.

Keeping blood sugar to 100 mg/dl or less after eating teaches you how to avoid provocation of insulin. A shrinking tummy will follow.

To do this, you will need:

1) A glucose meter--My favorite is the One Touch Ultra Mini ($13.42 at Walmart). It's exceptionally easy to use and requires just a dot of blood. Drawback: Test strips are about $1 each. Accuchek Aviva is another good device. (We've had a lot of problems with Walgreen's brand device.)
2) Test strips--This is the costly part of the proposition. Purchased 25 or 50 at a time, they can cost from $0.50 to $1.00 a piece.
3) Lancets--These are the pins for the fingerstick device that comes with the glucose meter. A box should be just a few dollars.

No prescription is necessary, nor will insurance pay for your costs unless you're diabetic. To conserve test strips, use them only when a new, untested food or food combination is going to be consumed. If you had two scrambled eggs with green peppers, sundried tomatoes, and olive oil yesterday and had a one hour postprandial glucose of 97 mg/dl, no need to check blood sugar again if you are having the same meal again today.

Iodine update

As the iodine experience grows, I've made several unique observations.

Up to several times per day, I see people who are responding in some positive way to iodine supplementation. (See previous Heart Scan Blog posts about iodine: Iodine deficiency is REAL and The healthiest people are the most iodine deficient.)

Among the phenomena I've observed:

1) A free T4 thyroid hormone at the low end of normal, or even in the below normal range, along with a highish TSH (usually >1.5 mIU/L) are the most frequent patterns that signal iodine deficiency. Occasionally, a low free T3 value will also increase, though this is the least frequent development.

2) At a dose of 500 to 1000 mcg iodine per day, it requires anywhere from 3 to 6 months to obtain normalization of thyroid measures.

3) Reversal of small goiters also occurs over about 6 months.

4) Iodine intolerance is uncommon. If it occurs, using a low starting dose, e.g., 100-200 mcg per day, usually works. The dose can be increased gradually over the ensuing months.

5) Perceptible benefits of iodine occur only occasionally. The most common perceptible effects are increased energy and increased warmth, especially of the hands and feet.

6) Some people who have taken thyroid hormones for years will develop reduced need for their medication with iodine supplementation. In other words, their physician was inadvertently treating iodine deficiency with thyroid hormone replacement. Anyone already on any thyroid preparation(s), e.g., Synthroid, levothyroxine, Armour thyroid, Naturethroid, etc., should watch for signs of hyperthyroidism when iodine is added. But having your own thyroid gland make its own thyroid hormones is better and healthier than relying on the prescription agents. Just be sure to monitor your thyroid measures.

7) Iodine toxicity can occur--Two people in my clinic population developed iodine toxicity by taking 6000 mcg iodine per day for 6 or more months. (Both patients did it on their own based on something they read). Iodine toxicity is evidenced by shutting down your thyroid, i.e., marked increase in TSH, e.g., 15 mIU/L.


Most of the people in my clinic obtain their iodine from kelp tablets. Some use potassium iodine (KI) drops. A handful have used the high-potency Iodoral (12.5 mg or 12,500 mcg iodine per tablet); this was also the form that generated the toxic effects in the two females.

All in all, iodine deficiency is actually far more common than I ever suspected. Not everybody is iodine deficient. But a substantial minority of the Midwest population I see certainly are.
All posts by william-davis

Why ATP-3 is B--- S---

A Heart Scan Blog reader posted the link to this very excellent presentation by Dr. David Diamond, a neuroscientist at the University of South Florida.

ATP-3, or Adult Treatment Panel-3, is the set of cholesterol treatment guidelines as established by the National Cholesterol Education Panel, the guidelines used by practicing physicians nationwide. They are also the metric by which the "quality" of care is being judged by agencies like Medicare, health insurers, and other parties interested in policing healthcare. Dr. Diamond ably recounts how we ended up in this mess, the conflagration of "cut your fat, reduce cholesterol, and take a statin drug."

I was very impressed that, in his closing comments, he briefly discusses the pivotal role of glycation in heart disease causation. You will see in coming conversations how important an understanding of glycation is to create a healthy diet and lifestyle.

How far wrong can cholesterol be?

Conventional thinking is that high LDL cholesterol causes heart disease. In this line of thinking, reducing cholesterol by cutting fat and taking statin drugs thereby reduces or eliminates risk for heart disease.

Here's an (extreme) example of just how far wrong this simpleminded way of thinking can take you. At age 63, Michael had been told for the last 20 years that he was in great health, including "perfect" cholesterol values of LDL 73 mg/dl, HDL 61 mg/dl, triglycerides 102 mg/dl, total cholesterol 144 mg/dl. "Your [total] cholesterol is way below 200. You're in great shape!" his doctor told him.

Being skeptical because of the heart disease in his family, had a CT heart scan. His coronary calcium score: 4390. Needless to say, this is high . . . extremely high.

Extremely high coronary calcium scores like this carry high likelihood of death and heart attack, as high as 15-20% per year. So Michael was on borrowed time. It was damn lucky he hadn't yet experienced any cardiovascular events.

That's when Michael found our Track Your Plaque program that showed him how to 1) identify the causes of the extensive coronary atherosclerosis signified by his high calcium score, then 2) correct the causes.

The solutions, Michael learned, are relatively simple:

--Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation at a dose sufficient to yield substantial reductions in heart attack.
--"Normalization" of vitamin D blood levels (We aim for a 25-hydroxy vitamin D level of 60-70 ng/ml)
--Iodine supplementation and thyroid normalization
--A diet in which all wheat products are eliminated--whole wheat, white, it makes no difference--followed by carbohydrate restriction.
--Identification and correction of all hidden causes of coronary plaque such as small LDL particles and lipoprotein(a)

Yes, indeed: The information and online tools for health can handily exceed the limited "wisdom" dispensed by John Q. Primary Care doctor.

The best artificial sweeteners

Our new recipes, such as New York Style Cheesecake and Chocolate Coconut Bread, are wheat-free and low- or no-carbohydrate. They fit perfectly into the New Track Your Plaque Diet for gaining control over coronary atherosclerotic plaque, not to mention diabetes, pre-diabetes, hypertension, small LDL particles, high triglycerides, high inflammation (c-reactive protein) and other distortions of metabolism.

However, there's one compromise: We include use of non-nutritive sweeteners. It's therefore important to know that artificial sweeteners are not all created equal.

One common tripping point: maltodextrin.

Maltodextrin is composed of polymers (repeating subunits) of glucose, as few as 3 or as many as 20 or more glucose subunits. So maltodextrin is glucose sugar. While it lacks the especially destructive pentose sugar, fructose, maltodextrin is metabolized to glucose and thereby increases blood sugar substantially.

Many artificial sweeteners are bulked up with maltodextrin. For instance, granulated Splenda and Stevia in the Raw, two sweeteners billed as low-calorie and sugar-free that is used on a cup-for-cup basis like sugar, are primarily maltodextrin--with only a teensy bit of Splenda or stevia.

The best artificial sweeteners, i.e., the most benign without a load of maltodextrin, are:

Liquid stevia--Just the extract from stevia leaves and water. It can be a bit pricey, e.g., $10 for a 2 oz bottle, but a little goes a long way.

Truvia--While I'm not too fond of the manufacturer (Cargill), I believe that Truvia is among the better sweeteners around. It is a mixture of the natural sugar, erythritol, that generates little to no blood sugar effects and rebiana (rebaudioside), an isolate of stevia. Some people aren't too fond of the mild menthol-like cooling effect of the erythritol nor the slight aftertaste. I find it works pretty well in most recipes.

Be aware that, no matter which artificial sweetener you use, it has the potential to stimulate appetite. I therefore like to not eat foods sweetened with liquid stevia or Truvia in isolation but as part of a meal. That way, any appetite stimulation that results is substantially quelled by the proteins and fats ingested.

Sugar Nation



Former Men's Health editor, Jeff O'Connell, has just released his new book, Sugar Nation.

Back in 2009, Jeff contacted me to obtain some background insights into diabetes and its relationship with diet. He recently sent me a copy of his new book that contains some brief quotes from me.

Jeff is a writer, not a physician nor scientist. But I think that you will find his grasp of diabetes and the nutritional and lifestyle events that led him there far exceed the insights held by most practicing physicians. Like many of us, Jeff discovered how to find his way back from pre-diabetes through lessons he had to learn on his own, but not from his doctor.

Jeff tells this story as reporter, son of an estranged diabetic father with whom he reconnects as he approaches the end of his life, and as fellow sufferer of the pre-diabetic/diabetic mess that modern habits and "official" dietary advice have given us. Jeff's book is worth a read to see yet another dimension of the human stories that are emerging from this incredible nutritional tangle we find ourselves in.

Here's a unique YouTube video about Jeff's story.

Track Your Plaque makes Consumer Reports!

. . . but not in a good way.

The September, 2011 issue of Consumer Reports showcases their Protect Your Heart discussion. Third paragraph: "The website Track Your Plaque warns, 'The old tests for heart disease were wrong--dead wrong.' It says heart scans are 'the most important health test you can get.'"

They go on to expose the overuse of heart procedures like angioplasty and stent implantation and offer their advice on how to manage heart disease risk: lower BP, reduce LDL cholesterol, lose weight, stop smoking, take aspirin. They quote Dr. Paul Ridker who declares heart scans are not useful because the "deposits cardiologists worry about are the less stable plaques that CT scans routinely miss."

I thought I'd been transported back to 1995. Not only is it clear that the Consumer Report writers never looked beyond the homepage of Track Your Plaque, but somehow saw our heart disease prevention and reversal program as promoting heart procedures. Incredible.

Of course, the Track Your Plaque program does the exact opposite: Advocates an approach that virtually eliminates the need for procedures and returns control over heart disease to the participant. That's a critical difference.

And, as I've had to remind my colleagues time and time again, what we are really after is an index of total coronary atherosclerotic plaque. Even in 2011, that index remains the simple coronary calcium score, a gauge of total plaque, not just of "hard," stable plaque. Perhaps in 10 years we will be using a better tool to gauge progression and regression of all the components of coronary atherosclerotic plaque, but today it remains the simple, accessible, mammogram-like coronary calcium score.

Consumer Reports does for the idea of heart disease prevention what food manufacturers do for health and weight loss: Echo conventional wisdom of the sort that generally makes us fatter, more diabetic, leads us to more heart procedures and needless deaths. I might use Consumer Reports to rate MP-3 devices or toasters, but I certainly would not rely on them for insightful health advice.

Paging Dr. Basedow

A 23-year old man came to my office having experienced weeks of extreme anxiety, palpitations, and 19 pounds of weight loss triggered by an overactive thyroid.

It all happened because of a large dose of iodine received during a CT scan using iodine-containing x-ray dye. (X-ray dyes are made visible on x-ray due to the iodine content.) This is a reaction first described in the 19th century by German physician, Karl Adolph von Basedow. (Jod is German for iodine.)[caption id="attachment_4313" align="alignleft" width="217" caption="Dr. von Basedow. Image courtesy Wikipedia"][/caption]

Now, here's the kicker: Jod-Basedow only occurs when there is pre-existing iodine deficiency. Indeed, this young man had an enlarged thyroid, signaling longstanding iodine deficiency (a goiter).

This example is among the more flagrant examples of something I have been witnessing: the return of iodine deficiency. As Americans cut back on their intake of iodized salt and fail to obtain iodine in sufficient quantities from seafood, seaweed, or supplementation, goiters and iodine deficiency are making a return in all its glory, reminiscent of the early 20th century, pre-iodized salt.

This young man's frightening experience is yet another way iodine deficiency can show itself, by the overenthusiastic thyroid response to a large dose of iodine when iodine deficiency has been present for a prolonged period.

Iodine deficiency and goiters have been lost to memory for most people. Even the FDA, in its advice for Americans to reduce salt and sodium intake, have forgotten to remind everyone to obtain iodine from an alternative source. "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

Get your iodine.

Carb counting

In the recent Heart Scan Blog post, Can I eat quinoa, I discussed how non-wheat carbohydrate sources like quinoa, amaranth, black beans, brown rice, fruit, etc. do not exert the inflammation-provoking, appetite-increasing effects of wheat (since gliadin and gluten are not present), nor do they increase blood glucose as enthusiastically as the amylopectin A of wheat--but non-wheat grains can still increase blood sugar quite substantially.

Of course, any food that triggers blood sugar also trigger hepatic de novo lipogenesis, thereby increasing triglyceride levels and postprandial particles (e.g., chylomicron remnants), which, in turn, triggers formation of small LDL particles.

So these non-wheat carbohydrates, or what I call "intermediate carbohydrates" (for lack of a better term; low-glycemic index is falsely reassuring) still trigger all the carbohydrate phenomena of table sugar. Is it possible to obtain the fiber, B-vitamin, flavonoid benefits of these intermediate carbohydrates without triggering the undesirable carbohydrate consequences?

Yes, by using small portions. Small portions are tolerated by most people without triggering all these phenomena. Problem: Individual sensitivity varies widely. One person's perfectly safe portion size is another person's deadly dose. For instance, I've witnessed many extreme differences, such as 1-hour blood sugar after 6 oz unsweetened yogurt of 250 mg/dl in one person, 105 mg/dl in another. So checking 1-hour blood sugars is a confident means of assessing individual sensitivity to carbs.

Some people don't like the idea of checking blood sugars, however. Or, there might be times when it's inconvenient or unavailable. A useful alternative: Count carbohydrate grams. (Count "net" carbohydrate grams, of course, i.e., carbohydrates minus indigestible fiber grams to yield "net" carbs.) Most people can tolerate around 40-50 grams carbohydrates per day and deal with them effectively, provided they are spaced out throughout the day and not all at once. Only the most sensitive, e.g., diabetics, apo E2 people, those with familial hypertriglyceridemia, are intolerant to even this amount and do better with less than 30 grams per day. Then there are the genetically gifted from a carbohydrate perspective, people who can tolerate 50-60 grams, occasionally somewhat more.

People will sometimes say things like "You don't know what the hell you're talking about because I eat 200 grams carbohydrate per day and I'm normal weight and have perfect blood sugar and lipids." As in many things, the crude measures made are falsely reassuring. Glycation, for instance, from postprandial blood sugars of "only" 140 mg/dl--typical after, say, unsweetened oatmeal--still works its unhealthy magic and will lead long-term to cataracts, arthritis, and other conditions.

Humans were not meant to consume an endless supply of readily-digestible carbohydrates. Counting carbohydrates is another way to "tighten up" a carbohydrate restriction.

One hour blood sugar: Key to carbohydrate control and reversing diabetes

Diabetics are instructed to monitor blood glucose first thing in the morning and two hours after eating. This helps determine whether blood sugar is controlled with medications like metformin, Januvia, Byetta injections, or insulin.

But that's not how you use blood sugar to use to prevent or reverse diabetes. Two-hour blood sugars are also of no help in deciding whether you have halted glycation, or glucose modification of proteins the process that leads to cataracts, brittle cartilage and arthritis, oxidation of small LDL particles, atherosclerosis, kidney disease, etc.

So the key is to check one-hour after-eating (postprandial) blood sugars, a time when blood glucose peaks after consumption of carbohydrates. (It may peak somewhat sooner or later, depending on factors such as how much fluid was in the meal; protein, fat, and fiber content; presence of foods like vinegar that slow gastric emptying; the form of carbohydrate such as amylopectin A vs. amylopectin B, amylose, fructose, along with other factors. Once in a while, you might consider constructing your own postprandial glucose curve by doing fingersticks every 15 minutes to determine when your peak occurs.)

I reject the insane notion that after-eating blood sugars of less than 200 mg/dl are acceptable, the value accepted widely as the cutoff for health. Blood sugars this high occurring with any regularity ensure cataracts, arthritis, and all the other consequences of cumulative glycation. I therefore aim to keep one-hour after-eating glucoses 100 mg/dl or less. If you start in a pre-diabetic or diabetic range of, say, 120 mg/dl, then I advise people to not allow blood glucose to go any higher. A pre-meal blood glucose of 120 mg/dl would therefore be followed by an after-eating blood glucose of no higher than 120 mg/dl.

No doubt: This is strict. But people who do this:

--Lose weight from visceral fat
--Heighten insulin sensitivity
--Drop blood pressure
--Drop HbA1c and fasting glucose over time
--Reduce small LDL and other carbohydrate-sensitive measures

By the way, if you inadvertently trigger a high blood sugar like I did when I took my kids to the all-you-can-eat Indian buffet, go for a walk, bike, or burn the sugar off with a 30-minute or longer physical effort. Check your blood sugar again and it should be back in desirable range. But then learn from your lesson: Eliminate or reduce portion size of the culprit carbohydrate food.

Wheat Belly coming to bookstores!

Anyone following the conversations on these pages know that I have some very serious concerns about this thing being sold to us called "wheat"--cause it ain't wheat! It is the result of incredible genetics shenanigans inflicted on this plant, mostly in the name of increased yield per acre.



I now classify wheat as "Public Enemy #1," the prime nutritional culprit underlying obesity, heart disease, "cholesterol" abnormalities, hypertension, arthritis, psychiatric illness, and on and on. Once you read the full story, I believe that you will agree: Modern Triticum aestivum, the plant that now serves as the source for virtually all the wheat flour products now consumed--organic, whole grain, multigrain, sprouted . . . it makes no difference--does not belong in the human diet. So many people, searching for solutions for their fatigue, weight gain, leg edema, incurable rashes, joint pain, etc., will find their answers here.

Wheat Belly: Lose the wheat, lose the weight and find your path back to health will be on bookstore shelves including Barnes and Noble August 30, 2011 or is available for preorder here at Amazon. Wheat Belly will also be available as a downloadable Kindle book and as unabridged audio CDs.

You can also follow the Wheat Belly conversations on my Wheat Belly Blog. One of my recent posts discusses the herbicide-resistant semi-dwarf wheat strain, Clearfield, that is now making its way to more and more supermarket shelves.

You'll also find more conversation on the Wheat Belly Facebook pages.

The exception to low-carb

I witness spectacular results restricting carbohydrates, both in the office as well as in my online experiences, such as those in Track Your Plaque. Of course, the diet I advocate is not just low-carb; it starts with elimination of wheat (for a long list of reasons). So the diet is wheat-free in the setting of low-carbohydrate.

What does this accomplish? Here's a partial list:

--Weight loss-Specifically, loss of visceral fat, the kind hinted at on the surface as "love handles" or what I call "wheat belly."
--Reduced blood sugar and HbA1c (reflecting prior 60-90 days glucose)
--Marked reduction in small LDL and triglycerides, increased HDL
--Reduced inflammatory measures like c-reactive protein
--Reduced leptin and leptin resistance, increased adiponectin
--Reduced estrogen and prolactin in men, accompanied by shrinkage or loss of enlarged breasts ("man boobs"); reduced estrogen in females accompanied by reduced risk for breast cancer

Pretty impressive. But there's one group of people who can experience unexpected effects with this diet: The 25% of people with apoprotein E4.

Everybody has two genes for apo E; the most common type is apo E 3/3. Around 1 in 4 people have 1, less commonly 2, genes for apo E4.

I hate apo E4. I hate apo E4 because it means I've got to dust off the nonsense I used to tell patients about cutting their fat, cutting their saturated fat. But that's what apo E4 people have to do. But it doesn't end there.

Apo E4 people also typically have plenty of small LDL particles triggered by carbohydrates. Put fats and carbohydrates together and you get an explosion of small LDL particles. Remove fats, small LDL goes down a little bit, if at all. Remove carbohydrates, small LDL goes down but total LDL (mostly large) goes up. The large LDL in apo E4 does seem to be atherogenic (plaque-causing), though the data are fairly skimpy.

So apo E4 creates a nutritional rock and a hard place: To extract full advantage from diet, people with apo E4 have to 1) go wheat-free, low-carb, then 2) not overdo fats, especially saturated fat.

It still gives me the creeps to tell an apo E4 person that they've got to watch their fats, worse than watching Starsky and Hutch reruns.
The nattokinase scam

The nattokinase scam

A conversation about vitamin K2 commonly leads to confusion. Several people have asked about something called nattokinase.

The scientific data on the potential role of vitamin K2 deficiency in causing both osteoporosis and vascular calcification is fascinating. Along with vitamin D3, vitamin K2 may be an important factor in regulation of calcium metabolism. Supplementation may prove to be a major strategy for inhibition of vascular calcification.

Obtaining K2 in the diet is tricky, since it's present in just a handful of foods: egg yolks, liver, traditional cheeses, and natto. This is where the confusion starts.

Natto is a Japanese fermented soy product. I've had it and it's quite disgusting. Nonetheless, Japanese who eat natto experience less fracture. (A parallel study in heart disease has not been performed.) Natto is also a source of another substance called nattokinase.

Advocates (otherwise often known as supplement distributors) claim that nattokinase is a "fibrinolytic", or blood clot-dissolving, preparation that "improves blood flow, protects from blood clots, and prevents heart attacks and strokes."

Don't you believe it. This is patent nonsense. There are several problems with this rationale:

--Any oral fibrinolytic agent is promptly degraded in the highly acid environment of the stomach. That's why all medically used fibrinolytics are given intravenously. Drug companies have struggled for years to encapsulate, modify, or somehow protect protein (or polypeptide) products taken orally from degrading this way. They've never succeeded. That's why, for instance, growth hormone (a polypeptide) remains an injection, not an oral agent. An oral growth hormone, by the way, would sell like mad, so the drug companies would very much like to figure out how to bypass the degradative effects of stomach acid. One of the "researchers" behind the nattokinase claims boasts that he has single-handedly figured out how to protect the nattokinase molecule in the gastrointestinal tract. However, he won't tell anybody how he does it. Right.

--Fibrinolytic agents are extremely dangerous. In years past, we used to treat heart attacks with intravenous fibrinolytic agents like tissue plasminogen activator, urokinase, streptokinase, and others. They have fallen by the wayside, for the most part, because of limited effectiveness and the unavoidable dangers of their use. Fibrinolytics are "dumb": they dissolve blood clots in both good places and bad. While they might dissolve the blood clot causing your heart attack, they also degrade the tiny clot in your cerebral (brain) circulation that was protective. That's why fatal brain hemorrhages, bleeding stomach ulcers, and blood oozing from strange places can also occur with fibrinolytic administration. Believe me, I've seen it happen, and I've watched people die from them.

The idea that a small dose taken orally is healthy is ridiculous. Even if nattokinase worked, why the heck would you take an agent that has known dangerous and very real consequences?

Don't let this idiocy reflect poorly on the K2 conversation, which, I believe, holds real merit and is backed by legitimate science. This is symptomatic of a larger difficulty with the supplement industry: Insane and unfounded claims about one supplement erodes credibility for the entire industry. It gives regulation-crazed people like the FDA ammunition to go after supplements, something none of us need. You and I have to sift through the nonsense to uncover the real gems in this rockpile, real gems like vitamin D3, omega-3 fatty acids from fish oil, and, perhaps, vitamin K2. But not nattokinase.

Comments (179) -

  • Anonymous

    6/2/2007 6:49:00 PM |

    Before you dismiss Nattokinase, please check out research done by Hiroyuki Sumi from 1987 (original discovery) and 1990, and subsequent research on how the compound has an effect on plasmin and other clot-dissolving agents.

  • Dr. Davis

    6/2/2007 10:12:00 PM |

    I have read his research. I stand by my opinion: Nattokinase is a scam. It is an utterly ridiculous notion that anyone should take oral thrombolytic agents to "prevent blood clots". Thrombolysis is a dangerous strategy, even if it worked in humans by the oral route. An agent that, if it worked, poses serious potential for severe side effects and death needs to be tested thoroughly first. It is plain idiocy to use this agent. It is not fish  oil, it is not a vitamin, it is something entirely different that has no basis for use as a preventive. You're throwing your money away.

  • Anonymous

    9/2/2007 5:33:00 AM |

    I actually don't find natto disgusting at all -- I think I am one of the few non-Japanese who like it.  I didn't realize it was so healthy for you.  Should I consciously add it to my diet?

  • Dr. Davis

    9/2/2007 1:29:00 PM |

    No kidding?

    Natto is an abundant source of vitamin K2, which may have a role in regulating calcium metabolism. Although not as crucial as vit D3, K2 is emerging as a potential addition to our program. See our full Special Report on vitamin K2 on the www.trackyourplaque.com website.

  • Anonymous

    12/18/2007 11:07:00 PM |

    "Fibrinolytics are "dumb": they dissolve blood clots in both good places and bad."

    That's true of anything taken orally, and is not much of a criticism. And there is little difference in risk between fish oils or aspirin, and typical nattokinase intakes. So the only point you're making that makes any sense to me is that nattokinase does not survive stomach acidity, but that is contradicted by studies where nattokinase taken orally did have an effect.

  • Anonymous

    12/19/2007 6:04:00 AM |

    "I believe you are failing to appreciate what fibrinolytics accomplish if they were truly being absorbed through the stomach: They are deadly. You have to be nuts to take an agent like this chronically if it worked."

    Problem is that it's even nuttier to be taking warfarin chronically, considering it's _known_ interaction with vitamin K - but that's exactly what is currently pushed. See www.vitamink2.org for discussion of the evils of warfarin - the surest route to osteoporosis and blood vessel calcification.

    Personally, I take K2-7, fish oil, etc., but am open to the idea that nattokinase may be able to offset the decline in plasmin production that occurs with age. Of course, it would be best if we had a (convenient) blood value to monitor to check dosage (something as simple as a blood glucose or INR meter). Certainly more research is needed.

    If not nattokinase, then how do you suggest that we address the increased risk of clotting with age? And how should the amounts of these alternatives be adapted to individual differences? (As exemplified by the issue of how much fish oil to consume.)

  • Dr. Davis

    12/19/2007 1:32:00 PM |

    I agree with you on the vitmamin K2 issue and certainly with omega-3. However, the whole lytic issue is truly nutty. Lytics are destructive. While warfarin (I'm no fan, either, and I put all interested warfarin-taking patients on K1 and K2 supplements if the warfarin can't be avoided, e.g., chronic pulmonary emboli, left ventricular thrombi, prosthetic heart valve--these people have no choice) prevents propagation of blood clot, it is NOT a blood clot dissolver. Lytic agents ARE. In other words, the little protective blood clot in the tiny defect in your middle cerebral artery that would have healed itself without consequence becomes a cerebral bleed. I know--I've seen it happen several times in the "old days" when lytics were popular. It even happens with the smaller doses used for localized clot dissolution introduced via specific delivery into the thrombus.

    Unfortunately, I don't have an answer on how to manage the acquired disorder of blood coagulation that accompanies aging. However, omega-3s are a big part of the solution.

  • Anonymous

    12/19/2007 2:49:00 PM |

    For the record, here's a summary of the argument for nattokinase, as promoted by Holsworth. If all of this turns out to be true, would you still be against use of nattokinase?

    Dr. Holsworth describes the actions of nattokinase as “Nurturing Nature”. The most therapeutic perspective property of NK is the indirect effect.
    1) inhibits PAI-1 (plasminogen activation inhibitor-1)
    2) upregulates individual’s own tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) anti-clotting mechanism
    3) converts endogenous pro-urokinase to urokinase
    4) has small anti-platelet activity – similar to garlic or onions
    Lyses cross-linked or dysfunctional fibrin. NK is 6 times more efficient than our own plasmin, but does not compete with cleavage of fibrinogen, so doesn’t attack anything that isn’t dysfunctional. Fibrin is the single-most causative agent that makes blood thick.
    -No direct tPA activity – no direct competition in clotting
    -No degradation of albumin by NK
    -Said to act like an Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitor ACEi). Keeps angiotensin II down and in rat studies, thins the neo-intimal layer of inflamed blood vessels. He is not impressed with the clinical studies suggesting the ACEi effect; but clinically, it works as an anti-hypertensive medicine . He does find that people on antihypertensives decrease the amount of high blood pressure medication or eliminate them all together in 7 – 14 days.
    Dr Holsworth cautions that individuals on high blood pressure medicines, closely monitor their blood pressure and notify their primary care physician about any lowering of their blood pressure.
    Dr. Holsworth has seen significant decreases of 10-20 points of systolic and diastolic blood pressures within 7 days of starting nattokinase.
    -Linked to circadian rhythm. PAI-1 inhibits the ability to create plasmin. Clots occur early in the a.m. predominantly and, therefore, increase the stroke or heart attack incidence.
    Breaking down existing clots…
    NK has only slight or limited Pac Man capabilities to “eat away” directlyat existing clots, but rather “nurtures nature” by enhancing our own endogenous pro-fibrinolytic system. Small direct effect of less than 10% efficacy similar to plasmin where it works directly on a clot – Pac Man style. It will not break loose a clot.

    What is an ideal thyrombolyic agent?
    • Rapid – NK is effective within 4 hours PO (oral) administration and has significant fibrinolytic activity in blood vs. tPA which has that 3-hour grace period to initiate…so there is only one hour differential in ischemia situation. Additionally, tPA has short duration of effectiveness and must be taken intravenously..
    • Duration – maintain patency of vasculature – no early reclusions.
    • Sustained duration of action - half-life of NK is 8 – 12 hours. After tPA administration, patients are at an increased risk for the next 14 – 48 hours where patients are susceptible and have an increased thrombophilic state secondary to tPA IV (as in rebound effect).
    • Specific - no shotgun effect of cleaving any and all fibrin in the body… Specific or targeted…that’s what NK does with cross-linked fibrin.
    • Thrombosis–specific…doesn’t adversely affect coagulation factors or the coagulation cascade
    • Upregulates body’s own plasminogen system.
    • Low risk of hemorrhage - isolated cases of epistaxis (nose bleeds) – compounded by 4 – 5 other anti-platelet agents…garlic ginkgo, fish oil. Reduce intake.
    • Absence of systemic side effects.
    • Caution – if on antihypertensives, check blood pressure in 7 – 10 days. NK can quickly correct the body’s Hemorheology. Blood pressure medicines may have to be titrated down so individual is not over-medicated or discontinue use.
    • -Low cost
    • Per oral (P.O.) convenience (as opposed to IV).

  • Anonymous

    12/22/2007 3:24:00 PM |

    I should have mentioned that the above Holsworth summary is from Jackie on the www.afibbers.net forum.

    I guess I'm also interested in what Dr. Davis has to say about the use of nattokinase to treat fibroids, as exemplified by Fibrovan (www.fibrovan.com). Are all the testimonies faked? Or will all the patients soon die of some sort of internal bleeding?

  • Dr. Davis

    12/23/2007 12:31:00 AM |

    The data I've looked at re: nattokinase has been proprietary, generated clearly by a manufacturer. Until some real science emerges, even modest, to support this otherwise counterintuitive strategy, it remains something that has no value for our plaque reducing focus. The disease is not thrombus or clot; the disease is atherosclerosis. Clot develops when heart attack occurs. It makes no sense to take a lytic agent that dissolves clotes continuously. Unless I am missing something here, nattokinase remains squarely in the nonsense column.

  • Anonymous

    2/24/2008 2:38:00 PM |

    My wife has enometriosis with disabling pain and the treaments that the doctors have been giving seems to only make it wrose. I found aFibrovan on the internet stating that it would reduce the symptoms within in weeks with no side effects.

    Is this fibrovan similar to the scams in which you speak or does it have merit for endo an treatment?

  • Anonymous

    3/2/2008 2:33:00 PM |

    Thank you Dr. Davis for your comments re:  nattokinase.  As you know, the testimonials (at the product sites) are pretty amazing.  As my holistic MD is suggesting UFE or myomectomy, I'm thinking about trying one of the fibrovan, neprinol "fibroid dissolvers"!  I'm also taking codliver oil, turmeric and a pile of herbs to support liver function.  are all those testimonials lies?  maybe if we had an economic system based on love and caring instead of profit, we wouldn't be asking this question.  thank you again for your knowledge and care-it's clear that you do. lynn

  • Anonymous

    3/9/2008 12:18:00 AM |

    I don't have a heart problem.  I have had debilitating muculoskeletal pain for over 8 years.  Last week Friday, 3/7/08, I began taking a large dose of nattokinase.  Results were evident in fewer than 4 hours and continue today, 8 days later.  I am able to function without my usual pain medication and the adhesions and hypertone in my muscle tissue continue to decrease daily.  Do you have any ideas why?

    Thanks.

  • Anonymous

    3/19/2008 3:24:00 PM |

    I have spoken with my doctor who states that NK is being used currently in Germany to treat DVT's, clots, etc., and two of her heart patients also take it, one for over two years now (from Germany himself) and another woman for the past six months, both have improved health.  I also have many friends who have used NK to dissolve their DVT's who no issues what so ever, and with doctors involvement watching the progress.  Why is none of this ever talked about?  I haven't heard one report of a person dying from NK.  SH

  • Rett

    4/15/2008 3:31:00 PM |

    I an interested to know why you think, that if nattokinase were dangerous in that it may dissolve clots too quickly or inappropriately, how come users of natto do not report excessive bruising?

  • Anonymous

    4/17/2008 8:04:00 PM |

    As if conventional medicine is so great.  The United States spends more on health care than any other nation, yet as a recent study revealed we are dead last in outcomes.  I went to FIVE (5) physicians (PCP, ortho, GYN, etc.) over a 3.5-month period with left leg pain and swelling, and stated several times with these symptoms and the fact I'm on estrogen I think this is a DVT.  Response?  "Oh, no that's normal as we age.  Our veins become less efficient" (oh, please...what a crock)  The sixth physician, a pulmonologist, ordered an ultrasound that revealed an extensive proximal DVT.  If conventional medicine is so charming, please explain to me why it is so d*** incompetent.  A friend of mine went for a mammogram.  "We see something suspicious."  Pathology after biopsy-indeterminate x3, then "you've got lymphoma".  An oncologist was wanting to start chemo right away.  A PET scan and numerous labs were all NORMAL!!!  No cancer.  How pathetic.  How many people are receiving chemotherapy who never had cancer in the first place?  Perhaps Dr. Davis you need to open your mind!!  Most sincerely!

  • Anonymous

    4/18/2008 1:33:00 PM |

    I started taking Nattokinase for a DVT.  I was initially taking 2,000 FU per day then bumped it to 6,000.  Recent labs and ultrasound show IT IS WORKING!!  Fibrin degradation products are high and the ultrasound shows a resolving clot just weeks after diagnosis.  (Natto was started in the past 3 weeks; the higher dose within the last week.)  We've been using rat poison (Coumadin) since the early 1950s.  The hair thinning/loss, bloating, headache, etc. that accompanies Coumadin are known side effects though most doctors will tell patients they are not.  Are we to believe that in 60 years we can't come up with anything better to offer than Coumadin?  Studies have undeniably shown that after one year of "treatment" with Coumadin, more than 24 percent of people STILL HAVE residual clot.  Coumadin, of course, does not dissolve clots.  It only prevents new ones from forming and impacts the clotting cascade to enable the body to absorb the clot.  Nattokinase is a viable, effective alternative.  The real reason it is not studied in America is because it is a naturally-occurring substance that cannot be patented,i.e., no drug company can profit.  The Japanese people are the healthiest people on the face of the earth.  How thoughtful of Japan Air Lines to include natto in their snacks on their LONG-HAUL flights.  Obviously, they are proactive in their healthcare and attempts to prevent clots.  Just as American medical practitioners laugh at Nattokinase, I recall a time when we laughed at those cars called Toyotas.  No one is laughing now at the quality and high integrity of this company.  Now as then, perhaps we should stop criticizing and start emulating.

  • Anonymous

    4/18/2008 1:37:00 PM |

    Dr. Davis-you should be upfront about the fact that Coumadin is one of the top 10 reasons for emergency room visits in the United States.

  • Anonymous

    6/21/2008 2:39:00 AM |

    I like the saying "If all you have is a hammer, everyting you see is a nail".  I have seen many doctors on various occasions, lost a tooth because the dentist only had a hammer.  Now I have s second tooth that feels funny, and it will not be treated by a dentist.

    I started taking nattokinase a few days ago, 5000FU per pill once a day.  I do feel something different happening, but can't quite put my finger on it.  But it's not a feeling of being better.  As of now, I am feeling a bit numbness in both arms, and a location between the shoulder blades hurts a bit and changes in area now and then.

  • Dr. William Davis

    7/8/2008 3:47:00 AM |

    Looking back over these posts accumulating over the past several months, I note that some readers have interpreted my criticisms of the junk science behind nattokinase as an indirect endorsement of warfarin.

    That is plain wrong.

    I criticize nattokinase for making extravagant claims with virtually no real data in humans. If fibrinolysis truly developed with nattokinase, we would expect several deaths for every 100 people who take it, because that is the experience with any agent causing lysis of clots.

    If I advocate anything, it is truth. Be aware that, whether it's a drug manufacturer, a food manufacturer, or a supplement manufacturer, they are willing takers of your money.

    There are truly effective, powerful supplements out there. Nattokinase is not one of them.

  • Oswald

    7/12/2008 3:04:00 PM |

    This is an interesting debate on a couple of levels:

    (1) The assertion that "all" fibrolytic substances are broken down by the stomach environment. That should be all *known* substances. Just because you have always seen only white swans doesn't mean there aren't any black swans (see the philosopher Karl Popper to learn about being a real scientist).

    (2) Anecdotal evidence from myself. I try to be objective. I can't say anything about the anticoagulant effects of Nattokinase, but so far as I can tell it has some anti-inflammatory effect. I have monitored this in my own health.

    Of course we all need to proceed carefully when new substances are touted as having fabulous effects.
    Snake oil is ever present. We should also remember that most Doctors are not trained to be scientists, they seldom understand how science should proceed. So very often they retreat into dogma and blanket assertions. It wasn't so long ago that saying stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria would have caused a Doctor to be derided as a fool. Science and knowledge proceeds by conjecture and refutation, and while we do have to be careful of Snake oil, we also have to be aware that accepted dogma is often wrong.

  • Anonymous

    8/4/2008 6:07:00 AM |

    "If fibrinolysis truly developed with nattokinase, we would expect several deaths for every 100 people who take it, because that is the experience with any agent causing lysis of clots." - Dr. Davis

    Makes perfect sense, that as a oral thrombolytic agent, nattokinase very likely is a "scam."

    But, nattokinase's efficacy as an oral anticoagulant is not out of the question by the limited empirical evidence that exists.  Nattokinase begs to be studied in that regard, and should be before being totally declared a "scam."

    Would not nattokinase qualify as an important part of the TYP protocol if it does indeed prove to be an effective alternative for all thoughs people taking warfarin?

  • Gene

    8/22/2008 8:50:00 PM |

    I take it you disapprove of NK.
    Thank you for your insights.  It may or may not be that your paradigm colored your opinion, as it does with all of us, I suppose.  
    NK is an over-the-counter substance and, if taken on its face value, according to your analysis, it should be removed from the stores, as it is monkeying with primal forces.
    Therefore, either someone is asleep at the switch or the risk is not as purported (the risk of being ripped off is another department.)
    I think the scientific method is over-used as a sword and shield, yet doctors rely on their own experience all the time, even disagreeing with reports. My view there is no report not telling me to not eat wood screws.
    More real information is needed, but the drug companies, unlike what is suggested, will not be happy to find a cheap, generic solution to anything. though the president may use the solution. It is just the way reality has been organized.
    What is needed is a useful government, but we all know that is a wasted thought.
    Foreign research should not be put aside, not because to do so is some sort of racism, but because it may be balanced.
    Clearly, NK does something. We can't just throw our hands up and deny anecdotal experience, often quoted by intrigued doctors, and call people nuts. That may be sort of true, but it is a meaningless as blatant advocacy. Thus, we must wait and look for research, probably out of Japan.
    In the meantime, natto is OK if you add cinnamon. Forget that soy stuff.  Do this, and it is anti-inflammatory, too.
    Me, I am a fan of Serrapeptase and have not found much to dissuade me.

  • Anonymous

    9/8/2008 6:31:00 PM |

    Hello Dr. Davis

    While your credentials speak for themselves, I would submit that you simply do not have the nutritional background to support many of your claims re: Nattokinase. I base this on the typical Medical curriculum that includes on average a whopping equivalent of a weekend course at best... I suggest you look at the coagulation pathways that Nattokinase acts within and then you might be entitled to having an opinion that comes from reality and not your personal dogma.

  • Ryan W.

    10/5/2008 8:02:00 AM |

    Another fibrinolytic enzyme, serrapeptase, (which is also a serine protease) which is larger than nattokinase and also absorbed by the gut (if coated to pass through the stomach) is capable of breaking up bacterial biofilms, enhancing the effectiveness of antibiotics, and removing persistent bacterial infections.

    Serrapeptase is also used commonly as a painkiller and anti-inflammatory in Germany with no marked ill effects. The fact that it has fibrinolytic activity, is absorbed gastrointestinaly and still is safe makes me question your catagorical statements about nattokinase.

    I don't suppose you can cite any peer reviewed in vitro research that actually supports your view?

    The safety of natto aside for a moment, personally what I wonder is whether Natto's beneficial effects are from nattokinase or from a different serine protease found in natto.

    ----
    Because the control of the invasion of host cells by Listeria could potentially hinder its spread in the infected host, we have examined the effects of a protease treatment on the ability of L. monocytogenes to form biofilms and to invade tissues. We have chosen serratiopeptidase (SPEP), an extracellular metalloprotease produced by Serratia marcescens that is already widely used as an anti-inflammatory agent, and has been shown to modulate adhesin expression and to induce antibiotic sensitivity in other bacteria. Treatment of L. monocytogenes with sublethal concentrations of SPEP reduced their ability to form biofilms and to invade host cells.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18479885?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

    CONCLUSIONS: Serratiopeptidase was effective for eradicating infection caused by biofilm-forming bacteria in this experimental animal model. The antibiofilm property of the enzyme may enhance antibiotic efficacy in the treatment of staphylococcal infections.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16757752?ordinalpos=2&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

    Among the different mechanisms of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents that have been studied, biofilm formation is one of the most widespread. This mechanism is frequently the cause of failure in the treatment of prosthetic device infections, and several attempts have been made to develop molecules and protocols that are able to inhibit biofilm-embedded bacteria. We present data suggesting the possibility that proteolytic enzymes could significantly enhance the activities of antibiotics against biofilms. Antibiotic susceptibility tests on both planktonic and sessile cultures, studies on the dynamics of colonization of 10 biofilm-forming isolates, and then bioluminescence and scanning electron microscopy under seven different experimental conditions showed that serratiopeptidase greatly enhances the activity of ofloxacin on sessile cultures and can inhibit biofilm formation.


    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8109925?ordinalpos=3&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum


    These results indicated QK-1 was a plasmin-like serine protease and QK-2 a subtilisin family serine protease.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14984705?ordinalpos=13&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

  • Dan

    10/8/2008 2:45:00 PM |

    "I don't have a heart problem. I have had debilitating muculoskeletal pain for over 8 years. Last week Friday, 3/7/08, I began taking a large dose of nattokinase. Results were evident in fewer than 4 hours and continue today, 8 days later. I am able to function without my usual pain medication and the adhesions and hypertone in my muscle tissue continue to decrease daily. Do you have any ideas why?"

    Dr. Davis,

    I have been taking NK since I wrote the quote, above.  In the past 6 months I have continued to experience improvement in my condition.

    I am a massage therapist, having worked on 1000's of clients, many with similar, but less severe, symptoms as mine.  I have never seen, nor experienced such a dramatic improvement in tissue health except with one client who began treatment with quinolin(many years ago), an anomoly to me at that time.

    I was a mechanical engineer, before head injury led to my physical dysfunction.  It is common, in every field of knowledge, for us to limit our options for problem solutions due to unfounded beliefs, often out of convenience, fear or ignorance.

    NK has allowed me to end my slow slide into physical pain and oblivion after more than 8 years of extensive, and intensive treatment(s) that had only succeeded in slowing my slide.  It has allowed me to return to massage practice, part time, to begin reconnecting with my family after years of isolation, and has given me reason to think that a return to engineering practice may one day be possible, too.

    That is a big claim, I realize, but it represents a careful evaluation of objective evidence of the beneficial action of NK in the human body, something I haven't found anywhere, to date. I don't know what makes NK work, but for people with hardened myofacsia, it improves their response to therapy, resulting in reduced pain and improved function in a much shorter time than is typical.  It's effects are obvious to palpation in less than 4hours.

    You have reason to question NK for lack of solid evidence. I don't expect my claim to change your position.  But I can tell you that my claim is solidly objective, the results are more repeatable than most medical claims, rising very near the level of empirical certainty.

    I hope this discussion leads others to unexpected solutions, as it has me.

  • Anonymous

    10/14/2008 5:59:00 PM |

    What the good Doctor unfortunately overlooks, is that most serious Nattokinase supplements are enteric coated tablets, and quite easily pass the acid barrier of the stomach, he also fails to mention that not all of Nattokinase, even in a non enteric protected form, is destroyed by stomach acid. For example , a diet rich in Natto, isn't suffering 100% lost to stomach acid, but rather a mere percentage, as with most any strict exclusive diet of one particular thing.

  • rudy

    11/19/2008 8:43:00 PM |

    i am taking natto 100mg primarily to make blood harder to clot, i have observed three things; 1) it is pretty potent, even with 100mg (2000FU), i had a bleeding in the gum is harder to clot, 2) my blood pressure have dropped about 8 points both high and low side, 3) like DAN, my myfascial pain is lessen ever since taking natto, at first i thought it was because of MSM, but actually it was natto that reduced my pain

    however, my father died from cerebal bleeding after he was given thrombolytic in ER for his heart attack, so i certainly do appreciate Dr.Davis point of view that sometimes clots are useful, and if you overdo it and use too much anticongulate agent (such as natto) it may have negative side effects one has to be careful

  • Anonymous

    12/3/2008 11:05:00 AM |

    By calling Nattokinase a "scam", one implies that current medical treatment is superior or less dangerous.  It encourages people on Coumadin to continue this dangerous drug, which has led to untold morbidity and mortality--and we won't go into the manufacturing debacles from China.  We really should not be comparing Coumadin/Warfarin (a product of the laboratory) with Nattokinase.  Coumadin and Warfarin do NOT dissolve blood clots. They simply prevent them from enlarging/prevent new clots, while the clots (hopefully) stabilize and do not embolize.  After stabilization of a clot against the vessel wall, one must exercise to increase plasmin in the blood in order to significantly affect breakdown.  Doctors DO NOT inform patients that Coumadin is not a fibrinolytic.  Most patients on Coumadin believe that Coumadin is breaking down their clots. Nattokinase supports the plasmin realm, working the way the body naturally does, to gradually break down clot constituents--no emboli are created.  ("-ase" indicates enzyme)  Some other enzymes and enzyme products can have anti-inflammatory properties, such as those naturally occuring in foods, those in the famous Wobenzym, and those in a number of digestive enzyme products absorbed through the gut.  Inflammation is a key factor in preventing aberrant clots.  But taking laboratory products, rather than foods or food derivatives, is what gets us in trouble.  We do not have the full knowledge of synergy in foods and conventional doctors tend to dismiss, rather than respect, what is unknown.  Synergy is why eating "live" food is so important.  I will stand by Hippocrates--"Let your food be your medicine and your medicine your food."  Treatments derived from foods (which have been alive) are safer than and, in the long term, superior to isolated, fractionated, or synthetic drugs.  Enzymes decrease inflammation because they allow it to resolve--breaking down the barriers in the circulatory and interstitial spaces, so that waste products can leave and nutrition can enter.  This may be why folks report effects on fibroids, muscle pain, and fatigue with enzymes such as Nattokinase and Wobenzym.  It supports the normal, continuous break-down/re-build process at work in the body.  Synthetic drugs target isolated effects (clots) from a bigger problem (inflammation) and fail to address root causes.  Enzymes have a more comprehensive effect--they also aid digestion, so that food does not putrefy, ferment, become rancid--absorption of which also causes inflammation and other undesirable effects on health.  We have 3 paths in the body that cause blood to clot and just one (plasmin) to break down clots. That speaks to the wisdom of the Creator--given a good, low inflammation diet of fresh foods with enzymes, clotting would not occur abnormally.  Bleeding (from injury), not aberrant clotting, would be the primary concern for us if we followed a healthy lifestyle.  With aging, there is more tendency to clotting--this parallels digestive problems (stomach, liver, gall bladder, pancreas, intestinal tract).  Conventional Doctors give acid preventer drugs, such as the purple pill, and antacids.  Natural doctors address healing of ulcers and leaky gut, if necessary, and give enzymes and hydrochloric acid supplements (HCl production declines by 1/2 by the time we reach 50--it's the lactic acid from food fermentation that typically causes heartburn).  One cannot   knowledgeably discuss whole foods or whole food derived supplements with a medical-style mindset--foods/phytonutrients are far more complex than synthetic drugs, and have  synergistic, protective effects that haven't been duplicated in the laboratory. Nattokinase is currently being researched for use in atrial fibrillation.

  • Anonymous

    12/10/2008 3:20:00 AM |

    I know someone who has essential thrombocytosis and her platelets were on a steady path upward until she started taking nattokinase with doctor supervision of her platelets.  They are now on a steady path downward and have already dropped by almost 400 in the last 2 months.  I'm not sure the risks are any moreso than taking a chemotherapy drug for the rest of your life which was the alternative. Anecdotal evidence should not be ignored.

  • lmontgom

    1/12/2009 4:11:00 AM |

    Nattokinase has been a miracle for me. I could barely walk or sleep because of chronic, pervasive pain in both my legs. My doctor x-rayed hips and knees, recommended replacements. She sent me to an orthopedist who asked if my knees and hips hurt. My "No" caused him to send me away. I asked for physical therapy. That helped little. Reading on the vitacost site, I found a comment on natto kinase that caused me to drive to my local health food store, buy some and take it immediately. By Day 2, my legs hurt much less. by Day 4, they stopped hurting. That was about 2 months ago, and the experience continues. In addition, occasional numbesses in my hands ceased. I urge Dr. Davis to look at the effects we are experiencing and find research telling him why it works. I know nothing about thrombolytics but am grateful that I have nattokinase and can walk!

  • Red Beard

    1/29/2009 5:35:00 PM |

    Everyone seems to be missing the most important argument against the effectiveness of nattokinase:  it is a protein enzyme, and there is not a single protein in this universe that can be taken up by our GI tract in its whole and active form.  Look at it this way:  there are a few rare diseases in which a person is unable to make some important enzyme on their own.  If enzyme replacement therapy is an option, this is always done intravenously, because we've known for a long time that you cannot introduce an enzyme in pill form and have it be functional in the blood stream.  If you could, enzyme replacement pills would be a multi-billion dollar industry!

    Yes, nattokinase may have all the effects that have been described vs. clotting, but this is only if you add it DIRECTLY to the blood.  The research that has been done that everyone quotes was not done by having people take this enzyme orally then examining their clotting function.  They either took blood out of a person and added it, or gave it to animals intravenously.  

    Secondly, even IF it was true that an enzyme like nattokinase could be orally active--which is impossible--its fibrinolytic properties would make it MORE DANGEROUS than aspirin in terms of serious side effects.

  • Karen

    2/10/2009 3:09:00 PM |

    and the alternative is coumadan (warfarin) WHICH IS RAT POISON. You are so wrong doctor.

  • Anonymous

    2/15/2009 1:50:00 PM |

    Nattokinase taken orally works, yoiu can find a lot of research on pubmed.
    Maybe stomach environment transforms it in something different, but what if that something is active against blood clotting?

  • Anonymous

    2/23/2009 6:41:00 PM |

    I have noted that NattoKinase as an oral blood thinner is asserted to be a scam here and the rationalisation for this is that there was no reliable research done to back it for what it is purported to do, right?.

    If I advocate anything, it is truth. Be aware that, whether it's a drug manufacturer, a food manufacturer, or a supplement manufacturer, they are willing takers of your money.

    Quote:
    "There are truly effective, powerful supplements out there. Nattokinase is not one of them."
    Dr.Davis

    Well what do you call asserting a negative (its a scam) without empirical research to back the assertion? Do we have the pot calling the kettle black?

    Apparently the research has proceeded to an empirical stage.
    A research summary can be seen here:
    http://www.xymogen.com/drr/RR-012-1104-07.pdf

    Excerpt from link;

    Research
    Two human trials and 17 other studies have been done
    on nattokinase. In a placebo-controlled study done by
    Dr. Sumi in which dogs were induced to have blood
    clots, oral administration of nattokinase (1 gm nattokinase
    as four 250 mg capsules) resulted in angiograms
    showing normal circulation and dissolution of the clot
    within five hours of treatment. In contrast, blood clots
    in the dogs receiving only a placebo did not show any
    signs of dissolution during the 18 hours following treatment.4
    Japanese researchers who studied nattokinase's ability
    to dissolve a thrombus in the carotid arteries of rats
    found that those given nattokinase regained 62% of
    blood flow, whereas those treated with plasmin regained only 15.8%.5
    Researchers from Oklahoma State University,Miyazaki Medical College and JCR Pharmaceuticals
    conducted a human study on 12 healthy volunteers (6 men and 6 women; ages 21-55 years). Before breakfast,each of the volunteers was given 200 grams of the food natto. Then, through a series of blood tests, the researchers tracked the fibrinolytic activity. On average, the volunteers' ELT (a measure of how long it takes to dissolve a blood clot) dropped by 48% within two hours of treatment. This heightened ability to dissolve blood clots was retained for 2 to 8 hours. In order to provide
    a control for the study, the same amount of boiled soybeans
    (non-fermented)was consumed by
    the volunteers. The same tests for fibrinolytic activity did
    not show any significant changes.6

    In recent years, several clinical trials on animals and humans have confirmed this action. A Wister rat study demonstrated on average a 12.7% decline in systolic blood pressure within two hours of a single administration of test extract directly into the
    peritoneum of the rats. These same researchers also confirmed the presence of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors within the test extract of natto.7 The same extract was then tested on hypertensive human volunteers who took 30 grams of the extract for four consecutive days. In four out of five volunteers, the systolic blood pressure dropped an average of 10.9% and the diastolic dropped 9.7%.7,8

  • Anonymous

    3/2/2009 8:16:00 PM |

    During my last blood test, my C-Reactive Protein Test came out high (3.6) My doctor suggested nattokinase to see if that would reduce the inflammation.  After taking the nattokinase for a month I retested my CRP and the reading was 1.4.  Also, as a side note, I had continuous problems with a hemmroid which has disappeared.  I don't know if this was the nattokinase or not, but I wasn't taking anything else at the time.

  • FunkOdyssey

    3/3/2009 9:23:00 PM |

    You are incorrect in your assertion that nattokinase cannot be absorbed intact across the gut mucosa, and this is supported by published data in contrast to your opinion.  Its effects in humans after oral administration include a reduction of blood pressure:

    Hypertens Res. 2008 Aug;31(8):1583-8.

        Effects of nattokinase on blood pressure: a randomized, controlled trial.
        Kim JY, Gum SN, Paik JK, Lim HH, Kim KC, Ogasawara K, Inoue K, Park S, Jang Y, Lee JH.

        Yonsei University Research Institute of Science for Aging, Department of Food and Nutrition, College of Human Ecology, Yonsei University, and Department of Family Medicine, Mizmedi Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

        The objective of this study was to examine the effects of nattokinase supplementation on blood pressure in subjects with pre-hypertension or stage 1 hypertension. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 86 participants ranging from 20 to 80 years of age with an initial untreated systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 130 to 159 mmHg received nattokinase (2,000 FU/capsule) or a placebo capsule for 8 weeks. Seventy-three subjects completed the protocol. Compared with the control group, the net changes in SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were -5.55 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI], -10.5 to -0.57 mmHg; p<0.05) and -2.84 mmHg (CI, -5.33 to -0.33 mmHg; p<0.05), respectively, after the 8-week intervention. The corresponding net change in renin activity was -1.17 ng/mL/h for the nattokinase group compared with the control group (p<0.05). In conclusion, nattokinase supplementation resulted in a reduction in SBP and DBP. These findings suggest that increased intake of nattokinase may play an important role in preventing and treating hypertension.

        PMID: 18971533

    Some evidence of the fact that nattokinase is an orally effective fibrinolytic agent in humans that can be dangerous when used improperly:

    Intern Med. 2008;47(5):467-9. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
        Cerebellar hemorrhage provoked by combined use of nattokinase and aspirin in a patient with cerebral microbleeds.
        Chang YY, Liu JS, Lai SL, Wu HS, Lan MY.

        Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

        Nattokinase is used as a health-promoting medicine for preventing thrombosis due to its fibrinolytic activity. Cerebral microbleed is remnant of blood extravasations from the damaged vessels related to cerebral microangiopathies. We report a patient, having used aspirin for secondary stroke prevention, who had an acute cerebellar hemorrhage after taking nattokinase 400 mg daily for 7 consecutive days. In addition to the hemorrhagic lesion, multiple microbleeds were demonstrated on brain MR images. We suggest that nattokinase may increase risk of intracerebral hemorrhage in patients who have bleeding-prone cerebral microangiopathy and are receiving other antithrombotic agent at the same time.

        PMID: 18310985

    It seems nattokinase should be contraindicated in certain high risk populations and should not be combined with other antithrombotic agents.

  • Anonymous

    3/9/2009 9:58:00 PM |

    I am curious about your blanket statement that fibrinolytics are dangerous. Many plants contain significant amounts of proteases that are fibrinolytic; these survive the acid of the stomach, and a portion is absorbed into the blood. Bromelain from pineapple is one prominent example; kiwis also contain a similar protease. These have been used in large doses for decades with few side effects.

  • DVT research

    3/20/2009 8:25:00 PM |

    Sumi's work was a great start, but now there is some momentum and the recent human trials are very interesting.

    Dr. Davis seems to have been a bit prejudicial. Some clinical MDs are very linear thinkers. Dr. Davis, I hope will open his mind.

  • Anonymous

    3/23/2009 5:05:00 PM |

    The nattokinase bottle states not to take it with any type of blood thinning medication or anticoagulant.  Aspirin of itself can cause a brain bleed

  • Jonathan Byron

    4/3/2009 12:59:00 PM |

    Blanket assumptions that proteolytic enzymes simply cannot be absorbed should be reconsidered.

    Here a study that found that orally administered bromelain enzyme is absorbed into the blood intact.

    Intestinal absorption of undegraded proteins in men: presence of bromelain in plasma after oral intake.


    Here are the conclusions of another review on bromelain:
    Bromelain, a standardized complex of proteases from the pineapple plant, is absorbed unchanged from the intestine of animals at a rate of 40%; in animal experiments it was found to have primarily anti-edema, antiinflammatory, and coagulation-inhibiting effects. These effects are due to an enhancement of the serum fibrinolytic activity and inhibition of the fibrinogen synthesis, as well as a direct degradation of fibrin and fibrinogen."

    On the pharmacology of bromelain

  • joker247

    4/5/2009 6:34:00 PM |

    just a comment on surviving stomach acid - I have UC, so I don't take blood thinners (if I started bleeding internally, where would you put the tourniquet?)
    However I do take an anti-inflammatory called ASACOL which has a polymeric coating that only dissolves in an alkaline environment so that the active ingredient gets where it needs to go, the colon. Unless this coating process is patented, it seems that it IS possible to have an active ingredient survive stomach acid. I'm not one to jump on the bandwagon of sensationalized products - as a former chemist I have a bit of wisdom in that regard - but if you really want to get something past the upper digestive tract it seems quite possible.

  • Anonymous

    4/8/2009 6:20:00 PM |

    My opinion is its all about the money  If you are protecting the Drug Companies,than only 3 people know about it. You,.the Drug Companies, and GOD. Every drug made has killed more people than it has cured. Eternity is a very long time I wish you the best

  • Anonymous

    4/14/2009 4:25:00 PM |

    April 14, 2009 Tues. I am 80 year of age, I have been eating fresh made Natto every day for the past 6 years.  My neuclear stress test has shown that I have a 52% blood flow thru my left ventricle of my heart, which I have been told by my doctor is very exceptional and good. Blood pressure rarely above 120/80 Natto is good for you, eat it.  These scientific guys are wrong quite often????

  • Anonymous

    5/3/2009 7:31:00 AM |

    I spent 25 years in medicine. I used to be somewhat close-minded or skeptical to some things so far as natural supplements were concerned.

    I feel that Dr. Davis is obviously close minded and speaks more like someone who is backed by Big Pharma.

    Dr. Davis -- There IS research out there and proven studies advocating the use and effectiveness of nattokinase. You just do not want to hear it for whatever reason.

    Here is a brief article written by pharmacist Dave Foreman who is an RPh, ND and well known author, lecturer and radio host:

    "In 1980, Doctor Hiroyuki Sumi was in the middle of searching for a natural agent that had thrombolytic effects (able to break up blood clots). The enzyme he was looking for would be able to dissolve the clots associated with heart attacks and stroke. After testing over 100 natural foods as potential clot busters, Dr Sumi accidentally found what he was looking for when Natto was dropped onto artificial thrombus (fibrin) in a Petri dish. The thrombus around the Natto dissolved gradually and had completely dissolved within 18 hours. Dr Sumi named the newly discovered enzyme "nattokinase", which means "enzyme in natto".

    To understand the importance of this discovery, let's go back to biology class for a second. Blood clots form when strands of protein called fibrin accumulate in a blood vessel. In the heart, blood clots cause blockage of blood flow to muscle tissue. If blood flow is blocked, the oxygen supply to that tissue is cut off and it eventually dies. This can result in angina and heart attacks. Clots in chambers of the heart can mobilize to the brain. In the brain, blood clots also block blood and oxygen from reaching necessary areas, which can result in senility and/or stroke.

    For many, Nattokinase may be the biggest discovery for natural approaches to cardiovascular health. But what is Nattokinase? Nattokinase is a potent fibrinolytic (breaks down fibrin) enzyme extracted and purified from a traditional Japanese food called Natto. Natto is a cheese-like food and is produced by a specific fermentation process of soybeans. Natto has been used in Japan for over 1,000 years for cardiovascular support and to lower blood pressure. Natto is the only preparation that contains the remarkable nattokinase enzyme with fibrin-dissolving properties.

    Why is Nattokinase so important? The enzyme is capable of breaking down and dissolving blood clots formed in a vessel or heart chamber and can enhance the body's natural ability to fight clotting of the blood. Unlike the class of medications called antithrombin, Nattokinase produces a prolonged action (lasting from 8 - 12 hours) in preventing coagulation of blood and dissolving existing clots.

    As a pharmacist and ND, I think that this discovery is and should be considered a major discovery for those concerned with cardiovascular health issues and general overall health. I come from a family history of cardiovascular disease and have started using Nattokinase personally to help prevent circulatory episodes in the future.

    Beyond the more obvious uses mentioned above, Nattokinase has shown to provide other health benefits. Here is a small list of some of the other potential health benefits of Nattokinase:

    Hemorrhoids and varicose veins
    Diabetes (caused by pancreatic dysfunction)
    Senile dementia
    Fibromyalgia
    Muscle spasms
    Poor healing
    Chronic inflammation

    I believe in using Nattokinase in combination with other enzymes. I believe in using balance and enzymes are no exception to this philosophy. Enzymes support many different facets of health and in this case, Nattokinase is the one to use for cardiovascular health. Regretfully, for those of us who are healthy, it is hard to notice any changes, but with the science behind Nattokinase, you can get piece of mind knowing that you are doing something proactive to help your cardiovascular health.

    Nattokinase is extremely important for circulation and circulatory disorders. If you look at the physiology of the body and understand how Nattokinase works, you can easily understand why this may be a supplement that even the healthiest of people would want to use.

    Finally, the one concern many natural health enthusiasts have is about safety. When looking for a quality Nattokinase, you need to look for one with the vitamin K removed. Natto contains the highest concentration of Vitamin K known in food. Significant amounts of Vitamin K2 are produced during the fermentation process of Nattokinase. By removing most or all of the Vitamin K2 you will eliminate any potential adverse drug interactions with warfarin (Coumadin), a Vitamin K antagonist pharmacological agent typically used an anticoagulant."

    I seriously hope that Dr. Davis will drop the attitude towards nattokinase and open his mind to the PROOF that IS out there supporting the use and  effectiveness of nattokinase.

    Making false statements such as calling nattokinase "a scam" makes people even more leery of doctors in this day and age. Rightfully so.

    Big Pharma has so many Dr's. blinded (or in their hip pockets) in this day and age and I feel that this may also be the case with Dr. Davis.

    I too made mistakes in putting too much faith in alopathic medicine and my own training. That all changed when I developed many significant health issues and was at one time on a dozen different prescription meds daily.

    No longer. I take natural supplements and my health is greatly improved. I'm on only 2 or 3 medications per day. Modern pharmaceutical agents almost cost me my life!

    Let's wake up people. Prescription medications and ignorance are the real killers!

  • Anonymous

    5/3/2009 7:39:00 AM |

    Dr. Davis - I encourage you to do some research on Dr. Stephen Sinatra. He is a board certified Cardiologist and nationally known speaker and best selling author.

    Dr. Sinatra advocates the use of Nattokinase and has switched many of his patients to taking it as opposed to harmful pharmaceuticals.

    Yes, there is the need for coumadin in some cases - but Dr. Sinatra has wondeful success with patients taking nattokinase!

    You owe it to yourself to check out Dr. Sinatra and what he has to say about Natto. There are enough documented studies that promote the safety and effectiveness of nattokinase.

    I hope you too will come to the realization that Nattokinase is not a scam and does in fact work!

  • Anonymous

    5/5/2009 12:10:00 AM |

    I have fibroids and a cyst on my only ovary-I have never had children and I want to. Can Nattokinase help me? What affect will 100 mg 2000 FU do for me or to me? I want real help because I am running out of options that will keep my fertility intact and rid some of these fibroids so they don't take over my uterus. PLEASE HELP!

  • Anonymous

    5/7/2009 5:04:00 PM |

    Anyone wondering if nattokinase can survive the gut and enter the bloodstream has only to search PubMed. Dr. Davis is incorrect in his assertion that nattokinase is rendered ineffective by transit through the gut. There are interesting studies suggesting that nattokinase can lower blood pressure and inhibit restenosis after angioplasty.

  • Anonymous

    5/21/2009 9:40:29 PM |

    Does anyone know, if when taking Nattokinase, a person can remain active in contact sports or does it thin the blood too much?

  • KRyan

    5/22/2009 5:12:44 PM |

    If your worried about stomach acid destroying nattokinase or any other acid sensitive supplement, just make sure your stomach acid is low. Take them on an empty stomach when there is no need for stomach acid. Take them with water to dilute the acid. I think you'll be surprised at how high the ph will go just from the water alone. (I wonder if people drink to many fluids with their meals and it hinders digestion or puts stress on the body to produce greater loads of acid) More info on stomach acid and reactions with food, supplements,enzymes etc http://www.care2.com/news/member/956805373/322081

  • terraoutwest

    5/28/2009 10:25:06 PM |

    Factor Five Leiden is my main problem, not the usual plaque and cholesterol type issues with blood clots. I recently had a minor heart attack where the blood clot developed in the heart itself (they think) and now I'm on warfarin 5mg. I'm an athlete and although I don't intend to "hurt myself, (who does?)the opportunity for bumps, bruises and scrapes is there. I really don't like the other side effects of warfarin either. I would really like to get away from the pharmaceuticals and on to something more natural with less (or no) side effects. Surely there is some other way to manage Factor Five patients who are otherwise quite healthy. And... I miss my leafy greens!  Any research out there on management of Factor Five without Coumadin?

  • Carla B

    6/4/2009 4:52:48 AM |

    To the person who posted anonymously on december 9, 2008. I am desperately looking for a natural way to treat my escalating thrombocytosis. Would love to talk to your friend. If you're still tuned into this post, please reach me at purpledots at pacbell dott net. I would be forever grateful.

  • Anonymous

    6/4/2009 5:18:50 AM |

    To the anonymous person who left the comment on December 9, 2008 with the friend who's thrombocytosis was improved with nattokinase: I'm desperately trying to find something natural to treat mine. If you're still tuned in to this post, please drop me a line at purpledots at pacbell dott net. I would be forever grateful.

  • Anonymous

    6/10/2009 2:39:19 PM |

    I have various fibroids - the biggest is the size of a canteloupe - or was - since taking Natto for 2 weeks - it is shrunk. I cannot say that it was the Natto for sure, but I changed nothing else.  

    Natto was easier for me to find that Nattokinase.  I have heard that Natto is not popular amongst Westerners but I have no problem with it.

    If it helps those willing to try - its texture is like a tin of baked beans mixed into a tablespoon of a beaten egg. While at the Asian supermarket - where I bought the Natto in the chilled storage section - I also bought a bottle of Chili Soy Sauce (from the Chinese section) and the Chili Soy Sauce is yummy with the Natto.  But then I do like Chili Soy Sauce.  Its worth trying. The Natto that is - add a sauce flavor you like, if it makes it more palatable to you.  The real Natto is way cheaper than the supplement, and in my view it is the supplement manufacturer's that are putting us off eating the cheaper, natural Natto by saying things like it is disgusting - but then some people don't like beaten egg.  PS there are many different types of Natto and I am working my way through.  I can't read Japanese - so all I can tell you is so far I like the ones in the Green wrapper and also the ones in the yellow wrapper.  They are stacked as three small trays each and I eat half a tray every 2 days.

  • Anonymous

    6/14/2009 4:33:21 PM |

    My father had a DVT 2 years ago.  He was started on heparin and then switched to coumadin and had complete resolution of his clots.  He didn't like the idea of being on warfarin for the rest of his life and switched to natto instead.  He had not been feeling well over the course of the past 3 weeks but didn't want to see his doctor until he collapsed at home and was rushed to the ED via ambulance.  He had numerous pumlmonary emboli as well as large clots in his pulmonary artery and the veins of both legs.  The doctors told him that he had probably been throwing clots for weeks if not months.  He is set to be released today and is already talking about when he can get off the warfarin and back on the natto.  I think this is clearly a failure of the natto to prevent and/or treat the clots.  I do not know if the warfarin would have prevented them or not, but due to the number of clots in multiple vessels I am pushing for him to continue the warfarin.  Warfarin certainly has side effects but it is the gold standard for preventing blood clots.  Unless there is a study natto is superior to warfarin then I wouldn't recommend using it.  BTW he had been taking natto for several years prior to his first DVT, so it didn't prevent that one either.

  • terraoutwest

    6/15/2009 2:46:58 PM |

    What about the earthworm based lumbrokinase? Anyone out there tried this?

    It sounds more disgusting than Natto, but I believe there have been more/better studies on it and has accepted as a better alternative (at least) by the Naturopathic doctors.

  • Anonymous

    7/6/2009 2:15:22 AM |

    Anonymous, June 14, 2009 :

    What brand name of Nattokinase did your father take? Be assured there are REPUTABLE brands out there, but also MANY FAKES!

    Just because a brand is cheap does not mean it is reputable. Many of the fakes out there claim to be reputable, and even provide you with a 'certificate', but in reality they have no active ingredients!

    A reputable brand would be (as an example) Allergy Research.

  • Anonymous

    7/6/2009 2:22:54 AM |

    terraoutwest  May 28, 2009

    Nattokinase might just be your ticket. It has virtually no side effect;, the 'real' stuff has no vitamin K in it, so it can be used with warfarin, but if you do it w/o warfarin, then you can eat and drink whatever you want to and however much you want to. The only thing you should not do is to take nattokinase together with other enzymes. Wait a couple hours between each.
    I have factor v leiden, and am on nattokinase since about eight years now. No clots.
    Cannot overdose on it either. Make sure you get a reputable brand.

  • Anonymous

    7/11/2009 4:00:19 AM |

    RE:"Everyone seems to be missing the most important argument against the effectiveness of nattokinase: it is a protein enzyme, and there is not a single protein in this universe that can be taken up by our GI tract in its whole and active form."

    Never say never, or should I regret having just violated that rule by saying never.

    Prions are a class of proteins that modify other proteins.  If taken orally, it will cause illness like mad cow disease.  It is believed that the prion modifies other proteins in the brain in a cascading fashion, eventually causing total cns dysfunction by converting increasing number of proteins into more prions.

    My point, saying all proteins can not survive low pH in the stomach is too broad of a statement to make.  I am afraid modern sciences is not yet able to explain all events that can take place in the body.

    Saying one should be skeptical of nattokinase is justifiable, but declaring nattokinase to be a scam is a claim that calls for more evidence, in my opinion.

    If I witness first hand cases in which natto proves to be effective, I will then become skeptical of the claim that nattokinase is a scam.

    I hope the same will be true for Dr. Davis.

  • Anonymous

    7/19/2009 11:49:43 PM |

    Nearly a year ago I could barely function due to endometriosis. I was working from home only a few hours a week because the pain was so bad. I just wanted to lay around and have someone put me out of my misery.

    I then began purchasing Fibrovan which has nattokinase in it. It didn't take long before I started noticing positive results. Little by little I started improving. The pain began lessening. My blood pressure improved.My energy improved. I was able to go for long walks and I'm back working full time outside the home, doing a very physically demanding job working in a hospital.

    A scam is something that is  fraudulent or deceptive. I in no way feel like I have been scammed. My health has improved and for that I am thankful.

  • citizen alan

    7/20/2009 5:08:10 PM |

    I think the work of Linus Pauling definitely indicates that EVERYONE on ANY sort of anti-coagulant should be supplementing with Vitamin C. My dad was taking aspirin (as a preventative) without letting me know and wound up with blood collecting in his eyes.  Permanently half-blind, a condition that I believe would have been totally avoidable had he also supplemented with at least 500 mg/day of Vitamin C.

  • Anonymous

    7/24/2009 6:30:18 PM |

    My husband and I eat natto, and while not Japanese, I have come to like it. We buy several packs and freeze them.

    We think natto tastes good with chopped green onions or chives, and/or some grated daikon radish, along with a bit of soy sauce.

    Sometimes we also mix natto with a bit of soy sauce, a very small amount of grated ginger, finely shredded radish leaves (leaves of the familiar small, red-skinned-white-inside radishes), and some of the dried fish flakes called "katsuobushi," which is available in small packets at Japanese food stores.

    If you eat natto along with rice, it will probably be easier to get down.

  • Anonymous

    8/5/2009 10:33:31 PM |

    Dr. Davis,

    I don't know if you are right or not on this matter.  If the stomach destroys Nattokinase, how then is there any effect, good or bad?  My wife has fibrosis in her bone marrow and we just discovered today that this substance may stop or reverse this activity.  The alternative is a steady downgrade and finally death.  I am concerned that she is on a baby aspirin along with her chemo as that might not be a good thing to take with this; we will be seeing the oncologist next week again and ask.  

    In any case, I appreciate your attempt to warn, and hope that whoever does not agree would be kind in their remarks and suggestions.  Thank you.

  • Anonymous

    8/12/2009 8:01:50 PM |

    My experience is only anecdotal. After going through a triple by-pass I was put on Plavix, aspirin, etc.  I din't experience the blotches (internal bleeding) that a co-worker who had a stent put in did.  

    But when I added NK about 5 months in I did experience them and consequently cut the Plavix rather than the NK.

    That was a couple years ago and still continue the NK. Wouldn't mind trying the Natto though I would have to go up to Tucson to get it.

    So it could have been just a coincidence but as an engineer I don't really believe in them or half the crap the medical community tries to foist off as fact.  No offense, Doc.  Smile

  • lmontgom

    8/19/2009 8:51:51 PM |

    Dr. Davis:
    Why have you been silent on nattokinase for so long?  I continue to derive great benefit from it.  I would not be walking today because of muscle weakness and pain were it not for nattokinase, which I buy from vitacost.com.

  • Anonymous

    9/8/2009 6:58:32 PM |

    VERY TELLING how Dr. Davis has disappeared, stopped replying when confronted with the double-blind studies that show he's wrong.

    I'm disappointed.  I was considering signing up for the Track Your Plaque program, but forget it.

    This guy has shown that if he's not selling it, he's not buying it either.

  • Fran

    9/22/2009 4:13:25 AM |

    I searched your blog for "serrapeptase", another supplement that claims to be a natural Chelation-Anti-Inflammatory. From serrapeptase info website: "Serrapeptase digests non-living tissue, blood clots, cysts, and arterial plaque and inflammation in all forms." Have you written any blogs about this product?

  • Anonymous

    9/26/2009 3:24:59 PM |

    lmontgom said...
    Dr. Davis:
    Why have you been silent on nattokinase for so long? I continue to derive great benefit from it. I would not be walking today because of muscle weakness and pain were it not for nattokinase, which I buy from vitacost.com

    Please tell me what brand name you bought, I want to be sure to get one that someone has experienced success with! i have always experienced heavy bleeding during menstration but 2 yrs ago it got worse, now I have been bleeding for 3 weeks VERY heavy, hemoglobin down (will need blood transfusion soon), i have fibroids and i have an ultra sound scheduled to see if the fibroids have increased in size, but the treatments that my dr has suggested are ablation or hysterectomy (have 2 children and although I don't currently want any more, not sure if i am ready to close that door, still in my 30s).  I've spoke to many women who have experienced this and am just appalled that some dr's i have seen sit so nonchalant while i explain what is happening as if flowing quarts of blood out of you is completly acceptable!!  Although I have read reviews where nattokinase has not worked for some people, I have not read any reviews where people have experienced negative side effects.  I will try nattokinase and post again, but again, what brand do you buy, I want a reputable brand?

  • Anonymous

    9/28/2009 3:54:08 PM |

    I am interested in NK. This forum has been on for over two years initiated by valid criticisms from Dr. Davis. The respondents are all intelligently fluid in their arguments. There is one thing missing.

    Dr. Davies mentioned side affects of good blood clots dissolving. I imagine anyone with these symptoms would be very miserable or dead and the diagnosis of cause very, very difficult. Of the previous respondents how many have suffered these symptoms? How would we ever know? Could everyone who is PRO NK assign a close relative to update this forum if something happens?

  • Anonymous

    10/1/2009 5:03:44 AM |

    As a mother of 3 adult sons, I have a dilemma! My youngest son (25 yrs) was recently diagnosed with a DVT in his leg. While my oldest son (today 34 yrs) had a blood cloth in his brain 6 yrs ago. Doctors then declared to be a "very rare" case and not to worry that it would happen again. Last Sept, he developed a DVT in his leg. He is now on Coumadin for life.

    I had contacted a Naturopath earlier (Feb 09) who told me that he has helped many patients with similar conditions with Nattokinase.
    As my boys are very young in age (tests do not show genes as both parents have no problems) I would really appreciate some feedback.

  • Tom

    10/19/2009 5:46:32 AM |

    To many people with so little grasp of basic physiology.

    1. Proteins are denatured in the stomach, not degraded. Degradation occurs in the small intestine and can not be avoided because this is also the purported  site of absorbtion.

    2. Intact proteins can not be absorbed. If intact proteins could be absorbed, pretty much all food would be 100% fatal.

    3. If Nattokinase did even half of what is claimed, Dr. Davis is quite right, it would kill you.


    I think most of the miracle cures being claimed by other commentors are either placebo, or missattributed. (I might point out that, in most cases described, the symptoms alleviated could have resulted from a severe vitamin K deficiency, and might be alleviated by the fact that these crude isolates of natto CONTAIN VITAMIN K)




    Nattokinase is produced and market heavily by the same guys who sell you trypsin and chymotrypsin pills in the form of wobenzyme with the claim that those enzymes are able to have a systemic effect.  Clearly the naturally occurring enzyme trypsin (which functions to lyse proteins in the small intestine) could not possibly leave the small intestine without killing you.


    I had a dog once that had a intestinal defect that did allow intact proteins be absorbed from its intestine. Obviously this dog didn't live very long. Think massive fluid imbalances and kidney failure.

  • Dr. William Davis

    10/19/2009 10:04:18 PM |

    Hi, Tom--

    Excellent points.

    The fanaticism that surrounds this absurd approach continues to astound.

  • Anonymous

    10/20/2009 10:52:51 PM |

    From one who has taken nattokinase for a couple of years I find your comments while logically consistent - wrong.

    Nattokinase blew out my arteriosclerosis as evidenced by the elasticity of my blood vessels, reduced my BP. and appears to have cleared out my blood debris. It doesn't replace fish oil, so I will take both - intemittently.

  • Anonymous

    10/22/2009 2:51:32 PM |

    So, how do you research the companies, marketing Nattokinase, to know if the ingredients are real or not?

  • Anonymous

    10/26/2009 1:02:17 AM |

    There is research the supports the concept that the human GI tract can absorb intact proteins:

    http://ajpgi.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/273/1/G139

    http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146%2Fannurev.nu.08.070188.001553

  • Tom

    10/26/2009 6:06:40 AM |

    That first link is only pseudo science done on a small scale by scientific guns for hire, (note that the institute La Fey specializing in being contracted by private R&D entities, and also observe that each author has published about 1 dubious article in just about every field).

    The second only involves trace absorption of 2-3 residue peptides, with some exceptions due to the role of erythrocytes as antigen presenting cells.  It is possible that this mechanism would allow an ingested peptide to be presented intact or in fragments to the immune system with immunomodulating effects(as is clearly the case with certain foodborne allergies and conditions). It is possible that these enzyme products might produce a beneficial effect through that or other unknown mechanisms, but the makers of these products do not make that claim, perhaps due to its complexity. Rather, they invariably make simple, easily marketed claims.


    But that is besides the point,
    those who market and promote Nattokinase and other "enzyme" healing products deceptively make claims that are unsupported, contradictory, and physiologically unfeasible.   One should always be wary of any product, natural or otherwise that makes broad unsupported claims as to how and what it does.

  • lmontgom

    10/26/2009 7:15:16 PM |

    Everyone -- users, researchers, docs -- should remember that each human body is unique.  For those of us who have used nattokinase and say it works (meaning it stops the pain, in my case), who are you to say that we should discontinue it?  I will order natto itself just to be sure nothing has happened in the processing of nattokinase that changes its impact in the body.  Until then, I will use what works for me and trust that Dr. Davis and the rest of the nay-sayers would do the same.

  • Anonymous

    10/29/2009 5:30:58 PM |

    Dear Doc -
    if NK is a scam like you say, then how can it be dangerous?  since a scam is afterall a fake.    yet you say the people who eat the food get some kind of benefit and no ill effects?    

    this does not make any sense.

  • Anonymous

    10/29/2009 11:14:55 PM |

    Not sure what you mean by "pseudoscience" in terms of bromelain absorption (the protein in question my posting of 10/25).  

    This would no doubt come as a surprise to Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, who states:  "Orally administered bromelain is absorbed intact through the intestine. Because of its proteolytic activity, about 50% of bromelain is rapidly complexed with an antiproteinase, namely alpha-2-macroglobulin (AMG). Proteolytic activity is maintained within this protective molecule, but reduced. In a recent human study, plasma half-life was determined to be 6-9 hours. Orally administered bromelain is absorbed at a rate of 40% in animal studies."

    I would also remind you that cyclosporine is an 11 polypeptide molecule that is administered orally.


    Thrombolysis is a natural occuring event.  All blood clots secrete thrombolysins. The question is now much, how its mediated, etc.  It's like saying no one should take Coumadin or Lovenox, because they would all become hemophiliacs and bleed to death.

    I would agree that the story on nattokinase is not complete.  But calling it a "scam" is merely the obverse of calling it a "miracle drug."

  • Tom

    10/30/2009 4:09:16 AM |

    Seriously? You refute me refuting your paper by citing a source which cites the same fake research paper? It is pseudoscience because all the names associated with the paper are people are hired to write whatever paper/conclusion you want. BTW, the paper only goes so far as to say that over a 48 hour period 10.8 micrograms were in the ENTIRE plasma. May I offer you a book titled "How To Lie With Statistics"?


    For a much more in depth study of bromelian absorption look for a 1971 study published in the Japanese Journal of Pharmacology titled Gastrointestinal Absorption And Anti Inflammatory Effect of Bromelian. That study was done in dogs, but they found the half life of intravenous bromelian was only about one hour. They also found that less than .052% of a intraduodenal dose of labeled bromelian was absorbed "intact" based on the assumption that radioactive proteins of similar mass and isoelectric point found in the plasma were in fact bromelian. Their immunological assays detected that the actual amount of bromelian was MUCH less.  The absorption you quote, 40%, is absurd.

    Also, cyclosporine is only 11 residues long, cyclic, and composed of D-amino acids not normally encountered in nature.  11 is much smaller than 275 for nattokinase.  Yes some proteins can be absorbed, like botulin toxin (on a nanogram scale), but not the huge amounts claimed by the natto guys.

  • Anonymous

    11/4/2009 1:24:26 PM |

    Why would someone buy supplements? The whole supplement industry kinda' confuses me over all. Nattou is delicious... just eat nattou. There are lots of foods that have vitamins and nutritional value that you can receive if you just eat a varied diet. As long as you're eating a variety of healthy foods, taking supplements is a big fat waste of money!

  • Chris33780

    11/11/2009 9:29:45 AM |

    Dr Davis said: "The data I've looked at re: nattokinase has been proprietary, generated clearly by a manufacturer. Until some real science emerges, even modest, to support this otherwise counterintuitive strategy, it remains something that has no value for our plaque reducing focus."

    Why would the FDA bother with producing real science on something they cannot patent and gain a return on their investment? I am not going to fall for criticism of the effectiveness of a substance just because money cannot be made by the FDA. The people I hear putting nattokinase down want proof by FDA approval, and this would only happen if it could be patentable, which a natural substance cannot be.

  • Dr. William Davis

    11/11/2009 1:07:21 PM |

    Earth to Chris:

    The FDA does NOT generate data to support or refute any drug or supplement. They are only a regulating agency.

  • Anonymous

    11/22/2009 2:39:06 AM |

    I am just starting to look into this issue having recently been diagnosed with a DVT.

    I appreciate that Dr. Davis has taken the time to explain why he refutes certain natto claims.  I am squarely in the camp of proof via empirical evidence; even more so when people stand to profit from a mere suggestion that something benefits you in a particular way.

  • Anonymous

    12/1/2009 4:48:30 AM |

    Here's the problem with blasting nattokinase based on stomach acid acidity or fear of indiscriminate breakdown of "good" clots as an unwanted side effect: this kind of Western, Descartian thinking when applied to the complex human body so often proves to be simply wrong. There are studies that show vitamin B2 promotes cancer growth, for example, but others that show increased vitamin C counteracts that effect. Perhaps the Japanese who ingest more nattokinase and have fewer fractures benefit from it in ways that are similar to users of whole herbs who do better than those who use just the "active ingredient" isolated from the same herbs. "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio..." I eat Natto miso and LOVE it. It tastes great in soup or rice and veggies. I've gone out of my way to find it via internet/mail order after our co-op stopped carrying it. I feel great after I eat it. I also tried buying a bottle of nattokinase and found that my trigeminal neuralgia gets worse after taking it, or seems to. I've only tried it a very few times so perhaps it was coincidental. (When you have something this painful you don't play around with trying things that seem to make it worse.) I also notice bromelain makes it worse, and from what I've read that, too, is fibrinolytic, right? And that one has a lot of research showing it somehow survives the stomach acid, doesn't it? I'm going from memory of quickly scanned articles, there, so may be all wrong. A final thought: I've heard that vegans have substantially less stomach acid than meat eaters. Have there been any studies on this? My intuition is there is probably something to this, and the difference may be quite significant. My wife and I often think our desire for sugar after protein is out of a need to generate more acid than we tend to produce normally. Just some thoughts to encourage a less "know-it-all" attitude so common among doctors trained in the USA and other Western cultures. I almost think sometimes it is a personality trait that is a prerequisite for getting through Med schools here, having a mind that quickly closes.

  • Trey

    12/5/2009 7:41:22 PM |

    Dr. Davis...isn't it true that you as a physician are bound by the laws of the medical community and face a severe fine or possibly loss of license for recommending anything out of conventional treatment? The same treatments such as the same thing we have done tirelessly for years for cancer treatment (Chemotherapy) amd that also as a doctor going through medical school Doctors are taught very little about nutrition?

  • Anonymous

    12/14/2009 10:08:31 PM |

    Could the proliferation of various electromagnetic-radiation-producing technologies within the last century (electricity/electrical power lines, radio, radar, cell phone and wifi towers and antennas) be the underlying mechanism behind the increased risk of heart attacks and strokes in industrialized nations, more so than diet?

    I ask because I've read several articles which seem to indicate that calcium metabolism is affected by these exposures to electromagnetic/radiofreqency/microwave radiation. Specifically, calcium's 'efflux' - its movement into and out of cells - is affected by these exposures.

    http://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/the-cell-phone-and-the-role-of-calcium/

  • ron

    12/30/2009 2:49:14 PM |

    I have had two heart attacks, the last one after a quintuple bypass. Unfortunately, no tests are done as to the bodies rejection factor of sutures used in bypass surgery, resulting in two of the bypass grafts failing (disintegrating) and the remaining grafts heavily crusted by the bodies rejection mechanisms. I am still strong and active, plavix and aspirin daily with BP meds. During a recent angiogram, the Dr. tore the saphenous vein graft to my rt. cor. art. causing a large thrombus. Hence the present meds. Anyone used NK in this instance.
    I know it sounds scary, but I have no chest pain, exercise daily BP 120/60 HR 60. Any other input would be appreciated.
    Ron

  • Anonymous

    12/30/2009 6:42:47 PM |

    The real scam is American medicine that has for years led people to believe it is about "health" and "care".  In reality, it is about money.  Follow the money, you'll always find the answer.  Big Pharma is big business, plain and simple.  Most doctors don't give a hoot about their patients.  With Big Pharma rewarding doctors for prescribing their drugs, doctors have lost credibility in favor of montary persuasion.  It's no longer what's best for the patient, but what profits the practitioner.

  • Anonymous

    1/4/2010 2:09:54 AM |

    Dr. Davis, by not publishing one's comments you likely think nattokinase will lose credibility.  Regardless of what Big Pharma-rewarded MDs think in this country, nattokinase works.  However, I understand the tenacles of Big Pharma reach far and wide and why you would be afraid to publish my comment clearly showing NK worked.  U.S. medicine is gravely lacking in many ways.  I dare you to publish my prior comment regarding how four (count 'em 4) MDs couldn't diagnose the obvious >2 ft. clot in my left leg despite my emphatically telling them it was a clot.  Indeed and in fact, many practitioners have egos that arrive 20 minutes before they do!  I suppose you think the American people should have confidence in a system controlled by drug companies.  You have immensely increased my respect for the Japanese where research is not sponsored by Big Pharma.  Instead of criticizing the Japanese and Nattokinase, perhaps you should start emulating!!

  • Holly

    1/10/2010 4:24:46 AM |

    I am a patient who has antiphospholipid syndrome.  I also have low factor VIII levels. Before this was diagnosed, in 2008, I suffered over 5 strokes (only 1 left me with some small permanent damage, luckily) and countless tia's (am in my 50's and there was no other medical reason for me to be having stroke/tia).
    Because of the low factor VIII levels, my hematologist explained I was not a candidate for warfarin, however we tried heparin injections for 4 months.  My body could not tolerate them, it was explained to me that there was nothing which could be done for me.  (yes, I did have a second opinion).  
    Several months later I was introduced to nattokinase at Allergy Research Group.  After much research, started taking 400 mg. daily, divided.  This was 2 years ago.  Since that time I have had one tia.  My hematologist is familiar with nattokinase, but will not support it, so I have had to leave her.  However I am working with my internist who does support it and gives me the proper blood tests; everything is in order.
    Allergy Research Group addresses the question of stomach acid you bring up; they have printed much with the limited research which has been able to be done.  Before closing your book completely on this subject, perhaps you might look a bit further - many people are being helped by this where no other help is available.  
    Natto is not a scam.  It IS important to get quality product and there ARE inferior products out there.  It is always vital to study carefully when one is venturing into any alternative health remedy and remember that someone is ready to take your money all too easily.  It is just as vital to remember that western medicine, as marvelous as it is, does not have all the answers.  All too often doctors can be very closed minded without doing proper research.

  • Anonymous

    1/29/2010 3:39:51 AM |

    A very interesting thread for sure.

    I had Massive PE last year.  It stemmed from walking pneumonia (treated as adult onset asthma)
    PE never showed up on scans as no contrast was used.  
    They even did a heart cath on me while I had massive PE and could hardly breath (they thought I was nervous)  Major Pulmonary HTN and Massive PE found a week later at a University clinic via spiral CT.
    I could not walk 10 feet, they just said "You out of shape" hehe I'm 40 and play singles comp. tennis.  

    I did have very high CRP >10 and high D-dimer but they failed to connect the dots.  

    Anyway after IV abs, heparin then later coumadin (I declined surgery
    ) My CRP went down to near normal levels.   My clots were thought to be from chronic infection and resulting inflammation.

    I don't take natto (yet) but there seems to be quite a bit of anecdotal and some scientific evidence (Airline study)

    The problem I see is
    1. How does it interact with ASA?
    2. How does it interact with warfarin?
    3. How much is enough?
    4. How often?

    I agree with the good Dr. Davis on most of the points.  But its very difficult to call anything "Snake Oil" without knowing the true mechanism of action.  

    There are many medications that have been studied and are currently being prescribed in which the mechanism of actions is "unknown".  The studies show that it had a repeatable effect and that it improved the condition being tested for but the "how it works" is not known.  These are not snake oil because we do not know how it works.  Its because they have been found to show a positive response above what is found with placebo.


    There is enough anecdotal evidence on Natto for scientific studies to be done.  This is how many drugs are finally tested.  Where do you think we got antibiotics?  People have been taking natural things way before we had science.  Many of these have been tested.

    Natto is one that has not been.

    I would love to see some real studies on it.  

    A more interesting question is not if it is or not is snake oil but why has this not been studied?

    The assumption of its destruction in the stomach implies that one knows its mechanism.  After studies are done we will know.  It may be it works but in a totally different way than DR. Davis envisioned.  

    So I am not sure why he is so quick to label it as a scam when he simply does not have enough information to say one way or another.

    It may be true that the drug companies can't make a profit on it but why can't some of these well to do Vitamin companies fund the research?  The money has to come from somewhere.  I don't expect big pharm to foot the bill but someone should.

    From what evidence is available it all points to something more than a placebo effect.  Animal studies and one human study point to something real happening.
    I have yet to read any studies stating that there is no effect.

    Without seeing studies to the contrary I think Dr. Davis is just using his intuition.  Not saying his educated guess is wrong just saying its just a guess with some holes in it.

  • Anonymous

    1/31/2010 3:59:26 AM |

    I've had many a spirited discussion with MDs and PhDs about whether enzymes taken orally can go systemic.  All I can say is that there are a lot of MDs and PhDs who believe that enzymes cannot and do not go systemic.  HOWEVER, there are other MDs and PhDs who vehemently disagree and there are studies from reputable investigators that support the belief that enzymes can enter the blood stream intact or at least in some fashion where they can can be proteolytic or fibrolytic.  

    So, it's easy to stop all argument about the efficacy of an enzyme like nattokinase if you believe it can't work because it can't get into the blood.  I mean, honestly, there is nothing left to discuss, right?  And that seems to be Dr. Davis's basic position and Dr. Davis is clearly with the majority of doctors who hold this position.  

    However, if you accept the possibility that some enzymes CAN enter the blood stream, then you must then discuss what they might accomplish, for good or for bad, while in the blood.  And that leads to a discussion of WHICH enzymes might work best, and WHAT they might accomplish, and WHAT dosages work . . . a whole host of follow on questions that, presently, have few answers.

    That leaves all of us who'd like to know real answers sort of in the dark.  We are left with anecdotal testimonials, some who had good experiences and some who had adverse reactions.  That still doesn't give intellectual warm fuzzies.  However, if does suggest that if something MIGHT work and has few contraindications, that one might want to give it a try.

    As Dr. Davis clearly knows, logic is not controlling in science.  Science is complete with theories that are logically sound and later completely discredited as simply wrong despite the logic.  

    Logically, one has to allow that enzymes may be able to enter the blood system and may have curative effects -- until the theory is totally discredited -- even if you don't really know how it works.

  • stevensgarethb

    2/8/2010 11:57:22 PM |

    300 years ago if you were ill you would go to the local barbers where they would take some blood with an unclean instrument and infect you with a nasty disease. They would then send you home with some medication which did not work and was highly dangerous causing other medical conditions to arise. It is different today. Now the only thing that has changed is that you go to a nice new hospital to get infected and given medication that is dangerous and does not work and causes other medical conditionsSmile

    I am taking Neprinol which contains Nattokinase and Serrapeptase and it worked within several hours taken orally. I  use Neprinol as a replacement for Fragmin which I had already been taking for 6 months.  The alternative would have been Coumadin (Warfarin). It is all very well knocking Nattokinase but what alternative is there?
    I tried to stop taking fragmin but within half a day my symptoms came back.  Since taking Neprinol my symptoms have not returned and I am  experiencing no side effects apart from increased energy. I am cycling uphill 8 gears higher than before and not getting tired. Previously I had been admitted to hospital 5 times with chest pain, the first time I had an MI and the other times were at a different hospital who did not have a clue.  I did not appreciate being given a drug which made my condition worse.  I am from a highly technical background and could tell that the cardiac department had no expertise in understanding how the body works. It is obvious to me that medical staff are "non technical" so they can never work out what is wrong with someone.
    I decided to self diagnose and self prescribe and that was the best decision I ever made. I understand my condition now and how to treat it which is great.  I have also discovered a rare genetic link in my family and hope to connect with a University who are researching this subject.  I hope to start golf again when the weather improves and cycle along some mountain routes to improve my fitness.


    If doctors were paid by results... we would save an awful lot of money!

  • Anonymous

    2/18/2010 10:40:33 PM |

    I had a documented >2 foot long blood clot.  There is no denying the existence of this clot.  (THERE IS ALSO NO DENYING THE RESOLUTION OF THIS CLOT BY CURRENT ULTRASOUND!)  I went on one week of Lovenox and had serial ultrasounds on my left leg for  months.  The clot remained.  I started Nattokinase 15,000 FUs per capsule (4x/day).  Eighteen months later when another ultrasound was done, I was called back to the facility because they thought they had done the wrong leg or the test was done incorrectly by the tech.  Why?  BECAUSE THERE WAS NO CLOT FOUND.  The radiologist repeatedly stated I had to be incorrect in what I was taking, that it had to be Coumadin [note:  Coumadin prevents additional clots--it does not lyse clots].  HE WAS INCORRECT.  I definitely know what I take--it was, is and continues to be Nattokinase.  Nattokinase got rid of my clot, plain and simple.  If conventional providers do not want to believe it, I don't care.  If it can work for a >2 foot long clot, it likely works for other clots.  That said, I am a healthcare professional and fact is conventional medicine cares about nothing other than money.  Healthcare is "sick" care because that's where the money is made.  An epidemic of good health is the last thing Big Pharma wants!  If something can be effective without requiring frequent labs and doctor visits, obviously it would cut into the "take" on the part of MDs and other providers.  The system itself is sick!  Just as we laughed at those "funny-looking" Japanese cars in the 1970s and 1980s, it was those "funny" cars that gained the majority market share.  The Japanese healthcare system is much more efficient than the U.S. system.  Since it is care-driven versus our money-driven system, I believe it has more credibility.  I believe Dr. Sumi's research and will not have confidence in our system until such time research is objective and not controlled by big pharma.

  • Anonymous

    2/21/2010 3:02:13 AM |

    I just read this from Tom's post and found he countradicts himself:
    Tom said:
    It is possible that these enzyme products might produce a beneficial effect through that or other unknown mechanisms, but the makers of these products do not make that claim, perhaps due to its complexity. Rather, they invariably make simple, easily marketed claims.

    One should always be wary of any product, natural or otherwise that makes broad unsupported claims as to how and what it does." end quote

    Does this apply to Avandia too?

    I stated taking NK a month ago because I was having heart pain, nothing terribly serious as doctors never find any problems with my heart. After a few weeks I have not had any heart pains, and feel better, sleep better, etc.  I attribute it to the NK, and will continue to take it. My dad had heart problems so I am aware that I must prevent the same.  Taking anything else would be contrary to what works.  It is clear that Dr. Davis doesn't have a cure for heart disease and therefore can make no claims that NK does not work.  You can't have it both ways chum.
    The scam is the drug cartels, not natural products that work.

  • Dottie

    2/23/2010 10:46:17 PM |

    I haven't seen anything about Nattokinase being used to dissolve scar tissue in the stomach, for which I was referred.  Anyone heard of this?

  • Anonymous

    3/1/2010 12:39:41 AM |

    Please, people, stop falling into the trap of thinking that every study abstracted in PubMed is of good quality, let alone "proof."  I have to constantly caution myself against this, especially when all I am looking at is an abstract (and I would venture to say that less than 1% of the abstract readers bother to obtain the full article, and even if they do they probably don't rally understand much of what they are reading).

    And remember that the "pro supplement" research is just as prone to bias (often economically-motivated) as the pharma studies, and MORE prone to low quality.  Big Pharma and the Supplement industry BOTH have the almighty dollar as their primary motivator, and your health as -- perhaps -- a secondary motivator.  Neither should be demonized any more than the other.

    I use multiple supplements, including some herbs, and multiple drugs.  And I know there are potential risks and benefits (including unknown properties and unknown interactions) with both.  I also knwo that just because something "works" for me and *seems* safe, that it won't necessarily work for everyone, and isn't necessarily safe for everyone.  And that long-term hidden unknown detriments or benefits (again, for both supplements and drugs) may lurk.

    I know this has been rambling, but the main takeaways are:
    (1) Drug vs. "natural" partisans, please wise up
    (2) Don't assume everything you read is accurate (even the relatively unbiased stuff) just because "there are some studies,"  and
    (3) For very serious consitions such as cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and cancer, realize that you NEED a doctor.  That doesn't mean you can't shop around for a better one, or that you can't question everything they say.

    Let me finish by saying that I found a "5 star" customer review of nattokinase on a well-known supplement site chilling.  It was to the effect of, "My Dad died of an aneuryism and no one can explain why, so I'm taking nattokinase to make sure the same thing doesn't happen to me!  It's great!"  That's SCARY!!

    (sorry, no time to check for typos right now... -- gotta run)

  • Anonymous

    3/22/2010 9:10:18 PM |

    Dr. Davis. You say Nattokinase supplementation is a scam? Someone with your professional credentials ought to be a little more informed on the subject as well as sensitive to the needs of others.

    Capsules, pills and tablets can't be made to protect their contents in the stomach? Have you ever herd of enteric coated, time release, or sustained release meds and supplements?

    You've personally witnessed bleed out and death that you attribute to use of nattokinase and other such enzymes. Is this due to product abuse by users? Was it because of a combination of other medical factors resulting in complications? Where is the documentation of your findings? Where is the open mindedness and balance in your personal and professional position? I see scare tactics and ignorance in a condecending spirit.

    I have had 5 DVT's and 3 PE's in recent years with no diagnosis for the cause. I have been seen by dozens of doctors, had 4 trips to the emergency room, and racked up enough medical bills to put me in bankruptcy. I've been on a steady diet of low dose rat poisin (warfarin) and am reminded to flex my calves when standing or sitting. Yes, I just have to live with it, I'm told.

    What ar you going to do for me? You all had your shot. I'm saying to you - Don't be afraid to learn something new or investgate the untraditional. Do your homework first. Then maybe there will be more to your position on this subject than emotional reasoning and unsubstantiated events.

    To all those out there exploring the new wave of enzyme therapies, I say carry on. It is an amazing science and a very viable alternative.

  • Anonymous

    3/26/2010 5:28:54 PM |

    Dr. Davis, I am seriously disappointed in your comments that nattokinase is a scam.  You seem to be very misinformed or have not done your research.

    Any scam you mention does not have to do with Nattokinase itself but the way supplement companies are marketing NK as well as how they are packaging and encapsulating NK with other ingredients to make it seem like a multivitamin.  The supplement versions of NK are diluted considerably by supplement companies. I know this first hand as I have personally seen and taken probably the most purest and concentrated form of NK available.

    "Clot develops when heart attack occurs. It makes no sense to take a lytic agent that dissolves clotes continuously. Unless I am missing something here, nattokinase remains squarely in the nonsense column."

    You are definitely misinformed.  It's really sad that you feel this way seeing that many people will now be misinformed about the truth of NK and how it improves human health.  NK does not have to be taken as a hard capsule.  It does survive stomach acid. That being said, I can understand that you may not have access to all of the information or the pure form of Nattokinase as it is not readily available anywhere other than Japan and China.

    I would suggest that you refrain from calling NK a scam until you yourself have definitive proof.  Otherwise your opinion remains squarely in the nonsense-column.

  • Dr. Dawn

    3/29/2010 1:35:15 PM |

    Dr. Davis,
    This reminds me of the initial skepticism about fish oil--you reference it as if it was always accepted and promoted in the medical community. Now there is Lovasa-- $200/mo. vs. $20/mo. for fish oil. (I actually recommend Krill oil.)
    Enzymes, when used against inflammation instead of digestive purposes, are taken on an empty stomach and are  absorbed into the blood stream. The thrombolytic effect is not sudden and works peripheral to central on the clot, posing no risk of embolism. I introduced fish oil to the cardiology department at  University Hospital (Michigan) in 1993 following a patient's M.I.-- at that time they hadn't heard of using omega 3s, but at least they were open to functional foods, eventually making fish oil part of their cardiac protocol. The early days of introducing most functional foods to the medical community is like turning around a locomotive-- until the pharmaceutical companies find a way to patent them-- we can thank them for the high cost of "sickness mgt" instead of health care. Coumadin counters K2, so while people have been guided to prevent clots (it does not break down clots, only prevents new ones and enlargement of those  established), they've also been engineering hypertension and atherosclerosis in their bodies--not to mention the organ repercussions of Coumadin. Humility in the medical community with respect to historical wisdom would be a refreshing change-- and might have gone a long way to prevent the gradual replacement of health care with our costly system of "sickness management", as well as the recent push for a governmental takeover plan. Research continues: Nutrition Research. Volume 29, Issue 3, March 2009, Pages 190-196. The older article by Milner explains the clotting mechanism for laymen. Research shows that Nattokinase can suppress thickening of the intima following damage to the inside of a blood vessel. Nutrition. 2003 Mar;19(3):261-4
    Remember, many doctors have created many health problems over the years   because they made assumptions..... After all, K2 is in egg yolks and helps calcium reach the bones instead of depositing in arteries-- yet for years doctors advised patients to avoid eggs if they had cardiovascular disease-- more mythology debunked. Those same eggs provide choline, key to brain, liver, and who-knows-what-else. Tanning (sun or bed) has been decried, yet Hollick showed women who tan regularly have 25% higher bone density--and not the inferior bone resulting from so-called osteoporosis drugs-- check out the NY Times article from March 25th.   Vitamin D3 deficiency, due to seriously flawed advice, has contributed to untold diseases-- diabetes, MS, cardiovascular disease,  breast, prostate, and colon cancer--to name just a few. Let's remain humble about non-drug methods and not attribute  characteristics and side effects of synthetic pharmaceutical drugs to functional foods. We are still identifying the beneficial synergistic relationships within these foods that do not exist in synthetic, isolated chemical constituents of drugs.

  • Inquisitive

    4/7/2010 5:00:46 PM |

    I am a 49 year old white male with a high stress life.  I am overweight, have sleep apnea, an asymptomatic irregular heartbeat, bouts with depression and anxiety (for which I was prescribed Prozac), supposedly "pre-diabetic" and I have, what a shock, high blood pressure.  I am interested in the potential benefits of Nattokinase as a possible enhancement to or replacement for the precription meds I am taking for hypertension.  I have recently started taking some other supplements such as Vitamins D3, K2, Fish Oil, Resveratrol, CoQ10 etc.  Does anyone out there with an open mind and the intellect to back it up have any personal experience, reccomendations or advice for me?  Please respond if so!  Thank you!  I am intelligent and I spend lots of time reading and researching from various sources on the internet and frankly, I just don't know who to believe anymore.  I just want to be healthier!

  • Anonymous

    4/9/2010 6:15:01 AM |

    I just want to chime in here - I have been on nattokinase for the last 8 years.
    Before that, I was on Coumadin for over two years for a clot that went all the way from my calf to my belly button. I have Factor V Leiden, a genetic clotting condition.
    While on Coumadin, I had numerous side effects, including Post Phlebitic Syndrome (PPS).
    Since starting on nattokinase, I have not been bothered with ANY of the side effects I had with Coumadin. No more Ultram for PPS, no more worrying about (not) eating my greens, no more INRs - NOTHING! My blood pressure is a healthy 115/75 (I am around 60y/o).

    I swear by Nattokinase, but I also know that there are many 'fakes' out there that claim to be nattokinase, but in reality have no active ingredients. Buyer beware!
    Check out reputable brands like Allergy Research, or Pure Prescriptions, or check out Dr. Holsworth, the researcher of nattokinase. Contact him for other reputable brands.

  • madanthony

    4/10/2010 7:04:09 PM |

    There ARE studies showing oral nattokinase IS fibrinolytic (so obviously was absorbed despite stomach acid!).  Here's one.  (I am limitted by your size restrictions)

    Sumi, H. et al. "Enhancement of the fibrinolytic activity in plasma by oral administration of nattokinase." Acta haematol 1990, 84: 139-43.
    Abstract
    The existence of a potent fibrinolytic enzyme (nattokinase, NK) in the traditional fermented food called 'natto', was reported by us previously. It was confirmed that oral administration of NK (or natto) produced a mild and frequent enhancement of the fibrinolytic activity in the plasma, as indicated by the fibrinolytic parameters, and the production of tissue plasminogen activator. NK capsules were also administered orally to dogs with experimentally induced thrombosis, and lysis of the thrombi was observed by angiography. The results obtained suggest that NK represents a possible drug for use not only in the treatment of embolism but also in the prevention of the disease, since NK has a proven safety and can be massproduced.

  • Ara

    4/13/2010 6:37:58 PM |

    So if nattokinnasse works for you. You are dismissed as a crazy -fanatic- person. So here I'm another "fanatic" person that has been taking fibrovan for over a year. My horrendous pelvic (menstrual) pain has improved more than half.
    So I guess it is over 12 months of the placebo effect.
    I read somewhere: First they ignore you then the ridicule you and finally they join you!
    Thank you Dr for at least not deleting the "freaks" posts.
    Anna

  • Anonymous

    4/25/2010 2:14:52 PM |

    I am 54 years old and have suffered from multiple fibroids and dangerous haeavy non-stop bleeding with clots in excess of 1 oz each. I started bleeding last July and by November 15 was close to hemmoraging. I was dangerously anemic for months. They wanted to give me a transfusion in the ER but I refused. I ended up with 10 days of fibrovera which did little except the clots decreased in size. My obgyn wanted to do a hysterectomy but I said no. He gave me 14 days more of fibrovera. Still bleeding I went online and ordered Fibrovan. I had previously taken a fibrinolytic mix with a lot of improvement but had stopped due to feeling better and the cost. After a week on Fibrovan I stopped bleeding for 4 months. I am now having  light manageable flow and will continue the Fibrovan. I would not be able to function otherwise. There are many more testimnials of the help it has been to other women who did not want to be cut on.
    Gail age 54 Texas

  • Tom

    4/25/2010 7:32:17 PM |

    That is ridiculous. Fibroids have nothing to do with fibrin, the words just sound similar. Nor would a purported fibrinolytic help to reduce uterine bleeding. In fact, if it did have fibrinolytic properties, it would increase bleeding.

    The makers of fibrovan and fibrovera (which are both practically identical) both make the absurd claim that nattokinase reduces fibroid size. Fibroids are a benign tumor and are effected by hormone levels. It is absurd to add the unsupported claim that nattokinase is able to shrink tumors and reduce bleeding because this would contradict the other unsupported claims made by pronattokinase commenters.


    It is shameful that supplement manufactures will create entire product lines simply because fibroid sounds like fibrin. I suggest we name this new fake medicine Homonymopathy.

  • Anonymous

    5/17/2010 2:56:11 AM |

    Nattokinase worked for me and I am living proof via ultrasounds.  Wake up folks!  If conventional medicine is so blasted great, then why are there currently mass tort actions regarding Avandia, Bextra, Vioxx, pain pumps used after shoulder surgery, Fleet's Phosphosoda used as a prep before colonoscopies that has put a number of people across our nation in renal failure requiring dialysis and transplants, nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy as a result of gadolinium used for MRIs, etc., etc., etc.  I could go on and list at least 50 actions rights now for products made by Big Pharma and pushed by those who call themselve doctors (aka glorified drug pushers).  Our system is so broken, I wouldn't trust it to take care of a fruitfly!

  • Tom

    5/18/2010 9:39:02 AM |

    Supplements are just big pharm unregulated. That really turned out well for Europe and thalidomide.

    Also, natural does not equal non toxic. I'm acquainted with a patient who absolutely destroyed his liver on vitamin A and E to the point where he required a transplant.

  • ron

    5/18/2010 12:51:42 PM |

    I had bypass surgery 3 years ago after a heart attack. Five bypass grafts were performed. A year ago, I had another heart attack, the cause as indicated on the angiogram was that my body rejected the sutures used. Two of the bypass grafts fell off, and the others are full of crap at the suture that my body has deposited to counter what it feels is a foreign object. The point of this is that if a bypass is necessary, make sure the sutures used are compatible to your body and will not be rejected. there are several suture materials available from silk to propylene and many others. Question if they will work for you.
    All the best
    RB

  • Dave

    5/21/2010 2:51:10 AM |

    Dr. Davis and Tom,

    Fact: Clinical trials support the fact that oral NK mildly, but significantly, increases fibrnolytic activity in humans. I've personally witnessed this with myself.

    Fact: Clinical trials support the fact that NK lowers BP. I've personally witnessed this myself.

    Fact: Nattokinase lowers CRP levels. I've personally witnessed this myself.

    I realize that if any protease enzyme were directly injected into our blood stream, it would turn our veins and arteries into mush. Obviously, very little oral NK is absorbed, but enough to have an affect.

  • Anonymous

    6/1/2010 6:50:30 PM |

    Does anyone know if NK can be helpful in case of Protein C deficiency?
    I have 2 sons who have been diagnosed with 0.62 ratio of Protein C deficiency (genetically predisposed). It should read 0.70 to be normal range.

    In their case, they have to take Coumadin 10mg for life. Trying to avoid by all means.

    Please help.

  • Anonymous

    6/5/2010 11:38:56 AM |

    While barefoot on a ladder I slipped and fell to the next metal step. By the next day the entire arch of my foot was a deep purple with bruise. As witnessed in the office I showed my bruise, ate 100gm of fermented natto food and we watched as the next two days the bruise had cleared entirely. The only remnant was a small wound under the skin that was the source of the bruise/bleeding. It healed in what I would consider a normal period of time.

    Think of all the people on coumadin that would not be walking around with bruised arms or legs...etc

    Someone please explain if a bruise is a form of clotting or not.

    Perhaps in this economy of forced health care the government could spend some of that money on non pharmaceutical research as it might apply to the health of its citizens from eating food.

    I make my own natto, have been eating it weekly for the last 7 years. Soy sauce makes it better so does yogurt...I now am accustomed to eating it by itself. Thank you mother nature.

    A 52 year old believer.

  • Anonymous

    6/5/2010 11:57:24 AM |

    Same 52 year old believer from recent post.

    My wife was hit by an automobile while on her bicycle very recently. The ER sent her home with clean X-Rays for broken bones but advise on future possibility of finding damaged ligaments and or tendons in her leg where the bike frame contacted her.

    The folks at the ER said that day two would have more pain but day three would be the worse. They also advised that she should expect bruising on here entire leg area along with other areas that she was not aware of yet. (she used her arms when falling to protect her head)

    Within a few hours the large area of a bruise was showing. Again, roughly 100g of natto-the food, and the bruising has cleared the same evening. We are on day 4 and still no bruises. We can see an area under the skin where the tissue has been injured, perhaps a tear.....we are not medically trained. Her healing is progressing ahead of schedule as day two and three where better than day one.
    She was struck hard enough for the SUV to have a flat tire from the bicycle.
    I share these experiences to help show that...yes, there is an active ingredient in the natto and yes it gets past the stomach and does have an effect, if only in clearing a bruised area of the body.
    When I have a paper cut or small skin cut the blood is bright red, like I remember when I was very young. The blood also seems to be thinner but will coagulate easily when I apply pressure...as I always have done pre-natto. This from an ongoing, once a week usage.

  • Anonymous

    7/15/2010 4:36:01 PM |

    If what you say is true about stomache acid, then Plavix does not work either, nor does Asprin.

  • Anonymous

    7/17/2010 6:29:52 AM |

    1. If nattokinase worked as argued, then it should increase bruising, not decrease it.

    2. Plavix and asprin are both not enzymes.

  • Anonymous

    7/28/2010 5:09:52 AM |

    from pubmed.gov

    "Effects of nattokinase on blood pressure: a randomized, controlled trial.

    Kim JY, Gum SN, Paik JK, Lim HH, Kim KC, Ogasawara K, Inoue K, Park S, Jang Y, Lee JH.

    Yonsei University Research Institute of Science for Aging, Department of Food and Nutrition, College of Human Ecology, Yonsei University, and Department of Family Medicine, Mizmedi Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
    Abstract

    The objective of this study was to examine the effects of nattokinase supplementation on blood pressure in subjects with pre-hypertension or stage 1 hypertension. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 86 participants ranging from 20 to 80 years of age with an initial untreated systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 130 to 159 mmHg received nattokinase (2,000 FU/capsule) or a placebo capsule for 8 weeks. Seventy-three subjects completed the protocol. Compared with the control group, the net changes in SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were -5.55 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI], -10.5 to -0.57 mmHg; p<0.05) and -2.84 mmHg (CI, -5.33 to -0.33 mmHg; p<0.05), respectively, after the 8-week intervention. The corresponding net change in renin activity was -1.17 ng/mL/h for the nattokinase group compared with the control group (p<0.05). In conclusion, nattokinase supplementation resulted in a reduction in SBP and DBP. These findings suggest that increased intake of nattokinase may play an important role in preventing and treating hypertension."

    PMID: 18971533 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]"

  • Robert

    8/5/2010 5:43:33 AM |

    Dr. David, check http://www.houston-enzymes.com/learn/articles/doctor-may-not-know.php which says that plant and microbe based enzymes do survive the stomach acid, it is  the animal based or pancreatic enzymes that do not. So please retract your statement on enzymes.

  • Robert

    8/5/2010 6:17:29 AM |

    The bruising anecdotes are interesting, hopefully some medical researchers will look into it. Natto the food supposedly contains vitamin K2 which helps with clotting and may help reduce additional bleeding.  It is not clear what the interplay is between Nattokinase and K2.

  • Knox

    8/7/2010 3:24:15 PM |

    Dr. Davis -
    I would be very interested in your thoughts on SOD and it's action on fibrosis.  Note the following study:
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11134893

  • Anonymous

    8/8/2010 3:10:03 AM |

    I am thoroughly enjoying the debate on Nattokinase on this site, but one thing bothers me about Dr. Davis' claim that it is a scam.  Firstly, and foremost he claims that there is no way that it can survive the acidity of the stomach, even if it is enteric coated.  Secondly, he claims that it's anti-thrombolic properties are dangerous and can cause aneurysms in the brain.  I think he needs to pick a topic and stick with it.  If indeed, this product is a scam and does not survive the digestive process, then how can it be dangerous. Seems there needs to be more medically based research done on this enzyme before the word "scam" can be wholeheartedly used.

  • Anonymous

    8/10/2010 2:32:40 PM |

    I've been taking Nattokinase for 4 days now, I'm only 35 years old, but I can literally feel how it dramatically improves blood circulation in my body. The best way to prove or disprove something is to try. I have undiagnosed headaches which nobody can figure out for 13 years, I have chronic pain for 13 years daily non stop. My own theory (not supported by healthcare proffessionals) is that I had some kind on tiny aneurysm rupture or other kind of minor brain bleeding not big enough to show up in MRI but enough to somehow cause me this terrible chronic pain. It started as sudden worst headache you could possibly imagine, I almost lost consciousness. Something terrible must have happened. In any case if Nattokinase can help me it will be pretty major proof. It seems that it started to improve things already. The pain is not going away completely, but it started to disappear for like half a day ...

  • knox

    8/12/2010 4:27:33 PM |

    Anonymous from Aug 10 -

    I'm curious if you drink diet soft drinks or consume aspartame.  I used to have daily headaches and they stopped instantly when I stopped consuming aspartame.  It's a neurotoxin and it's deadly.

  • Anonymous

    8/30/2010 9:43:04 PM |

    I.m also interested into Nattokinase and fully agree with comment posted last August 10 by Anonimous:

    "... one thing bothers me about Dr. Davis' claim that [Nattokinase]is a scam. Firstly, and foremost he claims that there is no way that it can survive the acidity of the stomach, even if it is enteric coated. Secondly, he claims that it's anti-thrombolic properties are dangerous and can cause aneurysms in the brain. I think he needs to pick a topic and stick with it. If indeed, this product is a scam and does not survive the digestive process, then how can it be dangerous. Seems there needs to be more medically based research done on this enzyme before the word "scam" can be wholeheartedly used."

    Would like to know Dr.Davis answer

  • Anonymous

    9/1/2010 12:11:25 AM |

    Part 1
    For those who are searching for an answer to dissolving blood clots, I would love 2 share my success story.  In Oct 2009 I developed a freak blood clot after knee surgery.  I exercise almost every day and part of the regimen is cardio 5-7 days a week for 40 minutes @ a time. For a 40 year old male I was in peak condition.  My resting heart rate is excellent, blood pressure, cholesterol, weight, & BMI all perfect.  The week before my surgery I developed the H1N1 flu which put me in bed for a week and they had to push my knee surgery back.  So I went from super active to lying in bed for a week then having surgery and lying in bed again 2 recover.  Doctors tested for all diseases and genetic causes of blood clots and I had none of them.  They finally came to a conclusion that going from extreme activity to nothing could have been the only cause.  If I knew then what I know now I would have moved around more etc. but I had no clue?  I actually self diagnosed my own blood clot using web md and called my doctor.  He didn’t believe me so he said take an aspirin and come see him in the morning (3-4 days after surgery)  They put a Doppler on my leg found the blood clots & immediately rushed me to surgery to have a filter placed in my groin 2 prevent the clot from traveling 2 my heart.  They started giving me Heparin and then warfarin (coumidan) when I left the hospital.  They kept increasing my dose of warfarin since they could not get my PT level above 2 (they wanted it between 2-3) my level was 1.5-1.8.  I started getting terrible headaches, pain behind my eyes and after 6 weeks of this I developed horrible heartburn (I never was sensitive to ANY spicy food for my whole life) they wanted me to take 12mg of warfarin “rat poison” a day and I had enough.  None of my doctors wanted to discuss garlic, fish oil, or any of the other natural blood thinning methods.  They just wanted to give me one drug to cover the side effects of the other.  Since I normally eat mostly organic foods and am ultra healthy I had enough and decided to do my own research.  I read that Nattokinase would not only thin my blood, but unlike the “rat poison” it would actually dissolve the clot.  My doctor had told me that I would always have scars from blood clots and thus would need to take a baby aspirin for the rest of my life and go on warfarin whenever I had surgery in the future, because the “rat poison” only prevented future clots, but would not dissolve the clot.  So I found the best pharmaceutical grade Natto made by Allergy Research Group (I believe it is made in Japan) but was able to find in on Amazon.  I started taking 100mg a day and reduced my warfarin to 5mg & added 1 eight hour time released garlic pill.  Since my doctor could not measure my blood level (his devise only measured the amount of warfarin in my blood) I had to do this on my own and lied to my doctor about how much warfarin I was taking.  I had to judge my blood thickness by bruising and blood flow when pricked ( I know this sounds crazy but where I live I could not find a doctor that was willing to help me)  I knew that I had the filter in my leg as a back up, so that took some of the danger out of the equation.  After about a month of this I went to 200mg of Natto (one pill every 12 hours) and three eight hour time released garlic pills and stopped taking warfarin all together.  I did this for another 3 months.  PLEASE NOTE I UNDERSTAND WHAT I DID WAS DANGEROUS, SO I HOPE YOU CAN FIND A DOCTOR TO HELP WITH THIS PROCESS.
    to be continued...

  • Anonymous

    9/1/2010 12:12:50 AM |

    Part 1
    For those who are searching for an answer to dissolving blood clots, I would love 2 share my success story.  In Oct 2009 I developed a freak blood clot after knee surgery.  I exercise almost every day and part of the regimen is cardio 5-7 days a week for 40 minutes @ a time. For a 40 year old male I was in peak condition.  My resting heart rate is excellent, blood pressure, cholesterol, weight, & BMI all perfect.  The week before my surgery I developed the H1N1 flu which put me in bed for a week and they had to push my knee surgery back.  So I went from super active to lying in bed for a week then having surgery and lying in bed again 2 recover.  Doctors tested for all diseases and genetic causes of blood clots and I had none of them.  They finally came to a conclusion that going from extreme activity to nothing could have been the only cause.  If I knew then what I know now I would have moved around more etc. but I had no clue?  I actually self diagnosed my own blood clot using web md and called my doctor.  He didn’t believe me so he said take an aspirin and come see him in the morning (3-4 days after surgery)  They put a Doppler on my leg found the blood clots & immediately rushed me to surgery to have a filter placed in my groin 2 prevent the clot from traveling 2 my heart.  They started giving me Heparin and then warfarin (coumidan) when I left the hospital.  They kept increasing my dose of warfarin since they could not get my PT level above 2 (they wanted it between 2-3) my level was 1.5-1.8.  I started getting terrible headaches, pain behind my eyes and after 6 weeks of this I developed horrible heartburn (I never was sensitive to ANY spicy food for my whole life) they wanted me to take 12mg of warfarin “rat poison” a day and I had enough.  None of my doctors wanted to discuss garlic, fish oil, or any of the other natural blood thinning methods.  They just wanted to give me one drug to cover the side effects of the other.  Since I normally eat mostly organic foods and am ultra healthy I had enough and decided to do my own research.  I read that Nattokinase would not only thin my blood, but unlike the “rat poison” it would actually dissolve the clot.  My doctor had told me that I would always have scars from blood clots and thus would need to take a baby aspirin for the rest of my life and go on warfarin whenever I had surgery in the future, because the “rat poison” only prevented future clots, but would not dissolve the clot.  So I found the best pharmaceutical grade Natto made by Allergy Research Group (I believe it is made in Japan) but was able to find in on Amazon.  I started taking 100mg a day and reduced my warfarin to 5mg & added 1 eight hour time released garlic pill.  Since my doctor could not measure my blood level (his devise only measured the amount of warfarin in my blood) I had to do this on my own and lied to my doctor about how much warfarin I was taking.  I had to judge my blood thickness by bruising and blood flow when pricked ( I know this sounds crazy but where I live I could not find a doctor that was willing to help me)  I knew that I had the filter in my leg as a back up, so that took some of the danger out of the equation.  After about a month of this I went to 200mg of Natto (one pill every 12 hours) and three eight hour time released garlic pills and stopped taking warfarin all together.  I did this for another 3 months.  PLEASE NOTE I UNDERSTAND WHAT I DID WAS DANGEROUS, SO I HOPE YOU CAN FIND A DOCTOR TO HELP WITH THIS PROCESS.
    to be continued...

  • Anonymous

    9/1/2010 12:14:57 AM |

    Part 1
    For those who are searching for an answer to dissolving blood clots, I would love 2 share my success story.  In Oct 2009 I developed a freak blood clot after knee surgery.  I exercise almost every day and part of the regimen is cardio 5-7 days a week for 40 minutes @ a time. For a 40 year old male I was in peak condition.  My resting heart rate is excellent, blood pressure, cholesterol, weight, & BMI all perfect.  The week before my surgery I developed the H1N1 flu which put me in bed for a week and they had to push my knee surgery back.  So I went from super active to lying in bed for a week then having surgery and lying in bed again 2 recover.  Doctors tested for all diseases and genetic causes of blood clots and I had none of them.  They finally came to a conclusion that going from extreme activity to nothing could have been the only cause.  If I knew then what I know now I would have moved around more etc. but I had no clue?  I actually self diagnosed my own blood clot using web md and called my doctor.  He didn’t believe me so he said take an aspirin and come see him in the morning (3-4 days after surgery)  They put a Doppler on my leg found the blood clots & immediately rushed me to surgery to have a filter placed in my groin 2 prevent the clot from traveling 2 my heart.  They started giving me Heparin and then warfarin (coumidan) when I left the hospital.  They kept increasing my dose of warfarin since they could not get my PT level above 2 (they wanted it between 2-3) my level was 1.5-1.8.  I started getting terrible headaches, pain behind my eyes and after 6 weeks of this I developed horrible heartburn (I never was sensitive to ANY spicy food for my whole life) they wanted me to take 12mg of warfarin “rat poison” a day and I had enough.  None of my doctors wanted to discuss garlic, fish oil, or any of the other natural blood thinning methods.  They just wanted to give me one drug to cover the side effects of the other.  Since I normally eat mostly organic foods and am ultra healthy I had enough and decided to do my own research.  I read that Nattokinase would not only thin my blood, but unlike the “rat poison” it would actually dissolve the clot.  My doctor had told me that I would always have scars from blood clots and thus would need to take a baby aspirin for the rest of my life and go on warfarin whenever I had surgery in the future, because the “rat poison” only prevented future clots, but would not dissolve the clot.  So I found the best pharmaceutical grade Natto made by Allergy Research Group (I believe it is made in Japan) but was able to find in on Amazon.  I started taking 100mg a day and reduced my warfarin to 5mg & added 1 eight hour time released garlic pill.  Since my doctor could not measure my blood level (his devise only measured the amount of warfarin in my blood) I had to do this on my own and lied to my doctor about how much warfarin I was taking.  to be continued...

  • Anonymous

    9/1/2010 12:16:39 AM |

    Part 1
    For those who are searching for an answer to dissolving blood clots, I would love 2 share my success story.  In Oct 2009 I developed a freak blood clot after knee surgery.  I exercise almost every day and part of the regimen is cardio 5-7 days a week for 40 minutes @ a time. For a 40 year old male I was in peak condition.  My resting heart rate is excellent, blood pressure, cholesterol, weight, & BMI all perfect.  The week before my surgery I developed the H1N1 flu which put me in bed for a week and they had to push my knee surgery back.  So I went from super active to lying in bed for a week then having surgery and lying in bed again 2 recover.  Doctors tested for all diseases and genetic causes of blood clots and I had none of them.  They finally came to a conclusion that going from extreme activity to nothing could have been the only cause.  If I knew then what I know now I would have moved around more etc. but I had no clue?  I actually self diagnosed my own blood clot using web md and called my doctor.  He didn’t believe me so he said take an aspirin and come see him in the morning (3-4 days after surgery)  They put a Doppler on my leg found the blood clots & immediately rushed me to surgery to have a filter placed in my groin 2 prevent the clot from traveling 2 my heart.  They started giving me Heparin and then warfarin (coumidan) when I left the hospital.  They kept increasing my dose of warfarin since they could not get my PT level above 2 (they wanted it between 2-3) my level was 1.5-1.8.  I started getting terrible headaches, pain behind my eyes and after 6 weeks of this I developed horrible heartburn (I never was sensitive to ANY spicy food for my whole life) they wanted me to take 12mg of warfarin “rat poison” a day and I had enough.  None of my doctors wanted to discuss garlic, fish oil, or any of the other natural blood thinning methods.  They just wanted to give me one drug to cover the side effects of the other.  Since I normally eat mostly organic foods and am ultra healthy I had enough and decided to do my own research.  I read that Nattokinase would not only thin my blood, but unlike the “rat poison” it would actually dissolve the clot.  My doctor had told me that I would always have scars from blood clots and thus would need to take a baby aspirin for the rest of my life and go on warfarin whenever I had surgery in the future, because the “rat poison” only prevented future clots, but would not dissolve the clot.  So I found the best pharmaceutical grade Natto made by Allergy Research Group (I believe it is made in Japan) but was able to find in on Amazon.
    to be continued...

  • Anonymous

    9/1/2010 12:18:58 AM |

    Part 1
    For those who are searching for an answer to dissolving blood clots, I would love 2 share my success story.  In Oct 2009 I developed a freak blood clot after knee surgery.  I exercise almost every day and part of the regimen is cardio 5-7 days a week for 40 minutes @ a time. For a 40 year old male I was in peak condition.  My resting heart rate is excellent, blood pressure, cholesterol, weight, & BMI all perfect.  The week before my surgery I developed the H1N1 flu which put me in bed for a week and they had to push my knee surgery back.  So I went from super active to lying in bed for a week then having surgery and lying in bed again 2 recover.  Doctors tested for all diseases and genetic causes of blood clots and I had none of them.  They finally came to a conclusion that going from extreme activity to nothing could have been the only cause.  If I knew then what I know now I would have moved around more etc. but I had no clue?  I actually self diagnosed my own blood clot using web md and called my doctor.  He didn’t believe me so he said take an aspirin and come see him in the morning (3-4 days after surgery)  They put a Doppler on my leg found the blood clots & immediately rushed me to surgery to have a filter placed in my groin 2 prevent the clot from traveling 2 my heart.  They started giving me Heparin and then warfarin (coumidan) when I left the hospital.  They kept increasing my dose of warfarin since they could not get my PT level above 2 (they wanted it between 2-3) my level was 1.5-1.8.  I started getting terrible headaches, pain behind my eyes and after 6 weeks of this I developed horrible heartburn (I never was sensitive to ANY spicy food for my whole life) they wanted me to take 12mg of warfarin “rat poison” a day and I had enough.  None of my doctors wanted to discuss garlic, fish oil, or any of the other natural blood thinning methods.  They just wanted to give me one drug to cover the side effects of the other.  Since I normally eat mostly organic foods and am ultra healthy I had enough and decided to do my own research.
    to be continued...

  • Anonymous

    9/1/2010 12:24:06 AM |

    PART 2 Sorry for multiple post the server was not working correctly...

    At the 6 month mark my doctor tested my blood clotting abilities and cleared me to stop taking Warfarin (not knowing I had been off it for a couple of months)  two weeks ago my doctor wanted me to get another Doppler on my leg to see how the blood clot scaring looked as I was going to have another surgery on the same knee (he wanted a before and after picture to see if any further clotting would cling to the scar tissue) The Doppler tech looked up and down my entire leg and could not find ANY evidence I ever had a blood clot.  Naturally I was vindicated and wanted to share my success story with my fellow bloggers that are tired of being pumped full of drugs so that big Pharma can make billions of dollars addicting us to pills.  I know traditional medicine needs to be used in some cases, but I am happy the blood thinning and clot removal can be done naturally.  Now I need to find a natural way to heal the heartburn that has been a part of my life, thanks to the “rat poison” my doctor forced down my throat.

  • Anonymous

    9/1/2010 12:25:51 AM |

    Part 3

    ... Sorry Dr. Davis, but I am LIVING PROOF that you are wrong.

  • Anonymous

    9/1/2010 1:52:07 AM |

    The weight of the anecdotal evidence favors natto and nattokinase.  How can Dr. Davis continue to deny it?  To the most recent courageous person who posted in 3 installments, more power to you.  you give us all courage.

  • Anonymous

    9/1/2010 1:55:45 AM |

    Part 2 (sorry for the multiple posts but the server was having problem.)

    At the 6 month mark my doctor tested my blood clotting abilities and cleared me to stop taking Warfarin (not knowing I had been off it for a couple of months)  two weeks ago my doctor wanted me to get another Doppler on my leg to see how the blood clot scaring looked as I was going to have another surgery on the same knee (he wanted a before and after picture to see if any further clotting would cling to the scar tissue) The Doppler tech looked up and down my entire leg and could not find ANY evidence I ever had a blood clot.  Naturally I was vindicated and wanted to share my success story with my fellow bloggers that are tired of being pumped full of drugs so that big Pharma can make billions of dollars addicting us to pills.  I know traditional medicine needs to be used in some cases, but I am happy the blood thinning and clot removal can be done naturally.  Now I need to find a natural way to heal the heartburn that has been a part of my life, thanks to the “rat poison” my doctor forced down my throat.
    2 b continued...closing statement

  • Anonymous

    9/1/2010 3:48:34 AM |

    Part 4 - I need to add something to my story.  When I used the word Natto in my story, I was referring to Nattokinase.  I should have used NK for a shorten version as Natto is obviously a different form. Sorry for that confusion and the fact that my posts came separately, but I wanted to explain my whole story to help others that are tired of watching our health and this world be destroyed by chemicals and greed.  

    I really think the United states will never have an honest government until they stop allowing Big Pharma, Oil companies, etc. to fund the campaigns of our politicians.  There should be no political parties only Americans that want to protect our health & environment.  Also the only religion that should be affiliated with government is the freedom to practice it.  Watching people treat others badly in the name of their God is probable what drives people to not believe in any God.  

    Peace to you all and good healthSmile

  • Anonymous

    9/1/2010 12:27:10 PM |

    Thanks, Anonymous, for the complete five-part story.  I agree with you on all points. I think we like-minded people need to band together to try to impact the upcoming election.  Any ideas?

  • Anonymous

    9/1/2010 3:03:58 PM |

    Thanks for taking interest in my Nattokinase story (i wish I could have used just one post, but it was too long)and it is great to hear others with  a similar mindset.  Unfortunately, I'm really not sure any vote will matter until we have political reform in this country.  It is laughable to think any politician in any party is going to vote for political reform, when you have separate parties that are both controlled by corporations (Big Pharma, Oil companies, Telecommunication,etc.) funding their campaigns.  The only answer I can see is that you have a number of candidates with NO party affiliation that are not allowed to advertise.  A government political site could have a web page for each qualified candidate (where they answer a uniform set of questions so citizens know the type of policies they support) & TV networks could be forced to donate one commercial for each candidate.  NO special interest, NO personal money could be used.  The small cost to set up a webpage would have to come out of our taxes so that it is kept none bias. I know my idea may sound strange, but without political reform our votes are really just a hope that the persons we put in office will not be influenced by the people funding the ridiculous spending they use to advertise themselves and that is not going to happen.

    Take careSmile

  • Anonymous

    9/1/2010 5:59:03 PM |

    I like the idea of a non-partisan, beyond-the-2-party-deadlock  website.  I see no movement toward a real solution to our problems.  On Diane Rehm's show this morning, I heard about something I knew had to exist -- the BigPharma campaign to take control of medical marijuana, including influencing legislation that is outlawing grow-your-own stuff. The per-capita prescription drug use in the US is 11+, while in the poorest states, it's as high as 17.  We are fat, unhealthy and uninformed, so much so that Fox leads viewership.  Amazing that my country could deteriorate so fast. Take a look at this story: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38727236/ns/health-forbescom

  • Anonymous

    9/2/2010 9:06:38 PM |

    One thing bothers me. FDA does not approve NK as a drug since it has not passed the required tests (clinical trials). On the other hand it is well known that going through the whole process of a certified clinical trial is lenghty and quite costly: only big farmaceutical industries could do it, as a long term investment. Since NK is a natural product, the returns out of such investment would represent for that company a net loss. So, there appear to be no solutions, other  than the organization of interested groups exchanging ideas and information in discussions, blogs [as the present one], ets., with moderators competent and sensible to the issues involved.  This in practice corresponds to a 'natural clinical trial' procedure. It may be objected that it might produce some increscious failures. But this is the case also among people accepting to take part in a certified trial. After all, what counts is the overall general outcome.

  • Anonymous

    9/4/2010 10:33:59 AM |

    Looks like Dr. Davis has been schooled here.  NK wins.

  • Anonymous

    9/22/2010 6:21:46 AM |

    Thanks for your 5 part story.  Hope you come back again to see this post.  It may sound counter-intuitive, but taking one tablespoon of Apple Cider Vinegar will get rid of your heartburn almost immediately.  People with heartburn actually need MORE acid in their stomachs.  Good luck.

  • Anonymous

    10/8/2010 1:40:01 PM |

    In the web several people claim urotherapy (drinking your own urine) is a panacea for a number of ailments (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urine_therapy ). Scientific literature does not back this claim but agrees that generally this practice is not harmful (97% of urine is water, it is sterile, and its components come out from a filtering process balancing our blood constituents). The low fraction of urea in it, which in large quantities is toxic, has no adverse effect.
    One of the components of urine is urokinase, which is a potent fibrinolytic. This "natural", costless therapy could represent a safe (since merely enhancing an existing physiological process) alternative to nattokinase. At least for those who claim its validity, disregarding Dr. Davis' opinion that it would be destroyed by the acidity of the stomach.
    I practice urotherapy with good results (better digestion, better sleep, no discomfort whatsoever).
    It should be avoided in certain circumstances (see reference above).

  • Anonymous

    10/15/2010 5:54:48 AM |

    I am so glad I found this thread. I have found in life that the truth is usually somewhere in the middle. I am going to try nattokinase. I think nattokinase probably works at least some of the time, probably because if taken properly, SOME of it does survive. But as somebody noted earlier, I also believe some of these people had a severe vitamin K deficiency which was really the problem. Also, I am going to get off of anything that is a blood thinner like Ginkgo, aspirin or anything else and I'm not going to exceed 2,000 FUs a day. The bottom line is, there are too many people claiming to does work and not enough people dying from any adverse effects to keep me from not at least approaching it with caution.

  • Anonymous

    10/30/2010 5:48:32 AM |

    Thanks for the apple cider vinegar suggestion,  I will give it a trySmile  

    Update on my Nattokinase success story;  I had another doppler done on my leg post ACL surgey and all is clearSmile  The Doppler Tech was amazed when he saw the before and after pictures and had me write down the name of my supplement.  He had NEVER seen blood clots completely disappear like the ones in my leg. It feels good 2 prove Dr. Davis WRONG.

  • Anonymous

    10/31/2010 7:04:14 AM |

    Dear Dr. Davis,

    I have read these comments and can tell you from personal experience that Natto is a much safer way to keep blood from becoming sticky and clotting than thinning the blood with strong pharmaceuticals like Coumadin (Warfarin).

    My Dad had heart surgery and a complication that almost killed him post-operatively - a blood clot that traveled to his lung. Thank God, my Mom's intuition and his attentive Heart Specialist for finding it finally.

    Heparin was used for that intense situation. Then he was to go on Coumadin for 6 months.  After 1 month he started to experience blood blotches all over his body after a shower.

    Something was clearly happening to his blood that was not healthy or normal from the medicine - Not to mention having to go for Blood Tests every 3 weeks to see that it's not TOO thin and Not being able to ever eat healthy quantities of Green foods that build the bodies immune and other systems.

    The doctor's took him off of the Coumadin after several months at our  request and put him on daily aspirin - also to thin the blood and prevent future clots.

    It took him almost a full year of being Coumadin free for his post-shower blood splotches to clear up.

    Ten years later, he developed two small clots in his leg below the knee. The doctor wanted to start up a Coumadin again even though my Dad could not tolerate it.

    He warned us the clots could break off and travel at any time. We saw an MD who was also an ND and well versed. He recommended Nattokinase.

    We used it for 3 month and the MRI showed the clots were stationary. We upgraded to Boluoke Lumbrokinase (Many times more effective) and it had been two years and he is healthy.

    No new clots. No aspirin (since it may conflict with Natto or Lumbro). We are down to 1 tablet a day for maintenance with other natural blood thinners like Fish Oil.

    When he skips the Lumbrokinase, he will get leg cramps from the PAD. When he takes it - there is a marked difference.

    Nattokinase and Lumbrokinase are not miracle cures. But they are not derived from what was intended to be a Poision (Coumadin). The liklihood of a deadly side-effect is slim as they are naturally derived and have been used by many people for a number of years in Japan, China and other countries.


    My Dad can eat healthy green vegetables and drink green drinks. People on Coumadin can't and fear they will die without it. He takes the Lumbrokinase (or Natto if we run out of it) in a dose the ND and research has helped us determine works for his condition.

    He doesn't have to have his blood drawn every three weeks. And there are not long-term side effects that we have seen for the past two years.

    In conclusion, with Nattokinase and Lumbrokinase is a viable alternative to medicines that have immediate and possibly serious long term negative effects - even with the positive effects they are prescribed for.

    All I can tell you is that my Dad has a better quality of life  - and isn't that what we see a Doctor for to begin with?

  • Anonymous

    10/31/2010 7:14:50 AM |

    Dr. Davis,

    My Dad has been on Nattokinase, and then Boluoke Lumbrokinase for more than 2 years in response to two small blood clots below his kneee.

    He could not tolerate Coumadin - he had it more than fifteen years ago for a blood clot after heart surgery.  It gave him blood splotches all over his body after showering. He was only on it for 2 months. Instead he was on low dose aspirin and we saw an MD who is also an ND for a strong antioxidant and heart health program.

    We decided against the Coumadin and opted for the Nattokinase (3x day). The MRI showed the clots stayed the same size or were slightly smaller after 3 months. No new clots. We upgraded to Boluoke Lumbrokinase (3x day).

    It has been 2 years and no further clots. We are down to 1x a day on the Lumbrokinase.

    My Dad feels great, can eat greens make healthy green drinks and doesn't need to go for a blood test every 3 weeks for Coumadin.  If he skips the Lumbro, he will get a cramp in his legs from PAD - noticeable difference.

    Quality of Life is what it is about for my Dad. We've been through the surgery, drugs and side-effects.  

    With solid health research, consulting an experienced MD/ND and determination to find a solution that is not a long-term use of a strong pharmaceutical drug, we have a healthy program.

    Natto and Lumbro are not miracle cures. But they are giving my Dad the quality of life in his older years he could never have with the long term use of potent medications that interfere with the body's natural processes rather than work with it to strengthen it.

  • Anonymous

    10/31/2010 9:19:57 PM |

    Dr Davis:  What are your thoughts on enzymes such as Wobenzymor other enzyme products such as bromelein for myalgia pain?

  • buy jeans

    11/2/2010 7:42:31 PM |

    I have read his research. I stand by my opinion: Nattokinase is a scam. It is an utterly ridiculous notion that anyone should take oral thrombolytic agents to "prevent blood clots". Thrombolysis is a dangerous strategy, even if it worked in humans by the oral route. An agent that, if it worked, poses serious potential for severe side effects and death needs to be tested thoroughly first. It is plain idiocy to use this agent. It is not fish oil, it is not a vitamin, it is something entirely different that has no basis for use as a preventive. You're throwing your money away.

  • Bpb

    11/3/2010 11:51:49 AM |

    I posted a lengthy comment on November 1, where is it?  If you are going to have free speech then have it. If the moderator is going to choose what get's posted then let's bring back Hitler and burn all the books

  • xanax

    11/7/2010 1:34:10 PM |

    Problem is that it's even nuttier to be taking warfarin chronically, considering it's _known_ interaction with vitamin K

  • Anonymous

    11/7/2010 6:32:53 PM |

    The whole point of warfarin is in it's interaction with vitamin K, that is how it works. Also, warfarin is a nearly identical synthetic derivative of a naturally occuring myotoxin called dicoumarin, so warfarin is about as natural as most supplements being promoted as such. If you were really concerned, you could get the all natural version, dicoumarin.


    Warfarin is nasty stuff, which is why doctors carefully weigh the risks versus the benefits of it.


    If you only believe in testimonial evidence given on this blog by commenters, you can still prove to yourself nattokinase is a scam because there are people here shilling it here claiming it helped them clot as well as bust clots.

  • ardi

    11/11/2010 4:36:36 AM |

    You recommend vitamin K2 for people with heart disease because of its property to slow or reverse the process of calcification of the arteries.  However, vitamin K2 promotes the ability of blood to clot, which is especially dangerous for people with heart disease.  
    I am confused by this contradiction.

  • Anonymous

    11/27/2010 12:29:14 AM |

    Does he work for the pharma industry? Doctors are trained to prescribe drugs. Patients have become used to Placebo treatments. Hey! it's a win-win situation. For 5+ years, I worked for Pfizer in Groton, Connecticut and I have been deeply involved with their marketing strategies. Even if Natto were to work, or works, they will never allow it to be considered safe to use, unless regulated by the Pharma industry. Too much money to be lost here. Yes. This is the truth. Work in a pharma establishment, get involved with their tactics and assess yourself. The whole industry is like Amway (no doubt, there are absolute good things this industry has brought for humanity though). Food for thought - get the book "The Encyclopedia of Medical Breakthroughs and Forbidden Treatments" http://cancerdefeated.com/DIA/ or just Google it.

  • jack

    12/19/2010 11:21:25 PM |

    I don't see the answer to the question posted on November 10 ( i think) which said, You recommend vitamin K2 for people with heart disease because of its property to slow or reverse the process of calcification of the arteries. However, vitamin K2 promotes the ability of blood to clot, which is especially dangerous for people with heart disease.
    I am confused by this contradiction.

    I am lookin for the same answer.
    Thank you

  • jack

    12/19/2010 11:22:18 PM |

    You recommend vitamin K2 for people with heart disease because of its property to slow or reverse the process of calcification of the arteries. However, vitamin K2 promotes the ability of blood to clot, which is especially dangerous for people with heart disease.
    I am confused by this contradiction.

  • Anonymous

    12/20/2010 4:28:57 PM |

    I have read the 'for'/'against' arguments about using Nattokinase with interest. I was looking for some guidance on using this product, but instead have uncovered a 'minefield' of claim and counter-claim. Just who can you believe? Well, history is littered with disasters brought about by so-called 'safe' drugs, developed by the big pharmaceutical companies. So although, clinical trials do need to be carried out, they offer no guarantee of 100% safety or, the prevention of possible side-effects. I am also sceptical of anyone who dismisses something so readily. Keeping an open mind until proven otherwise seems a much more sensible approach, especially with so much positive anecdotal evidence being posted. There is much about the human body that even the most eminent MD does not fully understand. So discrediting Nattokinase without this complete knowledge is, at best foolish. Most people are simply looking for help at a time of concern over their health. Please remember this all you doctors out there and don't ridicule something until you know for sure. And, unless I've missed something - you don't!

  • Dr. William Davis

    12/21/2010 1:04:41 PM |

    Jack--

    K2 NORMALIZES clotting, it does NOT cause it.


    Anon-

    My thinking does not change on nattokinase. It still remains foolhardy to believe that, based on marketing claims and the flimsiest of evidence, that you would chance taking a "supplement" for a potentially life-threatening condition. It's not that I love the drugs; it's I like not dying to enrich some foolish supplement manufacturer who makes claims without evidence.

  • Harold

    12/26/2010 10:34:46 PM |

    All foods, (excepting undigestible minerals) are composed of CHO or carbohydrates, including protein which differs by carboxyl minerals in the CHO chain. So it was interesting that you point out no proteins nor enzymes pass through the intestine into the blood.

    However, breaking down nattokinase to its amino acids does provide the blocks to rebuild serine protease.

    "Serine proteases are inhibited by a diverse group of inhibitors, including synthetic chemical inhibitors for research or therapeutic purposes, and also natural proteinaceous inhibitors. One family of natural inhibitors called "serpins" (abbreviated from serine protease inhibitors) can form a covalent bond with the serine protease, inhibiting its function. The best-studied serpins are antithrombin and alpha 1-antitrypsin, studied for their role in coagulation/thrombosis and emphysema/A1AT, respectively. "
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serine_protease

    It's necessary to eat foods or the enzymes or proteins that can provide the amono acid materials to form enzymes the body uses for repair. The wonder is what other foods could offer the same as natto.

    If the argument is that no proteins or enzymes pass digestion, then it might be assumed that people are wasting time eating them, so fats and sugars are needed.

  • Anonymous

    1/1/2011 12:34:35 AM |

    I'm sure the FDA's sperm finds its way to that nice shiny skin of yours, so why wouldn't nattokinase do the same.

  • Anonymous

    1/11/2011 3:04:46 AM |

    I am done taking Warfarin. I do not want osteoporosis and am using Now Foods Natto-100mg,120 veg cap.

    I feel better than I did on the warfarin. My periods are much better and I do not have the clutching feeling in my chest that I had after being diagnosed with bi-lateral pulmonary embolisms.

    Thank God for Natto. Please research it more. It works.

  • Anonymous

    1/17/2011 5:35:04 AM |

    I had started taking vitamin K2 and notice that my bones are getting stronger (osteopenia) especially my jaw so less problems with my teeth.

    Secondly, I had some "spider veins" popping out on my legs (not severe) and they seem to have disappeared.

    Can someone out there tell me what this phenomena is? I knew about Vit K2 and bones, but spider veins??

  • Anonymous

    1/18/2011 3:31:59 PM |

    Dr. William Davis is either a narrow minded "know-it-all" or he (like many others in his profession) is having his pocket filled with blood money via Big Pharma.  

    I have documented my success story in my several part post and wanted to return to this forum to encourage others that there is hope beyond the rat poison known as Warfarin.  Nattokinase not only prevented further blood clots, but much to my Doctor & his Doppler Tech’s surprise, it COMPLETELY removed the blood clot without even a trace or scar.

    So Dr. Big Pharma can continue showing it’s true colors and bad mouth Nattokinase, & doctors can use medical terms to describe why it’s not possible for this substance to work and those who were willing to risk using a natural alternative to help with blood clots (LIKE MYSELF) can continue 2 prove how ignorant and WRONG they are.

    I will try to check back from time to time and continue my blood clot free success story.

    Good luck to the true believersSmile

  • Anonymous

    1/20/2011 6:45:33 AM |

    My mother who has been chronically ill and misgidanosed for decades began taking nattokinase as well as bolouke, rottozyme (spelling)..and several other supplements in October 2010 under the care of a naturopath physician.  The first in two decades she is showing improvement on multi-system levels!  I find it UTTERLY RIDICULOUS that dr's prescribe dangerous immune suppresents such as Remicade, Enbryl, my mothers were $1200 per pop, 2 hour infusion into her elbow that caused permanent nerve damage, dr's ignoring warning signes that are bioligic and made from mouse and hamster cell protiens, caused lesions in her brain and spinal, and that she was given Celebrex for more than a decade that was black box warned in 2001 and multiple lawsuits for causing strokes.  The proof is in the pudding for me.  My mother's health is improving, she is now walking, talking, showing interest, absolutly no negative side effects.

  • Anonymous

    1/20/2011 7:18:00 AM |

    And, Utterly ridiculous that most people are brainwashed to question natural, mother nature provided us with what we need...and brainwashed to totally trust taking man made synthetic chemicals and invasive surgeries as the only option, thinking them as superior & the only way.  My mother was too frail to endure any more synthetic chemicals that nearly killed her.  Wish I would have known about many of these  alternatives 20 years ago.  Another example, Artemisinin...been around for thousands of years, used to treat malaria and proven cancer cure for many types of cancer, even some strains resistant to chemo.  You won't hear about Artemisinin (the holly grail cure) until the UW professor who currently has a patent and developing a "sythetic version" so Pharma companies can market it. . .puts it on the market. totally true, google it.

  • Anonymous

    1/20/2011 7:39:47 AM |

    And I bet there are many out there who don't believe that parasites, fungus, mold, acidic high fat diet, skeletal structural issues and toxins are the cause for most all disease - and MDs will rarely if ever investigate and treat.  Nor believe that  natural mineral seasalt - the oldest antibiotic known to mankind, oil of oregano - thousands of uses for disease and parasite cures, chlorella, very popular and hightly used in Japan...ionic therapy...personally, I have taken niacin 500 mg every morning for circulation, have since my 20's. I knew somthing was wrong and kept getting poo-pood by dr's...unknown to me, I had congenital lyme, like my mother. For me, kept my blood from turning to syrup & ionic therapy totally helped me to regain my life, health & focus. Everyone is different, exposure, threshold levels..we should all be able to make informed decisions and choices about our health.  Medicare, like many insurance companies, do not pay for alternative medicine at this time...and times need to change. We are so behind the rest of the world.

  • Anonymous

    2/12/2011 6:55:42 PM |

    July 8 you stated there are some truly great supplements but NOT nattokinase. Why did you not name those supplements? Afraid that nattokinase or other healthy supplement would reduce your and big pharmas income?

  • Anonymous

    3/2/2011 5:51:46 PM |

    Fibrovan - I am a 46 yr old from Caddo Mills Tx.  For 2-3 yrs now I have had unbelievable heavy cycles and clots. A sonogram a year earlier revealed I had fibroids. My cycles were so bad, I had a hard time working. The sonogram at the hosp cost $500 w/insurance.  I am a single mom receiving no support and can not afford surgery. I am VERY skeptical and not an easy sell. I decided to try Fibrovan in desperation. I took it faithfully and am amazed at the results!!!! I am having a normal cycle, my stomach feels 'deflated' and I didn't think I was bloated before. I decided to google this product again to see if there were bad side effects.  I never believe these posts that are good and always think they must work for the company.  I AM TELLING YOU so far 100% satisfied !!!!!! Smile

  • Mark UK

    4/19/2011 8:43:40 AM |

    Hi Im Mark 53 years old and live in the UK, I've been in AF since March 2010 I've been on warfarin since June 2010 and have had a good INR of appox 2.5 and Im tested every week.
    2 weeks ago I went for an AF ablation at Harefield Hospital UK after getting myself in the right frame of mind about having the 5 hour ablation operation I was woken after 1 hour to be told they could not see if my LAA (left artial appendage) was clear of clots using an ultrasound device so I was put in a CT scanner only to be told my LAA was full of THROMBUS, so my doctors now want my INR to be 3.00 and I now have to wait 4 to 6 weeks to have another CT scan and hope the Thrombus has gone so I can have the Ablation and pray in the mean time I dont have a stroke or pulmonary embolism. I am concidering that if after the 6 week CT scan the Thrombus is still there that maybe my body needs the help of some nattokinase and less Warfarin if there is a balance to be found I will buy a Blood Testing CoaguChek XS PLUS system kit to test myself daily for my INR of my normal 2.5 level, because I feel to do nothing after my 6 weeks CT scan is maybe waiting time I may not have, I will leave more comments as time goes on and let you read what happens in the weeks to come, Kind regards Mark

  • ggaylmer

    4/26/2011 9:26:22 PM |

    I'm fed up reading opinions from "Anonymous".  Are they all the same person?  Why can't you give your name?  At least Dr Davis is not afraid to give his name.

  • Derek Weiss

    5/26/2011 1:33:05 PM |

    I've worked ER for fifteen years, and while I don't have data, only my observations, I'd have to say your statement is WAY over exaggerated.

  • John Doe

    6/16/2011 6:00:20 AM |

    ggaylmer - I don't know about others but I am the "Anonymous" that posted my multi-part success story and the reason I did not use my name is because I do not trust the power and corruption of Big Pharmaceutical companies.   You may find it hard to believe, but I feel there  is no difference between a multi-billion dollar company protecting it's interests and organized crime syndicates of old.

    I am still 100% clot free and now only use Nattokinase one week a month to make sure I stay that way.  Good Health to allSmile

  • Rick Parker

    7/4/2011 10:56:14 PM |

    I used nattokinase to dissolve some blood clots that I had. It cleared them up with no observed side effects, except that I bruised very easily.

  • John Francis

    7/16/2011 1:09:11 AM |

    Anyone out there have any experiance with using Cardiokinase?

  • Cassondra

    9/9/2011 10:06:12 AM |

    I'm grateful for Nattokinase NSK-SD and Cardiokinase. I had a large DVT stemming from behind my knee to mid-calf in 2006 that went away after taking Nattokinase. I did a blood panel not long after I was diagnosed with the DVT, and was additionally diagnosed with MTHFR (two genes) and Factor 5 Leiden (one gene). My Dr. said I would be a "warfarin-for-lifer" but I was only 23 years old when he said that. I'm not sure I'd be in such good condition today, at 28 years old, if I was still taking warfarin daily. It only took me 4 months of being on warfarin before I decided to educate myself about alternatives. During the 4 months being on warfarin, I felt sick much of the time. After taking Nattokinase for a couple months, I went back to the Dr and I no longer had a DVT. Some might deem me a "guinea pig" to this supplement and I'm okay with that. Nattokinase has helped me stay clot free since 2006, even during my pregnancies. I trust Nattokinase over the prescription options, based on the information I've gathered on all counts. The pros outweigh the cons, and it boils down to what *I* feel comfortable taking based on what I know.

  • Kay G

    10/6/2011 9:57:36 PM |

    Contrary to the negative belief that Nattokinase is only a scam, I must tell you that it SAVED MY life.  I read hoards and hoards of complaints here in the forum that there is NO scientific evidence that if taken oraly that it will be effective.  Well my proof is in MY own experience and that is as follows:  for several months I experienced heaviness in my legs and it became very painful for me to even move out of my drivers seat after my 40 minute drive from work each day.  Each time I pulled into my driveway I'd have to prepare myself for  the pain I knew I was about to endure just moving from my car to my front door.  Not exactly the way one wants to end their work day EVERY day.  But that's only the begining...soon I began experiencing an annoying numbness in my left leg when lying down and that same feeling in my left arm as well.  I would elevate my legs and at times that would help but I knew I had to do something more internally to help.  At the same time I began getting lesions on my legs and began to REALLY become afraid after reading the possible reasons for such on countless sites.  I ran across a site speaking of Natto and its ability to naturally disolve blood clots.  I had NO intention on taking Cumadin or Warifin after reading of its danger AND high costs.  I reseached Natto and decided that to order such from Japan or even CA would NOT be too wise as I had NO interest in worrying about the radiation that has taken place recently.  So I decided to take Nattokinase--its supplemental form.  PLEASE BELIEVE ME WHEN I TELL YOU THAT IN ONE MONTH AND A HALF  after taking it, I have had NOT even ONE of the problems described above.  I'd like to add that I am only 40 which tells me that part of my problem with my circulation had to be genetic...along with my sometimes poor eating habits AND the fact that I STAND for all  8 hours of my work shift there at the PO.  I stand by Nattokinase.  It has help me immensely.

  • vicola65

    3/11/2012 9:52:24 AM |

    I''m commenting on an older post from a woman with heavy menstrual bleeding and fibroids and am hoping that in nearly 3 years since her post she''s found relief but perhaps someone else experiencing the same symptoms may find this helpful. I take Doctors'' Best  serrapeptase and nattokinase, both enteric coated.  Here is how it all started.   I experienced prgressively heavy bleeding which basically took over my life, horrible pelvic pain 24/7, inexplicable bladder infections, constant back pain, borderline aneia and overall debilitating feeling of malaise for years.  My (now former) OBGYN treated individual symptoms as they came up, put me on additional estrogen therapy (!) and prescribed high iron pre-natal vitamins for anemia... basically wrote it off as some of the pain in my head and some attributed to my age (then early 40''s and otherwise appeared healthy).    I found that eliminating all red meat helped a bit but still ate soy-based protein and only wild-caught fish. A week after a ''normal'' annual exam,  in early 2010 I landed in the ER in indescribably agony.  After being pumped full of morphine to allow a scan was told of a ''mass'' on my left ovary.  In the next weeks that follwed it was determined that the mass obscured the ovary and it had to come out asap  to determine if it''s cancer,, given the size.  I was also put on vicodin for pain and for the first time in years had a pain free month .I went in calm just to get the ''thing'' out.   When I came out of surgery, my fantastic oncological surgeon gave me the good and the bad. The good turned out to be that he (laporoscopically) removed my ovary, the fallopian tube .and the tangerine-sized ovarian cyst which apparently grew inside the ovary and had smaller ones forming. The real (ha ha) problem turned out to be a stage iV  (!) endometriosis with ''substantial'' amount of endo scar tissue (YEARS!) which fused my many organs together. It took years t get to that point and the combination of symptoms made me a classic example of this disease.  The hour-lng surgery actually took two hours as my doc attempted to remove as much tissue as possible.  My recovery was great - 1 week back to work vs. 9 if operated old school. I happily waited for the feeling of pelvic ''heartburn'' pain  from before to disappear. Unfortunately, when it did not my new doc explained that I still have endetriosis, the remaining tissue produces exponentially more estrogen and causes it to spread.  She advised  Lupron shots to get that under control and to regulate the pain and avoid further disease advance.   I was devastated especially after learning about the med side effects.  
      Instead, I researched everything I could and decided to start fighting the estrogen attack through a strict ''endo'' diet which was close to how I ate already except no soy at all and, of course, gluten free.  To deal with the existing tissue and help the pain, I''ve been ordering Doctors Best Serrapeptase and Nattokinase and taking both (along with green tea extract) at least 1-2 hrs before food (they are also enteric caps), one nattokinase during the day and both at night.   I have for years taken K2/K1 supplement and 5K Vitamin D3 already.  In less than 2 weeks my pain, including back pain (from Tarlov cyst found during the CT scan pre-op), disappeared. That was about a year ago.  I''ve also added yarrow (hormone regulation) and chaste berry (to control bleeding) and am for the first time in the last decade living pain free and functioning normally.  Based on my experience I bought the same enzymes for my sister in law who suffered horribly from fibroids and she, within a month or two, felt considerably better.  Enteric caps are key. I take mine with a full 12 oz of water with a 1/2 tsp of  aluminum free baking soda.   I also noticed that my 25+ year old tendonitis in my elbows/wrists is completely gone, my knee joints feel as if I were in my 20''s.   I plan to continue my regimen until there is a need for something else. At 5'' 10", 135-140 lbs Imy blood pressure is ideal as is cholesterol. These enzymes and a tweaked diet are the only thing I''''ve changed.  I believe that they work as long as they are taken correctly - enteric caps on an empty stomach, otherwise they just work as potent digestive aids which is not a bad thing.  
    I could not be happier.

  • vicola65

    3/11/2012 10:17:22 AM |

    April, Thank you!   I just (overshared) by story as a response to an earlier post.   Big pharma is not always the answer, no matter how much one''s insurance covers.  In fact, I love having an effective solution or two without the added side-effects or dependency on my insurance in case of job loss.  Tow years ago, if someone told me that taking 400 mg liquid CoQ10 daily would wipe out out my migranes, be totally allergy free by drinking Gypsy Cold Care tea (b''bye $30 month/co-pay) and Serrapeptase/Nattokinase combo  would rid me of chronic pain and is likely dissolving my endo scars... well, I wouldn''t believe it either but there it is.

  • vicola65

    3/11/2012 11:06:31 AM |

    Kay,  I too have read every comment on this forum and vast majority of comments are pro NK SP, not against it.   One person complained about the anonimous posts but, honestly, if he/she does not understand that sharing medical issues on the internet is not a big deal that individual needs to learn a bit more on that topic and that''s not what''s important here.  I am a happy much healthier person having found these enzymes in early 2011. (When I posted I wrote about an ovarian cyst removal in 2011 though accidentally put 2010).  The ONLY point where I would agree with Dr. Davis is that just because something is ''natural'' that it is automatically safe. By the same token, however, just becuase something is natural it does not mean that a Big Pharma solution is more effective.  Curare, for example, is both natural and lethal.  Thankfully, these enzymes bought from reputable vendors (mine are from Doctors Best) are reasonably priced and work great.   Everyone''s bodies are different, many folks suffer from poor absorbtion of nutrients because they''ve spent years eating processed foods, bodies riddled with candida and/or yeast.  We need enzymes to digest properly. Everyone can benefit from these supplements in one way or another.  To get the full clot fight we do have to make a bit of effort but I cannot imagine living without them now.

  • Andrea

    12/11/2012 7:16:01 PM |

    God bless you and I pray Jesus will heal you

  • Bonita

    7/1/2014 11:32:04 PM |

    Due to a short course of Premarin (estrogen) to help with uterine fibroid symptoms in 2009, I ended up with a DVT that spread to my lungs within 2 months with barely any noticeable symptoms until my leg was hurting so bad that I ended up in the ER.  After almost 2 weeks in the hospital on Coumadin and Lovenox I went home and weaned myself off of the Coumadin and started nattokinase.   I took it for about 6 months and went off of it for a brief period until my symptoms returned in my leg.  I restarted it and then took it for another 9 months just to be sure and when I stopped taking it, there were no more symptoms.   So if nattokinase is a scam then why did my clots and symptoms go away and I've had no problems since then?  I would also at times add the serrapetase to the natto as well.   It did also help improve my fibroid symptoms as well.  The enzymes break down any fibrin and dissolves it.  Unlike Coumadin which prevents clotting...not a good thing if you get injured is it?

Loading

(Lack of ) Quality of nutritional supplements

In my last post, I blogged about how we must not confuse marketing with truth. They are often two different things.

A patient I saw today was absolutely convinced that his fish oil was the best available in the world: purer, uncontaminated by mercury or pesticides--"not like that other crap on the shelves." I asked him how he knew this. "They say so," he proudly declared.

Do you recognize this? He fell for the marketing. While there may be some truth in the manufacturer's claims, you can't believe it from the mouth of the manufacturer. True judgements about quality and purity have to come from an independent source like Consumer Reports, Consumer Lab, or the FDA.

But the FDA doesn't regulate the quality and purity of nutritional supplements. On the positive side, this has allowed supplement manufacturers to keep costs down, not having to navigate arcane and complex regulatory restrictions.

On the negative side, a fair number of supplement manufacturers get away with 1) producing supplements that fail to contain the stated amounts of ingredients, occasionally containing none of the essential ingredient(s), 2) contain contaminants like lead, and 3) make extravagant and often unfounded claims like "superior", "more effective", and "purer". (DHEA, for instance, is a particular landmine of poor quality. I recently suggested that a patient take DHEA; despite consistently taking 50 mg of a specific brand for several months, the blood level of DHEA-S didn't budge one bit--there was likely little or none in the capsule.)

The Fanatic Cook at http://fanaticcook.blogspot.com has posted some very insightful discussions on this issue and the proposed FDA regulations of supplements. They're worth perusing.

I really wish regulation weren't necessary and that the industry could have policed itself. But it clearly has failed and perhaps federal oversight is not such a bad thing, as long as the FDA regulations restrict themselves to oversight over quality and purity and not to efficacy. It's the efficacy regulation that could hogtie innovation in supplement development.

Marketing and truth are not the same

I often remind people: Don't confuse marketing with the truth.

Today, I spent a total of probably an hour and a half dissuading patients that some crazed piece of marketing trying to sell them something was not the same as truth.

I spent approximately 40 minutes alone with a woman who was absolutely convinced that:

--Nattokinase would cure her of all heart disease. It does not. Despite the promising health benefits of natto and vitamin K2 supplementation, nattokinase is a scam with no basis in science nor logic.

--Niacin destroys your liver and homeopathic remedies are superior. Quite simply, homeopathy = quackery. No rational thinking scientist endorses the utter nonsense practiced in this strange and outrageous set of practices that requires you to suspend all reason.

--Sufficient vitamin D is obtainable through a "potent" multivitamin. I know of no multivitamin preparation that even begins to provide the dose of vitamin D that is actually required by adults, nor is it absorbed since these D preparations are powder based.

--Fish oil will poison you with mercury. Accordingly, one brand of fish oil claims to be the only safe form. Those of you following these posts, or the reports of the USDA and FDA, as well as the reports of Consumer Reports and Consumer Lab (www.consumerlab.com) know that, unlike fish itself, there is no mercury in fish oil capsules.

--All coronary atherosclerotic heart disease is caused by heavy metal poisoning. Thus chelation with EDTA represents a cure for heart disease.


People are inundated with marketing that promise extravagant cures, remove need for any medication, make you smarter, sexier, thinner, and on and on.

If you see a TV ad for Ford that says they make the best cars in the U.S., do you immediately run out and put a For Sale sign on your GM car and buy a Ford? No, of course not. You recognize the ad for what it is: marketing. It may be true, but a TV commercial is not enough to convince you.

Then why would an ad promising extraordinary cures for cancer or heart disease convince you that this is true? It should not. Marketing ads should only serve to alert you to the possibility of value or benefit, but should never-- never--stand alone as proof. Take marketing for what it is: marketing of a product or service, not a scientific report, not a factual report, not news.

Marketing is advertising. Period.

More on erectile dysfunction

Several facts on erectile dysfunction and coronary plaque:


If you have erectile dysfunction, there's at least a 50% chance you also have coronary plaque.

If you have coronary plaque by a CT heart scan, there's a 50% chance you have erectile dysfunction.

If you have symptomatic coronary disease (chest pains, breathlessness, prior heart attack), there's a 90% chance you also have erectile dysfunction.


Coronary disease is characterized by a dysfunctional state of the "endothelium", or inner lining of the coronary arteries. Erectile dysfunction is characterized by dysfunction of the endothelium of the penile circulation. Same phenomenon, different territories. (There are other differences, of course, but the two conditions share this fundamental phenomenon.)


If you have any doubts about the physiologic effects of the supplement, l-arginine, just give it a try if you have erectile dysfunction. The erection enhancing effects alone should convince you that a genuine artery-dilating effect is exerted by this very powerful nutritional supplement.

If l-arginine fails by itself to restore full erectile capacity, there are additional strategies, both nutritional and medical, that you can consider.

Our newest Track Your Plaque Special Report on erectile dysfunction is coming out any day now.

High LDL cholesterol--only

As a sequel to my last post, just how often can we blame an isolated high LDL cholesterol as the cause of coronary plaque and a heart scan score?

In other words, how often does someone prove to have only LDL cholesterol as the cause of a heart scan score . . . and nothing else? No low HDL, small LDL, lipoprotein(a), a post-prandial (after-eating) intermediate-density lipoprotein, inflammatory responses, phospholipase A2, high triglycerides, vitamin D deficiency, etc.

Rarely. In fact, I can truly count the number of people who have only LDL cholesterol as their sole cause of coronary atherosclerotic plaque on one hand. It is really an infrequent situation.

Far more commonly, people have 5, 6, 7 or more reasons for coronary plaque.

Thus, the idea that a statin drug to reduce LDL will cure heart disease is completely folly. It does happen--but rarely. I think I've seen it happen twice. Much more commonly, a program that addresses all the causes of coronary plaque yields far superior benefits.

In my view, an effort to identify all the causes is relatively easy, makes far better sense, and provides you much greater assurance that you will succeed in conquering heart disease and removing its evil influence from your life.

Heart disease = statin deficiency

Judging from the conversations I hear from colleagues, what I hear from the media, and drug company advertising, you'd think that heart disease has one cause--a deficiency of statin drugs.

As their thinking goes, if you have coronary disease, you need a statin drug (Lipitor, Zocor, Crestor, pravachol, etc.). If you have progressive coronary disease, you need more statin drug. If you have a heart attack while on a statin drug, you need even more statin drug.

Some "experts" have even proposed that we do away with LDL cholesterol and we just give everybody a statin drug at high doses.

Does this make any sense to you?

Doesn't it make better sense that if someone has progressive heart disease or heart attack while on a statin drug, then target the other causes largely unaffected by a statin drug? Perhaps if LDL cholesterol remains high on the statin drug, then a higher dose is justified. But more often than not, it's not a high LDL on statin drugs that responsible, it's other causes. And there's many of them: low HDL, VLDL, IDL, Lp(a), deficiency of omega-3 fatty acids, inflammatory processes, vitamin D deficiency, among others. (An important exception to this is when the conventional calculated LDL substantially underestimates true LDL as measured by LDL particle number by NMR, apoprotein B, or 'direct' LDL.)

Imagine someone has pneumonia. After 2 weeks of antibiotics, they are only partly better. The solution: a higher dose of the same antibiotic--but never question if it was the right antibiotic in the first place. That's what is going on in heart disease.

The doctors have been brainwashed into believing this $22 billion dollar per year bit of propaganda. The drug companies actively try to recruit the public into believing the same. Don't fall for it.

The statin drugs do indeed have a role. But they are not the complete answer. More of the same when disease progresses makes no sense at all.

Fish oil and mercury

I often get questions about the mercury content in fish oil. I've even had patients come to the office saying their primary care doctor told them to stop fish oil to avoid mercury poisoning.

Manufacturers of fish oil also make claims that this product or that ("super-concentrated", "pharmaceutical grade", "purified", etc.) is purer or less contaminated than competitors' products. The manufacturers of the "drug" Omacor, or prescription fish oil, have added to the confusion by suggesting that their product is the most pure of all, since it is the most concentrated of any fish oil preparation (900 mg EPA+DHA per capsule). They claim that "OMACOR is naturally derived through a unique, patented process that creates a highly concentrated, highly purified prescription medicine. By prescribing OMACOR® (omega-3-acid ethyl esters), a prescription omega-3, your doctor is giving you a concentrated and reliable omega-3. Each OMACOR capsule contains 90% omega-3 acids (84% EPA/DHA*). Nonprescription omega-3 dietary supplements typically contain only 13%-63% EPA/DHA."

How much truth is there in these concerns?

Let's go to the data published by the USDA, FDA, and several independent studies. Let's add to that the independent (and therefore presumably unbiased) analyses provided by Consumer Reports and Consumer Labs (www.consumerlab.com). How much mercury has been found in fish oil supplements?

None.

This is different from the mercury content of whole fish that you eat. Predatory fish that are at the top of the food chain and consume other fish and thereby concentrate organic methyl mercury, the toxic form of mercury. Thus, shark, swordfish, and King mackerel are higher in mercury than sardines, herring, and salmon.

The mercury content of fish oil capsules have little to do with the method of processing and much more with the animal source of oil. Fish oil is generally obtained from sardines, salmon, and cod, all low in mercury. Fish oil capsules are not prepared from swordfish or shark.

Thus, concerns about mercury from fish oil--regardless of brand--are generally unfounded, according to the best information we have. Eating whole fish--now that's another story for another time. But you and I can take our fish oil to reduce triglycerides, VLDL, IDL, small LDL, and heart attack risk without worrying about mercury.

How much omega-3s are enough?

The basic dose we advocate for the Track Your Plaque program is 1200 mg per day of EPA + DHA, the essential omega-3 fatty acids.

1200 mg EPA+DHA is generally obtainable by taking 4 capsules of 1000 mg of fish oil, since the majority of preparations contain 180 mg EPA and 120 mg DHA per capsule.

But how will you know if a higher dose wouldn't be even better?

The principal parameter to look at is triglycerides. If triglycerides remain above 60 mg/dl, we usually consider increasing fish oil.

Another measure that's very important is intermediate-density lipoprotein, or IDL, also called "remnant lipoproteins" on a VAP panel. Persistence of any IDL or remnant lipoproteins is reason to consider more fish oil. Most commonly, if there is some persistence of either, we increase fish oil to 6000 mg per day of a standard preparation, or 1800 mg/day of EPA+DHA.

The only time we see persistence of IDL or remnant lipoproteins with this higher dose is when triglycerides are really high. If starting triglycerides are, for instance, 500 mg/dl, then even this higher dose may be insufficient. This is when more highly concentrated preparations of fish oil may be necessary, occasionally even the prescription form, Omacor. (We currently use Omacor only when high doses of EPA+DHA are required, most because of its outrageous cost. Two capsules per day costs around $120 per month; three capsules per day to provide 1800 mg/day of EPA+DHA costs $180 per month. I think this is outrageous and so we use it only when absolutely necessary.)

You might even argue that a higher dose of 1800 mg EPA+DHA, or 6000 mg of a standard capsule, might be preferable for more assured reduction of heart attack risk--even when triglycerides and IDL are perfectly under control. I wouldn't argue with you. But you won't observe any measurable feedback that tells you that a heightened effect is being obtained. I take that dose myself, in fact, despite the fact that elimination of wheat products and weight loss was sufficient to drop my triglycerides to the target level. I figure it's a small additional effort for added peace of mind.

Repentance for past sins

If you are new to the Track Your Plaque program and would like to jump start your effort, or if you are struggling with losing weight and excess weight is a part of the situation that created your CT heart scan score, then don't forget about fasting.

Fasting is the cessation of eating. However, recall from the Track Your Plaque Special Report, Fasting: Fast Track to Control Plaque at http://www.cureality.com/library/fl_04-012fasting.asp, there are many variations on fasting that permit some intake of healthy foods. (Thus, they are not, in the strict sense, "fasting". Accurate or no, there are variations that may be more palatable or do-able in the real world by real people.)

My personal favorite method to fast is to use a low-sugar, low-fat soy milk such as Light Silk, available at most major grocery stores. This high-protein, low-fat, low-sugar soy milk takes the edge off hunger and provides a minimal quantity of calories. A minimum of 72 hours is required for substantial results. (My one reservation about this brand of soy milk is that the Fanatic Cook claims that the manufacturer, Dean Foods, is a factory farm operation that abuses livestock--a discussion for another day.)

Fasting yields more than weight loss. It refreshes your appreciation for food. It reawakens you to the amount and quality of food you've been putting in your body. Fasting also allows you to recognize just how bad you might feel from the diet you were eating.

You also emerge from a fast with a reduced appetite and a renewed sense of appreciation for food. It makes the discipline of healthy eating a lot easier when you break your fast.

I tell people that fasting is not punishment. It is a form of enlightenment, of re-experiencing food and life. Fasting allows you to "catch up" on all the indiscretions you've been guilty of over the years.

It also provides enormous advantage in gaining control over coronary plaque.

A fanatic for Fanatic Cook

If you haven't already done so, I'd urge you to peruse the wonderfully insightful, sophisticated, and biting commentary provided by the Fanatic Cook Blog at http://fanaticcook.blogspot.com.

She (I assume it's a she) has been discussing the proposed Safe Food Act recently, an effort to address all the dangers in foods that have come to attention lately, like melamine in pet food and E. coli in bagged spinach. Her most recent post is:

Nebraska Farm Bureau Thinks Food Safety Act Bad Idea, the latest in a series of posts exploring this issue.

I'd like to know who the Fanatic Cook is, or "Bix" as she calls herself. (I assume it's a "she" but I don't really know that for a fact.) I've corresponded with her and she prefers to remain anonymous for unspecified reasons. I'd like to know who this person is both for a more secure sense of credibility, as well as I'd simply like to know who can write so intelligently and why. I suspect that she's a professional nutrition scientist or something along those lines, since the level of insight into many scientific issues is quite impressive. Her Blogs will make great material for a book, if compiled and organized. Watch out for this one.

Erectile dysfunction and coronary plaque

Erectile dysfunction (ED), previously known as "impotence," and coronary atherosclerotic plaque go hand in hand.

A recent study in men with advanced coronary disease showed that 93% experienced ED. The participants in the Track Your Plaque program, for the most part, do not have advanced coronary atherosclerosis, but have an earlier form detected by a CT heart scan.

What proportion of men with asymptomatic coronary plaque as measured by a CT heart scan have ED? Around 50%. In other words, it's not a rare occurrence.

The conversation about ED (and even its renaming from impotence) really gained momentum with the development of ED-drugs like Viagra and Cialis. The drugs are reasonably effective and safe. However, you will hear little about all the strategies that can either precede your need for these drugs and/or enhance your response to these drugs if the response is partial. That part of the conversation, of course, doesn't yield loads of drug company revenues.

One of the most helpful and specific nutritional supplements available that can partially restore the nitric oxide-deficiency of ED is l-arginine. L-arginine is the body's source of nitric oxide (NO), the master dilator (relaxing agent) for all arteries of the body. NO dilates penile arteries, it dilates coronary arteries. Lack of NO disables the penile capacity for erection and encourages growth of coronary atherosclerotic plaque. Track Your Plaque Members are already familiar with l-arginine as a facilitator of coronary plaque regression.

We will detail the supplements that you can use safely in your Track Your Plaque program to both enhance erectile function if you suffer ED, as well as impact positively on coronary health, in an upcoming and detailed Special Report on the www.cureality.com website.

Protecting the right to use bio-identical hormones in your heart disease prevention program

If you've been following the Track Your Plaque program, you know that we are advocates of "bio-identical hormones", i.e., hormone replacement using forms that are identical to the naturally-occuring human form.

In other words, we find it criminal that pharmaceutical manufacturers continue to promote use of non-identical hormones despite a probable increased side-effect and complication profile (a la Premarin). This unhappy situation persists because bio-identical hormones cannot be patent protected, meaning profits cannot be protected. Synthetic hormones can be patented and profits protected, thus their popularity among drug companies.

If that's not bad enough, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals--maker of synthetic hormone preparations, Premarin and Prempro--has filed an FDA petition to disallow the use of bio-identical hormones as prepared and dispensed by "compounding pharmacies". These are specialty pharmacies that mix and dispense hormones like estrogens (human estradiol, estriol, and estrione) and testosterone. They do so only with a doctor's prescription. Most are members of the Professional Compounding Centers of America (www.pccarx.com), a professional organization devoted to promoting quality-control over compounding practices.

Compounding pharmacies are occasionally guilty of compounding some suspect preparations. Witness the Fentanyl lollipops of 2002 in which the pain medication, Fentanyl, was put into lollipops for patients with chronic pain. This posed obvious dangers to any children who unsuspectingly ate the lollipops.

But the majority of compounding pharmacies are not guilty of such exotic practices. Most are simply pharmacies who might, for instance, mix a specific dermatologic preparation according to the orders of a dermatologist. Likewise with bio-identical hormones.

We have extensive experience with such a pharmacy in Madison, Wisconsin, the Women's International Pharmacy. They have filled hundreds of hormone prescription for us. They are responsible in their dispensing practices, in our experience. In fact, they have been at least as good, if not better, than other pharmacies we've dealt with.

We believe in protecting our rights to prescribe and you to use the choice of hormone preparations you and your doctor desire. This should include bio-identical hormones. The transparent profit motive from Wyeth should raise the hairs on your neck.

If you would like to post your comment to the FDA, there's a little time left. The folks at Womens' International Pharmacy have made it easy by posting links on their website. Go to http://www.womensinternational.com and just follow the instructions.



Here's a sample of some of the objections citizens have raised to Wyeth's petition:


I have been taking bioidentical hormones for two years. Bioidentical Hormones have been a great relief to me without the risk. I consult with my Physician who prescribes bio-identical hormones specifically for me, and my pharmacist prepares them. Without this medication and I would not be able to sleep; I would not be able to work due to the constant hot flashes. Without this medication, I find that I have less tolerance and I am considerably disagreeable. I also have problem with my memory without them. I want the bioidentcial hormones for the health benefits they provide. I urge you to not be swayed by Wyeth's petition. The product Premarin made by Wyeth, is made from pregnant horses not natural sources. Wyeth's hormones have been shown to cause cancer. I would not expect my government and its officials to submit to the highly funded petitioning of a pharmaceutical company who product is threatened by bioidentcial hormones. I do not expect my government to approved Wyeth's petition and leave me no choice of bioidentcial hormones and only the choice of Wyeth's cancer causing drugs Preamrin and Prempro. I ask that the FDA reject Wyeth's petition Docket #2005P-0411.

Another petitioner writes:

As a woman I take exception to Wyeth accusing the Compounding Pharmacy industry of unsafe practices. As a citizen of the United States I expect the FDA to stand up for my rights and the rights of all women who have found or in the future may seek consistent, safe and effective treatment with bioidentical hormones. Eliminating options by bowing to a large pharmaceutical company like Wyeth is not in the public interest and would deprive hundreds of thousands of American women from access to bioidentical hormones. Synthetic hormone replacement has been proven unequivocally unsafe in a government sponsored study and should not be forced as the sole treatment option for women. I hereby request the FDA rule against Wyeth's request. The FDA should not close down the bioidentical option of healthcare. I welcome studies of bioidentical hormones even though they are already FDA-approved and have been working effectively for decades. We already have the proof - hundreds of thousands of women, who over the past two decades have chosen bioidentical hormones based on their physicians' assessments. They are living proof that bioidentical hormones are safer and more effective and reliable than synthetic hormone drugs.

A physician and user of bio-identical hormones writes:

Wyeth, the filer of this complaint, is trying to prevent women from being able to choose less expensive compounded options for hormone replacement. There is medical evidence that in modifying the structure of their drugs (such as Premarin and Prempro) so that they could be patented, they may have introduced factors that cause the health risks identified in the Women's Health Initiative. This complaint appears to be filed for commercial purposes because of the market share that has shifted from Wyeth's products to bio-identical products from compounding pharmacies. If the complaint were upheld, patients and their doctors would not have a choice in hormone treatments. Wythe's commercial strategy of trying to eliminate the 'competition' from compounding pharmacies is against the public interest and in the interest of its own corporate profits. Women and their doctors should be able to choose between patented formulations such as those offered by Wyeth, bioidentical formulas available from compounding pharmacies, and no hormone treatment. I have been taking bio-identical hormones for several years and have had excellent results in improving my symptoms. I have been unable to take other synthetic hormones in the past, and am very concerned that my best treatment option will be taken away.

If you get a 64-slice CT coronary angiogram

With new 64-slice CT scanners popping up everywhere nowadays, be sure to get your heart scan with it.

The new scanners do indeed provide wonderful images of the coronary arteries. But, say you have a 20% blockage in one artery by a coronary angiogram generated on one of these devices. What will you do in 1, 2, or 3 years when you want to know if you have progressed? Should you have the CT angiogram repeated?

Well, if you did you'll be exposed to a large dose of radiation--appropriate for a diagnostic test, but not for a screening test. The radiation exposure is not that different from undergoing a full conventional cardiac catheterization, or up to 100 chest x-rays.

"20% blockage" is also, contrary to popular opinion, not a quantitative measure. It is just an estimate of the diameter reduction at one spot. That number says nothing about the lengthwise extent of plaque. It also says nothing about the potential for "remodeling", the phenomenon of artery enlargement that occurs as plaque grows. In other words, if you had another CT coronary angiogram a year later and was told that your blockag was still 20%, in reality you could have had substantial plaque growth but it would not be reflected in that value.

People will come to me after having a CT angiogram for an opinion. Unfortunately, I send them back to their scan center to get a simple coronary calcium score. That measure is easy, quantitative, precise, and can be repeated yearly if necessary to track progression. (Track Your Plaque--I hope most of you get this by now.) Some physicians poke fun at the heart scan, or calcium, score--it's old, boring, only a measure of hard plaque. None of that's true. The coronary calcium score is a measure of total plaque (hard and soft). And when you are empowered to learn how to control and reduce your score, then it's the most exciting number in your entire health program!

Don't fall for the hype. If you go to a scan center and they insist on a 64-slice CT scanner, or if your doctor orders one, you should insist on getting a calcium score out of the test. Just ask. If they refuse, go somewhere else. Centers that refuse to generate a score have one thing on their mind: identifying people with severe blockages sufficient to obtain the downstream financial bonanza--angioplasty, stents, and bypass surgery.

If you have hypertension, think Lp(a)

Clair has coronary disease.

Clair first came to attention at age 57 when she suffered a large heart attack involving the front of her heart (the "anterior wall") two years ago. Her cardiologist implanted a drug-coated stent. Her doctors advised her to "cut the fat" in her diet, exercise, and take Lipitor.

One year later, she required a stent to another artery (circumflex). At this point, Clair was thoroughly demoralized and terrified for her future. Her first heart attack left her heart muscle with only 50% of normal strength.

She came to my office for another opinion. Of course, one of the first things we did was to identify all causes of her heart disease. No surprise, Clair had 7 new causes not previously identified, including low HDL (37 mg/dl), a severe small LDL particle pattern (75% of all particles were small), and Lp(a).

Her blood pressure was also 190/88, despite her relatively slender build and 3 medications that reduced blood pressure. That's a Lp(a) effect: Exagerrated coronary risk along with unexpected hypertension that often seems inappropriate.

In fact, I saw several patients just this week with lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), and exagerrated high blood pressure (hypertension). It's not that uncommon.

Though it has not been described in the medical literature, our experience is that hypertension is a prominent part of the entire Lp(a) "syndrome".

Lp(a) is responsible for much-increased potential for coronary disease (coronary plaque). It increases in importance as estrogen recedes in a woman (pre-menopause and menopause) and testosterone in a man, since both hormones powerful suppress Lp(a) expression (though why and how nobody knows).

I believe that Lp(a) is also responsible for hypertension that most commonly develops in a persons mid-50s and onwards, often with a vengeance. 3 or 4 anti-hypertensive medications and still not controlled.



Role of l-arginine

L-arginine may be more helpful in this situation than others. L-arginine, recall, is the supply for your body's nitric oxide, a powerful dilator of the body's arteries and thereby reduces blood pressure. We use 6000 mg twice a day, a large dose that requires use of powder preparations rather than capsules.

More reading about l-arginine and nitric oxide is available through Nobel laureate, Dr. Louis Ignarro's book, NO More Heart Disease : How Nitric Oxide Can Prevent--Even Reverse--Heart Disease and Stroke, available at Amazon.com ( http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0312335814/104-1247258-6443909?v=glance&n=283155).




Will l-arginine truly reverse heart disease on its own? No, I don't believe so. Contrary to Dr. Ignarro's extravagant claims, I find l-arginine a facilitator of plaque regression, i.e, it helps other strategies achieve regression, but it does not achieve regression or reversal by itself. (Note that Dr. Ignarro is a lab researcher who studies rats and has never treated a human being.)

But l-arginine may have special application in the person with lp(a), particularly if hypertension is part of the syndrome.


Note: As always, please note that I talk frankly about l-arginine and other supplements and medications but have no hidden agenda: I am not selling anything, nor am I affiliated with any source/website/store etc. that sells these products. If I advocate something, I do so because I truly believe it, not because I'm trying to sell something. I make this point because so much nonsense is propagated in the media because of profit-motive. That's not true here.

Dr. Ornish: Get with the program!


In the era up until the 1980s, most Americans indulged in excessive quantities of saturated fats: fried chickem, spare ribs, French fries, gravy, bacon, Crisco, butter, etc.

Along came people like Nathan Pritikin and Dr. Dean Ornish, both of whom were vocal advocates of a low-fat nutritional approach. In their programs, fat composed no more than 10% of calories. This represented a dramatic improvement--at the time.


In 2006, a low-fat diet is a perversion of health. It means over-reliance on breads, breakfast cereals, pasta, crackers, cookies, pretzels, etc., the foods that pack supermarket shelves and that now constitute 70-80% of most Americans' diet.

Dr. Ornish still carries great name recognition. As a result, his outdated concepts still gain media attention. The June, 2006 issue of Reader's Digest, in their RDHealth column, carried an interview with Dr. Ornish in which he reiterates his fat-phobia.

However, on this occasion he takes a different tack. This time he rails against the "dangers" of fish oil and omega-3 fatty acids. "I've recently learned that omega-3s are a double-edged sword...In some cases, omega-3s could be fatal."

He goes on to say that, while he believes that fish oil may prevent heart attacks, it has fatal effect if you already have heart disease.

Does this make sense to you?

He's basing his views on a single, obscure study published in 2003 conducted in rural England that showed an increase in death and heart attack on fish oil. Most authorities have not taken these findings seriously, since they are wildly contrary to all other observations and because the study had some design flaws.

Despite the fact that this isolated study runs counter to all other, better-conducted studies seems not to matter to Dr. Ornish.

Clinging to the low-fat concept is like hoping 8-track tapes will make a comeback. It's not going to happen. We enjoyed the benefits while they lasted, appropriate for the era. But now, they're woefully outdated.

The overwhelming evidence is that fish oil provides tremendous benefits with little or no downside. In the Track Your Plaque program, fish oil remains a crucial supplement to gain control over your coronary plaque and stop or reduce your heart scan score. Ignore the doomsday preachings of Dr. Ornish.

(Watch for an article I wrote updating the benefits of fish oil for Life Extension magazine.)

The cholesterol fallacy

Evan spotted the kiosk set up in the middle of the local mall. "Free cholesterol screenings. Know your heart health!" the sign declared.

It was a free cholesterol screening being offered by a local hospital.

The friendly nurse behind the kiosk had Evan fill out a form, then pricked his finger. Five minutes later, she reported to him with a smile, "Sir, your cholesterol is 177--your heart's fine! We get concerned when cholesterol is over 200. So you're in a safe range."

What the nurse failed to recognize is that Evan's HDL was 30 mg, a low value that actually places him at high risk for heart disease. Low HDL also signifies high likelihood of the small LDL particle pattern, a marked predisposition towards pre-diabetes and diabetes, a probable over-reliance on processed carbohydrates in his diet, a dramatically increased probability of hidden inflammation (e.g., elevated C-reactive protein), increased tendency for high blood pressure. . .

In other words, Evan's "favorable" total cholesterol is, in truth, nonsense. It's misleading, falsely reassuring, and provided none of the insight that a real effort might have yielded. Like hippies, tie-dye, other relics of the 1960s, total cholesterol needs to be put to rest. It has served many people poorly and been responsible for countless deaths.

When you see a kiosk or other service like this, even if it's free, run the other way.

"Heart disease a growth business"





So announced a Boston newspaper recently, featuring a story about new heart program at a local hospital.

They were announcing how a hospital had entered the cardiovasculare procedure game and how it would boost their bottom line. The article discussed how the hospital administration was anticipating "a surge in patients from the baby boom generation."

To justify this new program, the article quoted an administrator from another hospital: "Cardiovascular issues is [sic] the number one cause people sought treatment at our hospital."

The hospital featured in the story had spent $13.5 million dollars to develop their program.

Do you think they'll make it back?

You bet they will--many times over. Hospitals are businesses, complete with a bottom line, an expectation of profit and an eye towards growth.

The hospitals in the city where I live (Milwaukee, Wisconsin) are, as in Boston and elsewhere, very aggressive--expanding into new territories, hiring new "salesmen" (physicians), all to capture more marketshare and produce more "product" (your coronary angioplasty, stent, bypass surgery, defibrillator, etc.).

The equation for hospital profits is tried and true. Ignore your heart disese risk and you can help your local hospital grow its business. Neglect to get your heart scan and you can help your hospital pay down its debt. Get a heart scan, then do nothing about it, and you may even justify a pay raise for the hospital administrators for record revenue growth and profit.

Hospitals are a growth business because of the failure of most people and their doctors to 1) identify hidden coronary disease (CT heart scan to obtain your heart scan score), then 2) seize control over it (the Track Your Plaque program or, at least, your doctor's guidance along with your efforts at prevention).

Unless you do so, you are highly likely to help your hospital boost its annual goal for procedures.

The myth of small LDL

Annie's doctor was puzzled.

Despite an HDL cholesterol of 76 mg (spectacular!) and LDL of 82 mg, her CT heart scan showed a score of 135. At age 51, this placed her in the 90th percentile.

Not as bad, perhaps, as her Dad might have had, since he died at age 54 of a heart attack.

So we submitted blood for lipoprotein testing. Surprise! over 90% of all her LDL particles were small. (By NMR, they're called "small". By gel electropheresis, or the Berkeley Lab test, or VAP (Atherotech) technique, they're called "HDL3".)

What gives? Traditional teaching in the lipid world is that if HDL equals or exceeds 40 mg/dl, then small LDL will simply not be present.

Well, as you can see from Annie's experience, this is plain wrong. Yes, there is a graded, population-based effect--the lower your HDL, the greater the likelihood of small LDL. But small LDL is remarkably persistent and prevalent--regardless of your HDL.

We've seen small LDL even with HDLs in the 90's! I call small LDL the "cockroach" of lipids. If you think you have it, you probably do. Getting rid of small LDL requires a specific bug killer. (Track Your Plaque Members: Read Dr. Tara Dall's interview on small LDL.)

Don't let anybody blow off your request for lipoprotein testing just because your HDL is high. That's just not acceptable. Loads can be wrong even with a favorable HDL.

My stress test was normal. I don't need a heart scan!

Katy had undergone a stress test while being seen in an emergency room, where she'd gone one weekend because of a dull pain on the right side of her chest. After her stress test proved normal, she was diagnosed (I believe correctly) with esophageal reflux, or regurgitation of stomach acid up the esophagus. She was prescrbed an acid-suppressing medication with complete relief.

But Katy also had coronary plaque. Three years ago, her CT heart scan score was 157. She'd made efforts to correct the multiple causes, though she still struggled with keeping weight down to gain full control over her small LDL particle pattern.

I felt it was time for a reassessment: another heart scan. After three years, without any preventive efforts, Katy's score would be expected to have reached 345! (That's 30% per year plaque growth.) It's a good idea to get feedback on just how much slowing you've accomplished.

But Katy declared, "But I didn't think another heart scan was necessary. My stress test was normal!"

What Katy was struggling to understand was that even at the time of her first scan, a stress test would have been normal. Plaque can be present with a normal stress test.

Plaque can even show explosive growth all while stress tests remain normal. Just ask former President, Bill Clinton, how much he should have relied on stress tests. (Mr. Clinton underwent annual stress nuclear tests. All were normal and he had no symptoms--all the way up 'til the time he needed urgent bypass surgery!)

Of course, at some point even a crude stress test will reveal abnormal results. But that's years into your disease and a lot closer to needing procedures and experiencing heart attack.

So, yes, Katy would benefit from another heart scan despite her normal stress test.

The message: Don't rely on stress tests to gauge whether or not plaque has grown, stabilized, or reversed. Stress tests can be used to gauge the safety of exercise, blood pressure response, and the potential for abnormal heart rhythms. Stress tests can be used as a method to determine whether blood flow in your coronary arteries is normal through an area with plaque.

But a stress test cannot be used to gauge whether plaque has grown. It's as simple as that. Gauging plaque growth requires a heart scan.

Patient-napping: Yet another reason to stay clear of hospitals!

When I started practicing medicine around 20 years ago, it was common practice to alert a physician when their patient was seen in an emergency room.

If John Smith, for example, went to the emergency room with chest pain, the physician who had an established relationship with the patient--knew their history, had managed their health and illnesses, etc.--was notified, even if the hospital ER had no relationship with the physician. It was not uncommon for the patient to then be transferred to the hospital where their own doctor practiced.

Though cumbersome at times, it preserved the relationship of the patient with their doctor.

Over the past few years, this practice has crumbled. Nowadays, hospitals and their employed physicians (and other unscrupulous physicians acting in the name of profit) "fail" to notify the physician with an established relationship.

Guess what happens? The patient all too often ends up being put through the gamut of testing and procedures.

Why? For hospital profit, of course. If failure to notify a doctor who's had a 10-year long relationship with the patient is "overlooked" or, even more commonly, it's "unsafe" to transfer the patient because the patient is too "unstable" to be transferred, then this patient becomes ripe for picking--heart catheterization, stents, bypass surgery, etc. Ten's, if not hundreds, of thousands of dollars can be reaped by this deception. I call it "patient-napping".

I see this at least several times every month. As hospitals are becoming increasingly competitive, and as they put pressure on their physicians to churn patients for revenues, you're going to see more and more of this.

As always, what is your protection from this expanding influence of hospitals and the doctors too meek to stand up to them? Education and information. Arm yourself with an understanding of what is accomplished in hospitals, when you truly need them, and when you don't.

Take it one step further. At least from a heart disease standpoint--the #1 profit-maker for hospitals--aim to 1)identify your coronary plaque, then 2) seize control over your coronary plaque and reduce your risk for heart attack and heart procedures as much as humanly possible. That's the goal of the Track Your Plaque program.

Don't believe the negative press on fish oil



A British Medical Journal study released in March, 2006 has prompted a media flurry of reports on the worthlessness of fish oil. (Hooper L, Thompson RL, Harrison RA et al. Risks and benefits of omega 3 fats for mortality, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: a systematic review. BMJ March,2006)

Don't believe it for a second.

First of all, the study was a re-analysis of the existing published scientific literature. It was not a new study. It included a wild conglomeration of different clinical observations, as the studies examining fish oil over the years have been extraordinarily heterogeneous--in populations examined, omega-3 supplement (e.g., fish vs. capsule), period of observation, endpoints measured.

The results were skewed by inclusion of a moderate-sized British study by Burr et al in men with angina. In this study, no benefit was demonstrated and, in fact, a negative effect--more heart attack and death--was observed with fish oil. This was not news, since the study was published in 2003. It's results have been a mystery to everyone, since its unexpected negative result for fish oil was so starkly different from virtually every other study that preceded it (suggesting a study flaw or statistical fluke).

Nonetheless, the Burr study served to throw off the overall analysis. It diluted the dramatic and persuasive outcome of the GISSI-Prevenzione Study of 11,000 people in which a 28% reduction in heart attack and 45% reduction in cardiovascular death was observed. Note that the substantial numbers of the GISSI make the study's outcome nearly unassailable.

Another important fact: fish oil is among the most powerful tools available to correct elevated triglycerides. Drops of 50% are common. Recall that triglycerides are a necessary ingredient to create the nasty LDL, as well as VLDL, Intermediate-density lipoprotein, and an undesirable shift from large to ineffective small HDL. Reducing triglycerides is therefore crucial for your plaque control program.

This re-analysis serves to prove nothing. Such analyses can only pose questions for further study in a real study like GISSI: a randomized (random participant assignment), controlled (treatment vs. placebo or other treatment) study.

The weight of evidence remains heavily in favor of fish oil, not only as helpful, but fabulously beneficial, particularly for anyone aiming to reduce coronary plaque.

Is shock therapy the answer to “cure” obesity?

The next obesity “fix” may be hitting the market known as "VBLOC therapy”.  This implanted device delivers intermittent electrical "blocking signals" to the intra-abdominal vagus nerve.  According to the manufacturer, the device "reduces sensations of hunger and produces satiety leading to weight loss.”

Seems to me like another classic case of conventional healthcare proposing surgery or medications to address the obesity epidemic. Pharmacologic treatment and bariatric surgery have been offered for years to win the battle of the bulge.  As a registered dietitian, who years ago begrudgingly counseled patients prior to undergoing bariatric surgery, I have seen countless people re-gaining all (if not more) of the weight lost after the first year of surgery. Same goes for pharmalogical interventions, such as Phentermine.  Sure it worked in the short-term.  But in every single case, when the medication was stopped, as it is not FDA approved for long-term use, the weight came creeping back.

My take on the releasing a significant amount of weight does not require going under the knife.  How about this instead? Address the cause of increase hunger and appetite.  This is a crucial missing link for many undergoing surgery or using medication(s) as a “solution”.  Not addressing the cause of increased hunger and ravenous eating behaviors precipitously results in rebound weight gain.  Rather than sending an electrical pulse to a nerve in the stomach, maybe the FDA should consider a Cureality-based nutrition program that is wildly successful stimulating a “side effect” of weight loss.  Wheat elimination offers a surgery-free option that reduces hunger and insistent drive to eat every few hours, thanks to freedom from gliadin driven appetite stimulation.  Weight loss is common experience due to reduced hunger and subsequent intake. Give it a try.  What else do you have to lose, but some love handles?

--Lisa Grudzielanek, MS,RDN,CD CDE
Cureality Nutrition & Health Coach

Are Your Beauty Products Toxic?

As a nutritionist and self-care advocate, I am very careful about what I put in my body.  Health benefits experienced through proper nutrition are well understood.  We avoid highly processed foods, wheat-based products, and sugary snacks because we know that are “unhealthy” for us.  But what about what we put on our skin?

An important piece of the health and wellness puzzle is not only what is on the end of our fork but on our toothbrush, slapped on our bodies and rubbed into our hair.  Skin is the largest organ and what we place on it on a daily basis penetrates the skin, enters the fat stores and contributes to the toxicity and adiposity of our bodies.  According to the Environmental Working Group, the average woman uses 12 beauty products per day, containing about 168 ingredients.  Yikes!

I’ve often held a high suspicious that endocrine disruptors such as parabens, triclosan, fragrance, and other punitive chemicals are a key suspect in the root cause of my endocrine disruption.  Interestingly, scientific evidence is now emerging to support this suspicion.

A few months back, I took a look at my hair, skin, and cosmetic products. I was shocked and horrified.  Parabens, an estrogen-mimicking preservative linked with endocrine disruption, was in dozens of products.  It reminded me of how I felt on that day years ago when I threw out all the products in my kitchen that contained wheat.  What are parabens not in?  Why was it in so many products?

In our next episode of Cureality Connections we will discuss key skin and beauty product chemicals to avoid along with other steps to take to attain beauty from within.

--Lisa Grudzielanek MS, RDN, CD, CDE

Top 3 Strength Training Exercises for Runners

First and foremost, if you’re a runner and you’re not strength training you need to start.  This in and of itself could be an entire blog article.  But here I go with the synopsis. 

Strength training will indirectly help you run longer and faster.  Strength training exercises can improve your running mechanics, so that you run more efficiently.  Efficient running mechanics will lead to less wasted energy with each step and less injuries. 

Think about it.  You will take 80 to 90 steps per foot each minute you run.  If you have muscular imbalances that lead to joint mobility or stability issues you will move through an improper range of motion with each step. 

When you run for 30 minutes you take 2700 steps with each foot for a combined 5400 steps.  That could be 5400 steps of feet rolling in, rounded shoulders, wasted side to side movement or just pure pain.  Needless to say, when you are an endurance athlete it’s important that each step and every workout is adding to improved performance not to injury or fatigue.

The key to becoming a better runner is consistency.  For most runners, injuries are the biggest disrupter of consistent training.  Runners get a few good weeks or months of training, and then they are injured.   That means time off, loss of motivation, and a decrease in fitness. 

Strength training with proper form 2 to 3 times a week will reduce the onset of injuries and improve your running form.  Here are my top 3 strength training exercises for runners. 

Bulgarian Split Squat

You will need a bench, chair or stepper to perform this exercise.  Start by doing this exercise with just body weight and then progress.  The progression could include holding dumbbells, kettlebells or a barbell.  You can also make this exercise explosive. 




 
  • Place the to top of your back foot on.  If you are having a hard time with balance, flex your back toes and place them on the bench.   
  • Stand in a staggered stance about 2 to 3 feet wide.  This should allow your knee to bend while keeping your knees behind your front toes. 
  • Inhale as you begin to bend both knees. 
  • Focus on your back knee pointing straight down toward the ground and your body weight in your front heel.   
  • Keep your front kneecap inline with the 3rd toe of the front foot. 
  • Exhale as you straighten both knees to come back up to standing.  
Start with 10 repetitions on each leg and progress to 15. 

Calf Lowers

Use a stair or a stepper to perform this exercise.  Start by doing this exercise with just body weight.  The progression would include holding a dumbbell in one hand. 


 


  • Place the ball of your foot on the stair while holding on to the wall or railing.   
  • Rise up on the ball of your foot as high as your heel will go.  Make sure you have weight evenly distributed on all of your toes and that you are not rolling onto one side of your foot. 
  • Slowly, lower you heel back to the starting position.  Try counting 3 to 5 slow counts to ensure you really focus on lowering part of the movement.   
Do 10 reputations on each foot to start.  Work up to doing 20 reputations on each foot. 

Band or Cable Row

How many runners do you see hunched over logging long miles.  This exercise is for improved running posture, which can lead to improved respiration. 

To perform this exercise, use a band or a cable.  This exercise can be done with both arms or with just one arm. 





  • Stand in a staggered stance with relaxed knees.  Make sure your ribs on stacked on top of your hips to ensure good posture. 
  • Grab the handles of the band or the cable in the thumbs up position. 
  • Start the movement by protracting the shoulder blades.
  • Then bend the elbows straight back so that your biceps are close to your rib care.  Keep  your knuckles forward. 
  • To release, begin to straighten your elbows and bring your shoulders back to the starting position. 
Start with 10 repitions and work up to 20.  To increase difficulty, use a more difficult band or more weight on the cable system. 

Here’s to improving your running mechanics so that you can train more consistently.  Can’t wait to hear about the PR at your next race. 

How did Cureality get its start?




In the Cureality program, we embrace information and strategies that empower you in health without drugs, without hospitals, without procedures. We convert your doctor from director of healthcare to your assistant in health. He or she is there when you need help, but you largely direct your own health future.

How did we gain the know-how, information, tools, even chutzpah to take on such an ambitious project?


It started around 10 years ago with the awkwardly named Track Your Plaque program. In fact, some of the current followers of the Cureality program are former Track Your Plaque members, having learned of the wonderful list of strategies that can be adopted to gain better control over, even reverse, coronary atherosclerotic plaque and risk for heart attack. They also learned that something special happens when you engage with other people with similar interests, all sharing ideas, insights, and resources to get the self-directed health job done. Over time, what started out as simply a source of better information for coronary health evolved into a self-directed coronary disease management program. We never set out to create something as wildly ambitious as a do-it-yourself-at-home coronary disease risk management program, but that is how it inadvertently turned out.

How we went from Information Provider to Health Empowerment Program

So we never intended to take on something so seemingly impossible as managing coronary risk on your own. But, because we armed people with such empowering, profound insights into better ways to manage their heart disease risk beyond “don’t smoke, cut saturated fat, be active, and take a statin drug”—the typical advice offered by doctors—they returned after an interaction with their doctors disappointed: doctors often declared such strategies unnecessary, or the doctor didn’t understand them—even when there were clear-cut clinical data already available to support their use. In other words, the patients—everyday people, not experts—knew more than their doctors. 

This flip-flop in the balance of knowledge made for some very interesting stories, like “Harold” (not his real name) who, having survived a heart attack and received a stent, was told by his doctor to cut his fat intake, eat more whole grains, exercise, take aspirin and a beta blocker drug, and reduce his cholesterol values with a statin drug. Upon learning all the additional information from the Track Your Plaque program, Harold returned to his doctor and asked “I’m not so ready to just go along with this idea of ‘reducing cholesterol’ to address heart disease risk. Because my goal is to gain as much control over coronary disease as possible, maybe even reverse it, I’d like to address some additional issues that I believe may be important. I’d like to have my advanced lipoproteins drawn to measure the proportion of small LDL particles I have, whether I have lipoprotein(a), an omega-3 fatty acid index and 25-hydroxy vitamin D level, and a thyroid assessment. Oh, and I believe I should also have an assessment of my inflammation status, perhaps a c-reactive protein and phospholipase A2, and my blood sugar status measured with a fasting glucose, insulin, and hemoglobin A1c.” Harold’s doctor was dumbfounded and speechless. Rather than reveal his ignorance, his doctor advised Harold that none of that was necessary, sending him on his way and telling him that he was fine.

But this left Harold with a sour taste in his mouth, having engaged in many online discussions with people who had followed conventional advice that resulted in more heart attack, more heart procedures—the conventional answers simply did not work. He also discussed his situation with people who had successfully obtained the additional information he sought, added it to their program and enjoyed dramatically improved health, including freedom from more heart attacks, heart symptoms, and heart procedures, as well as improved overall health. So Harold found an easy way to obtain the testing on his own. Within a couple of weeks, he returned to his online community and shared all his information. Within moments, he was provided useful discussion to help him understand the values, all leading to changes in nutrition, nutritional supplement choices, how and where to get the simple tools necessary, such as iodine and vitamin D supplements. He even entered his data, choosing which values he was willing to share with others, which remained private, allowing him to compare his own follow-up values several months later. Engaged in this process, self-directed but collaborative, he witnessed marked transformations in his health. Not only did he never again—over several years—ever re-develop heart symptoms nor require any more trips back to the cath lab, he lost weight, reversed a pre-diabetic sugar profile, improved his cholesterol values without drugs, got rid of the acid reflux symptoms he endured for many years, dropped his blood pressure to normal, enjoyed better mood, energy, and sleep. Slender, healthier, all accomplished without his doctor. 

Harold returned to his doctor for a routine follow-up. Slender, energetic, without complaints, on no drugs except the aspirin for his stent, the basic laboratory assessment his doctor ordered in front of him, his doctor admitted,” Well, I don’t know how you’re doing it, but these values look like a 20-year old substituted his blood for yours. They’re unbelievable. What drugs are you taking to do this?” “No drugs,” Harold replied, “I’m following a program to reverse heart disease, but it means doing some things that are different from conventional solutions.” His doctor closed their meeting with the signature response of doctors nationwide: “Well, I don’t understand what you are doing, but just keep doing it.”

Yes, Harold knew more about how to control heart disease than his doctor, more than his cardiologist. The cardiologist knew how to insert a stent or defibrillator. But deliver information that empowered Harold in all aspects of health from head to toe, while also dramatically reducing, perhaps eliminating, his coronary disease risk? As you now know, that is not what conventional healthcare does, nor is it interested in doing so, as it would relinquish control and threaten to cut off this hugely profitable revenue stream that drives “healthcare.”

Having managed to inadvertently create a self-directed coronary risk management program with such spectacular results and in probably one of the most difficult areas of all—heart disease—it became clear that a similar approach could be even more easily applied to many other areas of health, such as weight loss, bone health, cholesterol and blood pressure issues, diabetes and pre-diabetes, hormonal health, autoimmune conditions, and others. You can do it when empowered by safe, effective information, and supported by a community of sharing and collaboration. We don’t fire our doctors; they are there when we need them when, for instance, we get injured or catch pneumonia, or as an occasional resource. But doctors should no longer be able to get away with neglect, misinformation, or blindly directing you to the next revenue-generating procedure because you are empowered by the information and support you receive in Cureality.

As we get more effective in delivering this information and new tools to you, just imagine what we can accomplish in this new age of information and self-empowerment. The future for us is bright with ambitions for better interactive tools with Cureality expert staff, better ways to crowd source health answers, provide more engaging community conversation, all while the health insights that help accomplish our self-directed health goals get better and better. Each person that joins Cureality helps make this service more effective because your wisdom, insights, and experience are added to the collective knowledge. We are more powerful together than we are as individuals.

If you are already a Cureality Member, please add your comments and questions to the growing conversation. If you are not a Member, consider joining our discussions, as each new voice gets us closer and closer to better answers to take back control over health.

Sit Less and Move More.



We sit way too much. Many of us have desk jobs where we sit for 8 to 9 hours a day. After we leave the office, we sit in our car to run errands. We follow that by sitting down to eat dinner. Our day ends by sitting on the couch to unwind by watching some television.

Many of us will be sitting a good 12 to 15 hours each and every day. Unfortunately the research shows that long hours of sitting can lead to obesity, heart disease, diabetes, and even early death. Don’t be fooled that your workout is enough movement. You can still be active and sedentary.

How can you add more movement to your day? First, think about all the times you find yourself sitting during the day. Then come up with a creative way that you can get out of the seat and move your feet.

Here are a couple of examples:

Instead of driving everywhere, jump on your bike. The picture above is of the bike I use to go to work or run errands. Bike riding is great exercise, greener transportation and a great stress relief.

We spend a lot of time at work sitting in front of the computer or the phone. Prop your laptop on a bookshelf to create a standing workstation. You can also purchase a sit-stand workstation you can adjust throughout the day. Get a headset and stand during phone calls.

Walk during your lunch break. Walk to the coffee shop, the mailbox, and the dry cleaners. Get your errands done on foot or just enjoy a stroll outside.

Take a movement break every hour. Do some desk push-ups, squats or walk the stairs. Need to communicate with a coworker? Don't email, walk over and talk to them.

Human beings are meant to move, not sit in chairs all day. I want to challenge you to incorporate more movement into your day. I'd love to read your comments how you move more and sit less.

Have You Had Your Prebiotics Today?



Prebiotics and resistant starch may be the missing link to your digestive health. Indigestible fibers that allow healthy bowel flora to proliferate and thrive are often called prebiotics. They are also known as resistant starches, because they are resistant to human digestion. I recently had a client call the addition of resistance starch to her diet, “the missing link my body needed”.

A starch that resists digestion and reaches the large intestine becomes food for the healthy bacteria in the large intestine. These bacteria can break down and “feed on” the resistant starch thus providing the friendly bacteria with the fuel they need to survive.

Imbalance of the quantity and type of bacteria species present in the gut contributes to gastrointestinal illness, blood sugar imbalance, obesity, mood disorders, and immune system challenges.

Green unripe bananas and plantains are one of best sources for prebiotic fiber content with 27 to 30 grams of fiber in one medium banana. Green bananas are essentially inedible. They are most easily incorporated into diet by blending into a smoothie.

One mistake frequently made incorporating prebiotic fibers from bananas is consuming bananas that are too ripe. Once the banana ripens the resistant starch is degraded and become a digestible starch. Thus, no longer a good prebiotic fiber source. In fact, the riper the banana becomes the higher the glycemic (blood sugar) response.

It can be difficult to find bananas that are very green. I made several trips to my local grocery store to find these bowel flora champions. I find it helpful to ask the produce clerk to take a look at the shipment that just arrived, noting the day the shipment arrives, for the best chance to gobble up these green beauties.

In an effort to keep green bananas green I tried a few strategies. One that sounded promising was wrapping the end of the banana to prevent the ethylene gas, which ripens the fruit, from dissipating. You can see from the image this clearly did not work. After a mere two days the green bananas were no longer green. What I found works best is placing the green bananas in the fridge. This halts the ripening process. The skin of the banana will turn brown, which is normal, but the fruit inside is still good. I’ve kept bananas in my fridge for up to 8 days and they hold up well other than the brownish black discoloring that develops on the skin. The banana will be firm and require a knife to cut the skin off the banana.

If you’d like to learn more about prebiotics and strategies to support resolution of common gastrointestinal complaints read the recently release Cureality Guide to Healthy Bowel Flora by Dr. Davis. This guide is one of the many valuable resources available exclusively to Cureality.com members.
---Lisa Grudzielanek, MS, RDN,CD,CDE
Cureality Nutrition Specialist

Something is Better Than Nothing



This past weekend I attended a fitness conference with an amazing lineup of presenters. Even after 11 years in the fitness industry, I love attending these events. I’m a lifetime student always learning more and honing my craft.

I went to a presentation by Al Vermeil about joint mobility, not knowing anything about him. To my surprise, Al was the strength and conditioning coach for the Chicago Bulls and the San Francisco 49ers the years these teams won championships in their respective sports. That’s a pretty impressive resume.

Al was a great presenter, full of fun and practical advice. During his presentation, Al said the following statement:

“Every time you miss a workout, the next one is easier to miss.”

This statement really hit home because I’ve seen this time and time again working in the fitness industry and in my own life. One workout is missed, then an entire week of workouts are missed, then it’s been an entire month of never setting foot back into the gym.

It’s easy to get thrown off your workout routine when life gets busy and days get long. So what do you do? Do you just trash your workout plan?

The all or nothing attitude is common when it comes to making health changes. Either you’re following your plan 100% or you not. I’m here to tell you that doing something is better than nothing. Doing part of your workout or a mini workout is better than missing an entire workout.

The other day I had the choice to do something or nothing. I had a full day of work meetings, video, and family commitments. Here is what happened. I did shorter variation of my joint mobility routine. I followed that with a quick kettlebell circuit of 25 kettlebell swings, 12 kettlebell overhead presses, and 12 kettlebell goblet squats. I did three rounds of this circuit. That’s it! The following day, I got back to my regular exercise routine.

Be consistent with movement and you’ll always see improvements. That’s the magic of exercise. You'll get better if you just do it.

What’s the Problem with My “Healthy” Bowl of Oatmeal?



Food manufacturers have clever ways to market foods to us. Unfortunately, many foods that have a reputation for being healthy are no more than junk food disguised as a healthy food choice. I commonly see people under the influence of a “health halo” effect. This is due to strategic marketing efforts. People overestimate the nutritional value of a food that is labeled “good for you” or they underestimate the negative impact of a food because it contains a healthful ingredient, like flaxseed or fiber. In fact, a recent study from the University of Houston found that terms on food labels such as antioxidants, all-natural, and gluten-free often are used to give an otherwise standard food a "healthy" halo, and influence consumption from the well- intended consumer.

Case in point-- oatmeal. We’ve all heard about the cholesterol lower benefits from soluble fiber contained in oatmeal. It’s blasted all over packages with a paid endorsement from The American Heart Association. However, that’s not the whole story. Most people enjoy a cup of oatmeal with one to two tablespoons of added sugar and fruit such as a ripe, yellow banana. In other words, let’s enjoy a bowl of “send my blood sugar through the roof” high glycemic oatmeal. The glycemic index of oatmeal is 55, and instant oatmeal is 83. Top that with more table sugar, glycemic index 58-65 and better yet top that with a high glycemic, ripe banana with a GI of 62.

Preparing one packet of regular instant oatmeal with one tablespoon of sugar and a medium ripe banana five days per week would result in the sugar equivalent of more than 5 1/2 cups of sugar per month!

Furthermore, the story many Americans are missing is all of that sugar intake, from their so-called “healthy” bowl of oatmeal, actually raises small-dense LDL cholesterol particles, increases blood sugar and contributes to insulin resistance, faulty gut flora, and belly fat.

How do we improve upon our bowl of oatmeal? Enjoy a bowl of hot coconut flaxseed cereal, eggs any variety of ways, or last night’s leftover salmon and vegetables.

The Cureality program provides tools, guidance, and support that does not follow the party line but rather offers nutrition solutions that address the underlying causes for proliferation of many chronic diseases.

Power in Numbers



In his book, The Wisdom of Crowds, author James Surowiecki begins with the story of an ox judging competition in which 800 people—not ox experts nor breeders, just ordinary people attending a county fair—were asked to guess the weight of the ox. The competition was conducted by a scientist, Francis Galton, who held a low opinion of the intelligence of the average person, remarking that “the stupidity and wrong-headedness of many men and women being so great as to be scarcely credible.” He hoped to prove, by examining the various guesses, that the average person had no idea of how to judge the real answer. After all participants casted their written votes, Galton tallied up the total and averaged the result: 1,197 pounds—just one pound off from the real weight of 1,198 pounds. Few individuals actually guessed the correct weight themselves but, when the opinions of many were combined, the result was near-perfect.

Crowds can also be a source of irrational behavior, panic, and stampede. Witness any modern football or soccer game, for instance, in which fights break out over an issue as minor as a disputed call or a heckle. Or go back through history to the countless events when mass hysteria ruled, such as the Salem Witch Trials or Orson Welles’ War of the Worlds radio broadcast.

Let’s put aside examples of mass emotional chaos of the sort that causes crowds to stampede store doors on Black Friday. Let’s focus instead on conscious, considered, thoughtful opinions. We all accept that there are as many opinions on issues as there are people, not uncommonly with widely divergent views. But can we, as Galton’s famous experiment did, combine the opinions of many and come away with some fruitful insight—the correct answer? Just as the people participating in Galton’s experiment were not experts, so Cureality participants—a crowd-sourced collection of opinions—are not experts. If we were to poll everyone to identify their area of expertise or experience, it would likely include finance, the retail industry, raising children, or teaching—but not health. Yes, we have experts curating the direction of content, but we also crowd-source collective opinion.

Right now, Cureality is based on existing science, the philosophy of self-directed health, combined with guidance and community to help the participant along in the sometimes complex world of health questions. But as our processes and procedures improve, can we—like Galton’s ox weight guessers—come away with coalescent wisdom, answers to our health questions, near-perfect solutions to health conditions that have eluded the “experts” for centuries?

I think that we can. No, I know that we can. We enter a new age in information and harness the power of the crowd-sourcing of solutions, even when no single individual has the complete answer herself.

Use This Trick to Boost Exercise Motivation



Are you been struggling to get your workouts in? 

Do you belong to a gym and find that you're not going?

Do you have exercise equipment sitting in your basement collecting dust because you find that you just can’t get yourself down there?

If you answered, “yes” to any of these questions you are not alone. Many people struggle with finding the motivation to exercise.

The problem here is that you have head trash going on. Head trash is that voice inside your head coming up with a million excuses that inhibit you from carving out a bit of time to take care of yourself.

Head trash will tell you that you’re too tired, even though a workout would give you a boost of energy.

Head trash will tell you that you’re too busy, even though you just spent a half hour on Facebook.

Head trash is barking at you to take care of others, even thought you know your health is important for you well being.

Head trash is a real conflict that can get in the way of our health and fitness goals. We start an exercise program with the intentions of a long-term commitment. But after the initial excitement wears off, we find our workouts occurring less frequently. Head trash begins to take over and soon we find ourselves not exercising at all.

Here is my secret for winning the battle over the head trash that keeps getting in way of your workouts. Tell yourself that you are only going to exercise for 10 minutes and evaluate if you want to continue. If you're truly too tired you can stop after 10 minutes. If you're truly too busy you can stop and move onto a task that needs your attention.

Making this deal with your mind that you are only going to exercise for 10 minutes seems reasonable. The head trash will become quite because your mind is convinced it has an out within 10 minutes.

I've used this 10-minute trick myself. I grind through the first few minutes, but then the magic happens. Once you hit the 10-minute mark your body takes over. Exercise feels amazing and your body is energized and enjoying the movement. You have tricked your mind to get over the hurdle of starting and now you’re in the exercise groove.

Try the 10-minute trick next time your head trash is getting in the way of your workout. You'll be amazed how your workout consistency improves.

Cureality | Real People Seeking Real Cures

For the sake of convenience: Commercial sources of prebiotic fibers

Our efforts to obtain prebiotic fibers/resistant starches, as discussed in the Cureality Digestive Health Track, to cultivate healthy bowel flora means recreating the eating behavior of primitive humans who dug in the dirt with sticks and bone fragments for underground roots and tubers, behaviors you can still observe in extant hunter-gatherer groups, such as the Hadza and Yanomamo. But, because this practice is inconvenient for us modern folk accustomed to sleek grocery stores, because many of us live in climates where the ground is frozen much of the year, and because we lack the wisdom passed from generation to generation that helps identify which roots and tubers are safe to eat and which are not, we rely on modern equivalents of primitive sources. Thus, green, unripe bananas, raw potatoes and other such fiber sources in the Cureality lifestyle.

There is therefore no need to purchase prebiotic fibers outside of your daily effort at including an unripe green banana, say, or inulin and fructooligosaccharides (FOS), or small servings of legumes as a means of cultivating healthy bowel flora. These are powerful strategies that change the number and species of bowel flora over time, thereby leading to beneficial health effects that include reduced blood sugar and blood pressure, reduction in triglycerides, reduced anxiety and improved sleep, and reduced colon cancer risk.

HOWEVER, convenience can be a struggle. Traveling by plane, for example, makes lugging around green bananas or raw potatoes inconvenient. Inulin and FOS already come as powders or capsules and they are among the options for a convenient, portable prebiotic fiber strategy. But there are others that can be purchased. This is a more costly way to get your prebiotic fibers and you do not need to purchase these products in order to succeed in your bowel flora management program. These products are therefore listed strictly as a strategy for convenience.

Most perspectives on the quality of human bowel flora composition suggest that diversity is an important feature, i.e., the greater the number of species, the better the health of the host. There may therefore be advantage in varying your prebiotic routine, e.g., green banana on Monday, inulin on Tuesday, PGX (below) on Wednesday, etc. Beyond providing convenience, these products may introduce an added level of diversity, as well.

Among the preparations available to us that can be used as prebiotic fibers:

PGX

While it is billed as a weight management and blood sugar-reducing product, the naturally occurring fiber--α-D-glucurono-α-D-manno-β-D-manno- β-D-gluco, α-L-gulurono-β-D mannurono, β-D-gluco-β- D-mannan--in PGX also exerts prebiotic effects (evidenced by increased fecal butyrate, the beneficial end-product of bacterial metabolism). PGX is available as capsules or granules. It also seems to exert prebiotic effects at lower doses than other prebiotic fibers. While I usually advise reaching 20 grams per day of fiber, PGX appears to exert substantial effects at a daily dose of half that quantity. As with all prebiotic fibers, it is best to build up slowly over weeks, e.g., start at 1.5 grams twice per day. It is also best taken in two or three divided doses. (Avoid the PGX bars, as they are too carb-rich for those of us trying to achieve ideal metaobolic health.)

Prebiotin

A combination of inulin and FOS available as powders and in portable Stick Pacs (2 gram and 4 gram packs). This preparation is quite costly, however, given the generally low cost of purchasing chicory inulin and FOS separately.

Acacia

Acacia fiber is another form of prebiotic fiber.  RenewLife and NOW are two reputable brands.

Isomalto-oligosaccharides

This fiber is used in Quest bars and in Paleo Protein Bars. With Quest bars, choose the flavors without sucralose, since it has been associated with undesirable changes in bowel flora.

There you go. It means that there are fewer and fewer reasons to not purposefully cultivate healthy bowel flora and obtain all the wonderful health benefits of doing so, from reduced blood pressure, to reduced triglycerides, to deeper sleep.

Disclaimer: I am not compensated in any way by discussing these products.

How Not To Have An Autoimmune Condition


Autoimmune conditions are becoming increasingly common. Estimates vary, but it appears that at least 8-9% of the population in North America and Western Europe have one of these conditions, with The American Autoimmune Related Diseases Association estimating that it’s even higher at 14% of the population.

The 200 or so autoimmune diseases that afflict modern people are conditions that involve an abnormal immune response directed against one or more organs of the body. If the misguided attack is against the thyroid gland, it can result in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. If it is directed against pancreatic beta cells that produce insulin, it can result in type 1 diabetes or latent autoimmune diabetes of adults (LADA). If it involves tissue encasing joints (synovium) like the fingers or wrists, it can result in rheumatoid arthritis. It if involves the liver, it can result in autoimmune hepatitis, and so on. Nearly every organ of the body can be the target of such a misguided immune response.

While it requires a genetic predisposition towards autoimmunity that we have no control over (e.g., the HLA-B27 gene for ankylosing spondylitis), there are numerous environmental triggers of these diseases that we can do something about. Identifying and correcting these factors stacks the odds in your favor of reducing autoimmune inflammation, swelling, pain, organ dysfunction, and can even reverse an autoimmune condition altogether.

Among the most important factors to correct in order to minimize or reverse autoimmunity are:


Wheat and grain elimination

If you are reading this, you likely already know that the gliadin protein of wheat and related proteins in other grains (especially the secalin of rye, the hordein of barley, zein of corn, perhaps the avenin of oats) initiate the intestinal “leakiness” that begins the autoimmune process, an effect that occurs in over 90% of people who consume wheat and grains. The flood of foreign peptides/proteins, bacterial lipopolysaccharide, and grain proteins themselves cause immune responses to be launched against these foreign factors. If, for instance, an autoimmune response is triggered against wheat gliadin, the same antibodies can be aimed at the synapsin protein of the central nervous system/brain, resulting in dementia or cerebellar ataxia (destruction of the cerebellum resulting in incoordination and loss of bladder and bowel control). Wheat and grain elimination is by far the most important item on this list to reverse autoimmunity.

Correct vitamin D deficiency

It is clear that, across a spectrum of autoimmune diseases, vitamin D deficiency serves a permissive, not necessarily causative, role in allowing an autoimmune process to proceed. It is clear, for instance, that autoimmune conditions such as type 1 diabetes in children, rheumatoid arthritis, and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis are more common in those with low vitamin D status, much less common in those with higher vitamin D levels. For this and other reasons, I aim to achieve a blood level of 25-hydroxy vitamin D level of 60-70 ng/ml, a level that usually requires around 4000-8000 units per day of D3 (cholecalciferol) in gelcap or liquid form (never tablet due to poor or erratic absorption). In view of the serious nature of autoimmune diseases, it is well worth tracking occasional blood levels.

Supplement omega-3 fatty acids

While omega-3 fatty acids, EPA and DHA, from fish oil have proven only modestly helpful by themselves, when cast onto the background of wheat/grain elimination and vitamin D, omega-3 fatty acids compound anti-inflammatory benefits, such as those exerted via cyclooxygenase-2. This requires a daily EPA + DHA dose of around 3600 mg per day, divided in two. Don’t confuse EPA and DHA omega-3s with linolenic acid, another form of omega-3 obtained from meats, flaxseed, chia, and walnuts that does not not yield the same benefits. Nor can you use krill oil with its relatively trivial content of omega-3s.

Eliminate dairy

This is true in North America and most of Western Europe, less true in New Zealand and Australia. Autoimmunity can be triggered by the casein beta A1 form of casein widely expressed in dairy products, but not by casein beta A2 and other forms. Because it is so prevalent in North America and Western Europe, the most confident way to avoid this immunogenic form of casein is to avoid dairy altogether. You might be able to consume cheese, given the fermentation process that alters proteins and sugar, but that has not been fully explored.

Cultivate healthy bowel flora

People with autoimmune conditions have massively screwed up bowel flora with reduced species diversity and dominance of unhealthy species. We restore a healthier anti-inflammatory panel of bacterial species by “seeding” the colon with high-potency probiotics, then nourishing them with prebiotic fibers/resistant starches, a collection of strategies summarized in the Cureality Digestive Health discussions. People sometimes view bowel flora management as optional, just “fluff”–it is anything but. Properly managing bowel flora can be a make-it-or-break-it advantage; don’t neglect it.

There you go: a basic list to get started on if your interest is to begin a process of unraveling the processes of autoimmunity. In some conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis and polymyalgia rheumatica, full recovery is possible. In other conditions, such as Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and the pancreatic beta cell destruction leading to type 1 diabetes, reversing the autoimmune inflammation does not restore organ function: hypothyroidism results after thyroiditis quiets down and type 1 diabetes and need for insulin persists after pancreatic beta cell damage. But note that the most powerful risk factor for an autoimmune disease is another autoimmune disease–this is why so many people have more than one autoimmune condition. People with Hashimoto’s, for instance, can develop rheumatoid arthritis or psoriasis. So the above menu is still worth following even if you cannot hope for full organ recovery

Five Powerful Ways to Reduce Blood Sugar

Left to conventional advice on diet and you will, more than likely, succumb to type 2 diabetes sooner or later. Follow your doctor’s advice to cut fat and eat more “healthy whole grains” and oral diabetes medication and insulin are almost certainly in your future. Despite this, had this scenario played out, you would be accused of laziness and gluttony, a weak specimen of human being who just gave into excess.

If you turn elsewhere for advice, however, and ignore the awful advice from “official” sources with cozy relationships with Big Pharma, you can reduce blood sugars sufficient to never become diabetic or to reverse an established diagnosis, and you can create a powerful collection of strategies that handily trump the worthless advice being passed off by the USDA, American Diabetes Association, the American Heart Association, or the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

Among the most powerful and effective strategies to reduce blood sugar:

1) Eat no wheat nor grains

Recall that amylopectin A, the complex carbohydrate of grains, is highly digestible, unlike most of the other components of the seeds of grasses AKA “grains,” subject to digestion by the enzyme, amylase, in saliva and stomach. This explains why, ounce for ounce, grains raise blood sugar higher than table sugar. Eat no grains = remove the exceptional glycemic potential of amylopectin A.

2) Add no sugars, avoid high-fructose corn syrup

This should be pretty obvious, but note that the majority of processed foods contain sweeteners such as sucrose or high-fructose corn syrup, tailored to please the increased desire for sweetness among grain-consuming people. While fructose does not raise blood sugar acutely, it does so in delayed fashion, along with triggering other metabolic distortions such as increased triglycerides and fatty liver.

3) Vitamin D

Because vitamin D restores the body’s normal responsiveness to insulin, getting vitamin D right helps reduce blood sugar naturally while providing a range of other health benefits.

4) Restore bowel flora

As cultivation of several Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria species in bowel flora yields fatty acids that restore insulin responsiveness, this leads to reductions in blood sugar over time. Minus the bowel flora-disrupting effects of grains and sugars, a purposeful program of bowel flora restoration is required (discussed at length in the Cureality Digestive Health section.)

5) Exercise

Blood sugar is reduced during and immediately following exercise, with the effect continuing for many hours afterwards, even into the next day.

Note that, aside from exercise, none of these powerful strategies are advocated by the American Diabetes Association or any other “official” agency purporting to provide dietary advice. As is happening more and more often as the tide of health information rises and is accessible to all, the best advice on health does not come from such agencies nor from your doctor but from your efforts to better understand the truths in health. This is our core mission in Cureality. A nice side benefit: information from Cureality is not accompanied by advertisements from Merck, Pfizer, Kelloggs, Kraft, or Cadbury Schweppes.

Cureality App Review: Breathe Sync



Biofeedback is a wonderful, natural way to gain control over multiple physiological phenomena, a means of tapping into your body’s internal resources. You can, for instance, use biofeedback to reduce anxiety, heart rate, and blood pressure, and achieve a sense of well-being that does not involve drugs, side-effects, or even much cost.

Biofeedback simply means that you are tracking some observable physiologic phenomenon—heart rate, skin temperature, blood pressure—and trying to consciously access control over it. One very successful method is that of bringing the beat-to-beat variation in heart rate into synchrony with the respiratory cycle. In day-to-day life, the heart beat is usually completely out of sync with respiration. Bring it into synchrony and interesting things happen: you experience a feeling of peace and calm, while many healthy phenomena develop.

A company called HeartMath has applied this principle through their personal computer-driven device that plugs into the USB port of your computer and monitors your heart rate with a device clipped on your earlobe. You then regulate breathing and follow the instructions provided and feedback is obtained on whether you are achieving synchrony, or what they call “coherence.” As the user becomes more effective in achieving coherence over time, positive physiological and emotional effects develop. HeartMath has been shown, for instance, to reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure, morning cortisol levels (a stress hormone), and helps people deal with chronic pain. Downside of the HeartMath process: a $249 price tag for the earlobe-USB device.

But this is the age of emerging smartphone apps, including those applied to health. Smartphone apps are perfect for health monitoring. They are especially changing how we engage in biofeedback. An app called Breathe Sync is available that tracks heart rate using the camera’s flash on the phone. By tracking heart rate and providing visual instruction on breathing pattern, the program generates a Wellness Quotient, WQ, similar to HeartMath’s coherence scoring system. Difference: Breathe Sync is portable and a heck of a lot less costly. I paid $9.99, more than I’ve paid for any other mainstream smartphone application, but a bargain compared to the HeartMath device cost.

One glitch is that you need to not be running any other programs in the background, such as your GPS, else you will have pauses in the Breathe Sync program, negating the value of your WQ. Beyond this, the app functions reliably and can help you achieve the health goals of biofeedback with so much less hassle and greater effectiveness than the older methods.

If you are looking for a biofeedback system that provides advantage in gaining control over metabolic health, while also providing a wonderful method of relaxation, Breathe Sync, I believe, is the go-to app right now.

Amber’s Top 35 Health and Fitness Tips

This year I joined the 35 club!  And in honor of being fabulous and 35, I want to share 35 health and fitness tips with you! 

1.  Foam rolling is for everyone and should be done daily. 
2.  Cold showers are the best way to wake up and burn more body fat. 
3.  Stop locking your knees.  This will lead to lower back pain. 
4.  Avoid eating gluten at all costs. 
5.  Breath deep so that you can feel the sides or your lower back expand. 
6.  Swing a kettlebell for a stronger and great looking backside. 
7.  Fat is where it’s at!  Enjoy butter, ghee, coconut oil, palm oil, duck fat and many other fabulous saturated fats. 
8.  Don’t let your grip strength fade with age.  Farmer carries, kettlebells and hanging from a bar will help with that. 
9.  Runners, keep your long runs slow and easy and keep your interval runs hard.  Don’t fall in the chronic cardio range. 
10.  Drink high quality spring or reverse osmosis water. 
11.  Use high quality sea salt season food and as a mineral supplement. 
12.  Work your squat so that your butt can get down to the ground.  Can you sit in this position? How long?
13.  Lift heavy weights!  We were made for manual work,.   Simulate heavy labor in the weight room. 
14.  Meditate daily.  If you don’t go within, you will go with out.  We need quiet restorative time to balance the stress in our life. 
15.  Stand up and move for 10 minutes for every hour your sit at your computer. 
16. Eat a variety of whole, real foods. 
17.  Sleep 7 to 9 hours every night. 
18.  Pull ups are my favorite exercise.  Get a home pull up bar to practice. 
19.  Get out and spend a few minutes in nature.  Appreciate the world around you while taking in fresh air and natural beauty. 
20.  We all need to pull more in our workouts.  Add more pulling movements horizontally and vertically. 
21. Surround yourself with health minded people. 
22. Keep your room dark for deep sound sleep.  A sleep mask is great for that! 
23. Use chemical free cosmetics.  Your skin is the largest organ of your body and all chemicals will absorb into your blood stream. 
24. Unilateral movements will help improve symmetrical strength. 
25. Become more playful.  We take life too seriously, becoming stress and overwhelmed.  How can you play, smile and laugh more often?
26.  Choose foods that have one ingredient.  Keep your diet simple and clean. 
27.  Keep your joints mobile as you age.  Do exercises that take joints through a full range of motion. 
28. Go to sleep no later than 10:30pm.  This allows your body and brain to repair through the night. 
29. Take care of your health and needs before others.  This allows you to be the best spouse, parent, coworker, and person on the planet. 
30.  Always start your daily with a high fat, high protein meal.  This will encourage less sugar cravings later in the day. 
31. Approach the day with positive thinking!  Stinkin’ thinkin’ only leads to more stress and frustration. 
32. You are never “too old” to do something.  Stay young at heart and keep fitness a priority as the years go by. 
33. Dream big and go for it. 
34.  Lift weights 2 to 4 times every week.  Strong is the new sexy. 
35.  Love.  Love yourself unconditionally.  Love your life and live it to the fullest.  Love others compassionately. 

Amber B.
Cureality Exercise and Fitness Coach

To Change, You Need to Get Uncomfortable

Sitting on the couch is comfortable.  Going through the drive thru to pick up dinner is comfortable.  But when you notice that you’re out-of-shape, tired, sick and your clothes no longer fit, you realize that what makes you comfortable is not in align with what would make you happy.   

You want to see something different when you look in the mirror.  You want to fit into a certain size of jeans or just experience your day with more energy and excitement.  The current condition of your life causes you pain, be it physical, mental or emotional.  To escape the pain you are feeling, you know that you need to make changes to your habits that keep you stuck in your current state.  But why is it so hard to make the changes you know that will help you achieve what you want?  

I want to lose weight but….

I want a six pack but…

I want more energy but….

The statement that follows the “but” is often a situation or habit you are comfortable with.  You want to lose weight but don’t have time to cook healthy meals.  So it’s much more comfortable to go through the drive thru instead of trying some new recipes.   New habits often require a learning curve and a bit of extra time in the beginning.  It also takes courage and energy to establish new routines or seek out help.  

Setting out to achieve your goals requires change.  Making changes to establish new habits that support your goals and dreams can be uncomfortable.  Life, as you know it, will be different.  Knowing that fact can be scary, but so can staying in your current condition.  So I’m asking you to take a risk and get uncomfortable so that you can achieve your goals.  

Realize that it takes 21 days to develop a new habit.  I believe it takes triple that amount of time to really make a new habit stick for the long haul.  So for 21 days, you’ll experience some discomfort while you make changes to your old routine and habits.  Depending on what you are changing, discomfort could mean feeling tired, moody, or even withdrawal symptoms.  However, the longer you stick to your new habits the less uncomfortable you start to feel.  The first week is always the worst, but then it gets easier.

Making it through the uncomfortable times requires staying focused on your goals and not caving to your immediate feelings or desires.  I encourage clients to focus on why their goals important to them.  This reason or burning desire to change will help when old habits, cravings, or situations call you back to your old ways.
Use a tracking and a reward system to stay on track.  Grab a calendar, journal or index card to check off or note your daily successes.  Shoot for consistency and not perfection when trying to make changes.  I encourage my clients to use the 90/10 principle of change and apply that to their goal tracking system.  New clothes, a massage, or a day me-retreat are just a few examples of rewards you can use to sticking to your tracking system.  Pick something that really gets you excited.  

Getting support system in place can help you feel more comfortable with being uncomfortable.  Hiring a coach, joining an online support group, or recruiting family and friends can be very helpful when making big changes.  With a support system in place you are not alone in your discomfort.  You’re network is there for you to reach out for help, knowledge, accountability or camaraderie when you feel frustrated and isolated.  

I’ve helped hundreds of people change their bodies, health and lives of the eleven years I’ve worked as a trainer and coach.  I know it’s hard, but I also know that if they can do it, so can you.  You just need to step outside of your comfort zone and take a risk. Don’t let fear create uncomfortable feelings that keep you stuck in your old ways.  Take that first step and enjoy the journey of reaching your goals and dreams.  

Amber Budahn, B.S., CSCS, ACE PT, USATF 1, CHEK HLC 1, REIKI 1
Cureality Exercise Specialist

The 3 Best Grain Free Food Swaps to Boost Fat Burning

You can join others enjoying substantial improvements in their health, energy and pant size by making a few key, delicious substitutions to your eating habits.  This is possible with the Cureality nutrition approach, which rejects the idea that grains should form the cornerstone of the human diet.  

Grain products, which are seeds of grasses, are incompatible with human digestion.  Contrary to what we have been told for years, eating healthy whole grain is not the answer to whittle away our waists.  Consumption of all grain-based carbohydrates results in increased production of the fat storage hormone insulin.  Increased insulin levels create the perfect recipe for weight gain. By swapping out high carbohydrate grain foods that cause spikes in insulin with much lower carbohydrate foods, insulin release is subdued and allows the body to release fat.

1. Swap wheat-based flour with almond flour/meal

  • One of the most dubious grain offenders is modern wheat. Replace wheat flour with naturally wheat-free, lower carbohydrate almond flour.  
  • Almond flour contains a mere 12 net carbs per cup (carbohydrate minus the fiber) with 50% more filling protein than all-purpose flour.
  • Almond flour and almond meal also offer vitamin E, an important antioxidant to support immune function.

2. Swap potatoes and rice for cauliflower

  • Replace high carb potatoes and pasta with vitamin C packed cauliflower, which has an inconsequential 3 carbs per cup.  
  • Try this food swap: blend raw cauliflower in food processor to make “rice”. (A hand held grater can also be used).  Sautee the “riced” cauliflower in olive or coconut oil for 5 minutes with seasoning to taste.
  • Another food swap: enjoy mashed cauliflower in place of potatoes.  Cook cauliflower. Place in food processor with ½ a stick organic, grass-fed butter, ½ a package full-fat cream cheese and blend until smooth. Add optional minced garlic, chives or other herbs such as rosemary.
3. Swap pasta for shirataki noodles and zucchini

  • Swap out carb-rich white pasta containing 43 carbs per cup with Shirataki noodles that contain a few carbs per package. Shirataki noodles are made from konjac or yam root and are found in refrigerated section of supermarkets.
  • Another swap: zucchini contains about 4 carbs per cup. Make your own grain free, low-carb noodles from zucchini using a julienne peeler, mandolin or one of the various noodle tools on the market.  

Lisa Grudzielanek, MS,RDN,CD,CDE
Cureality Nutrition Specialist

Not so fast. Don’t make this mistake when going gluten free!

Beginning last month, the Food and Drug Administration began implementing its definition of “gluten-free” on packaged food labels.  The FDA determined that packaged food labeled gluten free (or similar claims such as "free of gluten") cannot contain more than 20 parts per million of gluten.

It has been years in the making for the FDA to define what “gluten free” means and hold food manufactures accountable, with respect to food labeling.  However, the story does not end there.

Yes, finding gluten-free food, that is now properly labeled, has become easier. So much so the market for gluten-free foods tops $6 billion last year.   However, finding truly healthy, commercially prepared, grain-free foods is still challenging.

A very common mistake made when jumping into the gluten-free lifestyle is piling everything labeled gluten-free in the shopping cart.  We don’t want to replace a problem: wheat, with another problem: gluten free products.

Typically gluten free products are made with rice flour (and brown rice flour), tapioca starch, cornstarch, and potato flour.  Of the few foods that raise blood sugar higher than wheat, these dried, powdered starches top the list.

 They provide a large surface area for digestion, thereby leading to sky-high blood sugar and all the consequences such as diabetes, hypertension, cataracts, arthritis, and heart disease. These products should be consumed very rarely consumed, if at all.  As Dr. Davis has stated, “100% gluten-free usually means 100% awful!”

There is an ugly side to the gluten-free boom taking place.  The Cureality approach to wellness recommends selecting gluten-free products wisely.  Do not making this misguided mistake and instead aim for elimination of ALL grains, as all seeds of grasses are related to wheat and therefore overlap in many effects.

Lisa Grudzielanek MS, RDN, CD, CDE
Cureality Health & Nutrition Coach

3 Foods to Add to Your Next Grocery List

Looking for some new foods to add to your diet? Look no further. Reach for these three mealtime superstars to encourage a leaner, healthier body.

Microgreens

Microgreens are simply the shoots of salad greens and herbs that are harvested just after the first leaves have developed, or in about 2 weeks.  Microgreen are not sprouts. Sprouts are germinated, in other words, sprouted seeds produced entirely in water. Microgreens are grown in soil, thereby absorbing the nutrients from the soil.

The nutritional profile of each microgreen depends greatly on the type of microgreen you are eating. Researchers found red cabbage microgreens had 40 times more vitamin E and six times more vitamin C than mature red cabbage. Cilantro microgreens had three times more beta-carotene than mature cilantro.

A few popular varieties of microgreens are arugula, kale, radish, pea, and watercress. Flavor can vary from mild to a more intense or spicy mix depending on the microgreens.  They can be added to salads, soup, omelets, stir fry and in place of lettuce.  

Cacao Powder

Cocoa and cacao are close enough in flavor not to make any difference. However, raw cacao powder has 3.6 times the antioxidant activity of roasted cocoa powder.  In short, raw cacao powder is definitely the healthiest, most beneficial of the powders, followed by 100% unsweetened cocoa.

Cacao has more antioxidant flavonoids than blueberries, red wine and black and green teas.  Cacao is one of the highest sources of magnesium, a great source of iron and vitamin C, as well as a good source of fiber for healthy bowel function.
Add cacao powder to milk for chocolate milk or real hot chocolate.  Consider adding to coffee for a little mocha magic or sprinkle on berries and yogurt.




Shallots


Shallots have a better nutrition profile than onions. On a weight per weight basis, they have more anti-oxidants, minerals, and vitamins than onions. Shallots have a milder, less pungent taste than onions, so people who do not care for onions may enjoy shallots.

Like onions, sulfur compounds in shallot are necessary for liver detoxification pathways.  The sulfur compound, allicin has been shown to be beneficial in reducing cholesterol.  Allicin is also noted to have anti-bacterial, anti-viral, and anti-fungal activities.

Diced then up and add to salads, on top of a bun less hamburger, soups, stews, or sauces.  Toss in an omelet or sauté to enhance a piece of chicken or steak, really the possibilities are endless.  

Lisa Grudzielanek,MS,RDN,CD,CDE
Cureality Nutrition & Health Coach

3 Band Exercises for Great Glutes

Bands and buns are a great combination.  (When I talk about glutes or a butt, I use the word buns)  When it comes to sculpting better buns, grab a band.   Bands are great for home workouts, at gym or when you travel.  Check out these 3 amazing exercises that will have your buns burning. 

Band Step Out

Grab a band and place it under the arch of each foot.  Then cross the band and rest your hands in your hip sockets.  The exercise starts with your feet hip width apart and weight in the heels.  Slightly bend the knees and step your right foot out to the side.  Step back in so that your foot is back in the starting position.  With each step, make sure your toes point straight ahead.  The tighter you pull the band, the more resistance you will have.    You will feel this exercise on the outside of your hips. 

Start with one set of 15 repetitions with each foot.  Work on increasing to 25 repetitions on each side and doing two to three sets.



Band Kick Back

This exercise is performed in the quadruped position with your knees under hips and hands under your shoulders.    Take the loop end of the band and put it around your right foot and place the two handles or ends of the band under your hands.  Without moving your body, kick your right leg straight back.  Return to the starting quadruped position.  Adjust the tension of the band to increase or decrease the difficulty of this exercise. 

Start with one set of 10 repetitions with each foot.  Work on increasing to 20 repetitions on each side and doing two to three sets. 



Band Resisted Hip Bridge

Start lying on your back with feet hip distance apart and knees bent at about a 45-degree angle.  Adjust your hips to a neutral position to alleviate any arching in your lower back.  Place the band across your hipbones.  Hold the band down with hands along the sides of your body.  Contract your abs and squeeze your glutes to lift your hips up off the ground.  Stop when your thighs, hips and stomach are in a straight line.  Lower you hips back down to the ground. 

Start with one set of 15 repetitions.  Work on increasing to 25 repetitions and doing two to three.  Another variation of this exercise is to hold the hip bridge position.  Start with a 30 second hold and work up to holding for 60 seconds.